超深层碳酸盐岩层系硅质岩储层表征与评价——以塔里木盆地塔深6井为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210302

Abstract

Abstract:

Thick chert reservoirs were revealed by Well Tashen 6 penetrating the Ordovician Penglaiba Formation in the Tarim Basin and have been the focus of research for reservoir development characteristics and storage capacity. Based on lithology and electrical response characteristics, the reservoirs were studied with detailed core observation and description, X-ray diffraction, microscopic petrology analysis, reservoir performance and other reservoir characterization and evaluation methods. The results show that the reservoirs have higher porosity than dolostone reservoirs of the same sequence, with an average porosity as high as 13.5% at a burial depth of more than 7 400 m. The reservoirs are mainly composed of microcrystalline quartz, with a content as high as 83.0%-93.7%, and a small amount of clay, calcite, dolomite and other minerals. The reservoir space is relatively uniformly distributed intercrystalline micropores in quartz crystals with a pore diameter mainly varying from 1 to 10 μm, followed by 0.1-1 μm, and main throat diameter ranging from 10 to 100 μm. The off-line nuclear magnetic resonance of pressure saturated crude samples shows that pores of 0.1-10 μm in diameter serve as the main storage space. And the greater the total porosity, the greater the total amount of crude oil that can be accommodated. The interbedded siliceous-dolomite, the micro-bedding structure, the high initial porosity and the symbiotic siliceous nodules, all indicate that the reservoirs are the co-product of sedimentation and diagenesis in relatively deep water area on the platform. Furthermore, the seismic reflection characteristics reveal that the reservoir body is about 300 m long from north to south and 200 m wide from east to west. The discovery of siliceous rock reservoirs is of great significance to understanding the internal structural differences of the Early Ordovician carbonate platform in the Tarim Basin.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Penglaiba Formation, chert reservoir, ultra-deep carbonate reservoir, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Yongli Liu, Donghua You, Haiying Li, Lijun Gao, Hong Jiang, Weifeng Zhang, Fang Bao. Characterization and evaluation of chert reservoirs in ultra-deep carbonate rock formations-A case study on Well TS 6 in the Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 547-556.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 2

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 3

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 21

1	Rogers S M . Deposition and diagenesis of Mississippian Chat Reservoirs, North-Central Oklahoma[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 115- 129.
2	Bramlette M N . The Monterey Formation of California and the origin of its siliceous rocks[M]. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1946: 1- 24.
3	Reid S A , Mclntyre J L . Monterey Formation porcelanite reservoirs of the Elk Hills field, Kern County, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 169- 189.
4	Kolodny Y . Petology of siliceous rocks in the Mishash Formation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1969, 39 (1): 166- 175.
5	Oehler J H . Origin and distribution of silica Lepispheres in porcelanite from the Monterey Formation of California[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1975, 45 (1): 252- 257.
6	Cady S L , Wenk H R , Downing K H . HRTEM of microcrystalline opal in chert and porcelanite from the Monterey Formation, California[J]. American Mineralogist, 1996, 81 (11): 1380- 1395.
7	Chaika C , Williams L A . Density and mineralogy variations as a function of porosity in Miocene Monterey Formation oil and gas reservoirs in California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 149- 167.
8	Saller A H , Horn D V , Miller J A , et al. Reservoir geology of Devonian carbonates and chert -Implications for Tertiary recovery, Dollarhide Field, Andrews County, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75 (1): 86- 107.
9	Ruppel S C , Hovorka S D . Controls on reservoir development in Devonian Chert: Permian Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79 (12): 1757- 1785.
10	Montgomery S L . Thirtyone Formation, Permian Basin, Texas: Structural and lithologic heterogeneity in a Lower Devonian chert reservoir[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1998, 82 (1): 1- 24.
11	Saller A , Ball B , Robertson S , et al. Reservoir characteristics of Devonian cherts and their control on oil recovery: Dollarhide field, west Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 35- 50.
12	Ruppel S C , Barnaby R J . Contrasting styles of reservoir development in proximal and distal chert facies: Devonian Thirtyone Formation, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 7- 33.
13	刘永立, 尤东华, 高利君, 等. 塔河油田塔深6井蓬莱坝组硅质岩成因及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 83- 91.
	Liu Yongli , You Donghua , Gao Lijun , et al. Genesis and geological significance of siliceous rock in Penglaiba Formation in Well Tashen 6, Tahe oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 83- 91.
14	蔡习尧, 钱一雄, 陈跃, 等. 塔中地区中、下奥陶统划分与对比[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28 (3): 292- 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.03.010
	Cai Xiyao , Qian Yixiong , Chen Yue , et al. Division and correlation of Middle-Lower Ordovician in Tazhong area, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28 (3): 292- 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.03.010
15	Trotter J A , Williams I S , Barnes C R , et al. Did cooling oceans trigger Ordovician biodiversification? Evidence from conodont thermometry[J]. Science, 2008, 321 (5888): 550- 554. doi: 10.1126/science.1155814
16	高志前, 樊太亮, 焦志峰, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武-奥陶系碳酸盐岩台地样式及其沉积响应特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 24 (1): 19- 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.01.003
	Gao Zhiqian , Fan Tailiang , Jiao Zhifeng , et al. The structural types and depositional characteristics of carbonate platform in the Cambrian-Ordovician of Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2006, 24 (1): 19- 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.01.003
17	何治亮, 彭守涛, 张涛. 塔里木盆地塔河地区奥陶系储层形成的控制因素与复合-联合成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (6): 743- 752.
	He Zhiliang , Peng Shoutao , Zhang Tao . Controlling factors and genetic pattern of the Ordovician reservoirs in the Tahe area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (6): 743- 752.
18	Murata K J , Larson R R . Diagenesis of Miocene siliceous shales, Temblor Range, California[J]. U.S.Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1975, 3 (5): 553- 566.
19	Graham S A , Williams L A . Tectonic, depositional, and diagenetic history of Monterey Formation (Miocene), central San Joaquin Basin, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1985, 69 (3): 385- 411.
20	You Donghua , Han Jun , Hu Wenxuan , et al. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of silicified carbonate reservoirs in Well SN4 of the Tarim Basin[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2018, 36 (4): 820- 849.
21	Packard J J , Al-Aasm I , Samson Iain , et al. A Devonian hydrothermal chert reservoir: The 225 bcf Parkland field, British Columbia, Canada[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 51- 84.

样品号	矿物含量/%
样品号	粘土	石英	方解石	白云石	黄铁矿	其他矿物
TS6-2-1	5.2	84.9	7.8	0.6	0.9	0.6
TS6-2-2	7.8	85.2	5.6	0.1	0.7	0.6
TS6-14-1	9.0	86.7	3.2	0.5	—	0.6
TS6-14-2	4.4	93.7	0.4	0.5	0.7	0.3
1-5	4.8	83.0	10.1	0.1	1.8	0.2
2-1	3.3	91.8	3.7	0.5	0.5	0.2

样品号	总孔隙度/%	不同孔隙直径分布范围的孔隙体积占比/%
样品号	总孔隙度/%	< 0.1 μm	0.1~1 μm	1~10 μm	>10 μm
2-8	9.1	1.11	2.48	5.52	—
2-9-2	8.2	1.06	2.39	4.60	0.15
2-9-3	8.5	1.34	2.86	4.30	—
12	17.4	1.48	3.97	11.92	0.03
22	12.3	1.08	1.28	8.68	1.26
1	13.0	11.37(< 10 μm的孔隙体积占比)			1.63
24	12.8	9.84(< 10 μm的孔隙体积占比)			2.96

样品号	深度/m	岩性	孔隙度/%	渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	备注
1	7 418.38	硅质岩(薄层)	13.0	0.05	井壁取心
2	7 418.68	硅质岩(薄层)	17.1	0.08	井壁取心
12	7 547.47	硅质岩(厚层)	17.4	0.13	井壁取心
13	7 548.00	硅质岩(厚层)	12.6	0.36	井壁取心
14	7 549.09	硅质岩(厚层)	12.3	—	井壁取心
16	7 554.19	硅质岩(厚层)	27.9	0.71	井壁取心
19	7 561.49	硅质岩(厚层)	11.0	0.03	井壁取心
21	7 571.48	硅质岩(厚层)	16.2	0.54	井壁取心
22	7 576.71	硅质岩(厚层)	12.3	0.09	井壁取心
24	7 592.65	硅质岩(厚层)	12.8	0.66	井壁取心
25	7 603.85	硅质岩(厚层)	10.2	0.13	井壁取心
2-8	7 442.60	硅质岩(薄层)	9.1	0.02	岩心
2-9-2	7 442.70	硅质岩(薄层)	8.2	0.02	岩心
2-9-3	7 442.75	硅质岩(薄层)	8.5	0.01	岩心
5	7 432.48	白云岩	4.5	0.01	井壁取心
9	7 491.18	白云岩	3.0	0.02	井壁取心
28	7 268.79	白云岩	1.6	0.09	井壁取心
29	7 716.48	白云岩	5.3	0.03	井壁取心
2-9-4	7 442.80	白云岩	1.3	0	岩心
2-9-5	7 442.85	白云岩	1.0	0	岩心

[1]	Pengyuan HAN, Wenlong DING, Debin YANG, Juan ZHANG, Hailong MA, Shenghui WANG. Characteristics of the S80 strike-slip fault zone and its controlling effects on the Ordovician reservoirs in the Tahe oilfield， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 770-786.
[2]	Yanqiu ZHANG, Honghan CHEN, Xiepei WANG, Peng WANG, Danmei SU, Zhou XIE. Assessment of connectivity between source rocks and strike-slip fault zone in the Fuman oilfield， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 787-800.
[3]	Wenlong DING, Yuntao LI, Jun HAN, Cheng HUANG, Laiyuan WANG, Qingxiu MENG. Methods for high-precision tectonic stress field simulation and multi-parameter prediction of fracture distribution for carbonate reservoirs and their application [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 827-851.
[4]	Zicheng CAO, Lu YUN, Lixin QI, Haiying LI, Jun HAN, Feng GENG, Bo LIN, Jingping CHEN, Cheng HUANG, Qingyan MAO. A major discovery of hydrocarbon-bearing layers over 1，000-meter thick in well Shunbei 84X， Shunbei area， Tarim Basin and its implications [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 341-356.
[5]	Debin YANG, Xinbian LU, Dian BAO, Fei CAO, Yan WANG, Ming WANG, Runcheng XIE. New insights into the genetic types and characteristics of the Ordovician marine fault-karst carbonate reservoirs in the northern Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 357-366.
[6]	Changjian ZHANG, Debin YANG, Lin JIANG, Yingbing JIANG, Qi CHANG, Xuejian MA. Characteristics and origin of over-dissolution residual fault-karst reservoirs in the northern Tahe oilfield， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 367-383.
[7]	Junyu WAN, Jianhui ZHU, Suping YAO, Yi ZHANG, Chuntang LI, Wei ZHANG, Haijian JIANG, Jie WANG. Geobiological evaluation of hydrocarbon-generating organisms and source rocks in the Ordovician Majiagou Formation， east-central Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 393-405.
[8]	Tongwen JIANG, Xingliang DENG, Peng CAO, Shaoying CHANG. Storage space types and water-flooding efficiency for fault-controlled fractured oil reservoirs in Fuman oilfield， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 542-552.
[9]	Yuemeng NIU, Jun HAN, Yixin YU, Cheng Huang, Bo Lin, Fan YANG, Lang YU, Junyu CHEN. Igneous rock intrusions in the western Shunbei area， Tarim Basin： Characteristics and coupling relationships with faults [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 231-242.
[10]	San ZHANG, Qiang JIN, Jinxiong SHI, Mingyi HU, Mengyue DUAN, Yongqiang LI, Xudong ZHANG, Fuqi CHENG. Filling patterns and reservoir property of the Ordovician buried-river karst caves in the Tabei area， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1582-1594.
[11]	Wei HU, Ting XU, Yang YANG, Zengmin LUN, Zongyu LI, Zhijiang KANG, Ruiming ZHAO, Shengwen MEI. Fluid phases and behaviors in ultra-deep oil and gas reservoirs， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1053.
[12]	Tan ZHANG, Wei YAO, Yongqiang ZHAO, Yushuang ZHOU, Jiwen HUANG, Xinyu FAN, Yu LUO. Time scale and denudation thickness calculation of Carboniferous Kalashayi Formation in the Bamai area， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 1054-1066.
[13]	Honghui GUO, Jianwei FENG, Libin ZHAO. Characteristics of passive strike-slip structure and its control effect on fracture development in Bozi-Dabei area， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 962-975.
[14]	Faqi HE, Wei ZHANG, Xiaoqi DING, Zhuangzhuang QI, Chuntang LI, Hanjing SUN. Controlling mechanism of Wushenqi paleo-uplift on paleo-karst gas reservoirs in Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 276-291.
[15]	Bin LI, Xingxing ZHAO, Guanghui WU, Jianfa HAN, Baozhu GUAN, Chunguang SHEN. Differential hydrocarbon accumulation model of the Ordovician in Tazhong Ⅱ block， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 308-320.

Characterization and evaluation of chert reservoirs in ultra-deep carbonate rock formations-A case study on Well TS 6 in the Tarim Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 21

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics