准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩储层润湿性及其主控因素

doi:10.11743/ogg20220516

Abstract

Abstract:

Shale wettability is of great significance to relative permeability and capillary force of a reservoir， ultimately affecting the hydrocarbon accumulation process in shale as well as the shale oil/gas recovery rate. This study focuses on the wettability characteristics and main control factors of the Permian Fengcheng Formation shale in the Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin， by means of contact angle measurement and spontaneous imbibition plus micro-CT experiment. The results are shown as follows. First， the Fengcheng Formation shale in the Mahu Sag is of generally mixed wettability while prone to oil-wet， and the affinity of different lithofacies to water is listed out from the top， that is， felsic shale， limy felsic shale， dolomitic felsic shale， felsic dolomitic shale， and siltstone. Second， the shale wettability is jointly controlled by multiple factors including organic matter abundance， mineral composition， and pore structure. The shale hydrophobicity is positively correlated with the TOC， dolomite content， negatively with the quartz content， and in staged correlation with the calcite content； the larger the pore volume occupied by macro-pores， the more oil-wet is the shale sample. Third， the connectivity of oil-wet pores tends to grow better along the direction of crack and lamina development. A pore system of clustered type and certain connectivity is prone to form in dolomitic glomerates， which can form an unique shale oil storage space and migration pathway together with the interconnected small pores in the shale matrix. Fourth， the pores less than 1 μm have better connectivity and act as the main migration pathways for shale oil， while those larger than 1 μm with poor connectivity serve as the main storage space for shale oil. Fifth， it is preliminarily concluded that the high-quality shale oil reservoirs are of siltstone and dolomitic felsic shale with well-developed cracks， dolomitic glomerates and laminar structures in the study area according to the wettability characteristics of different lithofacies and sedimentary structure characteristics.

Key words: micro-CT experiment, spontaneous imbibition, contact angle, shale wettability, pore connectivity, shale reservoir, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Guowei Zheng, Zhiye Gao, Liliang Huang, Zhenxue Jiang, Wenjun He, Jiaqi Chang, Longfei Duan, Weihang Wei, Zhiwei Wang. Wettability of the Permian Fengcheng Formation shale in the Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin， and its main control factors[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1206-1220.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.3

Table 4

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 49

1	盛湘，陈祥，章新文，等. 中国陆相页岩油开发前景与挑战［J］.石油实验地质， 2015， 37（3）： 267-271.
	Sheng Xiang， Chen Xiang， Zhang Xinwen， et al. Prospects and challenges of continental shale oil development in China［J］. Petroleum Geology & Experiment， 2015， 37（3）： 267-271.
2	卢双舫，薛海涛，王民，等. 页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势［J］. 石油学报， 2016， 37（10）： 1309-1322.
	Lu Shuangfang， Xue Haitao， Wang Min， et al. Several key issues and research trends in evaluation of shale oil［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2016， 37（10）： 1309-1322.
3	杨智，邹才能. “进源找油”：源岩油气内涵与前景［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2019， 46（1）： 173-184.
	Yang Zhi， Zou Caineng. “Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen”： Connotation and prospects of source rock oil and gas［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2019， 46（1）： 173-184.
4	姜在兴，张文昭，梁超，等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素［J］. 石油学报， 2014， 35（1）： 184-196.
	Jiang Zaixing， Zhang Wenzhao， Liang Chao， et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2014， 35（1）： 184-196.
5	柳波，吕延防，孟元林，等. 湖相纹层状细粒岩特征、成因模式及其页岩油意义——以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2015， 42（5）： 598-607.
	Liu Bo， Lu Yanfang， Meng Yuanlin， et al. Petrologic characteristics and genetic model of lacustrine lamellar fine⁃grained rock and its significance for shale oil exploration： A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Malang Sag， Santanghu Basin， NW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2015， 42（5）： 598-607.
6	赵贤正，周立宏，蒲秀刚，等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例［J］. 石油学报， 2019， 40（9）： 1013-1029.
	Zhao Xianzheng， Zhou Lihong， Pu Xiugang， et al. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin ：A case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Candong Sag， Bohai Bay Basin［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2019， 40（9）： 1013-1029.
7	邹才能，杨智，王红岩，等. “进源找油”：论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田［J］. 地质学报， 2019， 93（7）：1551-1562.
	Zou Caineng， Yang Zhi， Wang Hongyan， et al. “Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen”： Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Acta Geoligica Sinica， 2019， 93（7）：1551-1562.
8	李国欣，朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题［J］. 中国石油勘探， 2020， 25（2）： 1-13.
	Li Guoxin， Zhu Rukai. Progress， challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2020， 25（2）： 1-13.
9	杨智，唐振兴，李国会，等. 陆相页岩层系石油富集区带优选、甜点区段评价与关键技术应用［J］. 地质学报， 2021， 95（8）： 2257-2272.
	Yang Zhi， Tang Zhenxing， Li Guohui， et al. Optimization of enrichment plays， evaluation of sweet area & section and application of key technologics for the continental shale strata oil in China［J］. Acta Geoligica Sinica， 2021， 95（8）： 2257-2272.
10	赵文智，朱如凯，胡素云，等. 陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2020， 47（6）： 1079-1089.
	Zhao Wenzhi， Zhu Rukai， Hu Suyun， et al. Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic‑rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2020， 47（6）： 1079-1089.
11	支东明，唐勇，郑孟林，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油藏地质特征与成藏控制因素［J］. 中国石油勘探， 2019， 24（5）： 615-623.
	Zhi Dongming， Tang Yong， Zheng Menglin， et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation controlling factors of shale reservoirs in Fengcheng Formation， Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2019， 24（5）： 615-623.
12	郑孟林，樊向东，何文军，等. 准噶尔盆地深层地质结构叠加演变与油气赋存［J］. 地学前缘， 2019， 26（1）： 22-32.
	Zheng Menglin， Fan Xiangdong， He Wenjun， et al. Superosition of deep geological structural evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Junggar Bsain［J］. Earth Science Frontiers， 2019， 26（1）： 22-32.
13	冯有良，张义杰，王瑞菊，等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘风城组白云岩成因及油气富集因素［J］.石油勘探与开发， 2011， 38（6）： 685-692.
	Feng Youliang， Zhang Yijie， Wang Ruiju， et al. Dolomites genesis and hydrocarbon enrichment of the Fengcheng Formation in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2011， 38（6）： 685-692.
14	匡立春，唐勇，雷德文，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区三叠系百口泉组扇控大面积岩性油藏勘探实践［J］. 中国石油勘探， 2014， 19（6）： 14-23.
	Kuang Lichun， Tang Yong， Lei Dewen， et al. Exploration of fan⁃controlled large‑area lithologic oil reservoirs of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in slope zone of Mahu Depression in Junggar Basin［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2014， 19（6）： 14-23.
15	曹剑，雷德文，李玉文，等. 古老碱湖优质烃源岩：准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组［J］. 石油学报， 2015， 36（7）： 781-790.
	Cao Jian， Lei Dewen， Li Yuwen， et al. Ancient high‑quality alkaline lacustrine source rocks discovered in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation， Junggar Basin［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2015， 36（7）： 781-790.
16	秦志军，陈丽华，李玉文，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组碱湖古沉积背景［J］. 新疆石油地质， 2016， 37（1）： 1-6.
	Qin Zhijun， Chen Lihua， Li Yuwen， et al. Paleo‑sedimentary setting of the Lower Permian Fengcheng Alkali Lake in Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin［J］. XinJiang Petroleum Geology， 2016， 37（1）： 1-6.
17	支东明，宋永，何文军，等. 准噶尔盆地中—下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向［J］. 新疆石油地质， 2019， 40（4）： 389-401.
	Zhi Dongming， Song Yong， He Wenjun， et al. Geological characteristics， resource potential and exploration direction of shale oil in Middle‑Lower Permian， Junggar Basin［J］. XinJiang Petroleum Geology， 2019， 40（4）： 389-401.
18	唐勇，宋永，何文军，等. 准噶尔叠合盆地复式油气成藏规律［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2022， 43（1）： 132-148.
	Tang Yong， Song Yong， He Wenjun， et al. Characteristics of composite hydrocarbon accumulation in a superimposed basin， Junggar Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2022， 43（1）： 132-148.
19	Anderson W G. Wettability literature survey‑part 1： Rock/oil/brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability［J］. Journal of Petroleum Technology， 1986， 38（10）： 1125-1144.
20	冯程，樊海涛，石玉江，等. 润湿性影响下低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组长8¹段为例［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2020， 41（2）： 442-448.
	Feng cheng， Fan Haitao， Shi Yujiang， et al. Prediction for the formation water salinity in low‑permeability reservoirs with complex wettability： A case study of the Triassic Chang 8¹ Member， Longdong area， Ordos Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2020， 41（2）： 442-448.
21	王民，马睿，李进步，等. 济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组湖相页岩油赋存机理［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2019， 46（4）： 789-802.
	Wang Min， Ma Rui， Li Jinbu， et al. Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang Depression， Bohai Bay Basin， China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2019， 46（4）： 789-802.
22	李浩，王保华，陆建林，等. 东濮凹陷古近系页岩油富集地质条件与勘探前景［J］. 中国石油大学学报（自然科学版），2021，45（3）：33-41.
	Li Hao， Wang Baohua， Lu Jianlin， et al.Geological characteristics and exploration prospects of Paleogene continental shale oil accumulation in Dongpu Sag， Bohai Bay Basin［J］.Journal of China University of Petroleum（Edition of Natural Science）， 2021， 45（3）：33-41.
23	刘向君，熊健，梁利喜，等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩润湿性分析及影响讨论［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2014， 25（10）： 1644-1652.
	Liu Xiangjun， Xiong Jian， Liang Lixi， et al. Analysis of the wettability of Longmaxi formation shale in the south region of Sichuan Basin ang its influence［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2014， 25（10）： 1644-1652.
24	Hu Q H， Ewing R P， Rowe H D. Low nanopore connectivity limits gas production in Barnett Formation： Journal of geophysical research［J］. Solid Earth， 2015， 120（12）： 8073-8087.
25	Liu H H， Lai B T， Chen J H. Unconventional spontaneous imbibition into shale matrix： Theory and a methodology to determine relevant parameters［J］. Transport in Porous Media， 2016， 111（1）： 41-57.
26	Odusina E O， Sondergeld C H， Rai C S. An NMR study of shale wettability［C］∥Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary： SPE， 2011：147371.
27	Sulucarnain I D， Sondergeld C H， Rai C S， et al. An NMR study of shale wettability and effective surface relaxivity［C］ ∥SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary： SPE， 2012：162236.
28	Gao Z Y， Hu Q H. Wettability of Mississippian Barnett shale samples at different depths： Investigations from directional spontaneous imbibition［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2016， 100（1）： 101-114.
29	Xu M， Dehghanpour H. Advances in understanding wettability of gas shales［J］. Energy Fuels， 2014， 28（7）： 4362-4375.
30	Sharifigaliuk H， Mahmood S M， Padmanabhan E. Evaluation of the wettability variation of shales by drop shape analysis approach［C］ ∥ SPE/AAPG/SEG Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. Brisbane： SPE/AAPG/SEG， 2019：198277.
31	Sharifigaliuk H， Mahmood S M， Al‑Bazzaz W， et al. Complexities driving wettability evaluation of shales toward unconventional approaches： A comprehensive review［J］. Energy Fuels， 2021， 35（2）：1011-1023.
32	Gao Z Y， Hu Q H. Initial water saturation and imbibition fluid affect spontaneous imbibition into Barnett shale samples［J］. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering， 2016， 34： 541-551.
33	Clarkson C R， Jensen J L， Pedersen P K， et al. Innovative methods for flow‑unit and pore‑structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2012， 96 （2）： 355–374.
34	Ruppert L F， Sakurovs R， Blach T P， et al. A USANS/SANS study of the accessibility of pores in the Barnett Shale to methane and water［J］. Energy Fuels， 2013， 27（2）： 772-779.
35	Su S Y， Jiang Z X， Shan X L， et al. The wettability of shale by NMR measurements and its controlling factors［J］. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering， 2018， 169： 309-316.
36	Siddiqui M A Q， Ali S， Fei H， et al. Current understanding of shale wettability： A review on contact angle measurements［J］. Earth-Science Reviews， 2018， 181： 1-11.
37	郭建春，陶亮，陈迟，等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法［J］. 石油学报， 2020， 41（2）： 216-225.
	Guo Jianchun， Tao Liang， Chen Chi， et al. A new method for evaluating the mixed wettability of shale in Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2020， 41（2）： 216-225.
38	Tang W B， Zhang Y Y， Georgia P P， et al. Soft‑sediment deformation structures in alkaline lake deposits of Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation， Junggar Basin， NW China： Implications for syn‑sedimentary tectonic activity［J］. Sedimentary Geology， 2020，（406）：105719.
39	金之钧. 叠合盆地油气成藏体系研究思路与方法——以准噶尔盆地中部地区油气藏为例［J］.高校地质学报，2011， 17（2）： 161-169.
	Jin Zhijun. Methods in studying petroleum accumulation systems in a superimposed basin： A case study of petroleum reserviors in the Central Junggar Basin［J］. Geological Journal of China Universities， 2011， 17（2）： 161-169.
40	张元元，李威，唐文斌. 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩发育的构造背景和形成环境［J］. 新疆石油地质， 2018，39（1）：48-54.
	Zhang Yuanyuan， Li Wei， Tang Wenbin. Tectonic setting and environment of alkaline lacustrine source rocks in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag［J］. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology， 2018，39（1）：48-54.
41	陈建平，王绪龙，邓春萍，等. 准噶尔盆地油气源、油气分布与油气系统［J］. 地质学报， 2016， 90（3）： 421-450.
	Chen Jianping， Wang Xulong， Deng Chunping， et al. Oil and gas source， occurrence and petroleum system in the Junggar Basin， Northwest China［J］. Acta Geologica Sinica， 2016， 90（3）： 421-450.
42	刘得光，周路，李世宏，等. 玛湖凹陷风城组烃源岩特征与生烃模式［J］. 沉积学报， 2020， 38（5）： 946-955.
	Liu Deguang， Zhou Lu， Li Shihong， et al. Characteristics of source rocks and hydrocarbon generation models of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Depression［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica， 2020， 38（5）： 946-955.
43	Washbure E W. Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America， 1921， 7（4）： 115-116.
44	Gao Z Y， Hu Q H. Pore structure and spontaneous imbibition characteristics of marine and continental shales in China［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2018， 102（10）： 1941-1961.
45	Hu M Q， Persoff P， Wang J S Y. Laboratory measurement of water imbibition into low‑permeability welded tuff［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2001， 242（1-2）： 64-78.
46	张志杰，袁选俊，汪梦诗，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖沉积特征与古环境演化［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2018， 45（6）： 972-984.
	Zhang Zhijie， Yuan Xuanjun， Wang Mengshi， et al. Alkaline⁃lacustrine deposition and paleoenvironmental evolution in Permian Fengcheng Formation at the Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin， NW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2018， 45（6）： 972-984.
47	姜涛，金之钧，刘光祥，等. 四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩储层孔隙结构特征［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2021， 42（4）： 909-918.
	Jiang Tao， Jin Zhijun， Liu Guangxiang，et al. Pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Ziliujing Formation in Yuanba area， Sichuan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2021， 42（4）： 909-918.
48	胡钦红，刘惠民，黎茂稳，等. 东营凹陷沙河街组页岩油储集层润湿性、孔隙连通性和流体-示踪剂运移［J］. 石油学报， 2018， 39（3）： 278-289.
	Hu Qinhong， Liu Huimin， Li Maowen， et al. Wettability， pore connectivity and fluid‑tracer migration in shale oil reservoirs of Paleogene Shehejie Formation in Dongying Sag of Bohai Bay Basin， East China［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2018， 39（3）： 278-289.
49	Arsalan N， Palayangoda S S， Burnett D J， et al. Surface energy characterization of sandstone rocks［J］. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids， 2013， 74（8）： 1069-1077.

流体	密度/（g·cm^-3）	粘度/（mPa·s）	界面张力/（mN·m^-1）
空气	—	0.018	—
去离子水	1.00	1.002	72.0
正癸烷	0.73	0.840	23.9

样品编号	深度/ m	TOC/ %	S₁/ （mg·g^-1）	S₂/ （mg·g^-1）	T_max/ ℃	矿物组分含量/%							岩相类型
样品编号	深度/ m	TOC/ %	S₁/ （mg·g^-1）	S₂/ （mg·g^-1）	T_max/ ℃	石英	长石	方解石	白云石	粘土矿物	黄铁矿	其他	岩相类型
FC1	4 582.6	0.105 6	0.08	0.07	370	28.8	25.0	25.6	4.7	6.3	9.6	0	块状含灰长英质页岩
FC2	4 591.6	0.616 8	1.44	1.53	440	52.0	12.8	0	33.5	0	1.7	0	层状含云长英质页岩
FC3	4 660.7	1.235 0	2.29	5.41	440	9.0	29.2	1.4	51.8	1.2	7.4	0	层状含长英云质页岩
FC4	4 690.8	1.420 0	1.44	6.82	441	39.7	27.9	1.1	18.5	2.3	8.9	1.6	层状长英质页岩
FC5	4 709.6	0.856 2	0.59	2.61	438	22.9	27.5	10.2	27.0	2.4	8.3	1.7	纹层状含云长英质页岩
FC6	4 720.3	0.575 9	2.61	1.41	437	41.6	21.5	4.5	25.7	0	0	6.7	层状含云长英质页岩
FC7	4 750.6	0.812 5	2.97	2.74	432	46.8	38.8	0.7	9.1	0	4.6	0	层状长英质页岩
FC8	4 758.4	0.719 5	4.59	2.28	418	14.5	41.2	2.3	29.5	0	12.5	0	层状含云长英质页岩
FC9	4 764.4	0.579 2	3.76	2.25	416	32.5	47.4	2.2	7.4	0	5.6	4.9	块状粉砂岩
FC10	4 776.6	0.938 3	0.31	3.92	438	33.8	35.8	4.8	12.9	0	8.8	3.9	纹层状长英质页岩
FC11	4 780.5	0.674 2	0.51	1.70	430	19.4	36.5	15.7	18.5	0	9.9	0	纹层状含云长英质页岩
FC12	4 783.1	0.652 3	5.08	2.36	425	58.7	31.3	2.5	3.1	0	4.4	0	块状粉砂岩
FC13	4 820.5	0.414 9	0.15	0.94	440	20.9	29.9	0	41.0	1.1	7.1	0	层状含云长英质页岩
FC14	4 829.1	0.581 3	0.45	1.42	435	35.4	25.8	0	27.2	3.9	6.2	1.5	层状含云长英质页岩
FC15	4 848.6	0.724 6	4.01	1.81	408	14.2	35.4	10.0	22.8	0	15.0	2.6	块状粉砂岩
FC16	4 858.4	0.672 2	0.63	1.47	434	36.2	19.2	21.3	9.8	5.1	8.4	0	纹层状含灰长英质页岩

样品编号	水接触角/（°）
样品编号	实验1	实验2	实验3	平均值
FC1	90.82	74.72	78.51	81.35
FC2	64.67	62.98	80.80	69.48
FC3	80.16	78.78	93.91	84.28
FC4	77.14	45.45	66.49	63.03
FC5	74.65	75.03	59.60	69.76
FC6	67.65	87.02	101.35	85.34
FC7	79.35	85.86	83.83	83.01
FC8	112.33	113.91	102.09	109.44
FC9	112.87	117.47	93.27	107.87
FC10	68.30	78.94	73.74	73.66
FC11	54.66	60.05	84.62	66.44
FC12	119.27	116.08	103.64	113.00
FC13	89.24	63.40	76.47	76.37
FC14	63.62	81.73	85.02	76.79
FC15	113.61	98.50	111.60	107.90
FC16	64.78	63.91	73.74	67.48

样品编号	水相渗吸斜率		油相渗吸斜率
样品编号	顺层（P₁）	穿层（T₁）	顺层（P₂）	穿层（T₂）
FC1	0.558	0.103	0.178	0.645
FC2	0.328	0.255	0.274	0.483
FC3	0.513	0.338	0.238	0.307
FC4	0.126	0.22	0.345	0.249
FC5	0.228	0.167	0.360	0.220
FC6	0.160	0.090	0.624	0.198
FC7	0.273	0.694	0.700	0.425
FC8	0.296	0.253	0.548	0.588
FC9	0.243	0.434	0.424	0.994
FC10	0.326	0.525	0.540	0.384
FC11	0.351	0.378	0.680	0.380
FC12	0.543	0.188	0.320	0.363
FC13	0.160	0.331	0.271	0.380
FC14	0.392	0.209	0.477	0.125
FC15	0.392	0.386	0.365	0.493
FC16	0.380	0.376	0.714	0.526

[1]	Xiaoyu DU, Zhijun JIN, Lianbo ZENG, Guoping LIU, Sen YANG, Xinping LIANG, Guoqing LU. Evaluation of natural fracture effectiveness in deep lacustrine shale oil reservoirs based on formation microresistivity imaging logs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 852-865.
[2]	Hong PAN, Qingsen YU, Xiaoshan LI, Junqiang SONG, Zhibin JIANG, Li WANG, Guanxing LUO, Wenxiu XU, Haoyu YOU. Recognition of the Carboniferous strata in the Hongche fault zone， Junggar Basin and its hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 215-230.
[3]	Xuan CHEN, Xin TAO, Jianhua QIN, Changfu XU, Yingyan LI, Yuan DENG, Yang GAO, Taiju YIN. Hyperpycnal flow deposits of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Sag and its peripheries， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1530-1545.
[4]	Huimin LIU, Guanlong ZHANG, Jie FAN, Zhiping ZENG, Ruichao GUO, Yajun GONG. Exploration discoveries and implications of well Zheng 10 in the Zhengshacun area of the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1118-1128.
[5]	Yao ZHAO, Hong PAN, Feifei LUO, Liang LI, Danyang LI, Zongrui XIE, Donglian LU, Qin ZHANG. Characteristics and quality determinants of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in the Hongche Fault Zone， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1129-1140.
[6]	Hongbo WANG, Cunfei MA, Zheng CAO, Zhipeng LI, Changcheng HAN, Wenming JI, Yi YANG. Differential diagenesis and reservoir physical property responses of tight sandstone based on lithofacies： A case study on the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in Moxizhuang area， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 976-992.
[7]	Jiaquan ZHOU, Yue WANG, Ziyi SONG, Jiting LIU, Sainan CHENG. Characterizing hydrothermal siliceous nodules to guide shale oil exploration in the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation， Bogda area， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 789-800.
[8]	Jing SUN, Xincai YOU, Jingjing XUE, Yuanting CAO, Qiusheng CHANG, Chao CHEN. Characteristics of abnormal pressure and its influence on deep and ultra-deep tight reservoirs in the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 350-365.
[9]	Jianzhong Li, Xiaojun Wang, Fan Yang, Yong Song, Ablimiti, Baoli Bian, Hailei Liu, Xueyong Wang, Deyu Gong. Hydrocarbon accumulation pattern and exploration prospect of the structural traps in lower play of the western Central Depression in the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1059-1072.
[10]	Ke Ma, Jiagen Hou, Hu Dong, Guoqiang Wu, Lin Yan, Liwei Zhang. Pore throat characteristics of fine-grained mixed deposits in shale oil reservoirs and their control on reservoir physical properties： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1194-1205.
[11]	Xun Ge, Tonglou Guo, Yongsheng Ma, Guoli Wang, Maowen Li, Xiaoqun Yu, Peirong Zhao, Zhentao Wen, Peng Wang. Prediction of shale reservoir sweet spots of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in Lintanchang area， southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 633-647.
[12]	Yong Tang, Yong Song, Wenjun He, Long Zhao, Changyong Zhao, Menglin Zheng, Haibo Yang, Shuai Sun, Liying Fei. Characteristics of composite hydrocarbon accumulation in a superimposed basin， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 132-148.
[13]	Linsheng Wang, Yiping Ye, Jianhua Qin, Yang Gao, Yuan Deng, Yingyan Li, Dianshi Xiao. Microscopic pore structure characterization and oil-bearing property evaluation of lacustrine shale reservoir： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 149-160.
[14]	Deyu Gong, Changyong Zhao, Wenjun He, Long Zhao, Yumei Kong, Liya Ma, Ruiju Wang, Wei’an Wu. Genetic types and exploration potential of natural gas at northwestern margin of Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 161-174.
[15]	Erting Li, Jun Jin, Jian Wang, Wanyun Ma, Shijia Chen, Cuimin Liu, Haijing Wang. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of mid-to-shallow natural gas on the periphery of Shawan Sag， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 175-185.

Wettability of the Permian Fengcheng Formation shale in the Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin， and its main control factors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 49

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics