Oil & Gas Geology ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 696-709.doi: 10.11743/ogg20200404
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yong'an Xue(), Feilong Wang, Guomin Tang, Xinqi Li
Received:
2020-03-16
Online:
2020-08-01
Published:
2020-08-11
CLC Number:
Yong'an Xue, Feilong Wang, Guomin Tang, Xinqi Li. Geological condition and exploration prospect of shale oil and gas in the Bohai Sea[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 696-709.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Characteristic comparison of shale oil/gas both at home and abroad with shale from hydrocarbon-rich sags in the Bohai Sea"
类型 | 地区 | 泥页岩名称 | 环境 | 层系 | 埋深/km | 厚度/m | TOC/% | Ro/% | 有机质类型 |
页岩油 | 北美[ | Bakken | 海相烃源岩 | C1 | 1.8~2.7 | 5~15 | 7.23~12.90 | 0.65~0.90 | Ⅱ型 |
Niobrara | K2 | 2.4~2.7 | 80~140 | 2~8 | 0.6~1.3 | Ⅱ型为主 | |||
Barnett | C1 | 1.98~2.60 | 67~90 | 4~8 | 0.6~1.4 | Ⅱ型 | |||
Eagle Ford | K2 | 1.2~4.5 | 30~90 | 1~7 | 1.15~1.40 | Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型 | |||
Monterey | N1 | 2.130~4.267 | 914~1220 | 0.7~5.6 | 0.3~1.1 | Ⅱ型 | |||
沧东凹陷[ | 孔二段 | 陆相烃源岩 | E | 1.8~3.8 | 50~350 | 0.34~8.51 | 0.54~0.82 | Ⅰ型、Ⅱ1型 | |
吉木萨尔凹陷[ | 芦草沟组 | P | 3.0~4.5 | 100~320 | 0.75~3.83 | 0.66~1.63 | Ⅱ型为主 | ||
鄂尔多斯盆地[ | 延长组长7段 | T | 1.5~3.5 | 100~140 | 6~22 | 0.85~1.15 | Ⅰ型、Ⅱ1型 | ||
页岩气 | 北美[ | Ohio | 海相烃源岩 | D | 0.610~1.524 | 91~610 | 0.5~23.0 | 0.4~4.0 | Ⅱ型 |
Antrim | D | 0.183~0.730 | 49 | 0.3~24.0 | 0.4~0.6 | Ⅰ型 | |||
NewAlbany | D | 0.183~1.494 | 31~122 | 1~25 | 0.4~0.8 | Ⅱ型 | |||
Barnett | C | 1.981~2.591 | 61~300 | 1~13 | 1.0~2.1 | Ⅱ型 | |||
Lewis | K | 0.914~1.829 | 152~579 | 0.45~3.00 | 1.60~1.88 | Ⅲ型为主,少量Ⅱ型 | |||
四川盆地[ | 龙马溪组 | S1 | 1.6~3.6 | 80~180 | 1.88~4.36 | 2.6~3.6 | Ⅰ型、Ⅱ1型 | ||
筇竹寺组 | 2.5~4.2 | 100~400 | 1.5~5.7 | 3.0~4.2 | |||||
渤中凹陷 | 东三段 沙一二段 沙三段 | 陆相烃源岩 | E | 2.5~6.0/3.8 | 80~500/150 | 0.35~4.07/1.26 | 0.52~2.20/1.23 | Ⅱ型为主,少量Ⅲ型 Ⅱ型为主,少量Ⅰ型 Ⅱ型为主 | |
2.7~6.5/4.4 | 50~300/130 | 0.25~6.90/1.87 | 0.53~2.80/1.43 | ||||||
2.7~7.3/5.0 | 100~1000/215 | 0.34~7.76/1.78 | 0.54~3.60/1.77 | ||||||
辽中凹陷 | 1.1~4.1/2.5 | 70~295/150 | 0.2~2.5/1.5 | 0.31~1.80/0.84 | |||||
1.3~6.0/3.4 | 20~140/70 | 0.25~4.50/1.60 | 0.31~2.30/0.93 | ||||||
1.5~6.8/3.6 | 90~350/220 | 0.46~2.50/1.63 | 0.31~3.40/1.19 | ||||||
黄河口凹陷 | 2.0~4.1/3.2 | 80~370/135 | 0.1~2.8/1.1 | 0.51~1.20/0.79 | |||||
2.2~4.5/3.5 | 10~150/50 | 0.11~4.55/1.25 | 0.51~1.40/0.85 | ||||||
2.2~4.5/3.6 | 90~1000/230 | 0.22~9.19/1.60 | 0.51~2.10/1.03 | ||||||
歧口凹陷 | 1.8~4.3/3.2 | 60~300/130 | 0.10~3.15/1.10 | 0.45~1.20/0.79 | |||||
1.80~5.00/3.65 | 50~290/150 | 0.10~2.76/1.80 | 0.45~1.80/0.94 | ||||||
1.9~6.6/4.1 | 100~600/200 | 0.05~3.76/1.73 | 0.47~4.00/1.66 |
Table 2
Mineral composition of the marine and continental shale both at home and abroad and shale samples from the Bohai Sea"
地区 | 层位 | 盆地/凹陷 | 矿物含量/% | |||||
石英 | 长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 黄铁矿 | 粘土矿物 | |||
北美 | Barnett | Fort Worth盆地[ | 3.0~69.0/28.8 | 0~5.0/1.8 | 0~91.00/36.74 | 0~5.0/1.4 | 0~29.0/1.5 | 7~48.0/24.2 |
Eagle Ford | Gulf of Mexico盆地[ | 均值13.9 | 0~12.0/3.4 | 4~90/58 | 0~48.0/3.5 | 均值2.4 | 0~73.0/30.4 | |
Bakken | Williston盆地[ | 22.0~90.0/64.2 | 3~16.0/9.1 | 0~5.0/1.2 | 1~9.0/3.4 | 均值4.4 | 1.0~46.0/21.5 | |
四川 | 龙马溪组 | 四川盆地[ | 12.0~73.0/36.1 | 6.5~12.7/8.8 | 5.6~12.1/9.2 | 4.0~10.4/7.6 | 1~1.9/1.4 | 16.0~70.0/41.6 |
大港 | 孔二段 | 沧东凹陷[ | 10.0~25.0/15.7 | 5.0~30.0/17.3 | <20.0/8.2 | 0~50.0/27.2 | <3.0 | 5.0~25.0/13.0 |
渤海 海域 | 东三段 | 渤中凹陷 | 16.0~40.0/25.9 | 2.0~23.0/7.0 | 2.0~26.0/17.2 | 1.0~13.0/4.7 | 0~5.0/2.2 | 30.0~52.0/38.0 |
辽中凹陷 | 29.0~57.0/42.3 | 11.0~34.0/19.7 | 2.0~14.0/5.1 | 0~5.0/1.9 | 0~1.0/0.1 | 19.0~47.0/33.6 | ||
黄河口凹陷 | 20.0~61.0/38.6 | 13.0~27.0/20.7 | 1.0~8.0/3.8 | 0~2.0/1.2 | 0~1.0/0.1 | 11.0~44.0/32.4 | ||
歧口凹陷 | 18 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 30 | ||
沙一二段 | 渤中凹陷 | 16.0~34.0/24.5 | 2.0~15.0/5.9 | 7.0~42.0/18.9 | 3.0~22.0/10.2 | 1.0~6.0/3.2 | 21.0~46.0/33.9 | |
辽中凹陷 | 32.0~48.0/37.7 | 23.0~29.0/26.7 | 2.0~4.0/3.3 | 0~2.0/1.3 | 少见 | 24.0~32.0/28.7 | ||
黄河口凹陷 | 11.0~43.0/32.8 | 10.0~43.0/23.6 | 0~24.0/2.0 | 0~66.0/5.5 | 0~5.0/0.4 | 6.0~54.0/31.7 | ||
歧口凹陷 | 20 | 9 | 25 | 4 | 5 | 33 | ||
沙三段 | 渤中凹陷 | 17.0~30.0/23.3 | 3.0~21.0/10.3 | 2.0~33.0/13.5 | 3.0~20.0/9.8 | 1.0~5.0/2.5 | 25.0~47.0/37.3 | |
辽中凹陷 | 19.0~46.0/26.7 | 17.0~42.0/29.4 | 1.0~16.0/7.7 | 3.0~5.0/3.8 | 0.0~3.0/1.4 | 7.0~42.0/26.2 | ||
黄河口凹陷 | 19.0~46.0/26.8 | 17.0~42.0/29.5 | 1.0~16.0/7.8 | 0~18.0/6.0 | 0~3.0/1.5 | 7.0~42.0/26.3 |
Table 3
Mineral composition in continental shale samples from typical regions of the Bohai Sea"
凹陷 | 矿物含量/% | ||||||
石英 | 长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 黄铁矿 | 粘土矿物 | ||
渤中凹陷 | CFD23-2-1井区 | 15.0~35.0/23.4 | 10.0~36.0/22.6 | 3.0~25.0/8.8 | 0~17.0/9.4 | 0~3.0/0.5 | 5~43/26 |
渤中13-1 | 7.5~57.0/37.4 | 0.3~42.0/8.3 | 1.7~55.6/15.7 | 0~21.0/3.6 | 0~5.0/1.6 | 16~70/42 | |
渤中19-6 | 16.0~40.0/25.0 | 2.0~23.0/7.6 | 2.0~42.0/16.5 | 1~22.0/6.8 | 0~6.0/2.4 | 21~52/37 | |
歧口凹陷 | 18.0~20.0/19.0 | 9 | 25.0~31.0/28.0 | 4.0~6.0/5.0 | 2.0~5.0/3.5 | 30~33/32 | |
辽中凹陷 | 27.0~57.0/40.8 | 11.0~34.0/20.2 | 2.0~14.0/5.0 | 0~4.0/0.3 | 0~1.00/0.04 | 19~47/34 | |
黄河口凹陷 | 11.0~61.0/33.2 | 10.0~43.0/23.6 | 0~32.0/3.0 | 0~66.0/4.9 | 0~5.0/0.5 | 6~54/32 |
Table 4
Clay mineral composition in shale samples from the Bohai Sea"
层位 | 井号 | 深度/m | 粘土矿物相对含量/% | 伊/蒙混层比/% | |||
伊利石 | 高岭石 | 绿泥石 | 伊/蒙混层 | ||||
东三段 | BZ19-6-3 | 3 620 | 66 | 5 | 9 | 20 | 20 |
BZ19-6-7 | 4 050 | 64 | 5 | 5 | 26 | 25 | |
BZ19-6-7 | 4 260 | 96 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
JX1-2-1 | 2 115 | 45 | 11 | 5 | 39 | 20 | |
沙一二段 | BZ19-6-4 | 4 350 | 98 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
BZ19-6-6 | 4 005 | 87 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | |
BZ19-6-10 | 4 350 | 71 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 10 | |
BZ27-2-2 | 3 820 | 76 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 10 | |
KL10-2-2D | 2 455 | 20 | 8 | 5 | 67 | 50 | |
沙三段 | BZ19-6-3 | 3 800 | 95 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
BZ19-6-3 | 3 819 | 80 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 20 | |
BZ19-6-11 | 4 435 | 96 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
BZ19-6-11 | 4 445 | 87 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 20 | |
KL10-2-2D | 3 060 | 36 | 7 | 4 | 53 | 15 | |
KL10-2-2D | 3 160 | 39 | 5 | 3 | 53 | 15 | |
LD29-1-2 | 2 825 | 10 | 28 | 18 | 44 | 45 | |
LD29-1-2 | 2 845 | 54 | 3 | 2 | 41 | 20 |
Table 5
Hydrocarbon generation from the major source rocks in hydrocarbon-rich sags in the Bohai Sea"
凹陷 | 东三段 | 沙一二段 | 沙三段 | 总计 |
渤中凹陷 | ||||
辽中凹陷 | ||||
黄河口凹陷 | ||||
歧口凹陷 | ||||
总计 |
1 | 金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (3): 5- 12. |
Jin Zhijun , Bai Zhenrui , Gao Bo , et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (3): 5- 12. | |
2 | 戴金星, 黄士鹏, 刘岩, 等. 中国天然气勘探开发60年的重大进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (6): 689- 698. |
Dai Jinxing , Huang Shipeng , Liu Yan , et al. Significant advancement in natural gas exploration and developmentin China during the past sixty years[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (6): 689- 698. | |
3 | 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37 (6): 641- 653. |
Zou Caineng , Dong Dazhong , Wang Shejiao , et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resourcepotential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37 (6): 641- 653. | |
4 | 王祥, 刘玉华, 张敏, 等. 页岩气形成条件及成藏影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21 (2): 350- 356. |
Wang Xiang , Liu Yuhua , Zhang Min , et al. Conditions of formation and accumulation for shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21 (2): 350- 356. | |
5 | 赵靖舟. 非常规油气有关概念、分类及资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23 (3): 393- 406. |
Zhao Jingzhou . Conception, classification and resource potential of unconventional hydrocarbons[J]. Natural GasGeoscience, 2012, 23 (3): 393- 406. | |
6 | Montgomery S L , Jarvie D M , Bowker K A , et al. Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, north-central Texas:Gas shale play with multitrillion cubic foot potential[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89 (2): 155- 175. |
7 | U.S.Energy Information Administration.U.S.crude oil and natural gas proved reserves, year-end 2018[R].Washington: 2019 Annual Report of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves. |
8 | 邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 等. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28 (12): 1781- 1796. |
Zou Caineng , Zhao Qun , Dong Dazhong , et al. Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28 (12): 1781- 1796. | |
9 | Hughes J D.Drilling Deeper, Part 3: Shale Gas[R].Post Carbon Institute, 2014: 151-302. |
10 | 马新华, 谢军. 川南地区页岩气勘探开发进展及发展前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (1): 161- 169. |
Ma Xinhua , Xie Jun . The progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and exploitationin southern Sichuan Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration andDevelopment, 2018, 45 (1): 161- 169. | |
11 | 胡明, 黄文斌, 李加玉. 构造特征对页岩气井产能的影响——以涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37 (8): 31- 39. |
Hu Ming , Huang Wenbin , Li Jiayu . Effects of structural characteristics on the productivity of shale gas wells:A casestudy on the Jiaoshiba Block in the Fuling Shale gasfield, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37 (8): 31- 39. | |
12 | 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (3): 361- 372. |
Zhao Xianzheng , Zhou Lihong , Pu Xiugang , et al. Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration breakthroughin a lacustrine basin:A case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (3): 361- 372. | |
13 | 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40 (9): 1013- 1029. |
Zhao Xianzheng , Zhou Lihong , Pu Xiugang , et al. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40 (9): 1013- 1029. | |
14 | 朱伟林, 米立军, 龚再升, 等. 渤海海域油气成藏与勘探[M]. 科学出版社, 2009. |
Zhu Weilin , Mi Lijun , Gong Zaisheng , et al. Oil and gas accumulation and exploration in Bohai Sea[M]. Science Press, 2009. | |
15 | 谢玉洪, 张功成, 沈朴, 等. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷大气田形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39 (11): 1199- 1210. |
Xie Yuhong , Zhang Gongcheng , Shen Pu , et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large gas field in Bozhong sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39 (11): 1199- 1210. | |
16 | 马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (4): 561- 574. |
Ma Yongsheng , Cai Yunyu , Zhao Peirong . China's shale gas exploration and development:Understanding and practice[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (4): 561- 574. | |
17 | 张文正, 杨华, 杨伟伟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7湖相页岩油地质特征评价[J]. 地球化学, 2015, 44 (5): 505- 515. |
Zhang Wenzheng , Yang Hua , Yang Weiwei , et al. Assessment of geological characteristics of lacustrine shale oil reservoirin Chang7 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Geochimica, 2015, 44 (5): 505- 515. | |
18 | 张金川, 姜生玲, 唐玄, 等. 我国页岩气富集类型及资源特点[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29 (12): 109- 114. |
Zhang Jinchuan , Jiang Shengling , Tang Xuan , et al. Accumulation types and resources characteristics of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29 (12): 109- 114. | |
19 | 聂海宽, 张培先, 边瑞康, 等. 中国陆相页岩油气富集特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (2): 55- 62. |
Nie Haikuan , Zhang Xianpei , Bian Ruikang , et al. Oil accumulationcharacteristics of China continental shale[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (2): 55- 62. | |
20 | 张金川, 林腊梅, 李玉喜, 等. 页岩油分类与评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19 (5): 322- 331. |
Zhan Jinchuan , Lin Lamei , Li Yuxi . Classification and evaluation of shale oil[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19 (5): 322- 331. | |
21 | 周立宏, 于超, 滑双君, 等. 沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油资源评价方法与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24 (6): 1- 6. |
Zhou Lihong , Yu Chao , Hua Shuangjun , et al. Shale oil resource estimation and application in Kong2 member of Cangdong Sag[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24 (6): 1- 6. | |
22 | 章敬, 李佳琦, 史晓川, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷致密油层压裂工艺探索与实践[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2013, 34 (6): 710- 712. |
Zhang Jing , Li Jiaqi , Shi Xiaochuan , et al. Fracturing technology for dense oil reservoir in Jimusaer Sag:probe and practice[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2013, 34 (6): 710- 712. | |
23 | 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 欧阳学成, 等. 世界页岩气研究概况及中国页岩气资源潜力分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19 (2): 198- 211. |
Jiang Fujie , Pang Xiongqi , Ouyang Xuecheng , et al. Themain progress and problems of shalegas study and thepotential prediction of shale gas exploration[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19 (2): 198- 211. | |
24 | 李延钧, 刘欢, 张烈辉, 等. 四川盆地南部下古生界龙马溪组页岩气评价指标下限[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2013, 43, 1088- 1095. |
Li Yanjun , Liu Huan , Zhang Liehui , et al. Lower limits of evaluation parameters for the lower Paleozoic Longmaxi shale gas in southern Sichuan Province[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2013, 43, 1088- 1095. | |
25 | 刘双莲, 陆黄生. 页岩气测井评价技术特点及评价方法探讨[J]. 测井技术, 2011, 35 (2): 112- 116. |
Liu Shuanglian , Lu Huangsheng . Evaluation methods and characteristics of log evaluation technology in shale gas[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2011, 35 (2): 112- 116. | |
26 | 严伟, 王建波, 刘帅, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组泥页岩储层测井识别[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (6): 30- 36. |
Yan Wei , Wang Jianbo , Liu Shuai , et al. Logging identification for the Longmaxi mud shale reservoir in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (6): 30- 36. | |
27 | 李新景, 吕宗刚, 董大忠, 等. 北美页岩气资源形成的地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29 (5): 27- 32. |
Li Xinjing , Lv Zonggang , Dong Dazhong , et al. Geologic controls on accumulation of shale gas in North America[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29 (5): 27- 32. | |
28 | 李登华, 刘卓亚, 张国生, 等. 中美致密油成藏条件、分布特征和开发现状对比与启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28 (7): 1126- 1138. |
Li Denghua , Liu Zhuoya , Zhang Guosheng , et al. Comparison and reve-lation of tight oil accumulation conditions, distribution characteristics and development status between China and U.S.[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28 (7): 1126- 1138. | |
29 | 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 韩文中, 等. 细粒相沉积地质特征与致密油勘探——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43 (1): 24- 33. |
Pu Xiugang , Zhou Lihong , Han Wenzhong , et al. Geologic features of fine-grained facies sedimentation and tight oil exploration:A case from the second Member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation of Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43 (1): 24- 33. | |
30 | 高辉, 何梦卿, 赵鹏云, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油与北美地区典型页岩油地质特征对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (2): 133- 140. |
Gao Hui , He Mengqing , Zhao Pengyun , et al. Comparison of geological characteristicsof Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (2): 133- 140. | |
31 | 王秀平, 牟传龙, 葛详英, 等. 川南及邻区龙马溪组黑色岩系矿物组分特征及评价[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36 (2): 150- 162. |
Zhang Xiuping , Mou Chuanlong , Ge Xiangyinh , et al. Mineral component characteristics and evaluation of black rock series of Longmaxi Formation in Southern Sichuan and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36 (2): 150- 162. | |
32 | 陈文玲, 周文, 罗平, 等. 四川盆地长芯1井下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, (3): 337- 350. |
Chen Wenling , Zhou Wen , Luo Ping , et al. Analysis of the shale gas reservoir in the Lower Silurian LongmaxiFormation, Changxin 1 well, Southeast Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29 (3): 1073- 1086. | |
33 | 曾祥亮, 刘树根, 黄文明, 等. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30 (2/3): 372- 384. |
Zeng Xiangliang , Liu Shugen , Huang Wenming , et al. Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in Chinaand Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30 (2/3): 372- 384. | |
34 | 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段与威利斯顿盆地Bakken组致密油形成条件的对比及其意义[J]. 现代地质, 2013, (5): 1120- 1130. |
Zhang Nini , Liu Luofu , Su Tianxi , et al. Comparison of Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin withBakken Formation in Williston Basin and Its Significance[J]. Geoscience, 2013, (5): 1120- 1130. | |
35 | 王淑芳, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中美海相页岩气地质特征对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (9): 1666- 1678. |
Wang Shufang , Dong Dazhong , Wang Yuman , et al. A comparative study of the geological feature of marine shale gas between China and the United States[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (9): 1666- 1678. | |
36 | 邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43 (2): 166- 178. |
Zou Caineng , Dong Dazhong , Wang Yuman , et al. Shale gas in China:Characteristics, challenges and prospects (Ⅱ)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43 (2): 166- 178. | |
37 | 徐同台, 王行信, 张有瑜, 等. 中国含油气盆地粘土矿物[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003: 569- 591. |
Xu Tongtai , Wang Xingxin , Zhang Youyu , et al. Clay minerals of petroleum basins in China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003: 569- 591. | |
38 | 王永诗, 巩建强, 房建军, 等. 渤南洼陷页岩油气富集高产条件及勘探方向[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19 (6): 6- 10. |
Wang Yongshi , Gong Jianqiang , Fang Jianjun , et al. Enrichment condition analysis and exploration direction of shale oil-gas in Bonansubsag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19 (6): 6- 10. | |
39 | 马卫, 李健, 王东良, 等. 烃源岩排烃效率及其影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27 (9): 1742- 1751. |
Ma Wei , Li Jian , Wang Dongliang , et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of source rocks and its influencing factors[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27 (9): 1742- 1751. | |
40 | 邹才能, 杨智, 崔景伟, 等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40 (1): 14- 26. |
Zou Caineng , Yang Zhi , Cui Jingwei , et al. Formation mechanism, geological characteristics and development strategy ofnonmarine shale oil in China[J]. PetroleumExploration and Development, 2013, 40 (1): 14- 26. | |
41 | 李忠兴, 屈雪峰, 刘万涛, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油合理开发方式探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42 (2): 217- 221. |
Li Zhongxing , Qu Xuefeng , Liu Wantao , et al. Development modes of Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 7 Member tight oil in Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42 (2): 217- 221. | |
42 | 郭建春, 陶亮, 曾凡辉. 致密油储集层水平井重复压裂时机优化——以松辽盆地白垩系青山口组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46 (1): 146- 154. |
Guo Jianchun , Tao Liang , Zeng Fanhui . Optimization of refracturing timing for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs:A case study of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46 (1): 146- 154. | |
43 | 李新宁, 马强, 梁辉, 等. 三塘湖盆地二叠系芦草沟组二段混积岩致密油地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42 (6): 763- 793. |
Li Xinning , Ma Qiang , Liang Hui , et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential of diamictite tight oil in the second Member of the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Santanghu Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42 (6): 763- 793. |
[1] | Xiao HE, Maja ZHENG, Yong LIU, Qun ZHAO, Xuewen Shi, Zhenxue Jiang, Wei WU, Ya WU, Shitan NING, Xianglu TANG, Dadong LIU. Characteristics and differential origin of Qiongzhusi Formation shale reservoirs under the “aulacogen-uplift” tectonic setting, Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 420-439. |
[2] | Rui LI, Jiao YANG, Yukun CHAI, Hua WANG, Jianwen DAI, Yonghui DENG, Shuang SUN, Xiaolin MA, Tengfei TIAN. A novel sedimentary pattern of wave-induced sandbars under high-angle wave incidence [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 530-541. |
[3] | Guanmin WANG, Xiaojun PANG, Xiaobo HUANG, Xuefang ZHANG, Kai PAN. Characteristics and origin of high-quality gravity-flow sandstone reservoirs in the 3rd member of the Dongying Formation, southern Liaozhong Sag, Bohai Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 81-95. |
[4] | Lijun MI, Jianyong XU, Wei LI. Shale oil resource potential in the Bohai Sea area [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1366-1377. |
[5] | Dongfeng HU, Zhihong WEI, Ruobing LIU, Xiangfeng WEI, Wei WANG, Qingbo WANG. Discovery of the Qijiang shale gas field in a structurally complex region on the southeastern margin of the Sichuan Basin and its implications [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1418-1429. |
[6] | Jiageng LIU, Yanzhong WANG, Yingchang CAO, Shuping WANG, Xuezhe LI, Zhukun WANG. Factors controlling the development of deep and ultra-deep coarse-grained siliciclastic reservoirs with high quality in the steep slope zone of the Minfeng sub-sag, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1203-1217. |
[7] | Qian ZHANG, Zhijun JIN, Rukai ZHU, Quanyou LIU, Rui ZHANG, Guanping WANG, Wanli CHEN, Ralf Littke. Remarkable issues of Rock-Eval pyrolysis in the assessment of shale oil/gas [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 1020-1032. |
[8] | Xiaogfeng DU, Xiaojun PANG, Xiaobo HUANG, Bingjie WANG. Characteristics of the source-to-sink system for the Paleogene Sha 2 Member of northern Liaoxi Sag, offshore Bohai Bay Basin and its control on beach bar sands [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 662-674. |
[9] | Xuanlong SHAN, Wei WANG, Xintao ZHANG, Jian YI, Chunqiang XU, Junpei YUE, Pengcheng LIU, Mao FU. Geological model and construction process of the Mesozoic volcanic edifices in Bozhong Sag, Bohai Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 675-688. |
[10] | Dingyou LYU, Haifeng YANG, Haibo YU, Pengbo LIU, Hui DENG, Shen ZHANG. Zonation and dynamic genetic mechanism of the Indosinian thrust nappe system in Bohai Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 720-734. |
[11] | Jing SUN, Xincai YOU, Jingjing XUE, Yuanting CAO, Qiusheng CHANG, Chao CHEN. Characteristics of abnormal pressure and its influence on deep and ultra-deep tight reservoirs in the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 350-365. |
[12] | Wei LI, Jianyong XU, Zhifeng LIU, Youchuan LI, Wenqi ZHU. Influence of mantle-derived CO2 on hydrocarbon accumulation in Qinhuangdao 29 tectonic zone, Bohai Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 418-428. |
[13] | Yiwen Gao, Shiyan Hao, Qing Wang, Weibo Wang, Shaojing Jiang, Qingxiong Fan, Zhijun Chen, Ye Zhou. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon resources potential of source rocks in Babei Sag, Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1445-1458. |
[14] | Ziliang Liu, Minghe Zhang, Sibing Liu, Junjie Wang, Jingyu Hao, Yicai Chen, Yue Zhou. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the Carboniferous Simen Formation at the southern margin of Xuefeng Mountain, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 902-916. |
[15] | Mingshui Song, Yongshi Wang, Xuejun Wang, Xuefeng Hao, Youqiang Li, Dongxia Chen, Fuwei Wang, Qiaochu Wang, Xuebin Shi, Yi Zou. Research of “synthem units of exploration” in mature exploration area and its application in the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 499-513. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||