致密砂岩裂缝测井识别特色技术及其应用效果——以四川盆地川西坳陷新场气田上三叠统须家河组二段为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210418

Abstract

Abstract:

Fractures are a key factor for high and stable production of tight sandstone reservoirs.The coincidence rate of fracture identification based on conventional logging is, however, low, due to the low resolution of conventional logging, rapid change of lithology and physical properties of tight sandstone, small-scale fractures with variable occurrences.Based on the concluded regional fracture types and fracture logging response characteristics, we innovatively extract multiple factors sensitive to fracture such as resistivity reduction and moveout augmentation in the tight sandstone of the second member of Xujiahe Formation (hereinafter referred to as Xu 2 Member) in Xinchang gas field, Western Sichuan Depression.Furthermore, resistivity dimension and acoustic dimension constraint index are selected to suppress the interference effect with the amplification of fracture signals; and the gray correlation is applied for the first time to determine the weight coefficient of sensitive factors, the fracture indication curve is calculated by weighting, and the threshold constraint is used to identify fractures.In comparison with the fracture response pattern library, the fracture type is identified by clustering.In comparing with electric imaging data of the 5 wells including Wells X5 and X101, the coincidence rate of fracture identification reaches up to more than 90%, providing a favorable basis for the study of fracture distribution pattern, reservoir type evaluation and productivity prediction of tight sandstones.

Key words: fracture sensitivity factor, grey correlation, conventional logging, fracture identification, tight sandstone, Xinchang gas field, Western Sichuan Depression

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Zhiyuan Liu, Hao Li, Qingzhao Wu, Zeyu Nan, Junlei Su, Wujun Jin. Characteristics and application effect of logging-based fracture identification in tight sandstones: A case study of the Upper Triassic Xu 2 Member in Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 981-991.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Fig.6

Table 2

Table 3

References 39

1	赵靖舟, 李军, 曹青, 等. 论致密大油气田成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (5): 573- 583.
	Zhao Jingzhou , li Jun , Cao Qing , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of large tight oil and gas fields[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (5): 573- 583.
2	李建忠, 郭彬程, 郑民, 等. 中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 32 (4): 607- 614.
	Li Jianzhong , Guo Bincheng , Zheng Min , et al. Main types, geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 32 (4): 607- 614.
3	朱如凯, 邹才能, 吴松涛, 等. 中国陆相致密油形成机理与富集规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1168- 1184.
	Zhu Rukai , Zou Caineng , Wu Songtao , et al. Mechanism for generation and accumulation of continental tight oil in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1168- 1184.
4	郭迎春, 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 等. 致密砂岩气成藏研究进展及值得关注的几个问题[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (6): 717- 723.
	Guo Yingchun , Pang Xiongqi , Chen Dongxia , et al. Progress of research on hydrocarbon accumulation of tight sand gas and several issues for concerns[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (6): 717- 723.
5	王威, 卢祥国, 吕金龙, 等. 裂缝对致密砂岩储层物性及产气能力影响实验[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38 (4): 160- 166.
	Wang Wei , Lu Xiangguo , Lv Jinlong . Experiments of the effects of the fracture on the physical property and gas production capacity for the tight sandstone[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019, 38 (4): 160- 166.
6	曾联波, 吕鹏, 屈雪峰, 等. 致密低渗透储层多尺度裂缝及其形成地质条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (3): 449- 454.
	Zeng Lianbo , Lu Peng , Qu Xuefeng , et al. Multi-scale fractures in tight sandstone reservoirs with low permeability and geolo-gical conditions of their development[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (3): 449- 454.
7	毛哲, 曾联波, 刘国平, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘侏罗系深层致密砂岩储层裂缝及其有效性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (6): 1212- 1221.
	Mao Zhe , Zeng Lianbo , Liu Guoping , et al. Characterization and effectiveness of natural fractures in deep tight sandstones at the south margin of the Junggar Basin, Northwestern China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (6): 1212- 1221.
8	梅丹, 胡勇, 王倩. 裂缝对气藏储层渗透率及气井产能的贡献[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (5): 769- 772.
	Mei Dan , Hu Yong , Wang Qian . Experimental study on fracture contribution to gas reservoir permeability and well capacity[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (5): 769- 772.
9	曹耐, 雷刚, 董平川, 等. 裂缝型储层渗透率应力敏感评价及对生产影响[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26 (2): 195- 199.
	Cao Nai , Lei Gang , Dong Pingchuan , et al. Stress sensitivity evaluation of permeability of fractured reservoir and its effect on production[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26 (2): 195- 199.
10	钱玉萍. 基于孔、裂隙理论评价致密气层[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33 (4): 21- 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2019.04.005
	Qian Yuping . Evaluation of tight gas formation based on pore and fracture theory[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineer, 2019, 33 (4): 21- 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2019.04.005
11	谭廷栋. 成像测井技术[J]. 中国石油勘探, 1997, 2 (1): 33- 38.
	Tan Tingdong . Imaging logging[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 1997, 2 (1): 33- 38.
12	Hiroaki Okada, Yasuo Yamada. Fracture distribution in and around intrusive rocks in the Fushime Geothermal Field, Japan evidence from the FMI logging[C]//Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, SPWLA 43th Annual Logging Symposium. Oiso, Japan: Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, 2002: paper DD.
13	刘冬冬, 杨东旭, 张子亚, 等. 基于常规测井和成像测井的致密储层裂缝识别方法——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31 (3): 76- 85.
	Liu Dongdong , Yang Dongxu , Zhang Ziya , et al. Fracture identification for tight reservoirs by conventional and imaging logging: A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31 (3): 76- 85.
14	王晓, 周文, 王洋, 等. 新场深层致密碎屑岩储层裂缝常规测井识别[J]. 石油物探, 2011, 50 (6): 634- 638. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2011.06.016
	Wang Xiao , Zhou Wen , Wang Yang , et al. Conventional log identification of fractures in the deep tight clastic reservoir in Xinchang Area[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 2011, 50 (6): 634- 638. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2011.06.016
15	苏J, 加特纳J, 尚作源. 根据测井曲线探测裂缝[J]. 石油物探译丛, 1982, 22 (1): 86- 96.
	Su J , Gartner J , Shang Zuoyuan . Detecting fractures according to logging curve[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 1982, 22 (1): 86- 96.
16	孙建孟, 刘荣, 梅基席, 等. 青海柴西地区常规测井裂缝识别方法[J]. 测井技术, 1999, 23 (4): 268- 272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.1999.04.006
	Sun Jianmeng , Liu Rong , Mei Jixi , et al. Fracture identification technique by conventional logs from Western Chaidamu Basin, Qinghai Oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 1999, 23 (4): 268- 272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.1999.04.006
17	谭海芳, 师桂祥, 申梅英, 等. 利用常规测井资料识别砂泥岩中裂缝的方法研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2004, 11 (6): 81- 82.
	Tan Haifang , Shi Guixiang , Shen Meiying , et al. Method research to distinguish fracture by using conventional logging data[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2004, 11 (6): 81- 82.
18	赵永刚, 潘和平, 李功强, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部镇泾油田延长组致密砂岩储层裂缝测井识别[J]. 现代地质, 2013, 27 (4): 934- 940.
	Zhao Yonggang , Pan Heping , Li Gongqiang , et al. Logging identification for the tight sandstone reservoir fractures of Yanchang Formation in Zhenjing Oilfield of Southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27 (4): 934- 940.
19	王瑞雪. 常规测井识别裂缝研究综述[J]. 山东工业技术, 2013, (7): 128- 129.
	Wang Ruixue . The Summarize of the convention logging indentify the fructure[J]. ShanDong Industrial Technology, 2013, (7): 128- 129.
20	王柯, 张荣虎, 戴俊生, 等. 低渗透储层裂缝研究进展[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2015, 37 (2): 44- 57.
	Wang Ke , Zhang Ronghu , Dai Jun-sheng , et al. Review on low-per-meability reservoir fracture[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2015, 37 (2): 44- 57.
21	杨长清, 李旻, 冷济高. 川西孝泉-丰谷构造带特征、演化历史及其天然气分布关系研究[M]. 成都: 中国石化西南油气分公司, 2010.
	Yang Changqing , Li Yu , Leng Jigao . Characteristics, evolution history and natural gas distribution of Xiaoquan & Fenggu structural belt in Western Sichuan Depression[M]. Chengdu: Sinopec Southwest Oil & Gas Company, 2010.
22	殷积峰, 谷志东, 李秋芬. 四川盆地大川中地区深层断裂发育特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (3): 376- 382.
	Yin Jifeng , Gu Zhidong , Li Qiufen . Characteristics of deep-rooted faults and their geological significances in Dachuanzhong area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (3): 376- 382.
23	吕正祥, 张世华, 叶泰然, 等. 新场气田须二气藏描述[M]. 成都: 中国石化西南油气分公司, 2010.
	Lv Zhengxiang , Zhang Shihua , Ye Tairan , et al. Description of Xu2 gas reservoir in Xinchang Gas Field[M]. Chengdu: Sinopec Southwest Oil & Gas Company, 2010.
24	郑荣才, 李国晖, 戴朝成, 等. 四川类前陆盆地盆-山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 96 (1): 170- 179.
	Zheng Rongcai , Li Guohui , Dai Chaocheng , et al. Basin-mountain coupling system and its sedimentary response in Sichuan Analogous Foreland Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 96 (1): 170- 179.
25	杜宗飞, 高红灿, 郑荣才. 渝南关坝地区上三叠统须家河组沉积特征[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33 (3): 1- 4.
	Du Zongfei , Gao Hongcan , Zheng Rongcai , et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Guanba Area of Southern Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2019, 33 (3): 1- 4.
26	唐大海, 谭秀成, 王小娟, 等. 四川盆地须家河组致密气藏成藏要素及有利区带评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27 (3): 40- 46.
	Tang Dahai , Tan Xiucheng , Wang Xiaojuan , et al. Tight gas accumulation elements and favorable zone evaluation of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Specail Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27 (3): 40- 46.
27	何志国, 熊亮, 杨凯歌. 川西坳陷中段新场构造须二气藏主控因素分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2006, 29 (4): 18- 22.
	He Zhiguo , Xiong Liang , Yang Kaige . Mainly controlling factors of Xujiahe 2 member gas reservoir in Xinchang structure, middle west-Sichuan sag[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2006, 29 (4): 18- 22.
28	雍世和, 张超谟, 高楚桥, 等. 测井数据处理与综合解释[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2007: 290- 297.
	Yong Shihe , Zhang Chaomo , Gao Chuqiao , et al. Logging data processing and comprehensive interpretation[M]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2007: 290- 297.
29	Sibbit A M, Faivre O. The dual laterolog response in fractured rocks[C]//SPWLA 26th Annual Logging Symposium. Dallas, Texas: Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, 1985: paper T.
30	南泽宇, 李军, 贾丽华, 等. 低阻碳酸盐岩储层双侧向裂缝响应模拟及定量评价[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29 (5): 2224- 2230.
	Nan Zeyu , Li Jun , Jia Lihua , et al. Simulation and quantitative evaluation of dual-laterolog response of fracture in low-resistivity carbonate reservoir[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29 (5): 2224- 2230.
31	楚泽涵. 声波测井原理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1987: 75- 79.
	Chu Zehan . Principle of sonic logging[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1987: 75- 79.
32	龚丹, 章成广. 裂缝性致密砂岩储层声波测井数值模拟响应特性研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013, 35 (7): 82- 86.
	Gong Dan , Zhang Chengguang . Research on numerical simulation response characteristics of acoustic logging for fractured tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013, 35 (7): 82- 86.
33	沈建中, 应崇福. 掠入射脉冲纵波在带形裂缝上的散射-光弹方法实验验证[J]. 声学学报, 1989, 14 (3): 216- 219.
	Shen Jianzhong , Ying Chongfu . A second-order approximate solution for scattering of a grazing longitudinal wave pulse by a ribbon-type crack-experimental verification by the photo elastic method[J]. Acta Acustica, 1989, 14 (3): 216- 219.
34	邓惠. 致密碎屑岩裂缝气层的自然电位[J]. 石油物探, 1991, 31 (1): 57- 62.
	Dang Hui . Spontaneous potential of fractured gas-bearing formation of compact clastic rock[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 1991, 31 (1): 57- 62.
35	姜达贵. 自然电位测井评价海拉尔油田变质岩潜山油藏裂缝性储层[J]. 测井技术, 2017, 41 (5): 550- 554.
	Jiang Dagui . Effectiveness evaluation of metamorphic buried hill fractured reservoir with spontaneous potential logging in Hailar Oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2017, 41 (5): 550- 554.
36	董双波, 柯式镇, 张红静, 等. 利用常规测井资料识别裂缝方法研究[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37 (4): 380- 388.
	Dong Shuangbo , Ke Shizhen , Zhang Hongjing , et al. On fracture identification with conventional well logging data[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37 (4): 380- 388.
37	龙章亮, 温真桃, 李辉, 等. 一种基于灰色关联分析的页岩储层可压性评价方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10 (1): 37- 42.
	Long Zhangliang , Wen Zhentao , Li Hui , et al. An evaluation method of shale reservoir crushability based on grey correlation analysis[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10 (1): 37- 42.
38	Dong Shaoqun , Zeng Lianbo , Lyu Wenya , et al. Fracture identification and evaluation using conventional logs in tight sandstones: A case study in the Ordos Basin, China[J]. Energy Geoscience, 2020, 1 (3-4): 115- 123. doi: 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.06.003
39	夏宏泉, 杨华斌, 刘红歧, 等. 川东飞仙关组鲕滩储层测井识别[J]. 天然气工业, 2001, 21 (1): 57- 61.
	Xia Hongquan , Yang Huabin , Liu Hongqi , et al. Analysis of some problems in casing calculation by finite element method[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2001, 21 (1): 57- 61.

敏感因子	公式	优势
电阻率降低因子RT_GR_FF	$ \frac{{\ln R{D_{{\rm{evp}}}} - \ln RD}}{{GR}} $	各类缝
时差增大因子AC_FF	$ \left( {AC - A{C_{{\rm{evp}}}}} \right)\left( {1 - {V_{{\rm{sh}}}}} \right) $	低角缝、裂缝破碎带
电阻率幅度差因子RDS_FF	$ \lg R{S_{{\rm{evp}}}}/RS - \lg R{D_{{\rm{evp}}}}/RD $	斜交缝、高角缝
自然电位因子SP_FF	$ \frac{{S{P_{{\rm{evp}}}} - SP}}{{GR}} $	层间缝、低角缝、破碎带
电阻率维度(约束指标) RT_fct	$ {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {\left\| {\lg R{D_{i + 1}} - \lg R{D_i}} \right\|} /m} $	裂缝与孔隙储层区分
声波维度(约束指标) AC_fct	$ {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {\left\| {A{C_{i + 1}} - A{C_i}} \right\|} /m} $	裂缝与孔隙储层区分

裂缝类型	电阻率降低因子	时差增大因子	电阻率幅度差因子	自然电位因子
低角缝	0.27	0.060	0.004	0.070
斜交缝	0.29	0.004	0	0.080
高角缝	0.14	0.040	0.080	0.001
网状缝	0.44	0.190	0.020	0.030

地层	井号	井类型	总取样数/个	非裂缝样品符合数/个	裂缝样品符合数/个	符合率/%
须二上亚段	X5	建模井	1 239	1 023	143	94.1
	L150		982	875	76	96.8
	X501		2 056	1 853	96	94.8
	X601	盲井	1 702	1 190	370	91.8
	X11	盲井	988	898	43	95.2
须二中亚段	X3	建模井	1 694	1 357	122	87.3
	X5	建模井	1 158	881	164	90.2
	X11	盲井	1 873	1 743	30	94.7
	X501	盲井	1 063	783	168	89.5

[1]	Hui PAN, Yuqiang JIANG, Xun ZHU, Haibo DENG, Linke SONG, Zhanlei WANG, Miao LI, Yadong ZHOU, Linjie FENG, Yongliang YUAN, Meng WANG. Evaluation of geological sweet spots in fluvial tight sandstone gas： A case study of the first submember of the second member of the Jurassic Shaximiao Formation， central Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[2]	Jiangjun CAO, Jiping WANG, Daofeng ZHANG, Long WANG, Xiaotian LI, Ya LI, Yuanyuan ZHANG, Hui XIA, Zhanhai YU. Effects of diagenetic evolution on gas-bearing properties of deep tight sandstone reservoirs： A case study of reservoirs in the 1^st member of the Permian Shanxi Formation in the Qingyang gas field， southwestern Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 169-184.
[3]	Shuangjian LI, Zhi LI, Lei ZHANG, Yingqiang LI, Xianwu MENG, Haijun WANG. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration targets of the Triassic subsalt ultra-deep sequences in the western Sichuan Depression， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[4]	Jianhui ZENG, Yaxiong ZHANG, Zaizhen ZHANG, Juncheng QIAO, Maoyun WANG, Dongxia CHEN, Jingli YAO, Jingchen DING, Liang XIONG, Yazhou LIU, Weibo ZHAO, Kebo REN. Complex gas-water contacts in tight sandstone gas reservoirs： Distribution pattern and dominant factors controlling their formation and distribution [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[5]	Hongbo WANG, Cunfei MA, Zheng CAO, Zhipeng LI, Changcheng HAN, Wenming JI, Yi YANG. Differential diagenesis and reservoir physical property responses of tight sandstone based on lithofacies： A case study on the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in Moxizhuang area， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 976-992.
[6]	Hongqi YUAN, Xinyu DENG, Huiyao DU, Yinghua YU, Fengming XU. Characterizing the heterogeneity of tight sandstone in outcropped Permian Shanxi Formation， Liujiang Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 468-479.
[7]	Chenglin Liu, Xinju Liu, Hongjun Zhang, Liyong Fan, Xiya Yang, Qibiao Zang, Bo Dai, Yue Meng, Hongliang Huo, Fang Wang. Application of an integrated geology-reservoir engineering approach to shale oil development in Ansai area， Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1238-1248.
[8]	Ziliang Liu, Minghe Zhang, Sibing Liu, Junjie Wang, Jingyu Hao, Yicai Chen, Yue Zhou. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the Carboniferous Simen Formation at the southern margin of Xuefeng Mountain， Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 902-916.
[9]	Guangyuan Sun, Zhelin Wang, Peigang Liu, Zhiqiang Zhang. Dissolved micro-pores in alkali feldspar and their contribution to improved properties of tight sandstone reservoirs： A case study from Triassic Chang-6³ sub-member， Huaqing area， Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 658-669.
[10]	Chengpeng Su, Ying He, Xiaobo Song, Bo Dong, Xiaoqi Wu. Reinterpretation of gas sources in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Western Sichuan gas field， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 341-352.
[11]	Xiaoqi Wu, Yingbin Chen, Changbo Zhai, Lingfang Zhou, Xiaojin Zhou, Jun Yang, Yanqing Wang, Xiaobo Song. Geochemical characteristics of bitumen and tracing of gas source in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation， Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 407-418.
[12]	Juan Zhang, Min Yang, Runcheng Xie, Ming Wang, Hong Wang, Ziwei Luo. Probability-constrained identification of Ordovician small-scale fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Blocks 4-6， Tahe Oilfield， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 219-228.
[13]	Zhaobing Chen, Zhenyu Zhao, Ling Fu, Jianrong Gao, Wei Song, Xinjing Chen. Interstitial matter and its impact on reservoir development in Chang 6 deepwater tight sandstone in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1098-1111.
[14]	Yufeng Gu, Daoyong Zhang, Zhidong Bao. Lithology identification in tight sandstone reservoirs using CRBM-PSO-XGBoost [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1210-1222.
[15]	Hongde Chen, Lei Liu, Liangbiao Lin, Xinglong Wang, Zhiwei Wang, Yu Yu, Jian Zeng, Pengwei Li. Depositional responses of Xujiahe Formation to the uplifting ofLongmenshan during the Late Triassic, Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 801-815.

Characteristics and application effect of logging-based fracture identification in tight sandstones: A case study of the Upper Triassic Xu 2 Member in Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 39

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics