高含水期大孔道渗流特征及定量描述方法

doi:10.11743/ogg20180421

Abstract

Abstract: The identification and quantitative description of large pore pathways are of great significance to improve the measures of oil recovery at high water cut stages.Since the large pore pathways,usually developed in unconsolidated sandstone oil reservoirs at high water cut stage under the long-term injected waterscouring,can cause ineffective water cycle,and compromise the effect of water injection on recovery enhancement.Thus the study analyzed the seepage characteristics of high-velocity non-Darcy flow in the large pore pathways,to set up diagnostic criteria for large pore pathways according to the standards used to identify the high-velocity non-Darcy flow,and established an oil reservoir simulation system based on permeability,which changes with the pore volume expansion during scouring through water injection.And a quantitative description of the large pore pathways was given.Finally,the Ng6³⁺⁴ development unit in the upper member of the west Gudong oilfield was selected for reservoir simulation to identify large pore pathways and to carry out the quantitative description of the pathways.The results show that the proportion of large pore pathways,mainly distributed around the injectors or between injectors and producers,is relatively small in the simulated reservoir.In conclusion,the diagnostic criteria of large pore pathways,taking into account of the injector-producer spacing,injection-production pressure difference and permeability,can be effectively applied to the oil reservoir simulation system and the resultant quantitative description of the large pore pathways is accurate.

Key words: high water cut stage, high-velocity non-Darcy flow, identification of large pore pathways, oil reservoir simulation, EOR, Gudong oilfield

CLC Number:

TE327

Wu Zhongwei, Cui Chuanzhi, Yang Yong, Huang Yingsong, Liu Zhihong. Seepage characteristics and quantitative description of large pore pathways at high water cut stage[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 839-844.

References

[1] 曾流芳,赵国景,张子海,等.疏松砂岩油藏大孔道形成机理及判别方法[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2002,10(3):268-276. Zeng Liufang,Zhao Guojing,Zhang Zihai,et al.The macroscopic throats forming mechanism of unsoldered sand-reservoir and their identifying method[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2002,10(3):268-276.
[2] 胡书勇,张烈辉,罗建新,等.砂岩油藏大孔道的研究——回顾与展望[J].特种油气藏,2006,13(6):10-14. Hu Shuyong,Zhang Liehui,Luo Jianxin.Study on large pore path in sandstone reservoirs-review and prospect[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoir,2006,13(6):11-14.
[3] 毛振强,谷建伟,董平志.疏松砂岩油藏大孔道形成机理与预测[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(01):77-79. Mao Zhengqiang,Gu Jianwei,Dong pingzhi.Study on occurrence mechanism and prediction of big channels in loose cemented sandstone reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(1):77-80.
[4] 王学忠.孤东油田高含水期井间大孔道特征研究[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(1):101-105. Wang Xuezhong.High-capacity channel features of the high water-cut stage in the Gudong oilfield[J].West China Petroleum Geoscience,2006,2(1),101-105.
[5] 曾流芳,陈柏平,王学忠.疏松砂岩油藏大孔道定量描述初步研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(4):53-55. Zeng Liufang,Chen Baiping,Wang Xuezhong.Preliminary study on quantitative description of high capacity channel in loose sandstone reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2002,9(4):53-55.
[6] 崔传智,杨勇,曹刚,等.疏松砂岩油藏大孔道中高速非达西渗流对产能的影响[J].石油天然气学报,2009,31(13):122-125. Cui Chuanzhi,Yang Yong,Cao Gang,et al.Effect of high velocity non-darcy on productivity in wormhole of unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2009,31(3):122-127.
[7] 顾文欢,刘月田,杨宝泉,等.大孔道内流体流动规律的物理模拟实验[J].科技导报,2014,32(36):75-79. Gu Wenhuan,Liu Yuetian,Yang Baoquan,et al.Fluid flow mechanism in large pore paths investigated using physical simulation[J].Science & Technology Review,2014,32(36):75-79.
[8] 张贤松.水驱油藏特高含水期非线性渗流产生条件[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,(2):90-93. Zhang Songxian.Generating condition of non-linear flow in water-flooding reservoir atultra-high water cut stage[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2009,33(2):90-93.
[9] 刘红岐,李宝莹,王万福,等.锦16区块储层及优势通道特征分析[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,36(6):60-68. Liu Hongqi,Li Baoying,Wang Wanfu,et al.Characteristics analysis of the reservoir and predominate channel in Block Jin-16[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2014,36(6):60-68.
[10] 宋子齐,赵磊,王瑞飞,等.利用常规测井方法识别划分水淹层[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2003,18(6):50-53. Song Ziqi,Zhao Lei,Wang Ruifei,et al.Recognizing watered-out zones by using traditional well logs[J].Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute(Natural Science Edition),2003,18(6):50-54.
[11] C Naides,Petrobras Energía and M.Paris,et al.Identification of water-bearing layers with resistivity image logs[J],SPE94962,2005.
[12] 刘淑芬,梁继德.试井技术识别无效注采水循环通道方法探讨[J].油气井测试,2004,13(1):27-30. Liu Shufen,Liang Jide.Discussion for an approach to specifying injection and recovery cyclic channel by well testing technology[J].Well Testing,2004,13(1):27-30.
[13] 杨士荣.用试井方法确定注水后地层渗透率的变化[J].油气井测试,2005,14(6):28-30. Yang Shirong.Determining Change of formation permeability after injec-tion water by testing method[J].Well Testing,2005,14(6):28-30.
[14] Maghsood A D,Brigham W E.Analysis of well-to-well tracer flow to reservoir layering[J].Society of petroleum engineering of AIME,1984.1753-1762.
[15] Brigham W E,Simith D H.Prediction of tracer behavior in five-spot flow[J].Society of petroleum engineering of AIME,1965.103-109.
[16] 刘月田,孙保利.大孔道模糊识别与定量计算方法[J].石油钻采工艺,2003,25(5):54-59. Liu Yuetian,Sun Baoli.Fuzzy identification and quantative calculation method for big pore throat[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2003,25(5):54-59.
[17] 姜汉桥,刘奋,洪光明.用概率模型方法确定卞东油田高渗通道地质参数的研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1997,24(1):55-58. Jiang Hanqiao,Liu Fen,Hong Guangming.Parameter determination for high permeable channels in BianDong oil field by probability model[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1997,24(1):55-58.
[18] 商志英,万新德,何长虹,等.应用水力探测方法确定储层大孔道及剩余油分布状况的研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(2):30-32. Shang Zhiying,Wang Dexin,He Changhong,et al.Study on high permeability channel and remaining oil distribution by using hydraulic detection method[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2004,23(2):30-33.
[19] 尹文军,陈永生,王华,等.水力探测大孔道及剩余油饱和度解释模型的建立[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(1):63-65. Yin Wenjun,Chen Yongsheng,Wang Hua,et al.Building of the interpretation model of the large channels and remaining oil saturation by hydraulic survey[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2005,12(1):63-65.
[20] Huang Haiying,Joseph Adib Ayoub.Applicability of the Forchheimer equation for non-Darcy flow in porous media[J].SPE102715,2006.
[21] 葛家理,宁正福,刘月田,等.现代油藏渗流力学原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:26-31. Ge Jiali,Ning Zhengfu,Liu Yuetian,et al.Modern oil seepage mechanics principle[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2001:26-31.
[22] 王晓东.渗流力学基础[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006:19-20. Wang Xiaodong.Foundation of seepage mechanics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2006:19-20.
[23] 张建国,雷光伦,张艳玉.油气层渗流力学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:11-13. Zhang Jiangguo,Lei Guanglun,Zhang Yanyu.Oil and gas seepage flow mechanics[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2006:11-13.
[24] J Geertsma.Estimating the coefficient of inertial resistance in fluid flow through porous media[J].SPE4706,1974.
[25] Belhaj H A,Agha K R,Nouri A M,et al.Numerical Simulation of Non-Darcy Flow Utilizing the New Forchheimer's Diffusivity Equation[C]//SPE81499 was presented in Middle East Oil Show & Conference.2003.
[26] 吴素英.长期注水冲刷储层参数变化规律及对开发效果的影响[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(04):35-37. Wu Suying.Changesof reservoir parameters in long-term water injection scouring and its influence on development effect[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2006,25(04):35-37.
[27] 赵寿元.注水开发储层物性参数变化数值模拟研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2009. Zhao Shouyuan.Research of numerical simulation on the change of reservoir parameter during flood development[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2009.
[28] 李爱芬.油层物理学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2001:312-315. Li Aifen.Reservoir physics[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2001:312-315.
[29] 周建林,杨少春,郭玉新.胜坨油田三角洲储层岩石物理特征[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2002,26(2):15-18. Zhou Jianlin,Yang Shaochun,Guo Yuxin.Petrophysical characteristics of rock in delta reservoir of Shengtuo Oilfield[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2002,26(2):15-18.
[30] 崔传智,耿正玲,王延忠,等.水驱油藏高含水期渗透率的动态分布计算模型及应用[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(4):118-122. Cui Chuanzhi,Geng Zhengling,Wang Yanzhong,et al.Calculation model of dynamic permeability distribution and its application to water drive reservoir at high water cut stage[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2012,36(4):118-122.

Seepage characteristics and quantitative description of large pore pathways at high water cut stage

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Huanquan SUN, Yong YANG, Jichao FANG, Zheyuan FAN, Guanghuan WU, Fuqing YUAN, Yuanliang YANG, Yongchao WU. Technological synergy for enhancing hydrocarbon recovery and its applications [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 600-608.
[2]	Zhe ZHAO, Bin BAI, Chang LIU, Lan WANG, Haiyan ZHOU, Yuxi LIU. Current status， advances， and prospects of CNPC’s exploration of onshore moderately to highly mature shale oil reservoirs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 327-340.
[3]	Bingyu Ji, Songqing Zheng, Hao Gu. On the development technology of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs：A case study on Tahe oilfield and Shunbei oil and gas field [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1459-1465.
[4]	Li Zhang. Progress and research direction of EOR technology in eastern mature oilfields of Sinopec [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 717-723.
[5]	Guohui Chen, Shu Jiang, Chun Li, Sisi Li, Peng Peng, Lan Mo, Yuying Zhang, Luchuan Zhang, Tianyu Zhang. Progress in shale reservoir upgrading through in-situ heating [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 286-296.
[6]	Jianzhong Wang, Xiankun Song, Yingchao Fu, Lianting Sun, Jinjie Xu. Time-varying permeability of sandstone reservoirs under waterflooding of different water quality [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1234-1242.
[7]	Meijun Li, Xiaoqiang Liu, Qiuya Han, Hong Xiao, Ronghui Fang, Daxiang He, Zhiwei Gao. Progress of molecular simulation application research in petroleum geochemistry [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 919-930.
[8]	Yi Tu, Zhenghe Yan, Jianwen Dai, Yahui Wang, YiDong Zhu, Yong Yang, Jiao Yang, Weifeng Wang. New understanding and tapping effect of remaining oil reservoirs in Xijiang oilfield, PRBM, South China Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(2): 522-532.
[9]	Bingyu Ji, Youqi Wang, Li Zhang. Research on overall recovery rate variations of dynamically changing OOIP [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6): 1257-1262.
[10]	Zhijiang Kang, Yang Li, Bingyu Ji, Yun Zhang. Key technologies for EOR in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 434-441.
[11]	Shi Juye, Jin Zhijun, Liu Quanyou, Huang Zhenkai, Zhang Rui. Quantitative classification of high-frequency sequences in fine-grained lacustrine sedimentary rocks based on Milankovitch theory [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1205-1214.
[12]	Zhao Qingmin, Lun Zengmin, Zhang Xiaoqing, Lang Dongjiang, Wang Haitao. Mechanism of shale oil mobilization under CO₂ injection [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1333-1338.
[13]	Liu Yukun, He Sheng, He Zhiliang, Zhang Dianwei, Li Tianyi, Wang Xiaolong, Guo Xiaowen. The rock physics modeling experiment under overpressure and theoretical model for overpressure prediction in carbonate rocks [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 716-724.
[14]	Hu Bo. Advances in numerical simulation technology of chemical flooding in high temperature and high salinity reservoir [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6): 1305-1310.
[15]	Liu Fang, Liu Xingquan, Liu Zongbao, Guan Xianli, Zhang Yunfeng, Liu Yunyan. Hydrocarbon accumulation analysis of tight sandstone based on reservoir architecture theory-A case from Putaohua reservoir in the Gulong syncline,Songliao Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2): 268-278.