水驱砂岩油藏在不同水质下的渗透率时变特征

doi:10.11743/ogg20210520

Abstract

Abstract:

Water injection may lead to a chronical reduction of reservoir permeability due to the blockage of formation pores by suspended solid particles, oil, bacteria, and other impurities in the injected water.For fields under water flooding for quite a long time, it is not wise to continue sticking to the water quality determined on originally measured formation permeability.This study investigates possible formation damage caused by water injection through laboratory experiments on sandstone cores of different permeability from wells with long water injection history according to 5 different standards of water quality(SY/T 5329-2012), and put forward a concept of water quality-sensitive permeability.And through theoretical derivation, a mathematical expression describing the attenuation law of permeability is established to describe changing sandstone reservoir permeability with time during injection of water of different qualities.The criteria for water and reservoir selection are determined for better decision making on injection water quality for high water-cut wells.It provides a theoretical basis for achieving better performance of wells with long-time water flooding through water quality adjustment.

Key words: waterflooding, water injcetion history, permeability retention, water quality-sensitivity, formation damage simulation, waterflooding, sandstone reservoirs, Gudong Oilfield

CLC Number:

TE341

Jianzhong Wang, Xiankun Song, Yingchao Fu, Lianting Sun, Jinjie Xu. Time-varying permeability of sandstone reservoirs under waterflooding of different water quality[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1234-1242.

Figures/Tables 14

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Table 3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 4

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 18

1	Liu Zhongquan , Shi Bingbing , Ge Tianchen , et al. Tight sandstone reservoir sensitivity and damage mechanism analysis: A case study from Ordos Basin, China and implications for reservoir damage prevention[J]. Energy Geoscience, doi: 10.1016/j.engeos.2021.05.001
2	赵向原, 吕文雅, 王策, 等. 低渗透砂岩油藏注水诱导裂缝发育的主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田W区长6油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (03): 586- 595. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200314
	Zhao Xiangyuan , Lyu Wenya , Wang Ce , et al. Major factors controlling waterflooding-induced fracture development in low-permeability reservoirs-A case study of Chang 6 reservoir in W block in Ansaioilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (3): 586- 595. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200314
3	李明忠, 秦积舜, 郑连英. 注水水质造成油层损害的评价技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2002, (03): 40- 43+84.
	Li Mingzhong , Qin Jishun , Zheng Lianying . Evaluation technology of formation damage caused by the quality of flooding water[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2002, 24 (3): 40- 43.
4	李承龙, 苗志国, 李照永, 等. 大庆长垣外围特低渗透油藏开发效果综合评价方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26 (4): 97- 102.
	Li Chenglong , Miao Zhiguo , Li Zhaoyong , et al. A new comprehensive evaluation of development performance for the peripheral ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs in Changyuan of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26 (4): 97- 102.
5	张光明, 汤子余, 姚红星, 等. 注入水水质对地层的伤害[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2004, 26 (3): 46- 48.
	Zhang Guangming , Tang Ziyu , Yao Hongxing , et al. Formation damage caused by injection water[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2004, 26 (3): 46- 48.
6	李军. 注水水质对储层渗流物性的影响研究(实验研究新理论与水质标准研究)[D]. 成都: 西南石油学院, 2003.
	Li Jun. Study on the influence of water injection quality on reservoir seepage physical properties (experimental research, new theory and water quality standard)[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2003
7	张琰. 储层伤害室内评价方法的研究[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 1999, 24 (2): 211- 215.
	Zhang Yan . Study on indoor evaluation method of reservoir damage[J]. Geoscience: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1999, 24 (2): 211- 215.
8	李欢, 王小琳, 任志鹏, 等. 注入水水质对姬塬长8油藏地层伤害的影响研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2012, 20 (24): 6003- 6007.
	Li Huan , Wang Xiaolin , Ren Zhipeng , et al. Impact of injected water quality on formation damage of Chang 8 reservoir in Jiyuan[J]. Science, Technology and Engineering, 2012, 20 (24): 6003- 6007.
9	王永清, 李海涛, 祝渝培, 等. 注入水中乳化油滴对地层伤害的实验研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2003, 25 (1): 43- 46.
	Wang Yongqing , Li Haitao , Zhu Yupei , et al. Experimental study on formation damage caused by emulsifiedoil droplets in injected water[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2003, 25 (1): 43- 46.
10	崔传智, 刘力军, 李志涛, 等. 高凝油藏中蜡沉积对开发效果的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41 (03): 98- 104.
	Cui Chuanzhi , Liu Lijun , Li Zhitao , et al. Influence of wax deposition in high pour point reservoir on development effect[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41 (03): 98- 104.
11	敬豪, 张广东, 孙大龙, 等. 注水倍数对储层微观孔隙结构影响实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42 (6): 1041- 1046.
	Jing Hao , Zhang Guangdong , Sun Dalong , et al. The influence of water flooding multiples on reservoir micro pore structure[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42 (6): 1041- 1046.
12	Rochon J, Creusot M R, Rivet P, et al. Water quality forwater injection wells[C]//RS Hanson. SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium. Louisiana: Society of Petroleum Engineering, 1996: 489-503.
13	Basan P B. Formation damage index number: A model for the evaluation of fluid sensitivity in shaly sandstones[C]//C Oberwinkler. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Louisiana: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1985: 143-153.
14	Zhang N S, Somerville J M, Todd A C. An experimental investigation of the formation damage caused by produced oily water injection[C]//Dixon T J. SPE Offshore Europe Louisiana: Society of Petroleum Engineering, 1993: 265-274.
15	Bansal K M, Caudle D D. A new approach for injection water quality[C]//Vinegar H, Tutunjian P. The 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Louisiana: Society of Petroleum Engineering. 1992: 383-396.
16	Van Oort E , Van Velzen J F G , Leerlooijer K . Impairment by suspended solids invasion: testing and prediction[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 1993, 8 (03): 178- 184.
17	Amanat Ali Bhatti , Atif Ismail , Arshad Raza , et al. Permeability prediction using hydraulic flow units and electrofacies analysis[J]. Energy Geoscience, 2020, 1 (1-2): 81- 91. doi: 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.04.003
18	Xia Dongling , Wu Yue , Zou Min , et al. Quality characterization of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Yanchang Formation of the Honghe oilfield, Ordos Basin, central China[J]. Energy Geoscience, doi: 10.1016/j.engeos.2021.07.001

序号	因素	特征
1	水敏、盐敏、速敏和应力敏感	与地层岩石不配伍引起敏感性粘土矿物膨胀、分散、微粒运移和操作不平稳引起的应力敏感伤害
2	结垢	与地层流体不配伍引起结垢堵塞地层
3	微生物和系统腐蚀产物	孔喉堵塞
4	悬浮固相	粒径和含量共同作用引起堵塞
5	含油量	油珠液锁、堵塞及降低水相渗流能力
6	微生物	直接参与或加剧腐蚀，如硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)

水质等级	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅴ
注入层平均空气渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	< 10	10~50	50~500	500~1 500	>1 500
悬浮固体含量/(mg·L^-1)	≤1.0	≤2.0	≤5.0	≤10.0	≤30.0
含油量/(mg·L^-1)	≤5.0	≤6.0	≤15.0	≤30.0	≤50.0

岩心气测渗透率	(K_g)=213.91×10^-3 μm²
无因次注入量(Qi)	5	10	20	50	100	150	200
岩心渗透率保留率(K/K₀)	0.971	0.958	0.851	0.708	0.591	0.443	0.312

地层渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	θ/10^-3
地层渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	Ⅰ级水质	Ⅱ级水质	Ⅲ级水质	Ⅳ级水质	Ⅴ级水质
1 500~2 000	1.2~2.3	1.6~3.1	2.4~3.8	3.7~5.3	5.3~6.7
500~1 500	2.3~4.5	3.1~5.9	3.8~6.6	5.3~8.5	6.7~9.5
50~500	4.5~5.2	5.9~7.8	6.6~9.2	8.5~9.4	9.5~11.7
10~50	5.2~11.9	7.8~13.2	9.2~13.9	9.4~14.8	11.7~16.7
1~10	11.9~13.4	13.2~14.4	13.9~15.0	14.8~16.0	16.7~17.9

[1]	Zhao Xiangyuan, Lyu Wenya, Wang Ce, Zhu Shengju, Fan Jianming. Major factors controlling waterflooding-induced fracture development in low-permeability reservoirs—A case study of Chang 6 reservoir in W block in Ansai oilfield,Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(3): 586-595.
[2]	Wang Wenhuan, Peng Huanhuan, Li Guangquan, Yu Tao, Wei Chenji. Waterflooding and optimum displacement pattern for ultra-low permeability reservoirs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(1): 182-189.
[3]	Zhao Xiangyuan, Zeng Lianbo, Jin Baoguang, Wang Ce, Li Shujun. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of waterflood induced fractures in low-permeability reservoirs: A case study from Chang 6 reservoir in Ansai oilfield,Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 696-705.
[4]	Wu Zhongwei, Cui Chuanzhi, Yang Yong, Huang Yingsong, Liu Zhihong. Seepage characteristics and quantitative description of large pore pathways at high water cut stage [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 839-844.
[5]	Gao Dapeng, Ye Jigen, Li Qi, Shi Chengfang, Hu Yunpeng, Hou Shaoji, Ji Shuhong, Huang Lei. An independent development method of low permeability oil thin layers with extreme high water cut in Changyuan Structure, Daqing oilfield [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(1): 181-188.
[6]	Ji Bingyu. Progress and prospects of enhanced oil recovery technologies at home and abroad [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(1): 111-117.
[7]	Quan Honghui, Zhu Yushuang, Zhang Hongjun, Li Li, Shao Fei, Zhang Zhang. Reservoir pore structure and micro-flow characteristics of waterflooding: a case study from Chang-6 reservoir of Wangyao block in Ansai oilfield [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(6): 952-960.
[8]	Zhou Weidong, Liu Zhenkun, Yue Dali, Zhou Yinbang, Zhong Xinxin. An analysis of point bar configuration of the Neogene Guantao Formation in the middle unit of Block 7 in Gudong oilfield, the Jiyang Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(1): 126-134.
[9]	Ran Qiyou, Zhao Qingfei, Fang Kaipu, Zhao Xiaojun. Calculation methods of remaining economic recoverable reserves in waterflooding oilfields [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(3): 379-383.
[10]	Chen Depo, Wang Yanzhong, Liu Shicheng, Yang Renjin. Reservoir heterogeneity and distribution of remaining oil in upper Guantao Formation in 7^th block west,Gudong oilfield [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004, 25(5): 539-543,581.
[11]	Zhang Li, Yang Yajuan, Yue Leping, Miao Kun, Song Shemin, Zhang Manku. CHARACTERISTICS OF MICRO-FRACTURES AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON WATERFLOODING IN AERSHAN RESERVOIR, HANAN OILFIELD [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(2): 158-160,193.

Time-varying permeability of sandstone reservoirs under waterflooding of different water quality

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 18

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics