陆相页岩油储层微观孔喉结构表征与含油性分级评价

doi:10.11743/ogg20220112

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of the diverse types of shale oil reservoirs and great difficulty in sweet-spot prediction in the Lucaogou Formation， analysis on the mechanism influencing shale oil pore development and evaluation on oil-bearing properties， are supposed to be carried out. To this end， this study focuses on the microscopic pore structure of shale oil reservoirs in the Permian Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag， through an integration of core observation， scanning electron microscopy （SEM）， mercury intrusion porosimetry （MIP） and nuclear magnetic resonance （NMR）， etc. As a result， the influential mechanism is disclosed and classification criteria for reservoir evaluation are set up. The results show that there are five types of reservoirs developed in the Lucaogou Formation： reservoirs of intergranular pore type， of intergranular-dissolved-intercrystalline pore type， of dissolved pore type， of dissolved-intercrystalline pore type and of intercrystalline pore type. Among others， reservoirs of intergranular pore type and dissolved pore type are the best in terms of physical property and mobility， and those of intergranular pore type are the worst. Second， larger amount of coarser grains， proper dolomite content and low level of cement， serve to jointly determine the formation of high-quality reservoirs， the distribution of which is controlled by near distance to provenance， high-energy environment and paleo-sag. Third， the oil-bearing property of source-reservoir alternating or integrated source-reservoir configurations is better than that of near-source thick reservoir type， with a pore throat of 15 nm and 70 nm as a boundary to determine whether the Lucaogou Formation contains oil and whether the reservoir has good oil-bearing property， respectively. Fourth， as guided by the correlation between pore throat structure and oil-bearing property， three types of oil layers （i.e.， Class Ⅰ， Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ） are identified. The second interval of the first member of Lucaogou Formation （Lu 1 Member） is characterized by well-developed reservoirs of high quality， good source-reservoir configuration， and large-scale distribution of sweet spots within. The research results are of a geological basis for the classification， evaluation and prediction of shale oil reservoirs in the Lucaogou Formation.

Key words: microscopic pore structure, mechanism affecting pore development, oil layer classification, shale oil reservoir, Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Linsheng Wang, Yiping Ye, Jianhua Qin, Yang Gao, Yuan Deng, Yingyan Li, Dianshi Xiao. Microscopic pore structure characterization and oil-bearing property evaluation of lacustrine shale reservoir： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 149-160.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 27

1	匡立春，唐勇，雷德文，等.准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力［J］.石油勘探与开发，2012，39（6）：657-667.
	Kuang Lichun， Tang Yong， Lei Dewen， et al. Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock， Junggar Basin， NW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2012，39（6）：657-667.
2	马克，侯加根，刘钰铭，等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组咸化湖混合沉积模式［J］.石油学报，2017，38（6）：636-648.
	Ma Ke， Hou Jiagen， Liu Yuming， et al. The sedimentary model of saline lacustrine mixed sedimentation in Permian Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica，2017，38（6）：636-648.
3	金之钧，白振瑞，高波，等.中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗？［J］.石油与天然气地质，2019，40（3）：451-458.
	Jin Zhijun， Bai Zhenrui， Gao Bo，et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution？［J］.Oil & Gas Geology，2019，40（3）：451-458.
4	张方，高阳，彭寿昌，等.湖相混积岩碳酸盐组分成岩作用及其孔隙结构特征——以新疆吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例［J］.断块油气田，2020，27（5）：567-572.
	Zhang Fang， Gao Yang， Peng Shouchang，et al.Diagenesis and pore structure characteristics of carbonate component of lacustrine mixed rocks： A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag，Xinjiang［J］.Fault⁃Block Oil and Gas Field，2020，27（5）：567-572.
5	宋永，周路，郭旭光，等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组湖相云质致密油储层特征与分布规律［J］. 岩石学报，2017，33（4）：1159-1170.
	Song Yong， Zhou Lu， Guo Xuguang， et al. Characteristics and occurrence of lacustrine dolomitic tight-oilreservoir in the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation，Jimusaer Sag，southeastern Junggar Basin［J］. Acta Petrologica Sinica，2017，33（ 4）： 1159-1170
6	王成云，匡立春，高岗，等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组泥质岩类生烃潜力差异性分析［J］. 沉积学报，2014，32（2）：385-390.
	Wang Chengyun， Kuang Lichun， Gao Gang， et al. Difference in hydrocarbon generation potiential of the shaly source rocks in Jimsar Sag， Permian Lucaogou Formation［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica，2014，32（2）：385-390.
7	王璟明，肖佃师，卢双舫，等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩储层物性分级评价［J］.中国矿业大学学报，2020，49（1）：172-183.
	Wang Jingming， Xiao Dianshi， Lu Shuangfang， et al. Classification evaluation of shale oil reservoir physical properties in Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag［J］. Journal of China University of Mini⁃ng & Technology， 2020，49（1）：172-183.
8	柳波，石佳欣，付晓飞，等.陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件——以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例［J］.石油勘探与开发，2018，45（5）：828-838.
	Liu Bo， Shi Jiaxin， Fu Xiaofei， et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine⁃grained sedimentary system： A case study of organic⁃rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag， Songliao Basin， NE China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2018，45（5）：828-838.
9	徐雄飞，于祥春，卿忠，等.三塘湖盆地芦草沟组岩相特征及其与页岩油藏的关系［J］.新疆石油地质，2020，41（6）：677-684.
	Xu Xiongfei， Yu Xiangchun， Zhong Qing，et al. Lithofacies characteristics and its relationship with shale oil reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in Santanghu Basin［J］. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2020，41（6）：677-684.
10	王伟，赵延伟，毛锐，等.页岩油储层核磁有效孔隙度起算时间的确定——以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层为例［J］.石油与天然气地质，2019，40（3）：550-557.
	Wang Wei， Zhao Yanwei， Mao Rui， et al. Determination of the starting time for measurement of NMR effective porosity in shale oil reservoir： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou shale oil reservoir， Jimusaer Sag［J］. Oil & Gas Geology，2019，40（3）：550-557.
11	Xiao D S， Jiang S， Thul D， et al. Combining rate⁃controlled porosimetry and NMR to probe full⁃range pore throat structures and their evolution features in tight sands： A case study in the Songliao Basin， China［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology，2017，83：111-123
12	Yao Y B， Liu D M. Comparison of low⁃field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distribution of coals［J］. Fuel，2012，95：152-158.
13	闫建平，温丹妮，李尊芝，等.基于核磁共振测井的低渗透砂岩孔隙结构定量评价方法——以东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段为例［J］. 地球物理学报，2016，59（4）：1543-1552.
	Yan Jianping， Wen Danni， Li Zunzhi， et al. The quantitative evaluation method of low permeable sandstone pore structure ba⁃sed on nuclear magnetic resonance （NMR） logging［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics，2016，59（4）：1543-1552.
14	韩成，陈旋，陈杰，等.三塘湖盆地芦草沟组页岩油测井评价技术进展［J］.新疆石油地质，2020，41（6）：740-747.
	Han Cheng， Chen Xuan， Chen Jie，et al. Progress of well logging evaluation techniques for shale oil of Lucaogou Formation in Santanghu Basin［J］. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2020，41（6）：740-747.
15	Washburn E W. The dynamic of capillary flow［J］. Physical Review，1921，17：273.
16	李书琴，印森林，高阳，等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组混合细粒岩沉积微相［J］.天然气地球科学，2020，31（2）：235-249.
	Li Shuqin， Yin Senlin， Gao Yang， et al. Study on sedimentary microfacies of mixed fine⁃grained rocks in Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience，2020，31（2）：235-249.
17	支东明，唐勇，杨智峰，等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理［J］.石油与天然气地质，2019，40（3）：524-534.
	Zhi Dongming， Tang Yong， Yang Zhifeng， et al. Geological chara⁃cteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag， Junggar Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology，2019，40（3）：524-534.
18	马明伟，祝健，李嘉成，等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油储集层渗吸规律［J］.新疆石油地质，2021，42（6）：702-708.
	Ma Mingwei， Zhu Jian， Li Jiacheng，et al. Imbibition law of shale oil reservoirs in the Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag［J］.Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2021，42（6）：702-708.
19	王剑，周路，靳军，等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油储层孔隙结构、烃类赋存及其与可动性关系［J］. 石油实验地质， 2021， 43（6）： 941-948.
	Wang Jian， Zhou Lu， Jin Jun，et al.Pore structure，hydrocarbon occurrence and their relationship with shale oil production in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag，Junggar Basin［J］.Petroleum Geology & Experiment，2021， 43（6）： 941-948.
20	Zhu R， Zou C， Zhang N，et al. Diagenetics fluids evolution and genetic mechanism of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Science in China Series D： Earth Sciences，2008，51（9）：1340-1353.
21	杨超，熊永强，张金川.中国不同沉积类型页岩生烃有机孔发育差异［J］. 地球化学，2019，48（6）：544-554.
	Yang Chao， Xiong Yongqiang， Zhang Jinchuan. Developmental differences of secondary organic pores among marine， lacustrine，and transitional shale in China［J］. Geochimica， 2019，48（6）：544-554.
22	肖佃师，卢双舫，房大志，等.海相高成熟页岩气储层孔隙连通关系——以彭水地区龙马溪组为例［J］.油气藏评价与开发，2019，9（5）：45-53.
	Xiao Dianshi， Lu Shuangfang， Fang Dazhi， et al. Pore connectivi⁃ty of marine high⁃maturity shale gas reservoirs： A case study in Longmaxi Formation， Pengshui area［J］.Reservoir Evaluation and Development，2019，9（5）：45-53.
23	董岩，肖佃师，彭寿昌，等. 页岩油层系储集层微观孔隙非均质性及控制因素——以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例［J］.矿物岩石地球化学通报，2021，40（1）：115-123.
	Dong Yan， Xiao Dianshi， Peng Shouchang， et al. Heterogeneity of microscopic pores in shale oil reservoir and its controlling factors： Taking the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimsar Sag as an exa⁃mple［J］. Bulletin of Mineralogy， Petrology and Geochemistry， 2021，40（1）：115-123.
24	马铨峥，杨胜来，杨龙，等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密储层微观孔隙特征［J］.大庆石油地质与开发，2020，39（6）：13-20.
	Ma Quanzheng， Yang Shenglai， Yang Long，et al.Characteristics of the micro⁃pore in Lucaogou⁃Formation tight reservoir of Jimsar Sag，Junggar Basin［J］.Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing，2020，39（6）：13-20.
25	葸克来，操应长，朱如凯，等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层岩石类型及特征［J］.石油学报，2015，36（12）：1495-1507.
	Xi Kelai， Cao Yingchang， Zhu Rukai， et al. Rock types and chara⁃cteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2015，36（12）：1495-1507.
26	曹元婷，潘晓慧，李菁，等. 关于吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油的思考［J］. 新疆石油地质，2020，41（5）：622-630.
	Cao Yuanting， Pan Xiaohui， Li Jing，et al. Discussion on shale oil in Jimsar Sag，Junggar Basin ［J］. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2020，41（5）：622-630.
27	Wilson L， Wilson M J， Green J， et al. The influence of clay mine⁃ralpgy on formation damage in north sea reservoir sandstones： A review with illustrative examples［J］. Earth Science Review，2014，134：70-80.

样品编号	含油级别	薄片鉴定岩性	孔隙度/%	渗透率/（10^-3 μm²）	孔喉组合类型	全岩矿物含量/ %					可动饱和度/ %
样品编号	含油级别	薄片鉴定岩性	孔隙度/%	渗透率/（10^-3 μm²）	孔喉组合类型	石英	长石	白云石	方解石	粘土	可动饱和度/ %
5?H	荧光	泥岩	5.5	0.577 0	E	28.6	53.5	1.5	1.2	15.2	20.50
13?H	荧光	白云质泥岩	6.9	0.055 9	E	—	—	—	—	—	13.83
17?H	荧光	白云质泥岩	6.1	0.009 4	E	20.6	32.7	40.8	0	5.7	17.54
3	荧光	泥晶白云岩	4.3	0.003 0	E	29.3	43.3	12.9	4.7	7.6	44.13
J43?95	油迹	灰质粉砂岩	5.6	0.008 5	D	9.4	49.7	1.5	36.3	3.1	22.69
13	油迹	含灰粉砂岩	5.1	0.011 9	D	14.1	53.2	6.5	21.2	3.3	36.89
10	油斑	泥岩	11.9	0.027 7	D	40.2	35.7	11.1	0	13.0	38.60
24	油斑	泥质粉砂岩	8.9	0.139 5	D	16.3	51.1	7.8	10.1	12.3	42.56
3?H	油斑	粉砂质泥岩	14.7	0.061 8	C	37.5	48.0	2.6	3.8	5.2	37.90
39	油浸	粉砂质白云岩	14.9	0.046 9	B	6.4	5.3	88.3	0	0	54.80
2?H	油浸	细粒粉砂岩	14.3	0.083 3	A	28.5	67.0	0	0	3.7	59.89
15?H	油浸	含灰泥质粉砂岩	9.4	0.019 7	B	21.0	56.7	0	18.7	3.1	43.24
9?H	富含油	云屑砂岩	14.0	0.289 0	A	12.0	74.2	2.4	9.8	1.6	70.20
32	富含油	细粒粉砂岩	15.6	0.107 5	C	22.1	59.2	5.1	0	6.4	69.80
10?H	富含油	云屑砂岩	13.7	0.275 0	A	12.0	73.2	2.4	9.8	1.6	69.15
12?H	富含油	砂屑云岩	14.6	1.320 0	A	4.5	29.2	40.4	24.2	1.7	77.32

[1]	Xiaoyu DU, Zhijun JIN, Lianbo ZENG, Guoping LIU, Sen YANG, Xinping LIANG, Guoqing LU. Evaluation of natural fracture effectiveness in deep lacustrine shale oil reservoirs based on formation microresistivity imaging logs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 852-865.
[2]	Hong PAN, Qingsen YU, Xiaoshan LI, Junqiang SONG, Zhibin JIANG, Li WANG, Guanxing LUO, Wenxiu XU, Haoyu YOU. Recognition of the Carboniferous strata in the Hongche fault zone， Junggar Basin and its hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 215-230.
[3]	Xuan CHEN, Xin TAO, Jianhua QIN, Changfu XU, Yingyan LI, Yuan DENG, Yang GAO, Taiju YIN. Hyperpycnal flow deposits of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Sag and its peripheries， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1530-1545.
[4]	Huimin LIU, Guanlong ZHANG, Jie FAN, Zhiping ZENG, Ruichao GUO, Yajun GONG. Exploration discoveries and implications of well Zheng 10 in the Zhengshacun area of the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1118-1128.
[5]	Yao ZHAO, Hong PAN, Feifei LUO, Liang LI, Danyang LI, Zongrui XIE, Donglian LU, Qin ZHANG. Characteristics and quality determinants of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in the Hongche Fault Zone， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1129-1140.
[6]	Ziyi WANG, Jinhua FU, Xianyang LIU, Shixiang LI, Changhu ZHANG, Xinping LIANG, Lin DONG. The influence of hydrothermal activities on shale oil reservoirs during the burial period of the Upper Triassic Chang 7 Member， Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 899-909.
[7]	Yong DENG, Caiwei FAN, Desheng HU, Weijun HE, Jianxin ZHANG. Heterogeneity of shale oil reservoirs in the E₂l^2（1） in Weixinan Sag， Beibu Gulf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 923-936.
[8]	Hongbo WANG, Cunfei MA, Zheng CAO, Zhipeng LI, Changcheng HAN, Wenming JI, Yi YANG. Differential diagenesis and reservoir physical property responses of tight sandstone based on lithofacies： A case study on the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in Moxizhuang area， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 976-992.
[9]	Jiaquan ZHOU, Yue WANG, Ziyi SONG, Jiting LIU, Sainan CHENG. Characterizing hydrothermal siliceous nodules to guide shale oil exploration in the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation， Bogda area， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 789-800.
[10]	Jing SUN, Xincai YOU, Jingjing XUE, Yuanting CAO, Qiusheng CHANG, Chao CHEN. Characteristics of abnormal pressure and its influence on deep and ultra-deep tight reservoirs in the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 350-365.
[11]	Jianzhong Li, Xiaojun Wang, Fan Yang, Yong Song, Ablimiti, Baoli Bian, Hailei Liu, Xueyong Wang, Deyu Gong. Hydrocarbon accumulation pattern and exploration prospect of the structural traps in lower play of the western Central Depression in the Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1059-1072.
[12]	Senlin Yin, Gongyang Chen, Changfu Xu, Xianyue Xiong, Jun Zhao, Ke Hu. Lithofacies architecture of lacustrine fine-grained mixed reservoirs and its control over sweet spot： A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation shale oil reservoir in the Jimsar Sag， Juggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1180-1193.
[13]	Ke Ma, Jiagen Hou, Hu Dong, Guoqiang Wu, Lin Yan, Liwei Zhang. Pore throat characteristics of fine-grained mixed deposits in shale oil reservoirs and their control on reservoir physical properties： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation， Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1194-1205.
[14]	Guowei Zheng, Zhiye Gao, Liliang Huang, Zhenxue Jiang, Wenjun He, Jiaqi Chang, Longfei Duan, Weihang Wei, Zhiwei Wang. Wettability of the Permian Fengcheng Formation shale in the Mahu Sag， Junggar Basin， and its main control factors [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1206-1220.
[15]	Yong Tang, Yong Song, Wenjun He, Long Zhao, Changyong Zhao, Menglin Zheng, Haibo Yang, Shuai Sun, Liying Fei. Characteristics of composite hydrocarbon accumulation in a superimposed basin， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 132-148.

Microscopic pore structure characterization and oil-bearing property evaluation of lacustrine shale reservoir： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics