珠江口盆地惠州26洼“源-汇-聚”特征与惠州26-6大油气田发现启示

doi:10.11743/ogg20220404

Abstract

Abstract:

In the Pearl River Mouth Basin， a majority of hydrocarbons were discovered in the Miocene-Oligocene reservoir rocks deposited during the depression stage， while only 8 % of the discovered hydrocarbons were found in the Eocene reservoir rocks formed during the rifting stage， and no commercial discoveries have been made in the Mesozoic buried hills. The main problems in exploration for the Paleogene reservoir rocks and Mesozoic buried hills include whether there are a quantity of hydrocarbons still preserved in the middle-to-deep downfaulted reservoir rocks of hydrocarbon-rich sags， whether the hydrocarbon migration pathways are effectively developed in the Paleogene reservoir rocks and Mesozoic buried hills， as well as whether the hydrocarbon accumulation dynamics， traps and reservoir-seal assemblages are well developed. In line with the assessment theory of “source-migration-accumulation”， the study discusses the static and dynamic elements of the hydrocarbon accumulation system in Huizhou 26 Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin， including the hydrocarbon source in terms of types and quality of source rocks， thermal evolution and hydrocarbon generation-expulsion history， and types and scale of hydrocarbon resources， the hydrocarbon migration in terms of migration unit and direction， migration pathway， confluence intensity， as well as the hydrocarbon accumulation in terms of secondary structural belt and trap， reservoir-seal assemblage， charging intensity and preservation condition. In conclusion， the study reveals the characteristics of source-migration-accumulation for the Paleogene reservoir rocks and Mesozoic buried hills in Huizhou 26 Sag， sets up a dynamic accumulation model featuring “accelerated maturation of oil-prone source rocks at later stages， generation of oil at first followed by gas， joint control of fault and overpressure， strong hydrocarbon supply by source-reservoir juxtaposition， and 3D migration and accumulation”. Major breakthrough has been made thereby in the exploration for the Paleogene reservoirs and Mesozoic buried hills in Huizhou 26-6 structure.

Key words: dynamic accumulation, source-migration-accumulation assessment, Mesozoic buried hill, Paleogene, Huizhou 26-6 oil/gas field, Huizhou 26 Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.3

Hesheng Shi, Yangdong Gao, Jun Liu, Junzhang Zhu, Zulie Long, Yuling Shi. Characteristics of hydrocarbon source-migration-accumulation in Huizhou 26 Sag and implications of the major Huizhou 26-6 discovery in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 777-791.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 37

1	施和生，朱俊章，姜正龙，等. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷油气资源再评价［J］. 中国海上油气，2009，1（1）： 9-14.
	Shi Hesheng， Zhu Junzhang， Jiang Zhenglong， et al. Hydrocarbon resources reassessment in ZhuⅠDepression， Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. China Offshore Oil and Gas， 2009，21（1）： 9-14.
2	彭光荣，张向涛，许新明，等. 南海北部珠江口盆地阳江凹陷油气勘探重要发现与认识［J］. 中国石油勘探，2019，24（3）：267-279.
	Peng Guangrong， Zhang Xiangtao， Xu Xinming， et al. Important discoveries and understandings of oil and gas exploration in Yang⁃jiang Sag of the Pearl River Mouth Basin， northern South China Sea［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2019，24（3）：267-279.
3	张强，吕福亮，贺晓苏，等. 南海近5年油气勘探进展与启示［J］. 中国石油勘探，2018，23（1）：54-61.
	Zhang Qiang， Fuliang Lyu， He Xiaosu， et al. Progress and en‑ lightenment of oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea in recent five years［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2018，23（1）：54-61.
4	张为彪，易浩，钟辉，等. 珠江口盆地东部地区预探井失利原因分析及启示［J］. 中国石油勘探，2018，23（3）：18-27.
	Zhang Weibiao， Yi Hao， Zhong Hui， et al. Analysis on the causes of failed wildcat wells in the eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin and its enlightenment［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2018，23（3）：18-27.
5	陈长民，施和生，许仕策，等. 珠江口盆地（东部）第三系油气藏形成条件［M］. 北京：科学出版社，2003.
	Chen Changmin， Shi Hesheng， Xu Shice， et al. Tertiary hydrocarbon accumulation condition in Pearl River Mouth Basin［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2003.
6	施和生，代一丁，刘丽华，等. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷油气藏地质特征与分布发育基本模式［J］. 石油学报，2015，36（2）：120-132.
	Shi Hesheng， Dai Yiding， Liu Lihua， et al. Geological characte‑ ristics and distribution model of oil and gas reservoirs in Zhu Ⅰ Depression，Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2015，36（2）：120-132.
7	朱明，张向涛，黄玉平，等.珠江口盆地烃源岩特征及资源潜力［J］.石油学报，2019，40（S1）：53-68.
	Zhu Ming， Zhang Xiangtao， Huang Yuping， et al. Source rock characteristic and resource potential in Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2019，40（S1）：53-68.
8	朱明，代一丁，朱俊章，等．珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近系油藏地质特征及成藏机理［J］. 中国海上油气，2017，29（1）：1-11.
	Zhu Ming， Dai Yiding， Zhu Junzhang， et al. Geological characte‑ ristics and accumulation mechanism of Paleocene reservoir in Huizhou Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. China Offshore Oil and Gas， 2017，29（1）：1-11.
9	施和生，于水明，梅廉夫，等. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近纪幕式裂陷特征［J］. 天然气工业，2009，29（1）：1-5.
	Shi Hesheng， Yu Shuiming， Mei Lianfu， et al. Features of Paleogene episodic rifting in Huizhou fault Depression in the Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2009，29（1）：1-5.
10	杜家元，丁琳，张向涛，等. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷西南部新近系岩性油气藏勘探思路与关键技术［J］. 石油地质实验，2017，39（6）：858-863.
	Du Jiayuan， Ding Lin， Zhang Xiangtao， et al. Exploration approach and techniques for the Neogene lithological reservoirs in the southwestern Huizhou Depression，Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment， 2017，39（6）：858-863.
11	田立新，刘杰，张向涛，等．珠江口盆地惠州26-6大中型泛潜山油气田勘探发现及成藏模式［J］. 中国海上油气，2020，32（4）：1-11.
	Tian Lixin， Liu Jie， Zhang Xiangtao， et al. Discovery and accumulation pattern of HZ26-6 large‑medium sized pan‑buried hill and gas field in Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. China Offshore Oil and Gas， 2020，32（4）：1-11.
12	田立新，施和生，刘杰，等，珠江口盆地惠州凹陷新领域勘探重大发现及意义［J］.中国石油勘探，2020，25（4）：22-30.
	Tian Lixin， Shi Hesheng， Liu Jie， et al. Significant discovery and significance of new frontier exploration in Huizhou Depression of the Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. China Petroleum Exploration，2020，25（4）：22-30.
13	施和生，舒誉，杜家元，等．珠江口盆地古近系石油地质［M］. 北京：地质出版社，2017.
	Shi Hesheng， Shu Yu， Du Jiayuan，et al. Petroleum geology of Paleogene in Pearl River Mouth Basin［M］. Beijing： Geological Publishing House， 2017.
14	施和生. 论油气资源不均匀分布与分带差异富集：以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷为例［J］. 中国海上油气，2013，25（5）：1-8.
	Shi Hesheng. On heterogeneous distribution and differential enrichment by zones of hydrocarbon resources： A case in ZhuⅠDepression，Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. China Offshore Oil and Gas， 2013，25（5）：1-8.
15	施和生. 油气勘探“源-汇-聚“评价体系及其应用——以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷为例［J］. 中国海上油气，2015，27（5）：1-12.
	Shi Hesheng.“Source‑migration‑accumulation”evaluation system and its application in hydrocarbon exploration： A case study of ZhuⅠDepression in Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. China Offshore Oil and Gas， 2015，27（5）：1-12.
16	舒誉，施和生，杜家元，等．珠一坳陷古近系油气成藏特征及勘探方向［J］. 中国海上油气，2014，26（3）：37-42.
	Shu Yu， Shi Hesheng， Du Jiayuan， et al. Paleogene characteristics in hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration direction in ZhuⅠDepression［J］. China Offshore Oil and Gas， 2014，26（3）：37-42.
17	胡朝元.“源控论”适用范围量化分析［J］. 天然气工业，2005，25（10）： 25-27.
	Hu Chaoyuan. Research on the appliance extent of “source control theory”by semi‑quantitative statistics characteristic of oil and gas migration distance［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2005，25（10）：25-27.
18	施和生，杜家元，梅廉夫，等．珠江口盆地惠州运动及其意义［J］. 石油勘探与开发，2020，47（3）：447-461.
	Shi Hesheng， Du Jiayuan， Mei Lianfu， et al. Huizhou Movement and its significance in Pearl River Mouth Basin， China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2020，47（3）：447-461.
19	胡圣标，龙祖烈，朱俊章，等.珠江口盆地地温场特征及构造-热演化［J］.石油学报，2019，5（S1）：178-187.
	Hu Shengbiao， Long Zulie， Zhu Junzhang， et al. Characteristics of the present‑day temperature field and the Cenozoic thermal history in the Pearl River Mouth Basin［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2019，5（S1）： 178-187.
20	米石云.盆地模拟技术研究现状及发展方向［J］.中国石油勘探，2009，14（2）：55-58，65.
	Mi Shiyun. Basin modeling technology development situation and its main trends［J］.China Petroleum Exploration， 2009，14（2）：55-58，65.
21	石广仁.油气运聚定量模拟技术现状、问题及设想［J］.石油与天然气地质，2009，30（1）：1-9.
	Shi Guangren， Status， problems and proposals of the quantitative modeling techniques for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2009，30（1）：1-9.
22	Barker R A， Gehman H M， James W R. Geologic field number and size assessments of oil and gas plays［J］.AAPG Bulletin，1984，68（4）：426-432.
23	Charles M. USGS petroleum resource assessment procedures［J］.AAPG Bulletin， 1993， 77（3）：452-453.
24	Charpentier R R， Klett T R. Guiding principles of USUS methodo‑ logy for assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resource［J］.Natural Resources Research，2005， 14（3）：175-186.
25	Hackley P C， Ewing T E. Assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resource， onshore Claiborne Group， United States part of the northern Gulf of Mexico Basin［J］.AAPG Bulletin，2010，94（10）：1607-1615.
26	Magoon L B.The petroleum system——A classification scheme for research， resource assessment and exploration［J］.AAPG Bulletin，1987， 71（5）：587.
27	Wu Tao， Li Lie， Li Wentuo， et al. A quantitative study on source rocks in the western Leidong Depression， northern South China Sea［J］. Energy Geoscience， 2021， 2（1）： 73-82.
28	张功成，陈莹，李增学，等.中国海域煤型油气成因理论［J］.石油与天然气地质，2022，43（3）：553-565.
	Zhang Gongcheng， Chen Ying， Li Zengxue， et al.Theory on ge‑ nesis of coaliferous petroleum in the China Sea［J］.Oil & Gas Geo‑ logy，2022，43（3）：553-565.
29	白国平，邱海华，邓舟舟，等.美国页岩油资源分布特征与主控因素研究［J］.石油实验地质，2020，42（4）：524-532.
	Bai Guoping， Qiu Haihua， Deng Zhouzhou，et al.Distribution and main controls for shale oil resources in USA［J］.Petroleum Geo‑ logy & Experiment，2020，42（4）：524-532.
30	Shi Hesheng， Dai Yiding， Liu Lihua，et al. Genetic pattern of belt-wide petroliferous phenomenon in the eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin and its practical application［J］.Petroleum Science，2014， 11（3）：1-13.
31	施和生，王清斌，王军，等．渤中凹陷深层渤中19-6 构造大型凝析气田的发现及勘探意义［J］. 中国石油勘探，2019，24（1）：36-45.
	Shi Hesheng， Wang Qingbin， Wangjun， et al. Discover and exploration significance of large condensate gas fields in BZ19-6 structure in deep Bozhong Sag［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2019，24（1）：36-45.
32	胡文革.塔里木盆地塔河油田潜山区古岩溶缝洞类型及其改造作用［J］.石油与天然气地质，2022，43（1）：43-53.
	Hu Wenge.Paleokarst fractured‑cavity types and their reconstruction in buried hill area， Tahe oilfield， Tarim Basin［J］.Oil & Gas Geology，2022，43（1）：43-53.
33	侯明才，曹海洋，李慧勇，等. 渤海海域渤中 19-6 构造带深层潜山储层特征及其控制因素［J］. 天然气工业，2019，39（1）：33-44.
	Hou Mingcai， Cao Haiyang， Li Huiyong， et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of deep buried‑hill reservoirs in the BZ19-6 structural belt， in Bohai Sea［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2019，39（1）：33-44.
34	施和生，牛成明，侯明才，等．渤中13-2 双层结构太古宇潜山成藏条件分析与勘探发现［J］. 中国石油勘探，2021，26（2）：12-20.
	Shi Hesheng， Niu Chengmin， Hou Mingcai，et al. Analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of double‑layered Archaeozoic buried hill and major discovery of Bozhong 13-2 oil and gasfield， Bohai Sea area［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2021，26（2）：12-20.
35	黄诚，云露，曹自成，等.塔里木盆地顺北地区中-下奥陶统“断控”缝洞系统划分与形成机制［J］.石油与天然气地质，2022，43（1）：54-68.
	Huang Cheng， Yun Lu， Cao Zicheng，et al. Division and formation mechanism of fault‑controlled fracture‑vug system of the Mid⁃dle‑to‑Lower Ordovician， Shunbei area， Tarim Basin［J］.Oil & Gas Geology，2022，43（1）：54-68.
36	薛永安，王奇，牛成民，等.渤海海域渤中凹陷渤中19-6深层潜山凝析气藏的充注成藏过程［J］.石油与天然气地质，2020，41（5）：891-902.
	Xue Yong’an， Wang Qi， Niu Chengmin，et al. Hydrocarbon char‑ ging and accumulation of BZ 19-6 gas condensate field in deep buried hills of Bozhong Depression，Bohai Sea［J］.Oil & Gas Geology，2020，41（5）：891-902.
37	徐长贵，杜晓峰，刘晓健，等. 渤海海域太古界深埋变质岩潜山优质储集层形成机制与油气勘探意义［J］. 石油与天然气地质，2020，41（2）：235-247.
	Xu Changgui， Du Xiaofeng， Liu Xiaojian， et al. Formation me⁃chanism of high‑quality deep buried‑hill reservoir of Archaean metamorphic rocks and its significance in petroleum exploration in Bohai Sea area［J］. Oil & Gas Geology，2020，41（2）：235-247.

[1]	Xiugang PU, Jiangchang DONG, Gongquan CHAI, Shunyao SONG, Zhannan SHI, Wenzhong HAN, Wei ZHANG, Delu XIE. Enrichment model of high-abundance organic matter in shales in the 2^nd member of the Paleogene Kongdian Formation， Cangdong Sag， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 696-709.
[2]	Hequn GAO, Yuqiao GAO, Xipeng HE, Jun NIE. Rock mechanical properties and controlling factors for shale oil reservoirs in the second member of the Paleogene Funing Formation， Subei Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 502-515.
[3]	Rui LI, Jiao YANG, Yukun CHAI, Hua WANG, Jianwen DAI, Yonghui DENG, Shuang SUN, Xiaolin MA, Tengfei TIAN. A novel sedimentary pattern of wave-induced sandbars under high-angle wave incidence [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 530-541.
[4]	Xinxu DONG, Xinghai ZHOU, Kun LI, Renhai PU, Aiguo WANG, Yunwen GUAN, Peng ZHANG. Seismic sedimentological characterization of an offshore area with sparse well control under the constraint of a high-resolution stratigraphic framework： A case study of the Paleogene Huagang Formation in block X of the central anticlinal zone in the Xihu Sag， East China Sea Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 293-308.
[5]	Guanghui YUAN, Guangrong PENG, Lili ZHANG, Hui SUN, Shuhui CHEN, Hao LIU, Xiaoyang ZHAO. Diagenesis and low-permeability tightening mechanisms of the deep Paleogene reservoirs under high temperature and highly variable geothermal gradients in the Baiyun Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 44-64.
[6]	Xiaoyi YANG, Chenglin LIU, Feilong WANG, Guoxiong LI, Dehao FENG, Taozheng YANG, Zhibin HE, Jiajia SU. Distribution and origin of overpressure in the Paleogene Dongying Formation in the southwestern sub-sag， Bozhong Sag， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 96-112.
[7]	Zhixiong FANG, Qiusheng XIAO, Dianwei ZHANG, Hongliang DUAN. Geological characteristics and exploration of continental fault-block shale oil reservoirs in the Subei Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1468-1478.
[8]	Yongshi WANG, Jianqiang GONG, Dongxia CHEN, Yibo QIU, Shuwei MAO, Wenzhi LEI, Huaiyu YANG, Qiaochu WANG. Phase evolution and accumulation mode of hydrocarbons in deep coarse-grained clastic reservoirs in the Yanjia area， Dongying Sag， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1159-1172.
[9]	Yingzhao ZHANG, Wei ZOU, Zhongyun CHEN, Yiming JIANG, Hui DIAO. The mechanism of “convergence ahead of accumulation” and its geological significance for gas reservoirs in Paleogene Huagang Formation across the central inverted structural zone of Xihu Depression， East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1256-1269.
[10]	Yuling SHI, Zulie LONG, Xiangtao ZHANG, Huahua WEN, Xiaonan MA. Exploring the dynamic hydrocarbon accumulation process of the Enping 17 sub-sag in the Enping Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1279-1289.
[11]	Hao LIU, Changgui XU, Yangdong GAO, Heming LIN, Xinwei QIU, Yongtao JU, Xudong WANG, Lei LI, Jun MENG, Xiaoming QUE. Source-to-sink system and hydrocarbon source rock prediction of underexplored areas in rifted lacustrine basins： A case study on northern lows in Zhu Ⅰ Depression， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 565-583.
[12]	Yangdong GAO, Guangrong PENG, Xiangtao ZHANG, Xudong WANG, Hui SUN, Taixun LIU, Fengchun SUN. Characteristics and evolution of the source-to-sink system of the Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Baiyun Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 584-599.
[13]	Jun LIU, Guangrong PENG, Jinyun ZHENG, Song CAI, Dingwei ZHU, Ziyi WANG. Sedimentary transformation and source-to-sink response to the Eocene rifting-detachment in the western Baiyun Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 600-612.
[14]	Guangrong PENG, Xucheng WANG, Weitao CHEN, Yaoyao JIN, Fei WANG, Wenyong WANG, Han QUAN. Source-to-sink system during rifting-depression transition period and its exploration significance： A case study of the Upper Enping Formation at southeastern margin of Huizhou 26 sub-sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 613-625.
[15]	Ziyi WANG, Hongbo LI, Jinyun ZHENG, Dingwei ZHU, Sa YU, Zhaoming CHEN, Zhensheng LI. Structural evolution and its control on source-to-sink system of Panyu 27 Sag in Pearl River Mouth Basin during rifting [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 626-636.

Characteristics of hydrocarbon source-migration-accumulation in Huizhou 26 Sag and implications of the major Huizhou 26-6 discovery in Pearl River Mouth Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 37

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics