四川盆地安岳气田震旦系台缘带和台内地区天然气成藏差异性及勘探领域

doi:10.11743/ogg20230103

Abstract

Abstract:

Anyue gas field in the Sichuan Basin is the largest marine carbonate gas field discovered so far in China， with discovered gas-in-place of 1.03×10¹² m³， of which gas in Dengying Formation accounts for 56.3 %. In recent years， the exploration and development of Dengying Formation mainly focus on its 4^th member （Deng 4 Member） in the marginal zone of platform， and the single well productivity of the platform marginal zone is markedly higher than that of the platform interior. In the study， we discuss the differential gas accumulation based on the geochemical characteristics of natural gas and the correlation between gas reservoirs in the platform marginal zone and the interior， combined with the analysis of accumulation conditions. The results show that the hydrogen isotope value in methane of natural gas in the platform margin zone is obviously larger compared with the platform interior， and the salinity of the paleowater medium of the Cambrian source rocks is correspondingly higher than that of the Sinian source rocks， which reflects the contribution increase of the Sinian source rocks from the platform marginal zone to interior. Second， the reservoirs in the two zones are consistent in multiple aspects like the rock type and reservoir space， but the dissolved pores or cavities of reservoirs in the platform marginal zone is better developed than that in the platform interior， which is mainly controlled by the development extent of mound-shoals and the intensity of epigenetic karstification. Third， there are differences in source-reservoir assemblages between the two zones. The platform marginal zone is adjacent to the source rocks in the rift with its reservoir laterally juxtaposed with the source rocks， resulting in various source-reservoir assemblages such as the side source rock-lateral reservoir assemblage as well as the upper source rock-lower reservoir assemblage. However， the platform interior is located far away from the source rocks in the rift， and faults rooted in source rocks are needed to transport the hydrocarbons， resulting in single-type source-reservoir assemblage. Fourth， the difference in the contribution between the Sinian and Cambrian source rocks and the differences in the development position and assemblage type of high-quality reservoirs are the main reasons for the huge differences in productivity between the two zones. Penglai-Jian’ge area in northwestern Sichuan Basin is a favorable play fairway for deep hydrocarbon exploration in the Dengying Formation of platform marginal zone in the future， while the surrounding slope areas of paleo-uplift are favorable for exploration of structural-lithologic gas reservoirs in the Dengying Formation of platform interior.

Key words: platform interior, platform marginal zone, accumulation difference, carbonate rock, Cambrian, Sinian, Anyue gas field, Sichuan Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.3

Jian LI, Chunlong YANG, Wuren XIE, Yurun RUI, Xiaobo WANG, Lu ZHANG, Zengye XIE, Zeqing GUO. Differences of natural gas accumulation and play fairways in the marginal zone and interior of Sinian platform in Anyue gas field， Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 34-45.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Fig. 4

Table 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 42

1	马新华. 四川盆地天然气发展进入黄金时代［J］. 天然气工业， 2017， 37（2）： 1-10.
	MA Xinhua. A golden era for natural gas development in the Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2017， 37（2）： 1-10.
2	马新华，闫海军，陈京元，等. 四川盆地安岳气田震旦系气藏叠合岩溶发育模式与主控因素［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2021， 42（6）： 1281-1294， 1333.
	MA Xinhua， YAN Haijun， CHEN Jingyuan， et al. Development patterns and constraints of superimposed karst reservoirs in Sinian Dengying Formation， Anyue Gas Field， Sichuan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2021， 42（6）： 1281-1294， 1333.
3	杨程宇，文龙，王铁冠，等. 川中隆起安岳气田古油藏成藏时间厘定［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2020， 41（3）： 492-502.
	YANG Chengyu， WEN Long， WANG Tieguan， et al. Timing of hydrocarbon accumulation for paleo-oil reservoirs in Anyue Gas Field in Chuanzhong Uplift［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2020， 41（3）： 492-502.
4	罗冰，杨跃明，罗文军，等. 川中古隆起灯影组储层发育控制因素及展布［J］. 石油学报， 2015， 36（4）： 416-426.
	LUO Bing， YANG Yueming， LUO Wenjun， et al. Controlling factors and distribution of reservoir development in Dengying Formation of paleo-uplift in central Sichuan Basin［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2015， 36（4）： 416-426.
5	乔占峰，张哨楠，沈安江，等. 塔里木和四川盆地白云岩规模优质储层形成与发育控制因素［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2022， 43（1）： 92-104.
	QIAO Zhanfeng， ZHANG Shaonan， SHEN Anjiang， et al. Controls on formation and development of large-sized high-quality dolomite reservoirs in the Tarim and Sichuan basins［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2022， 43（1）： 92-104.
6	魏国齐，杨威，杜金虎，等. 四川盆地震旦纪—早寒武世克拉通内裂陷地质特征［J］. 天然气工业， 2015， 35（1）： 24-35.
	WEI Guoqi， YANG Wei， DU Jinhu， et al. Geological characteristics of the Sinian-Early Cambrian intracratonic rift， Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2015， 35（1）： 24-35.
7	陈娅娜，沈安江，潘立银，等. 微生物白云岩储集层特征、成因和分布——以四川盆地震旦系灯影组四段为例［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2017， 44（5）： 704-715.
	CHEN Yana， SHEN Anjiang， PAN Liyin， et al. Features， origin and distribution of microbial dolomite reservoirs： A case study of 4th Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2017， 44（5）： 704-715.
8	罗平，王石，李朋威，等. 微生物碳酸盐岩油气储层研究现状与展望［J］. 沉积学报， 2013， 31（5）： 807-823.
	LUO Ping， WANG Shi， LI Pengwei， et al. Review and prospectives of microbial carbonate reservoirs［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica， 2013， 31（5）： 807-823.
9	田兴旺，张玺华，彭瀚霖，等. 川中高石梯-磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段气藏产能差异［J］. 新疆石油地质， 2019， 40（6）： 673-679.
	TIAN Xingwang， ZHANG Xihua， PENG Hanlin， et al. Productivity differences of gas reservoirs in the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area， central Sichuan Basin［J］. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology， 2019， 40（6）： 673-679.
10	王文之，杨跃明，文龙，等. 微生物碳酸盐岩沉积特征研究——以四川盆地高磨地区灯影组为例［J］. 中国地质， 2016， 43（1）： 306-318.
	WANG Wenzhi， YANG Yueming， WEN Long， et al. A study of sedimentary characteristics of microbial carbonate： A case study of the Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaomo area， Sichuan Basin［J］. Geology in China， 2016， 43（1）： 306-318.
11	杨跃明，文龙，罗冰，等. 四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏特征［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2016， 43（2）： 179-188.
	YANG Yueming， WEN Long， LUO Bing， et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation of Sinian natural gas reservoirs， Leshan-Longnüsi paleohigh， Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2016， 43（2）： 179-188.
12	魏国齐，杨威，杜金虎，等. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪古隆起构造特征及对特大型气田形成的控制作用［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2015， 42（3）： 257-265.
	WEI Guoqi， YANG Wei， DU Jinhu， et al. Tectonic features of Gaoshiti-Moxi paleo-uplift and its controls on the formation of a giant gas field， Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2015， 42（3）： 257-265.
13	赵文智，谢增业，王晓梅，等. 四川盆地震旦系气源特征与原生含气系统有效性［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2021， 48（6）： 1089-1099.
	ZHAO Wenzhi， XIE Zengye， WANG Xiaomei， et al. Sinian gas sources and effectiveness of primary gas-bearing system in Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2021， 48（6）： 1089-1099.
14	魏国齐，谢增业，杨雨，等. 四川盆地中部北斜坡震旦系—寒武系大型岩性气藏形成条件［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2022， 49（5）： 835-846.
	WEI Guoqi， XIE Zengye， YANG Yu， et al. Formation conditions of Sinian-Cambrian large lithologic gas reservoirs in the north slope area of central Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2022， 49（5）： 835-846.
15	田兴旺，彭瀚霖，王云龙，等. 川中安岳气田震旦系灯影组四段台缘—台内区储层差异及控制因素［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2020， 31（9）： 1225-1238.
	TIAN Xingwang， PENG Hanlin， WANG Yunlong， et al. Analysis of reservoir difference and controlling factors between the platform margin and the inner area of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Anyue Gas Field， central Sichuan［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2020， 31（9）： 1225-1238.
16	赵路子，汪泽成，杨雨，等. 四川盆地蓬探1井灯影组灯二段油气勘探重大发现及意义［J］. 中国石油勘探， 2020， 25（3）： 1-12.
	ZHAO Luzi， WANG Zecheng， YANG Yu， et al. Important discovery in the second member of Dengying Formation in Well Pengtan1 and its significance， Sichuan Basin［J］. China Petroleum Exploration， 2020， 25（3）： 1-12.
17	谢增业，李剑，杨春龙，等. 川中古隆起震旦系—寒武系天然气地球化学特征与太和气区的勘探潜力［J］. 天然气工业， 2021， 41（7）： 1-14.
	XIE Zengye， LI Jian， YANG Chunlong， et al. Geochemical characteristics of Sinian-Cambrian natural gas in central Sichuan paleo-uplift and exploration potential of Taihe gas area［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2021， 41（7）： 1-14.
18	魏国齐，杨威，谢武仁，等. 克拉通内裂陷及周缘大型岩性气藏形成机制、潜力与勘探实践——以四川盆地震旦系-寒武系为例［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2022， 49（3）： 465-477.
	WEI Guoqi， YANG Wei， XIE Wuren， et al. Formation mechanisms， potentials and exploration practices of large lithologic gas reservoirs in and around an intracratonic rift： Taking the Sinian-Cambrian of Sichuan Basin as an example［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2022， 49（3）： 465-477.
19	魏国齐，李剑，杨威，等. 中国陆上天然气地质与勘探［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2014.
	WEI Guoqi， LI Jian， YANG Wei， et al. Geology and exploration of onshore gas in China［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2014.
20	王文之，肖文摇，和源，等. 四川盆地震旦系陡山沱组烃源岩地球化学特征与有机质富集机制［J］. 高校地质学报， 2019， 25（6）： 860-870.
	WANG Wenzhi， XIAO Wenyao， HE Yuan， et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Sinian Doushantuo Formation source rocks of the Sichuan Basin： Implications for the organic matter accumulation［J］. Geological Journal of China Universities， 2019， 25（6）： 860-870.
21	彭波，刘羽琛，漆富成，等. 鄂西地区陡山沱组页岩气成藏地质条件研究［J］. 地质论评， 2017， 63（5）： 1293-1306.
	PENG Bo， LIU Yuchen， QI Fucheng， et al. Study on the accumulation conditions of shale gas in Doushantuo Formation in western Hubei［J］. Geological Review， 2017， 63（5）： 1293-1306.
22	张道亮，杨帅杰，王伟锋，等. 川东北—鄂西地区下震旦统陡山沱组烃源岩特征及形成环境［J］. 石油实验地质， 2019， 41（6）： 821-830.
	ZHANG Daoliang， YANG Shuaijie， WANG Weifeng， et al. Source rock characteristics and depositional environment of Lower Sinian Doushantuo Formation in northeastern Sichuan and western Hubei［J］. Petroleum Geology and Experiment， 2019， 41（6）： 821-830.
23	张家政，朱地，慈兴华，等. 湖北宜昌地区鄂阳页2井牛蹄塘组和陡山沱组页岩气随钻碳同位素特征及勘探意义［J］. 石油学报， 2019， 40（11）： 1346-1357.
	ZHANG Jiazheng， ZHU De， Xinghua CI， et al. Characteristics of carbon isotope while drilling and exploration significance of shale gas in Niutitang and Doushantuo formations in Well Eyangye-2， Yichang， Hubei， China［J］. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2019， 40（11）： 1346-1357.
24	汪泽成，刘静江，姜华，等. 中—上扬子地区震旦纪陡山沱组沉积期岩相古地理及勘探意义［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2019， 46（1）： 39-51.
	WANG Zecheng， LIU Jingjiang， JIANG Hua， et al. Lithofacies paleogeography and exploration significance of Sinian Doushantuo depositional stage in the Middle-Upper Yangtze region， Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2019， 46（1）： 39-51.
25	ZOU Caineng， WEI Guoqi， XU Chunchun， et al. Geochemistry of the Sinian-Cambrian gas system in the Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 2014， 74： 13-21.
26	魏国齐，谢增业，宋家荣，等. 四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系—寒武系天然气特征及成因［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2015， 42（6）： 702-711.
	WEI Guoqi， XIE Zengye， SONG Jiarong， et al. Features and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian of central Sichuan paleo-uplift， Sichuan Basin， SW China［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2015， 42（6）： 702-711.
27	徐会林，罗文军，徐伟，等. 磨溪震旦系灯影组台内优质储层主控因素［J］. 天然气勘探与开发， 2021， 44（3）： 11-18.
	XU Huilin， LUO Wenjun， XU Wei， et al. Main factors controlling intraplatform quality reservoirs of Sinian Dengying Formation， Moxi Block， Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Exploration and Development， 2021， 44（3）： 11-18.
28	杨威，魏国齐，谢武仁，等. 古隆起在四川盆地台内碳酸盐岩丘滩体规模成储中的作用［J］. 天然气工业， 2021， 41（4）： 1-12.
	YANG Wei， WEI Guoqi， XIE Wuren， et al. Role of paleouplift in the scale formation of intra-platform carbonate mound-bank body reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2021， 41（4）： 1-12.
29	SCHOELL M. The hydrogen and carbon isotopic composition of methane from natural gases of various origins［J］. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 1980， 44（5）： 649-661.
30	XIE Zengye， LI Jian， LI Zhisheng， et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin， China and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation［J］. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition， 2017， 91（5）： 1836-1854.
31	NI Yunyan， LIAO Fengrong， GAO Jinliang， et al. Hydrogen isotopes of hydrocarbon gases from different organic facies of the Zhongba Gas Field， Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering， 2019， 179： 776-786.
32	黄士鹏，段书府，汪泽成，等. 烷烃气稳定氢同位素组成影响因素及应用［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2019， 46（3）： 496-508.
	HUANG Shipeng， DUAN Shufu， WANG Zecheng， et al. Affecting factors and application of the stable hydrogen isotopes of alkane gases［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2019， 46（3）： 496-508.
33	郑海峰，宋换新，杨振瑞，等. 湖北神农架地区南华系大塘坡组元素地球化学特征［J］. 地球科学与环境学报， 2019， 41（3）： 316-326.
	ZHENG Haifeng， SONG Huanxin， YANG Zhenrui， et al. Element geochemical characteristics of Datangpo Formation of Nanhua system in Shennongjia area of Hubei， China［J］. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment， 2019， 41（3）： 316-326.
34	夏威，于炳松，孙梦迪. 渝东南YK1井下寒武统牛蹄塘组底部黑色页岩沉积环境及有机质富集机制［J］. 矿物岩石， 2015， 35（2）： 70-80.
	XIA Wei， YU Bingsong， SUN Mengdi. Depositional setting and enrichment mechanism of organic matter of the black shales of Niutitang Formation at the bottom of Lower Cambrian， in Well Yuke 1， southeast Chongqing［J］. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology， 2015， 35（2）： 70-80.
35	陶树，汤达祯，周传祎，等. 川东南-黔中及其周边地区下组合烃源岩元素地球化学特征及沉积环境意义［J］. 中国地质， 2009， 36（2）： 397-403.
	TAO Shu， TANG Dazhen， ZHOU Chuanyi， et al. Element geochemical characteristics of the lower assemblage hydrocarbon source rocks in southeast Sichuan-central Guizhou （Chuandongnan-Qianzhong） region and its periphery areas and their implications to sedimentary environments［J］. Geology in China， 2009， 36（2）： 397-403.
36	成汉钧，王玉忠. 五峰期上扬子淡化海成因之探讨［J］. 地层学杂志， 1991， 15（2）： 109-114.
	CHENG Hanjun， WANG Yuzhong. A discussion on the genesis of the Wufengian desalinated sea in the Upper Yangtze sea［J］. Journal of Stratigraphy， 1991， 15（2）： 109-114.
37	章乐彤. 重庆地区富有机质页岩地球化学特征及地质意义［D］. 北京：中国地质大学（北京）， 2019.
	ZHANG Letong. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of organic-rich shale in Chongqing area［D］. Beijing： China University of Geosciences（Beijing）， 2019.
38	吴伟，罗冰，罗文军，等. 再论四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系天然气成因［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2016， 27（8）： 1447-1453.
	WU Wei， LUO Bing， LUO Wenjun， et al. Further discussion about the origin of natural gas in the Sinian of central Sichuan paleo-uplift， Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2016， 27（8）： 1447-1453.
39	张水昌，何坤，王晓梅，等. 深层多途径复合生气模式及潜在成藏贡献［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2021， 32（10）： 1421-1435.
	ZHANG Shuichang， HE Kun， WANG Xiaomei， et al. The multi-path gas generation model and its potential contribution to petroleum accumulation in deep formations［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2021， 32（10）： 1421-1435.
40	郭泽清，梁坤，吴培红，等. 古老碳酸盐岩古油藏储量计算方法探讨——以四川盆地安岳气田灯影组为例［J］. 地质学报， 2022， 96（1）： 317-329.
	GUO Zeqing， LIANG Kun， WU Peihong， et al. Discussion on reserve calculation method of paleo oil reservoir in ancient carbonate——a case study from the Dengying Formation of the Anyue Gas Field in Sichuan Basin［J］. Acta Geologica Sinica， 2022， 96（1）： 317-329.
41	ZHU Lianqiang， LIU Guangdi， SONG Zezhang， et al. Reservoir solid bitumen-source rock correlation using the trace and rare earth elements-implications for identifying the natural gas source of the Ediacaran-Lower Cambrian reservoirs， central Sichuan Basin［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2022， 137： 105499.
42	谢武仁，杨威，汪泽成，等. 台缘带特征、形成主控因素及其对油气成藏的控制：以四川盆地灯影组为例［J］. 地质科学， 2021， 56（3）： 867-883.
	XIE Wuren， YANG Wei， WANG Zecheng， et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors on the development of a platform margin belt and its effect on hydrocarbon accumulation： A case study of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin［J］. Chinese Journal of Geology， 2021， 56（3）： 867-883.

层系		岩性	TOC/%	EqVR_o/%	裂陷槽厚度/m	台内厚度/m	δ¹³C_干酪根/‰	资料来源
寒武系	筇竹寺组	泥页岩	0.50～8.49（1.95）	1.84～2.40	50～300	40～120	-36.0～-31.0（-33.3）	文献［26］
震旦系	灯三段	泥岩	0.50～4.73（0.87）	3.16～3.21	5～30	5～25	-33.4～-28.5（-32.0）	文献［18，26］
	灯影组	藻云岩	0.20～3.67（0.61）	1.97～3.46	100～300	200～300	-32.8～-23.8（-29.4）	文献［25］
	陡山沱组	泥岩	0.50～14.17（2.91）	2.08～3.82	10～30	0～10	-31.5～-30.3（-30.8）	文献［25］

[1]	Caineng ZOU, Zengye XIE, Jian LI, Lu ZHANG, Chunlong YANG, Huiying CUI, Xiaobo WANG, Zeqing GUO, Songqi PAN. Differences and main controlling factors of large-scale gas accumulations in typical giant carbonate gas fields： A case study on Anyue gas field in the Sichuan Basin and Jingbian gas field in the Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 1-15.
[2]	Xiangyuan ZHAO, Yuchun YOU, Xiangyang HU, Jingrong LI, Yu LI. Classified-staged-grouped 3D modeling of multi-scale fractures constrained by genetic mechanisms and main controlling factors： A case study on biohermal carbonate reservoir of the Upper Permian Changxing Fm. in Yuanba area， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 213-225.
[3]	Yanfeng LIU, Taizhong DUAN, Yuan HUANG, Wenbiao ZHANG, Meng LI. Deep learning-based geological modeling driven by sedimentary process simulation [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 226-237.
[4]	Jianping Fan, Jinmin Song, Qingchun Jiang, Shugen Liu, Yuehao Ye, Shipeng Huang, Jiarui Wang, Wang Su, Liji Li, Xin Jin, Yuxiang Feng. Reservoir characteristics and development model of the Middle Permian Mao-1 Member in eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1413-1430.
[5]	Yan Zhang, Dong Hui, Jian Zhang, Deliang Zhang, Rui Jiang. Characteristics and main controlling factors of water vapor adsorption in marine shale： A case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shales in southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1431-1444.
[6]	Jianghui Meng, Peixi Lyu, Wei Wu, Renfang Pan, Yiqing Zhu. A method for evaluating the thermal maturity of marine shale based on graptolite reflectance and Raman spectroscopy： A case from the Lower Palaeozoic Wufeng‒Longmaxi Formations， southern Sichuan Basin， SW China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1515-1528.
[7]	Zongquan Hu, Wei Du, Tong Zhu, Zengqin Liu. Sequence stratigraphy and lithofacies characteristics of fine-grained deposits of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the Sichuan Basin and on its periphery [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1024-1038.
[8]	Haitao Lyu, Feng Geng, Kai Shang. Key factors and directions of exploration in the Cambrian pre-salt sequence， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1049-1058.
[9]	Zhensheng Shi, Shengxian Zhao, Qun Zhao, Shasha Sun, Tianqi Zhou, Feng Cheng, Shaojun Shi, Jin Wu. Fractures in cores from the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin and their implications for shale gas exploration [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1087-1101.
[10]	Pengwei Wang, Zhongbao Liu, Xiong Li, Haotian Liu, Lin Zhou, Xiong Xiao, Ruyue Wang, Peng Li. Development of the Upper Permian Wujiaping shale in Hongxing area， eastern Sichuan Basin， and its significance to shale gas enrichment [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1102-1114.
[11]	Haihua Zhu, Lin Chen, Zhenglin Cao, Minglei Wang, Haitao Hong, Yucong Li, Rui Zhang, Shaomin Zhang, Guangyi Zhu, Xu Zeng, Wei Yang. Microscopic pore characteristics and controlling factors of black shale in the Da’anzhai Member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation， central Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1115-1126.
[12]	Qianwen Li, Zhongbao Liu, Feiran Chen, Guangxiang Liu, Dianwei Zhang, Peng Li, Pengwei Wang. Lithofacies types and reservoir characteristics of Jurassic shale in the Sichuan Basin revealed by the Da’anzhai Member， Well Y2， Yuanba area [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1127-1140.
[13]	Senlin Yin, Gongyang Chen, Changfu Xu, Xianyue Xiong, Jun Zhao, Ke Hu. Lithofacies architecture of lacustrine fine-grained mixed reservoirs and its control over sweet spot： A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation shale oil reservoir in the Jimsar Sag， Juggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1180-1193.
[14]	Guangfu Wang, Fengxia Li, Haibo Wang, Jun Li, Hong Zhang, Tong Zhou, Xiaofei Shang, Linhua Pan, Yunqi Shen. Application of an integrated geology-reservoir engineering approach to fracturing in unconventional gas reservoirs， Sichuan Basin and some insights [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1221-1237.
[15]	Shuanglian Liu. Logging evaluation of “double sweet spot” in shale gas reservoirs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 1005-1012.

Differences of natural gas accumulation and play fairways in the marginal zone and interior of Sinian platform in Anyue gas field， Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 42

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics