岩石热解方法应用于页岩油气研究需注意的几个问题

doi:10.11743/ogg20230417

Abstract

Abstract:

Rock-Eval pyrolysis has been widely used in assessing source rocks from the very beginning. Although this approach can evaluate oil content， hydrocarbon generation， as well as the abundance， type， and thermal maturity of organic matter in a simple and rapid way， it is noteworthy that this technique has some limitations in application， and improper interpretation of pyrolytic data may bring more risks to shale oil/gas exploration. This study summarizes three main pitfalls commonly seen in previous publications based on massive experimental results. First， the use of hydrogen index （HI）， oxygen index （OI）， the temperature of maximum pyrolysis yields （T_max）， and the ratio of S₂/S₃ to discriminate kerogen of diverse types should target source rocks with maturity less than 1.35 % R_o； the feasibility of the technique to highly-to-over-mature source rock samples is limited. Second， the validity of T_max depends on the area of S₂ and whether it is in normal distribution， and the accuracy of T_max relies on kerogen type and thermal maturity； moreover， residual hydrocarbon and pyrite content have some effects on the accuracy of T_max. To obtain accurate T_max values， the maturity of source rocks of types Ⅰ， Ⅱ， and Ⅲ should not be larger than 1.70 % R_o. Third， the oil saturation index （OSI） has been used to indicate the mobility of shale oil， and a value larger than 100 mg/g TOC suggests sweet spots of shale oil. However， it should be noted that OSI could not directly provide information on the saturation of oil in shale. OSI values are generally smaller than 100 if the rocks are very organic-rich， and a small TOC value could also lead to a large OSI value （more than 100 mg HC/g TOC）. Besides， only a few shales bear OSI higher than 100 mg HC/g TOC， although many of the shales have been proven commercially successful. Therefore， the applicability of OSI larger than 100 mg HC/g TOC as a parameter for shale oil mobility merits further consideration. We suggest using individual OSI criteria for different types of sedimentary basins and shale formations. Moreover， the loss of light hydrocarbons during the storage and preparation of rock samples is strongly dependent on rock lithofacies， and thus， classified assessment should be adopted for shale oil reservoirs of multiple lithofacies.

Key words: sweet spot assessment, oil saturation index （OSI）, thermal maturity, organic matter type, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, shale oil and gas

CLC Number:

TE122.1

Qian ZHANG, Zhijun JIN, Rukai ZHU, Quanyou LIU, Rui ZHANG, Guanping WANG, Wanli CHEN, Ralf Littke. Remarkable issues of Rock-Eval pyrolysis in the assessment of shale oil/gas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 1020-1032.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 1

References 75

1	卢双舫，冯亚丽，刘晓艳，等. 与未熟-低熟油产出相关的有机质样品的宏观热解特征及其意义［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2000， 27（1）： 16-18.
	LU Shuangfang， FENG Yali， LIU Xiaoyan， et al. Megascopic pyrolysis characteristics of organic matter samples related to the occurrence of immature and low mature oils［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2000， 27（1）： 16-18.
2	孙丽娜，张中宁，吴远东，等. 半开放体系下温压对烃源岩HTHP模拟产物产率的影响［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2015， 26（1）： 118-127.
	SUN Lina， ZHANG Zhongning， WU Yuandong， et al. Effect of temperature and pressure on hydrocarbon yield of source rock HTHP simulation experiment in semi-open system［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2015， 26（1）： 118-127.
3	ESPITALIÉ J， LAPORTE J L， MADEC M， et al. Méthode rapide de caractérisation des roches mètres， de leur potentiel pétrolier et de leur degré d'évolution［J］. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue d'IFP Energies Nouvelles， 1977， 32（1）： 23-42.
4	PETERS K E. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 1986， 70（3）： 318-329.
5	VAN KREVELEN D W. Coal-typology， chemistry， physics， constitution［M］. Amsterdam： Elsevier， 1961.
6	TISSOT B， DURAND B， ESPITALIÉ J， et al. Influence of nature and diagenesis of organic matter in formation of petroleum［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 1974， 58（3）： 499-506.
7	BANERJEE A， SINHA A K， JAIN A K， et al. A mathematical representation of Rock-Eval hydrogen index vs T_max profiles［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 1998， 28（1/2）： 43-55.
8	ZHANG Qian， GROHMANN S， XU Xiaochen， et al. Depositional environment and thermal maturity of the coal-bearing Longtan Shale in southwest Guizhou， China： Implications for shale gas resource potential［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2020， 231：103607.
9	LUO Wen， HOU Mingcai， LIU Xinchun， et al. Geological and geochemical characteristics of marine-continental transitional shale from the Upper Permian Longtan formation， Northwestern Guizhou， China［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2018， 89（Part 1）： 58-67.
10	ZHANG Jizhen， LI Xianqing， ZHANG Xueqing， et al. Geochemical and geological characterization of marine-continental transitional shales from Longtan Formation in Yangtze area， South China［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2018， 96： 1-15.
11	TAN Jingqiang， HORSFIELD B， MAHLSTEDT N， et al. Natural gas potential of Neoproterozoic and Lower Palaeozoic marine shales in the Upper Yangtze Platform， South China： Geological and organic geochemical characterization［J］. International Geology Review， 2015， 57（3）： 305-326.
12	YANG Shengyu， HORSFIELD B. Critical review of the uncertainty of T_max in revealing the thermal maturity of organic matter in sedimentary rocks［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2020， 225： 103500.
13	KILLOPS S D， FUNNELL R H， SUGGATE R P， et al. Predicting generation and expulsion of paraffinic oil from vitrinite-rich coals［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 1998， 29（1/3）： 1-21.
14	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas： Part 2—shale-oil resource systems［M］//BREYER J A. Shale Reservoirs—Giant Resources for the 21st Century. Tulsa： American Association of Petroleum Geologists， 2012： 89-119.
15	ZHANG Shaohua， LIU Chiyang， LIANG Hao， et al. Paleoenvironmental conditions， organic matter accumulation， and unconventional hydrocarbon potential for the Permian Lucaogou Formation organic-rich rocks in Santanghu Basin， NW China［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2018， 185： 44-60.
16	LIU Bo， BECHTEL A， GROSS D， et al. Middle Permian environmental changes and shale oil potential evidenced by high-resolution organic petrology， geochemistry and mineral composition of the sediments in the Santanghu Basin， Northwest China［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2018， 185： 119-137.
17	SONG Jinli， LITTKE R， WENIGER P， et al. Shale oil potential and thermal maturity of the Lower Toarcian Posidonia Shale in NW Europe［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2015， 150/151： 127-153.
18	FANG Ronghui， LITTKE R， ZIEGER L， et al. Changes of composition and content of tricyclic terpane， hopane， sterane， and aromatic biomarkers throughout the oil window： A detailed study on maturity parameters of Lower Toarcian Posidonia Shale of the Hils Syncline， NW Germany［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 2019， 138： 103928.
19	ABARGHANI A， OSTADHASSAN M， GENTZIS T， et al. Correlating Rock-Eval™ T_max with bitumen reflectance from organic petrology in the Bakken Formation［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2019， 205： 87-104.
20	FROIDL F， ZIEGER L， MAHLSTEDT N， et al. Comparison of single- and multi-ramp bulk kinetics for a natural maturity series of Westphalian coals： Implications for modelling petroleum generation［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2020， 219： 103378.
21	JASPER K， KROOSS B M， FLAJS G， et al. Characteristics of type III kerogen in coal-bearing strata from the Pennsylvanian （Upper Carboniferous） in the Ruhr Basin， Western Germany： Comparison of coals， dispersed organic matter， kerogen concentrates and coal-mineral mixtures［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2009， 80（1）： 1-19.
22	DENG Ende， ZHANG Qian， JIN Zhijun， et al. Non-overmature equivalents confirmed a high initial hydrocarbon generation potential of the Permian Longtan Shale in southern China［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2022， 259： 104043.
23	TISSOT B P， PELET R， UNGERER P H. Thermal history of sedimentary basins， maturation indices， and kinetics of oil and gas generation［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 1987， 71（12）： 1445-1466.
24	STOCK A T， LITTKE R， SCHWARZBAUER J， et al. Organic geochemistry and petrology of Posidonia Shale （Lower Toarcian， Western Europe）-The evolution from immature oil-prone to overmature dry gas-producing kerogen［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2017， 176/177： 36-48.
25	JARVIE D M， HILL R J， RUBLE T E， et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems： The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2007， 91（4）： 475-499.
26	ZHANG Qian， FINK R， KROOSS B， et al. Reduction of shale permeability by temperature-induced creep［J］. SPE Journal， 2021， 26（2）： 750-764.
27	LEWAN M D， PAWLEWICZ M J. Reevaluation of thermal maturity and stages of petroleum formation of the Mississippian Barnett Shale， Fort Worth Basin， Texas［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2017， 101（12）： 1945-1970.
28	张振苓，邬立言，舒念祖. 烃源岩热解分析参数T_max异常的原因［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2006， 33（1）： 72-75.
	ZHANG Zhenling， WU Liyan， SHU Nianzu. Cause analysis of abnormal T_max values on Rock-Eval pyrolysis［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2006， 33（1）： 72-75.
29	张振苓，邬立言，脱奇，等. 烃源岩热解分析参数T_max异常值的还原［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2007， 34（5）： 580-584.
	ZHANG Zhenling， WU Liyan， Qi TUO， et al. Abnormal value recovery of maturity parameter T_max for Rock-Eval［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2007， 34（5）： 580-584.
30	SASSEN R， CHINN E W. Effects of elemental sulfur during programmed pyrolysis of kerogen［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 1989， 14（4）： 475-477.
31	HUNT J M， LEWAN M D， HENNET R J C. Modeling oil generation with time-temperature index graphs based on the Arrhenius equation［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 1991， 75（4）： 795-807.
32	SNOWDON L R. Rock-Eval T_max suppression： Documentation and amelioration［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 1995， 79（9）： 1337-1348.
33	SRINIVASAN P， JACOBI D， ATWAH I， et al. Integration of methyldibenzothiophene and pyrolysis techniques to determine thermal maturity in sulfur-rich Type II-S source rocks and oils［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 2022， 163： 104333.
34	祖小京，妥进才，张明峰，等. 矿物在油气形成过程中的作用［J］. 沉积学报， 2007， 25（2）： 298-306.
	ZU Xiaojing， Jincai TUO， ZHANG Mingfeng， et al. The roles of inorganic minerals on the oil and gas generating processes［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica， 2007， 25（2）： 298-306.
35	HAN Yuanjia， MAHLSTEDT N， HORSFIELD B. The Barnett Shale： Compositional fractionation associated with intraformational petroleum migration， retention， and expulsion［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2015， 99（12）： 2173-2202.
36	WANG Boyang， LIU Bo， SUN Guoxiang， et al. Evaluation of the shale oil reservoir and the oil enrichment model for the first member of the Lucaogou Formation， western Jimusaer Depression， Junggar Basin， NW China［J］. ACS Omega， 2021， 6（18）： 12081-12098.
37	MATHIA E J， BOWEN L， THOMAS K M， et al. Evolution of porosity and pore types in organic-rich， calcareous， Lower Toarcian Posidonia Shale［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2016， 75： 117-139.
38	Romero-Sarmiento M F， Rouzaud J N， Bernard S， et al. Evolution of Barnett Shale organic carbon structure and nanostructure with increasing maturation［J］. Organic Geochemistry， 2014， 71： 7-16.
39	PHILP R P， DEGARMO C D. Geochemical characterization of the Devonian-Mississippian Woodford Shale from the McAlister Cemetery Quarry， Criner Hills Uplift， Ardmore Basin， Oklahoma［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2020， 112： 104078.
40	CARVAJAL-ORTIZ H， GENTZIS T， OSTADHASSAN M. Sulfur differentiation in organic-rich shales and carbonates via open-system programmed pyrolysis and oxidation： Insights into fluid souring and H₂S production in the Bakken Shale， United States［J］. Energy & Fuels， 2021， 35（15）： 12030-12044.
41	ZHENG Tianyu， ZIEGER L， BANIASAD A， et al. The Shahejie Formation in the Dongpu Depression， Bohai Bay Basin， China： Geochemical investigation of the origin， deposition and preservation of organic matter in a saline lacustrine environment during the Middle Eocene［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2022， 253： 103967.
42	SUN Xun， LIANG Quansheng， JIANG Chengfu， et al. Liquid hydrocarbon characterization of the lacustrine Yanchang Formation， Ordos Basin， China： Organic-matter source variation and thermal maturity［J］. Interpretation， 2017， 5（2）： SF225-SF242.
43	LIU Bo， BAI Longhui， CHI Yaao， et al. Geochemical characterization and quantitative evaluation of shale oil reservoir by two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and quantitative grain fluorescence on extract： A case study from the Qingshankou Formation in Southern Songliao Basin， northeast China［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2019， 109： 561-573.
44	ZHANG Tongwei， SUN Xun， MILLIKEN K L， et al. Empirical relationship between gas composition and thermal maturity in Eagle Ford Shale， south Texas［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2017， 101（8）： 1277-1307.
45	HAN Yuanjia， HORSFIELD B， MAHLSTEDT N， et al. Factors controlling source and reservoir characteristics in the Niobrara shale oil system， Denver Basin［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2019， 103（9）： 2045-2072.
46	KOZLOVA E V， FADEEVA N P， KALMYKOV G A， et al. Geochemical technique of organic matter research in deposits enrich in kerogene （the Bazhenov Formation， West Siberia）［J］. Moscow University Geology Bulletin， 2015， 70（6）： 409-418.
47	SHEKARIFARD A， DARYABANDEH M， RASHIDI M， et al. Petroleum geochemical properties of the oil shales from the Early Cretaceous Garau Formation， Qalikuh locality， Zagros Mountains， Iran［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2019， 206： 1-18.
48	XIE Xiaomin， AMANN-HILDENBRAND A， LITTKE R， et al. The influence of partial hydrocarbon saturation on porosity and permeability in a Palaeogene lacustrine shale-hosted oil system of the Bohai Bay Basin， Eastern China［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2019， 207： 26-38.
49	王广昀，王凤兰，蒙启安，等. 古龙页岩油战略意义及攻关方向［J］. 大庆石油地质与开发， 2020， 39（3）： 8-19.
	WANG Guangyun， WANG Fenglan， MENG Qi’an， et al. Strategic significance and research direction for Gulong shale oil［J］. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing， 2020， 39（3）： 8-19.
50	王玉华，梁江平，张金友，等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油资源潜力及勘探方向［J］. 大庆石油地质与开发， 2020， 39（3）： 20-34.
	WANG Yuhua， LIANG Jiangping， ZHANG Jinyou， et al. Resource potential and exploration direction of Gulong shale oil in Songliao Basin［J］. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing， 2020， 39（3）： 20-34.
51	何文渊，蒙启安，张金友. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油富集主控因素及分类评价［J］. 大庆石油地质与开发， 2021， 40（5）： 1-12.
	HE Wenyuan， MENG Qi’an， ZHANG Jinyou. Controlling factors and their classification-evaluation of Gulong shale oil enrichment in Songliao Basin［J］. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing， 2021， 40（5）： 1-12.
52	王凤兰，付志国，王建凯，等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油储层特征及分类评价［J］. 大庆石油地质与开发， 2021， 40（5）： 144-156.
	WANG Fenglan， FU Zhiguo， WANG Jiankai， et al. Characteristics and classification evaluation of Gulong shale oil reservoir in Songliao Basin［J］. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing， 2021， 40（5）： 144-156.
53	孙龙德. 古龙页岩油（代序）［J］. 大庆石油地质与开发， 2020， 39（3）： 1-7.
	SUN Longde. Gulong shale oil （preface）［J］. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing， 2020， 39（3）： 1-7.
54	ABARGHANI A， OSTADHASSAN M， GENTZIS T， et al. Organofacies study of the Bakken source rock in North Dakota， USA， based on organic petrology and geochemistry［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2018， 188： 79-93.
55	LIU Kouqi， OSTADHASSAN M， ZHOU Jie， et al. Nanoscale pore structure characterization of the Bakken Shale in the USA［J］. Fuel， 2017， 209： 567-578.
56	LIU Kouqi， OSTADHASSAN M， SUN Liangwei， et al. A comprehensive pore structure study of the Bakken Shale with SANS， N₂ adsorption and mercury intrusion［J］. Fuel， 2019， 245： 274-285.
57	LIU Kouqi， OSTADHASSAN M， ZOU Jie， et al. Multifractal analysis of gas adsorption isotherms for pore structure characterization of the Bakken Shale［J］. Fuel， 2018， 219： 296-311.
58	AMIN S， WEHNER M， HEIDARI Z， et al. Rock classification in the Eagle Ford Formation through integration of petrophysical， geological， geochemical， and geomechanical characterization［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2021， 105（7）： 1357-1381.
59	JIANG Shuxian， MOKHTARI M. Characterization of marl and interbedded limestone layers in the Eagle Ford Formation， DeWitt county， Texas［J］. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering， 2019， 172： 502-510.
60	LIANG Chao， CAO Yingchang， JIANG Zaixing， et al. Shale oil potential of lacustrine black shale in the Eocene Dongying Depression： Implications for geochemistry and reservoir characteristics［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2017， 101（11）： 1835-1858.
61	LI Maowen， CHEN Zhuoheng， MA Xiaoxiao， et al. Shale oil resource potential and oil mobility characteristics of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation， Jiyang Super-Depression， Bohai Bay Basin of China［J］. International Journal of Coal Geology， 2019， 204： 130-143.
62	ZHANG Hong， HUANG Haiping， LI Zheng， et al. Oil physical status in lacustrine shale reservoirs-A case study on Eocene Shahejie Formation shales， Dongying Depression， East China［J］. Fuel， 2019， 257： 116027.
63	HAN Yuanjia， HORSFIELD B， WIRTH R， et al. Oil retention and porosity evolution in organic-rich shales［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2017， 101（6）： 807-827.
64	朱如凯，邹才能，吴松涛，等. 中国陆相致密油形成机理与富集规律［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2019， 40（6）： 1168-1184.
	ZHU Rukai， ZOU Caineng， WU Songtao， et al. Mechanism for generation and accumulation of continental tight oil in China［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2019， 40（6）： 1168-1184.
65	金之钧，朱如凯，梁新平，等. 当前陆相页岩油勘探开发值得关注的几个问题［J］. 石油勘探与开发， 2021， 48（6）： 1276-1287.
	JIN Zhijun， ZHU Rukai， LIANG Xinping， et al. Several issues worthy of attention in current lacustrine shale oil exploration and development［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2021， 48（6）： 1276-1287.
66	朱如凯，李梦莹，杨静儒，等. 细粒沉积学研究进展与发展方向［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2022， 43（2）： 251-264.
	ZHU Rukai， LI Mengying， YANG Jingru， et al. Advances and trends of fine-grained sedimentology［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2022， 43（2）： 251-264.
67	朱毅秀，吕品，金科，等. 四川元坝地区大安寨段陆相细粒沉积岩储层物性特征及有利储集层研究［J］. 特种油气藏， 2021， 28（4）： 39-47.
	ZHU Yixiu， Pin LYU， JIN Ke， et al. Study on physical properties and favorable reservoirs of terrestrial pulveryte reservoirs in Da’anzhai member， Yuanba area， Sichuan［J］. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs， 2021， 28（4）： 39-47.
68	聂银兰，谢庆宾，朱筱敏，等. 基于岩相表征的细粒沉积物沉积机制和研究展望［J］. 断块油气田， 2021， 28（3）： 305-310.
	NIE Yinlan， XIE Qingbin， ZHU Xiaomin， et al. The sedimentary mechanism and research prospect of fine grain sediments based on lithofacies characterization［J］. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field， 2021， 28（3）： 305-310.
69	张亚雄. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部地区三叠系延长组7段暗色泥岩烃源岩特征［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2021， 42（5）： 1089-1097.
	ZHANG Yaxiong. Source rock characterization： The dark mudstone in Chang 7 Member of Triassic， central Ordos Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2021， 42（5）： 1089-1097.
70	范柏江，师良，杨杰，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部湖相有机质沉积环境特征［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2022， 43（3）： 648-657.
	FAN Bojiang， SHI Liang， YANG Jie， et al. Sedimentary environment of lacustrine organic matter in the central Ordos Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2022， 43（3）： 648-657.
71	LI Wenhao， LU Shuangfang， XUE Haitao， et al. Oil content in argillaceous dolomite from the Jianghan Basin， China： Application of new grading evaluation criteria to study shale oil potential［J］. Fuel， 2015， 143： 424-429.
72	胡莹，卢双舫，李文浩，等. 江汉盆地新沟嘴组泥质白云岩含油性分析［J］. 东北石油大学学报， 2015， 39（3）： 76-82， 5-6.
	HU Ying， LU Shuangfang， LI Wenhao， et al. Oil-bearing property analysis of argillaceous dolomite in Xingouzui Formation in the Jianghan Basin［J］. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University， 2015， 39（3）： 76-82， 5-6.
73	张鹏飞，卢双舫，李文浩，等. 江汉盆地新沟嘴组页岩油储层物性下限［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2016， 37（1）： 93-100.
	ZHANG Pengfei， LU Shuangfang， LI Wenhao， et al. Lower limits of porosity and permeability of shale oil reservoirs in the Xingouzui Formation， Jianghan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2016， 37（1）： 93-100.
74	JARVIE D M. Components and processes affecting producibility and commerciality of shale resource systems［J］. Geologica Acta， 2014， 12（4）： 307-325.
75	李志明，陶国亮，黎茂稳，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部彬长区块三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩油勘探前景探讨［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2019， 40（3）： 558-570.
	LI Zhiming， TAO Guoliang， LI Maowen， et al. Discussion on prospecting potential of shale oil in the 3rd sub-member of the Triassic Chang 7 member in Binchang Block， southwestern Ordos Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2019， 40（3）： 558-570.

盆地	地层	组/段	TOC/%	有机质类型	T_max/℃	OSI/（mg/g）	文献来源
下萨克森	侏罗系	波西多尼亚	5.04 ~ 14.75 （8.17）	Ⅱ型	425 ~ 465 （445）	10 ~ 43 （26）	［37］
沃斯堡	石炭系	巴奈特	0.98 ~ 6.84 （3.67）	Ⅱ型	340 ~ 504 （446）	10 ~ 727 （67）	［27，38］
阿德莫	泥盆系	伍德福德	0.07 ~ 15.6 （8.97）	Ⅰ型，Ⅱ型	413 ~ 429 （421）	11 ~ 97 （48）	［39］
威利斯顿	泥盆系-石炭系	巴肯	2.44 ~ 23.44 （13.77）	Ⅱ型	416 ~ 465 （441）	11 ~ 135 （47）	［40］
渤海湾	古近系	沙河街组	1.01 ~ 5.33 （2.23）	Ⅰ型，Ⅱ型	438 ~ 458 （444）	13 ~ 193 （60）	［41］
鄂尔多斯	三叠系	长7段	1.90 ~ 14.70（5.71）	Ⅰ型，Ⅱ型	428 ~ 459 （448）	24 ~ 200 （84）	［42］
松辽	白垩系	青山口组	0.98 ~ 7.27 （3.30）	Ⅰ型	440 ~ 455 （448）	28 ~ 88 （50）	［43］
准噶尔	二叠系	芦草沟组	0.40 ~ 35.00 （4.84）	Ⅰ型	425 ~ 455 （446）	6 ~ 492 （51）	［16］
麦肯齐	白垩系	鹰滩	0.30 ~ 8.53 （3.12）	Ⅱ型	426 ~ 494 （454）	21 ~ 497 （124）	［44］
丹佛	白垩系	尼奥布拉拉	0.51 ~ 10.34 （3.89）	Ⅱ型	435 ~ 467 （448）	17 ~ 201 （66）	［45］
西西伯利亚	白垩系	巴热诺夫	2.04 ~ 14.72 （9.18）	Ⅱ型	425 ~ 464 （440）	32 ~ 154 （71）	［46］
扎格罗斯	白垩系	盖鲁	0.75 ~ 26.40 （16.03）	Ⅱ-S型	423 ~ 438 （431）	2 ~ 20 （10）	［47］

[1]	Huimin LIU, Youshu BAO, Maowen LI, Zheng LI, Lianbo WU, Rifang ZHU, Dayang WANG, Xin WANG. Geochemical parameters for evaluating shale oil enrichment and mobility： A case study of shales in the Bakken Formation， Williston Basin and the Shahejie Formation， Jiyang Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 622-636.
[2]	Huimin LIU, Zheng LI, Youshu BAO, Shouchun ZHANG, Weiqing WANG, Lianbo WU, Yong WANG, Rifang ZHU, Zhengwei FANG, Shun ZHANG, Peng LIU, Min WANG. Geology of shales in prolific shale-oil well BYP5 in the Jiyang Depression， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1405-1417.
[3]	Jianghui Meng, Peixi Lyu, Wei Wu, Renfang Pan, Yiqing Zhu. A method for evaluating the thermal maturity of marine shale based on graptolite reflectance and Raman spectroscopy： A case from the Lower Palaeozoic Wufeng‒Longmaxi Formations， southern Sichuan Basin， SW China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1515-1528.
[4]	Zhiqiang Li, Bo Yang, Jun Wang, Zijun Han, Qingxun Wu. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation history of Mesozoic-Cenozoic lacustrine source rocks in the South Yellow Sea Basin，offshore eastern China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 419-431.
[5]	Yong Tang, Yong Song, Wenjun He, Long Zhao, Changyong Zhao, Menglin Zheng, Haibo Yang, Shuai Sun, Liying Fei. Characteristics of composite hydrocarbon accumulation in a superimposed basin， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 132-148.
[6]	Zhen Qiu, Hengye Wei, Hanlin Liu, Nan Shao, Yuman Wang, Leifu Zhang, Qin Zhang. Accumulation of sediments with extraordinary high organic matter content: Insight gained through geochemical characterization of indicative elements [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 931-948.
[7]	Yong'an Xue, Feilong Wang, Guomin Tang, Xinqi Li. Geological condition and exploration prospect of shale oil and gas in the Bohai Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 696-709.
[8]	Jiang Qigui, Li Maowen, Qian Menhui, Bao Yunjie, Liu Peng, Tao Guoliang, Ma Xiaoxiao, Li Zhiming, Cao Tingting, Wu Shiqiang. Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 571-582.
[9]	Chen Zhuoheng, Li Maowen, Jiang Chunqing, Qian Menhui. Shale oil resource potential and its mobility assessment: A case study of Upper Devonian Duvernay shale in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 459-468.
[10]	Xu Tianwu, Zhang Hong'an, Li Jidong, Zhao Wei. Characters of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of salt-lake facies in Dongpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2): 248-261.
[11]	Nie Haikuan, Ma Xin, Yu Chuan, Ye Xin, Bian Ruikang, Liu Zhongbao. Shale gas reservoir characteristics and its exploration potential-analysis on the Lower Jurassic shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 438-447.
[12]	Sun Lina, Zhang Zhongning, Wu Yuandong, Su Long, Xia Yanqing, Wang Zixiang, Zheng Youwei. Evolution patterns and their significances of biomarker maturity parameters—a case study on liquid hydrocarbons from type Ⅲ source rock under HTHP hydrous pyrolysis [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(4): 573-580.
[13]	Xue Bing, Zhang Jinchuan, Yang Chao, Zhang Peng, Pei Songwei. Theoretical chart of shale gas content [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(2): 339-346.
[14]	Chang Xiangchun, Wang Tieguan, Tao Xiaowan, Cheng Bin. Aromatic biomarkers and oil source of the Ordovician crude oil in the Halahatang Sag, Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(2): 175-182.
[15]	Huang Wenbiao, Deng Shouwei, Lu Shuangfang, Yu Ling, Hu Shuo, Zhang Ju. Shale organic heterogeneity evaluation method and its application to shale oil resource evaluation—a case study from Qingshankou Formation, southern Songliao Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(5): 704-711.

Remarkable issues of Rock-Eval pyrolysis in the assessment of shale oil/gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 75

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics