试论“盆”“山”耦合和脱耦研究的方法学

doi:10.11743/ogg20040301

Abstract

Abstract:

Coupling and decoupling of "basin" and "range" is to study the uniform kinematic process and geodynamic mechanism of orogeny and basin development through viewing the two as a whole.It must be guaranteed by corresponding methodology.Three topics are discussed in this paper.(1)The "basin" and "range" system should be defined correctly on the basis of determining a certain time interval;(2)Two sets of classification systems should be used concurrently.Theoretical classification system is mainly used in "normal sequence" study and regional study,while practical classification system is mainly used in "reverse sequence" study and local(mainly refer to oil and gas reservoirs)study.(3)Thoughts,methods and technical means should be integrated together based on the successful study methods of orogenic belt and basin development in recent years.Coupling and decoupling of "basin" and "range" study,including its methodology,may provide new theoretical guidance for petroleum exploration in-mainland China.

Key words: methodology, coupling and decoupling of "basin", and "range", "basin", and "range", system, new technical means

CLC Number:

P541

Wu Genyao, Ma Li. Methodology of studying coupling and decoupling of "basin" and "range"[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004, 25(3): 239-246.

References

[1] 吴根耀,马力.试论"盆""山"的耦合和脱耦及其运动学[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(2):99～109[2] 吴根耀,马力."盆""山"耦合和脱耦--进展,现状和努力方向[J].大地构造与成矿学,2004,28(1):81～97[3] 吴根耀,马力."盆""山"耦合和脱耦:含油气盆地研究的新思路[A].见:中国石油学会石油地质专业委员会编.油气盆地研究新进展(第一辑)[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.20～36[4] 马力,陈焕疆,甘克文,等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2004.865[5] 吴根耀,马力.对中国南方大地构造和油气远景的若干新思考[A].见:李德生.中国含油气盆地构造学[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.272～291[6] 戴少武,贺自爱,王津义.中国南方中、古生界油气勘探的思路[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(3):195～202[7] 杨克明.川西坳陷油气资源现状及勘探潜力[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(4):322～325[8] 吴根耀,马力."盆""山"耦合和脱耦在含油气盆地分析中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(4):648～660[9] 吴根耀.燕山运动和中国大陆晚中生代的活化[J].地质科学,2002,37(4):453～461[10] 孙晓猛,吴根耀,郝福江,等.秦岭-大别造山带北部中-新生代逆冲推覆构造期次及时空迁移规律[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):63～76[11] 孙晓猛,张梅生,龙胜祥,等.秦岭-大别造山带北部逆冲推覆构造与合肥盆地,周口坳陷控盆断裂[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):191～198[12] 曹高社,李学田,刘德良,等.合肥盆地与北淮阳构造带印支期的推覆构造及其油气意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(2):116～122[13] 张进江,郑亚东,刘树文.小秦岭金矿田中生代构造演化与矿床形成[J].地质科学,2003,38(1):74～84[14] 吴根耀,马力,陈焕疆,等.苏皖地块演化,苏鲁造山带形成及其耦合的盆地发育[J].大地构造与成矿学,2003,27(4):336～352[15] Wu Genyao,Yano T,Inomata M.Yanshanian orogenics in South China:a relation to Neotethyan evolution[J].Scientia Geologica Sinica,1998,7(1):1～10[16] 铃木和博,端山好和,猪俣道也,等.福建石狮白垩纪片麻状花岗岩的CHIME年龄[J].科学通报,1997,42(12):1343～1344[17] 李武显,周新民,李献华.长乐-南澳断裂带变形火成岩的U-Pb和⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar年龄[J].地质科学,2003,38(1):22～30[18] 陈丕基.晚白垩世中国东南沿岸山系与中南地区的沙漠和盐湖化[J].地层学杂志,1997,21(3):203～212[19] 吴根耀.古缝合线活化和华南中生代陆内造山运动[A].见:中国地质学会编.第31届国际地质大会中国代表团学术论文集[C].北京:地质出版社,2001.32～39[20] 吴根耀.造山带地层学[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,2000.218[21] Ramsay J G,Huber M I.Model method of structural geology,Vol.1,analysis of strain[M].1988(中译本由刘瑞询,常志忠,张荣昌,译.现代构造地质学方法,第一卷,应变分析[M].北京:地质出版社,1991.1～337)[22] Suppe J.Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding[J].Amer Jour Sci,1983,283:684～721[23] Suppe J.Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding[J].Ecologae Geol Helv,1990,83(3):409～453[24] Bally A W,Snelson S.Realms of subsidence[A].In:Miall A D.Facts and principles of world petroleum occurrence[C].Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir,1980,6:9～94[25] Allen P A,Homewood P,Williams G D.Foreland basin:an introduction[A].In:Allen P A,Homewood P.Foreland basins[C].Oxford:Blackwell,1986.3～12[26] Ricci Lucchi F.The Oligocene to recent foreland basins of the northern Apennines[A].In:Allen P A,Homewood P.Foreland basins[C].Oxford:Blackwell,1986.105～139[27] 柳广弟,高先志.油气运聚单元分析:油气勘探评价的有效途径[J].地质科学,2003,38(3):307～314[28] 吴根耀.古深断裂活化与燕山期陆内造山运动--以川南-滇东和中扬子褶-冲断系为例[J].大地构造与成矿学,2001,25(3):246～253[29] 段铁军,徐宏节,伍泓,等.塔里木盆地与断裂作用有关的圈闭类型特征[J].石油实验地质,1998,20(3):217～222[30] 郝芳,邹华耀,姜建群.油气成藏动力学及其研究进展[J].地学前缘,2003,7(3):11～21[31] 庞雄奇,罗群,姜振学,等.叠合盆地断裂上、下盘油气差异聚集效应及成因机制[J].地质科学,2003,38(3):297～306[32] Bachu B.Flow systems in the Abberta basin:patterns,types and driving mechanisms[J].Bull Canadian Petroleum Geology,1999,47:455～474[33] Klemme H D,Ulmishek G F.Effective petroleum source rocks of the world:stratigraphic distribution and controlling depositional factors[J].AAPG Bull,1991,75:1809～1851[34] 孙肇才,邱蕴玉,郭正吾. 板内形变与晚期次生成藏--扬子区海相油气总体形成规律的探讨[J]. 石油实验地质,1991,13(2):107～142[35] 朱炎铭,秦勇,范炳恒,等.黄骅坳陷深层古生界烃源岩的生烃演化[J].地质科学,2001,36(4):435～443[36] 张有生,秦勇,刘焕杰,等.沉积有机质二次生烃有机岩石学特征[J].地质科学,2003,38(4):437～446[37] 李田忠,秦勇,张有生,等.二次生烃的蓝移现象[J].地质科学,2002,37(1):62～69[38] O'Brien G W,Lisk M,Duddy I R,et al.Plate convergence,foreland development and fault reactivation:primary controls on brine migration,thermal histories and trap breach in the Timor Sea,Australia[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1999,16:533～560[39] 郝芳,邹华耀,杨旭升,等.油气幕式成藏及其驱动机制和识别标志[J].地质科学,2003,38(3):403～412[40] 李旺军,罗晓容.碎屑岩输导层内油气运聚非均一性的定量分析[J].地质科学,2001,36(4):402～413[41] 张发强,罗晓容,苗盛,等.石油二次运移优势路径形成过程实验及机理分析[J].地质科学,2004,39(2):159～167[42] 陶士振.包裹体应用于油气地质研究的前提条件和关键问题[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):77～91[43] 刘光鼎,祝靓谊.近期油气勘探地球物理的一些新进展[J].地球物理学进展,2003,18(3):363～367[44] Brown F L,Benson Jr J M,Brink G L,et al.Sequence stratigraphy in offshore South African divergent basin[J].AAPG Studies in Geology,1995,41:181[45] 刘晓冬,徐景祯,李椿,等.流体势场中油气运聚分隔槽的自动识别及运聚单元的划分[J].地质科学,2002,37(3):295～301[46] 刘光鼎.雄关漫道真如铁--论中国油气二次创业[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(2):185～190[47] 吴根耀.初论造山带古地理学[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(2):81～98[48] 贺自爱. 假说--不应误解的一种研究方式[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(2):169～172[49] 何治亮,朱虹.石油勘探工作的系统观[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):356～360[50] 邸领军.克服油气勘探中的惯性思维[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(3):284～286[51] 王庭斌.中国天然气理论进展及勘探战略[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):1～7

Methodology of studying coupling and decoupling of "basin" and "range"

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Changjian ZHANG, Debin YANG, Lin JIANG, Yingbing JIANG, Qi CHANG, Xuejian MA. Characteristics and origin of over-dissolution residual fault-karst reservoirs in the northern Tahe oilfield， Tarim Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 367-383.
[2]	Lidong MI, Daqian ZENG, Hua LIU, Yandong GUO, Yanfeng LI, Zunzhao LI, Xudong SUN, Guangquan ZHANG, Chunhua LU, Peixian WANG. Key technologies and development trends for intelligent construction of underground gas storage facilities [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 581-592.
[3]	Naxin TIAN, Chenglin GONG, Gaokui WU, Kun QI, Yijie ZHU, Jingjing LIU. Development of submarine depositional systems under dynamic interplays between sediment gravity flows and seafloor topography： A case study of the Potiguar Basin on the equatorial Atlantic Ocean [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 15-30.
[4]	Xusheng GUO, Xiaoxiao MA, Maowen LI, Menhui QIAN, Zongquan HU. Mechanisms for lacustrine shale oil enrichment in Chinese sedimentary basins [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1333-1349.
[5]	Longde SUN, Xiaojun WANG, Zihui FENG, Hongmei SHAO, Huasen ZENG, Bo GAO, Hang JIANG. Formation mechanisms of nano-scale pores/fissures and shale oil enrichment characteristics for Gulong shale， Songliao Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1350-1365.
[6]	Yong LI, Zhitong ZHU, Peng WU, Chenzhou SHEN, Jixian GAO. Pressure evolution of gas-bearing systems in the Upper Paleozoic tight reservoirs at the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1568-1581.
[7]	Zhijiang KANG, Dongmei ZHANG, Zhenkun ZHANG, Ruiqi WANG, Wenbing JIANG, Kunyan LIU. Intelligent prediction of inter-well connectivity path in deep fractured-vuggy reservoirs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1290-1299.
[8]	Changgui XU, Chenglin GONG. Predictive stratigraphy： From sequence stratigraphy to source-to-sink system [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 521-538.
[9]	Hongtao ZHU, Changgui XU, Xiaofeng DU, Qianghu LIU, Zhongheng SUN, Zhiwei ZENG. Quantitative reconstruction， hierarchical division and coupling mode establishment for ancient source-to-sink systems in continental basins [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 539-552.
[10]	Hao LIU, Changgui XU, Yangdong GAO, Heming LIN, Xinwei QIU, Yongtao JU, Xudong WANG, Lei LI, Jun MENG, Xiaoming QUE. Source-to-sink system and hydrocarbon source rock prediction of underexplored areas in rifted lacustrine basins： A case study on northern lows in Zhu Ⅰ Depression， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 565-583.
[11]	Yangdong GAO, Guangrong PENG, Xiangtao ZHANG, Xudong WANG, Hui SUN, Taixun LIU, Fengchun SUN. Characteristics and evolution of the source-to-sink system of the Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Baiyun Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 584-599.
[12]	Jun LIU, Guangrong PENG, Jinyun ZHENG, Song CAI, Dingwei ZHU, Ziyi WANG. Sedimentary transformation and source-to-sink response to the Eocene rifting-detachment in the western Baiyun Sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 600-612.
[13]	Guangrong PENG, Xucheng WANG, Weitao CHEN, Yaoyao JIN, Fei WANG, Wenyong WANG, Han QUAN. Source-to-sink system during rifting-depression transition period and its exploration significance： A case study of the Upper Enping Formation at southeastern margin of Huizhou 26 sub-sag， Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 613-625.
[14]	Ziyi WANG, Hongbo LI, Jinyun ZHENG, Dingwei ZHU, Sa YU, Zhaoming CHEN, Zhensheng LI. Structural evolution and its control on source-to-sink system of Panyu 27 Sag in Pearl River Mouth Basin during rifting [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 626-636.
[15]	Xiaogfeng DU, Xiaojun PANG, Xiaobo HUANG, Bingjie WANG. Characteristics of the source-to-sink system for the Paleogene Sha 2 Member of northern Liaoxi Sag， offshore Bohai Bay Basin and its control on beach bar sands [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 662-674.