富有机质页岩-水蒸气吸附热力学与动力学特性——以鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系山西组页岩为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210115

Abstract

Abstract:

Adsorption is one of the key mechanisms for the occurrence of connate water and formation water in shale reservoirs. A characterization of water adsorption onto organic-rich shale is of great theoretical and practical significance to tackling such geological and engineering issues as the micro-distribution of water and gas, the mechanisms of shale gas enrichment and the improvement of shale gas recovery. Shale-water vapor isothermal adsorption experiments were therefore combined with some theoretical adsorption models (7 thermodynamic models and 4 kinetics models) to study the fundamental principles of water vapor adsorption on shale. Results indicate that the adsorption/desorption isotherms are showing the typical TypeⅡcurves with hysteresis loops extending to very low relative pressure region, which may be explained by the fact of reluctant dehydration of clay minerals. Two of the models, GAB and Dent, are proven to be the most fitting to the shale-water vapor isotherm curves and reveal a two-stage water molecule adsorption on shale from forming monolayers to multilayers and capillary condensation. With p/p₀ less than 0.1, water molecules are mainly adsorbed as monolayer on one site of shale. With p/p₀ between 0.1 and 0.8, the site is gradually saturating and more layers start to build upon the first layer, thus forming a secondary adsorption site. With p/p₀ greater than 0.8, the first site is almost fully saturated and the adsorption on the secondary site continues in such a rate that capillary condensation of water occurs. Moreover, the negative values of Gibbs free energy change, enthalpy change and entropy change of the adsorption, indicate a spontaneous, exothermic and entropy-reduction process. Thus the double first-order rate model is the most suitable for describing the adsorption process of water vapor on shale. It reveals that the adsorption process can be divided into a surface adsorption dominated by an earlier external diffusion and a pore adsorption dominated by a later internal diffusion, and that the internal diffusion serves to control the adsorption rate of water vapor onto shale.

Key words: thermodynamics, adsorption kinetics, adsorption mechanism, water vapor adsorption, organic-rich shale, Shanxi Formation, Permian, Ordos Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Wei Dang, Jinchuan Zhang, Fengqin Wang, Pei Li, Chang'an Shan, Ruijing Wang. Thermodynamics and kinetics of water vapor adsorption onto shale: A case study of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 173-185.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 2

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 3

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 4

References 51

1	李东晖, 聂海宽. 一种考虑气藏特征的页岩含气量计算方法——以四川盆地及其周缘焦页1井和彭页1井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1324- 1332.
	Li Donghui , Nie Haikuan . A new method to calculate shale gas content based on gas reservoir characterization-A case study of Wells JY 1 and PY 1 in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1324- 1332.
2	胡文瑄, 姚素平, 陆现彩, 等. 典型陆相页岩油层系成岩过程中有机质演化对储集性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 947- 956.
	Hu Wenxuan , Yao Suping , Lu Xiancai , et al. Effects of organic matter evolution on oil reservoir property during diagenesis of typical continental shale sequences[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 947- 956.
3	Schilthuis R J . Connate water in oil and gas sands[J]. Transactions of the AIME, 1938, 127 (1): 199- 214. doi: 10.2118/938199-G
4	柳广弟, 张厚福. 石油地质学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2009.
	Liu Guangdi , Zhang Houfu . Petroluem Geology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2009.
5	Curtis J B . Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86 (11): 1921- 1938.
6	蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等. 页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30 (10): 7- 12.
	Jiang Yuqiang , Dong Dazhong , Qi Lin , et al. Basic features and eval-uation of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30 (10): 7- 12.
7	邹才能, 杨智, 朱如凯, 等. 中国非常规油气勘探开发与理论技术进展[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89 (6): 979- 1007. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.06.001
	Zou Caineng , Yang Zhi , Zhu Rukai ,et al. Progress in China's unconventional oil & gas exploration and development and theoretical technologies[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89 (6): 979- 1007. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.06.001
8	刘洪林, 王红岩. 中国南方海相页岩超低含水饱和度特征及超压核心区选择指标[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33 (7): 140- 144.
	Liu Honglin , Wang Hongyan . Ultra-low water saturation characteristics and the identification of over-pressured play fairways of marine shales in south China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33 (7): 140- 144.
9	Tang X , Ripepi N , Valentine K A , et al. Water vapor sorption on Marcellus shale: measurement, modeling and thermodynamic analysis[J]. Fuel, 2017, 209, 606- 614. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.062
10	Seemann T , Bertier P , Krooss B M , et al. Water vapour sorption on mudrocks[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2017, 454 (1): 201- 233. doi: 10.1144/SP454.8
11	Hao F , Zou H , Lu Y . Mechanisms of shale gas storage: Implications for shale gas exploration in China[J]. AAPG bulletin, 2013, 97 (8): 1325- 1346. doi: 10.1306/02141312091
12	曾溅辉. 沉积盆地中地质流体运动与油气成藏[J]. 海相油气地质, 2005, 10 (1): 37- 42.
	Zeng Jianhui . Geofluids flow and hydrocarbon accumulation in sedimentary basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2005, 10 (1): 37- 42.
13	庞小婷, 陈国辉, 许晨曦, 等. 涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩吸附-游离气定量评价及相互转化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1247- 1258.
	Pang Xiaoting , Chen Guohui , Xu Chenxi , et al. Quantitative evaluation of adsorbed and free gas and their mutual conversion in Wufeng-Longmaxi shale, Fuling area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1247- 1258.
14	Wang F , Guan J , Feng W , et al. Evolution of overmature marine shale porosity and implication to the free gas volume[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40 (6): 819- 824. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60111-1
15	党伟, 张金川, 黄潇, 等. 陆相页岩含气性主控地质因素-以辽河西部凹陷沙河街组三段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36 (12): 1516- 1530. doi: 10.7623/syxb201512006
	Dang Wei , Zhang Jinchuan , Huang Xiao , et al. Main-controlling geological factors of gas-bearing property of continental shale gas: a case study of Member 3rd of Shahejie Formation in western Liaohe sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36 (12): 1516- 1530. doi: 10.7623/syxb201512006
16	聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49 (1): 13- 35.
	Nie Haikuan , He Zhiliang , Liu Guangxiang , et al. Status and direction of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49 (1): 13- 35.
17	Dang W , Zhang J C , Tang X , et al. Investigation of gas content of organic-rich shale: A case study from Lower Permian shale in southern North China Basin, central China[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2018, 9 (2): 559- 575. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.05.009
18	Zhou Y , Sun W , Chu W , et al. Theoretical insight into the enhanced CH4 desorption via H₂O adsorption on different rank coal surfaces[J]. Journal of energy chemistry, 2016, 25 (4): 677- 682. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2016.04.011
19	Tan J , Weniger P , Krooss B , et al. Shale gas potential of the major marine shale formations in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China, Part Ⅱ: Methane sorption capacity[J]. Fuel, 2014, 129, 204- 218. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.064
20	Tang X , Zhang T , Zhang J , et al. Effects of pore fluids on methane sorption in the Lower Bakken Shales, Williston Basin, USA[J]. Fuel, 2020, 282, 118457. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118457
21	Li P , Ma D , Zhang J , et al. Effect of wettability on adsorption and desorption of coalbed methane: A case study from low-rank coals in the southwestern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57 (35): 12003- 12015.
22	Li P , Zhang J , Rezaee R , et al. Effect of adsorbed moisture on the pore size distribution of marine-continental transitional shales: Insights from lithofacies differences and clay swelling[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2020, 105926.
23	Ma L , Yu Q . Dynamic behaviors of methane adsorption on partially saturated shales[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 190, 107071. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107071
24	Shaoul J R , van Zelm L F , De Pater C . Damage mechanisms in unconventional-gas-well Stimulation-a new look at an old problem[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2011, 26 (4): 388- 400.
25	Dang W , Zhang J , Nie H , et al. Isotherms, thermodynamics and kine-tics of methane-shale adsorption pair under supercritical condition: Implications for understanding the nature of shale gas adsorption process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383, 123191. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123191
26	Sang G , Liu S , Elsworth D . Water vapor sorption properties of Illinois shales under dynamic water vapor conditions: Experimentation and modeling[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55 (8): 7212- 7228. doi: 10.1029/2019WR024992
27	Zolfaghari A , Dehghanpour H , Holyk J . Water sorption behaviour of gas shales: I.Role of clays[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017, 179, 130- 138. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.05.008
28	冯东, 李相方, 李靖, 等. 黏土矿物吸附水蒸气特征及对孔隙分布的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42 (2): 116- 124.
	Feng Dong , Li Xiangfang , Li Jing , et al. Water adsorption isotherm and its effect on pore size distribution of clay minerals[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2018, 42 (2): 116- 124.
29	Wang T , Tian S , Li G , et al. Experimental study of water vapor adsorption behaviors on shale[J]. Fuel, 2019, 248, 168- 177. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.029
30	Qiu H , Lv L , Pan B C , et al. Critical review in adsorption kinetic models[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 2009, 10 (5): 716- 724. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A0820524
31	Duan S , Li G . Equilibrium and kinetics of water vapor adsorption on shale[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2018, 140 (12): 122001- 122010. doi: 10.1115/1.4040530
32	Langmuir I . The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2015, 40 (12): 1361- 1403.
33	Dubinin M M , Serpinsky V V . Isotherm equation for water vapor adsorption by microporous carbonaceous adsorbents[J]. Carbon, 1981, 19, 402- 403. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(81)90066-X
34	Dubinin M M , Serpinsky V V . Water vapour adsorption on microporous activated carbons[J]. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR., 1981, 285, 1151- 1157.
35	D'Arcy R , Watt I . Analysis of sorption isotherms of non-homogeneous sorbents[J]. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1970, 66, 1236- 1245. doi: 10.1039/tf9706601236
36	Furmaniak S , Gauden P A , Terzyk A P , et al. Water adsorption on carbons-Critical review of the most popular analytical approaches[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 137 (2): 82- 143. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2007.08.001
37	Brunauer S , Emmett P H , Teller E . Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1938, 60 (2): 309- 319. doi: 10.1021/ja01269a023
38	Anderson R B . Modifications of the Brunauer, Emmett and Teller equation1[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1946, 68 (4): 686- 691. doi: 10.1021/ja01208a049
39	De Boer J H . The dynamical character of adsorption[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.
40	Guggenheim E A . Applications of statistical mechanics[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.
41	Lagergren S . Zurtheorie der sogenannten adsorption geloster stoffe, Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens[J]. Handligar, 1898, 24, 1- 39.
42	Ho Y S , McKay G . Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes[J]. Process Biochemistry, 1999, 34 (5): 451- 465. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
43	Wilczak A , Keinath T M . Kinetics of sorption and desorption of copper (Ⅱ) and lead (Ⅱ) on activated carbon[J]. Water Environment Research, 1993, 65 (3): 238- 244. doi: 10.2175/WER.65.3.7
44	Wheeler A . Reaction rates and selectivity in catalyst pores[J]. Advances in Catalysis, 1951, 3 (5): 433- 439.
45	Iglesias H A , Chirife J , Viollaz P . Thermodynamics of water vapour sorption by sugar beet root[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 1976, 11 (1): 91- 101.
46	Sing K S . Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57 (4): 603- 619. doi: 10.1351/pac198557040603
47	汪政德, 张茂林, 梅海燕, 等. 毛细凝聚和吸附-脱附回路的物理化学解释[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2002, 23 (3): 233- 235. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2002.03.017
	Wang Zhengde , Zhang Maolin , Mei Haiyan , et al. The physical chemistry explanation of the capillary condensation and the circuit of adsorption-desorption[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2002, 23 (3): 233- 235. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2002.03.017
48	Hueckel T . Reactive plasticity for clays during dehydration and rehydration.Part 1: concepts and options[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2002, 18 (3): 281- 312. doi: 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00099-1
49	Saffron C M , Park J H , Dale B E , et al. Kinetics of contaminant desorption from soil: comparison of model formulations using the Akaike information criterion[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2006, 40 (24): 7662- 7667.
50	Hurvich C M , Tsai C L . Regression and time series model selection in small samples[J]. Biometrika, 1989, 76 (2): 297- 307. doi: 10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
51	Wan K , He Q , Miao Z , et al. Water desorption isotherms and net isosteric heat of desorption on lignite[J]. Fuel, 2016, 171, 101- 107. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.054

深度/m	有机地化特征			岩矿组成含量/%
深度/m	TOC/%	R_o/%	有机质类型	石英	长石	碳酸盐矿物	黄铁矿	粘土矿物	伊利石	高岭石	绿泥石	伊/蒙混层
3 577.87	2.28	2.45	偏生气型	42	3	—	1	54	23	11	9	11

温度/℃	DW模型						GAB模型					Dent模型
温度/℃	q₁/(mg·g^-1)	q₂/(mg·g^-1)	k₁	k₂	R²	AIC_c	q₀/(mg·g^-1)	C	k	R²	AIC_c	q₀/(mg·g^-1)	K	k	R²	AIC_c
20	6.79	10.84	10.43	0.56	0.997	-2.47	7.99	13.94	0.63	0.997	-11.09	7.99	8.83	0.63	0.997	-11.09
30	7.15	10.31	10.04	0.55	0.998	-7.67	7.96	14.98	0.61	0.998	-16.24	7.96	9.11	0.61	0.998	-16.24
40	4.75	26.59	13.47	0.33	0.998	-11.29	7.91	12.04	0.57	0.998	-15.99	7.91	6.88	0.57	0.998	-15.99

吸附量/(mg·g^-1)	斜率	截距	ΔH/(kJ·mol^-1)	ΔG/(kJ·mol^-1)	ΔS/(kJ·mol^-1·K^-1)
1	-1 164.04	0.22	-9.67	-9.14	-0.0 018
8	-798.61	1.61	-6.64	-2.72	-0.013 4
15	-536.29	1.59	-4.46	-0.59	-0.013 2

模型	拟合参数	p/p₀			T/℃
模型	拟合参数	0.05	0.30	0.90	20	30	40
拟一阶动力学模型	k₁/min^-1	0.24	0.12	0.07	0.13	0.06	0.08
	R²	0.992	0.974	0.968	0.974	0.945	0.971
	AIC_c	-205.12	-255.41	-378.46	-255.41	-230.73	-239.06
拟二阶动力学模型	k₂/(mg³·g^-1·min^-1)	0.23	0.22	0.14	0.23	0.12	0.16
	q_∞/(mg·g^-1)	2.31	1.16	1.13	1.16	1.15	1.11
	R²	0.949	0.952	0.959	0.952	0.97	0.948
	AIC_c	-150.96	-228.82	-353.51	-228.81	-257.78	-215.83
双一阶动力学模型	q₁	0.63	0.60	0.58	0.61	0.55	0.51
	q₂	0.37	0.40	0.42	0.39	0.45	0.49
	k′/min^-1	0.47	0.23	0.14	0.23	0.25	0.32
	k″/min^-1	0.02	0.05	0.06	0.06	0.03	0.06
	R²	0.995	0.995	0.994	0.992	0.993	0.992
	AIC_c	-209.66	-292.44	-466.61	-292.44	-324.83	-288.78
单孔扩散模型	(D/R²)/min^-1	0.014	0.007	0.004	0.006	0.003	0.005
	R²	0.978	0.972	0.979	0.972	0.991	0.981
	AIC_c	-174.95	-251.49	-394.77	-251.49	-303.86	-254.21

[1]	Weitao WU, Yansong FENG, Shixiang FEI, Yifei WANG, Heyuan WU, Xudong YANG. Enrichment factors and play fairway mapping for tight gas in the 5^th member of the Permian Shiqianfeng Formation， Shenmu gas field， Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 739-751.
[2]	Chenglin LIU, Zhengang DING, Liyong FAN, Rui KANG, Sijie HONG, Yuxin ZHU, Jianfa CHEN, Haidong WANG, Nuo XU. Geochemical characteristics and enrichment factors of helium-bearing natural gas in the Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 384-392.
[3]	Junyu WAN, Jianhui ZHU, Suping YAO, Yi ZHANG, Chuntang LI, Wei ZHANG, Haijian JIANG, Jie WANG. Geobiological evaluation of hydrocarbon-generating organisms and source rocks in the Ordovician Majiagou Formation， east-central Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 393-405.
[4]	Changbo ZHAI, Liangbiao LIN, Donghua YOU, Fengbin LIU, Siyu LIU. Sedimentary microfacies characteristics and organic matter enrichment pattern of the 1^st member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation， southwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 440-456.
[5]	LiHua YANG, ChiYang LIU, Lei HUANG, Yijun ZHOU, Yongtao LIU, Yang QIN. Discovery of suspected intrusive rock bodies in Gufengzhuang area， Ordos Basin and its geological significance [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 142-156.
[6]	Liang SHI, Bojiang FAN, Zhonghou LI, Ziwei YU, Zijin LIN, Xinyang DAI. Migration differentiation of hydrocarbon components in the 7^th member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation， central Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 157-168.
[7]	Jiangjun CAO, Jiping WANG, Daofeng ZHANG, Long WANG, Xiaotian LI, Ya LI, Yuanyuan ZHANG, Hui XIA, Zhanhai YU. Effects of diagenetic evolution on gas-bearing properties of deep tight sandstone reservoirs： A case study of reservoirs in the 1^st member of the Permian Shanxi Formation in the Qingyang gas field， southwestern Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 169-184.
[8]	Zongquan HU, Ruyue WANG, Jing LU, Dongjun FENG, Yuejiao LIU, Baojian SHEN, Zhongbao LIU, Guanping WANG, Jianhua HE. Storage characteristic comparison of pores between lacustrine shales and their interbeds and differential evolutionary patterns [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[9]	Chenglin LIU, Zhengang DING, Jianfa CHEN, Liyong FAN, Rui KANG, Haidong WANG, Sijie HONG, Anqi TIAN, Xueyong CHEN. Characteristics and helium-generating potential of helium source rocks in the Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1546-1554.
[10]	Yong LI, Zhitong ZHU, Peng WU, Chenzhou SHEN, Jixian GAO. Pressure evolution of gas-bearing systems in the Upper Paleozoic tight reservoirs at the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1568-1581.
[11]	Jianhui ZENG, Yaxiong ZHANG, Zaizhen ZHANG, Juncheng QIAO, Maoyun WANG, Dongxia CHEN, Jingli YAO, Jingchen DING, Liang XIONG, Yazhou LIU, Weibo ZHAO, Kebo REN. Complex gas-water contacts in tight sandstone gas reservoirs： Distribution pattern and dominant factors controlling their formation and distribution [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[12]	Yueli LIANG, Xiaoming ZHAO, Xi ZHANG, Shuxin LI, Jiawang GE, Zhihong NIE, Tingshan ZHANG, Haihua ZHU. Orbital forced high-resolution sequence boundary identification of marine-continental transitional shale and its geological significance： A case in Shan 2³ sub-member at the eastern margin of Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1231-1242.
[13]	Han LI, Jinhua FU, Hancheng JI, Lei ZHANG, Yuwei SHE, Wei GUAN, Xianghui JING, Hongwei WANG, qian CAO, Gang LIU, Jiayi WEI. Bauxite series in the Upper Paleozoic weathering crusts in the southwestern Ordos Basin： Development and distribution of dominant reservoirs [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1243-1255.
[14]	Xiao LI, Peng GUO, Yanzhi HU, Shixiang LI, Weiwei YANG. Experiment and numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in lacustrine shale： Taking the Ordos Basin as an example [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 1009-1019.
[15]	Bin BAI, Chaocheng DAI, Xiulin HOU, Liang YANG, Rui WANG, Lan WANG, Siwei Meng, Ruojing DONG, Yuxi LIU. Geological heterogeneity of shale sequence and evaluation of shale oil sweet spots in the Qingshankou Formation， Songliao Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 846-856.

Thermodynamics and kinetics of water vapor adsorption onto shale: A case study of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Ordos Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 51

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics