Oil & Gas Geology ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 722-738.doi: 10.11743/ogg20240311
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zaihua HAN1(), Hua LIU1,2(), Lanquan ZHAO3, Jingdong LIU1, Lijuan YIN3, Lei LI1
Received:
2023-12-24
Revised:
2024-05-31
Online:
2024-06-30
Published:
2024-07-01
Contact:
Hua LIU
E-mail:1339514178@qq.com;liuhua77@upc.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Zaihua HAN, Hua LIU, Lanquan ZHAO, Jingdong LIU, Lijuan YIN, Lei LI. Source rock-reservoir assemblage types and differential oil enrichment model in tight (low-permeability) sandstone reservoirs in the Paleocene Shahejie Formation in the Linnan Sub-sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 722-738.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Comparison of oil-bearing properties and accumulation conditions of the various source rock-reservoir assemblages in the Linnan Sub-sag"
源-储组合类型 | 源-储共生型 | 源-储紧邻型 | 源-储间隔型 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
含油性 | 油气显示比例/% | 28.0~100.0 | 9.0~78.0 | 2.5~25.0 |
含油饱和度/% | 22~83 | 17~75 | 2~51 | |
平均日产油量/t | 11.4 | 6.4 | 1.1 | |
供烃条件 | 平均烃源岩厚度/m | 180.6 | 100.9 | 66.9 |
优质烃源岩占比/% | 70.0 | 70.0 | 42.8 | |
运聚动力条件 | 源-储剩余压力差/ MPa | 3.0~16.9 | — | — |
源-储剩余压力梯度/(MPa/km) | — | 18~465 | 5~60 | |
输导条件 | 孔缝输导 | 孔缝-断裂-砂体联合输导 | 断裂-砂体输导 | |
储集条件 | 砂体平均累计厚度/m | 43.8 | 75.7 | 72.9 |
单砂体厚度/m | >5 | 0~6 | 0~6 | |
平均孔隙度/% | 9.6 | 12.5 | 8.5 | |
渗透率中值/( | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.32 | |
孔隙特征 | 次生溶蚀孔和晶间孔增多 | 残余粒间孔和次生溶蚀孔为主 | 次生溶蚀孔和晶间孔增多 |
1 | 邹才能, 陶士振, 杨智, 等. 中国非常规油气勘探与研究新进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2012, 31(4): 312-322. |
ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, YANG Zhi, et al. New advance in unconventional petroleum exploration and research in China[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012, 31(4): 312-322. | |
2 | 赵靖舟, 李军, 曹青, 等. 论致密大油气田成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(5): 573-583. |
ZHAO Jingzhou, LI Jun, CAO Qing, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of large tight oil and gas fields[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(5): 573-583. | |
3 | LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, WANG Ziyuan, et al. A review on pore structure characterization in tight sandstones[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 177: 436-457. |
4 | ZHANG Yingnan, GUO Wenyue. Molecular insight into the tight oil movability in nano-pore throat systems[J]. Fuel, 2021, 293: 120428. |
5 | LIU Yiming, YE Jiaren, ZONG Jie, et al. Analysis of forces during tight oil charging and implications for the oiliness of the tight reservoir: A case study of the third member of the Palaeogene Shahejie Formation, Qibei slope, Qikou sag[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 144: 105819. |
6 | DENG Jian, LIU Mingjie, JI Yongcheng, et al. Controlling factors of tight sandstone gas accumulation and enrichment in the slope zone of foreland basins: The Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Western Sichuan Foreland Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 214: 110474. |
7 | 曾溅辉, 杨智峰, 冯枭, 等. 致密储层油气成藏机理研究现状及其关键科学问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(6): 651-661. |
ZENG Jianhui, YANG Zhifeng, FENG Xiao, et al. Study status and key scientific issue of tight reservoir oil and gas accumulation mechanism[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(6): 651-661. | |
8 | 邹才能, 杨智, 陶士振, 等. 纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 13-26. |
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, TAO Shizhen, et al. Nano-hydrocarbon and the accumulation in coexisting source and reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 13-26. | |
9 | 赵靖舟, 孟选刚, 韩载华. 近源成藏——来自鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖盆东部 “边缘” 延长组6段原油的地球化学证据[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1513-1526. |
ZHAO Jingzhou, MENG Xuangang, HAN Zaihua. Near-source hydrocarbon accumulation: Geochemical evidence of lacustrine crude oil from the Member 6 of Yanchang Formation, eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1513-1526. | |
10 | ZHANG Xinshun, WANG Hongjun, MA Feng, et al. Classification and characteristics of tight oil plays[J]. Petroleum Science, 2016, 13(1): 18-33. |
11 | 宋岩, 罗群, 姜振学, 等. 中国中西部沉积盆地致密油富集机理及其主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(2): 421-433. |
SONG Yan, LUO Qun, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Enrichment of tight oil and its controlling factors in central and western China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(2): 421-433. | |
12 | 罗群, 红兰, 高阳, 等. 致密油源储组合差异富集机制与控藏模式——以酒泉盆地青西凹陷为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(1): 1-10, 19. |
LUO Qun, HONG Lan, GAO Yang, et al. Differential mechanism of tight oil enrichment and reservoir controlling model of source and reservoir combinations: A case study of Qingxi Sag, Jiuquan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2023, 45(1): 1-10, 19. | |
13 | 黄东, 段勇, 杨光, 等. 淡水湖相沉积区源储配置模式对致密油富集的控制作用——以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 518-527. |
HUANG Dong, DUAN Yong, YANG Guang, et al. Controlling effect of source-reservoir configuration model on tight oil enrichment in freshwater lacustrine sedimentary area: A case study of the Jurassic Da’anzhai Member in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 518-527. | |
14 | 姚泾利, 曾溅辉, 罗安湘, 等. 致密储层源储结构对储层含油性的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长6~长8段为例[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(3): 267-280. |
YAO Jingli, ZENG Jianhui, LUO Anxiang, et al. Controlling effect of source-reservoir structure in tight reservoir on oil-bearing property——A case study of Chang-6-Chang-8 members in Heshui area of Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(3): 267-280. | |
15 | 刘华, 赵珊, 梁书义, 等. 车镇凹陷斜坡带沙三段油气运聚与成藏模式[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5): 42-53. |
LIU Hua, ZHAO Shan, LIANG Shuyi, et al. Hydrocarbon transportation system and reservoir forming model of Es3 in slope belt of Chezhen Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(5): 42-53. | |
16 | 厚刚福, 宋兵, 倪超, 等. 致密油源储配置特征及油气勘探意义——以四川盆地川中地区侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(5): 1078-1085. |
HOU Gangfu, SONG Bing, NI Chao, et al. Tight oil source-reservoir matching characteristics and its significance for oil and gas exploration: A case study of the Jurassic Da’anzhai member in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(5): 1078-1085. | |
17 | 孙雨, 刘如昊, 于利民, 等. 源下致密砂岩油成藏特征、控制因素和运聚模式——以松辽盆地大安地区白垩系泉头组扶余油层为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(4): 793-805. |
SUN Yu, LIU Ruhao, YU Limin, et al. Accumulation characteristics, controlling factors and migration-accumulation model of tight sandstone oil below source rocks: A case study of Fuyu reservoirs of the Cretaceous Quantou formation in Da’an area of Songliao[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(4): 793-805. | |
18 | 王福伟, 陈冬霞, 解广杰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区延长组7段源-储结构控制下致密砂岩油的差异富集机制[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 941-956, 976. |
WANG Fuwei, CHEN Dongxia, XIE Guangjie, et al. Differential enrichment mechanism of tight sandstone oil under the control of the source-reservoir structures of Member 7 of Yanchang Formation in Qingcheng area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 941-956, 976. | |
19 | 曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 等. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083. |
ZENG Jianhui, ZHANG Yaxiong, ZHANG Zaizhen, et al. Complex gas-water contacts in tight sandstone gas reservoirs: Distribution pattern and dominant factors controlling their formation and distribution[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083. | |
20 | 刘飞, 朱钢添, 何生, 等. 渤海湾盆地惠民凹陷临南洼陷沙河街组原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6): 855-864. |
LIU Fei, ZHU Gangtian, HE Sheng, et al. Geochemical characteristics of crude oil and oil-source correlation of Shahejie Formation in Linnan sub-sag, Huimin Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2019, 41(6): 855-864. | |
21 | 李军亮, 王鑫, 王伟庆, 等. 致密砂岩砂-泥结构发育特征及其对储集空间的控制作用——以渤海湾盆地临南洼陷古近系沙河街组三段下亚段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1173-1187. |
LI Junliang, WANG Xin, WANG Weiqing, et al. Influence of sand-mud assemblages in tight sandstones on reservoir storage spaces: A case study of the lower submember of the 3rd member of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Linnan sub-sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1173-1187. | |
22 | 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 页岩油地质评价方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. |
State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Geological evaluating methods for shale oil: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020. | |
23 | 刘华, 蒋子月, 郝雪峰, 等. 渤南洼陷古近系古压力梯度与含油气性关系[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(2): 547-558. |
LIU Hua, JIANG Ziyue, HAO Xuefeng, et al. The relationship between the paleo-pressure gradient and hydrocarbon containing of Paleogene strata in the Bonan Sag[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(2): 547-558. | |
24 | 陈世加, 张焕旭, 路俊刚, 等. 四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段致密油富集高产控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2): 186-193. |
CHEN Shijia, ZHANG Huanxu, LU Jungang, et al. Controlling factors of Jurassic Da’anzhai member tight oil accumulation and high production in central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2): 186-193. | |
25 | 杨华, 梁晓伟, 牛小兵, 等. 陆相致密油形成地质条件及富集主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 12-20. |
YANG Hua, LIANG Xiaowei, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological conditions for continental tight oil formation and the main controlling factors for the enrichment: A case of Chang 7 Member, Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 12-20. | |
26 | 李明诚, 李剑. “动力圈闭”——低渗透致密储层中油气充注成藏的主要作用[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(5): 718-722. |
LI Mingcheng, LI Jian. “Dynamic trap”: A main action of hydrocarbon charging to form accumulations in low permeability-tight reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(5): 718-722. | |
27 | 郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 宋焕琪, 等. 致密油聚集模型与数值模拟探讨——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1): 4-10, 20. |
GUO Qiulin, CHEN Ningsheng, SONG Huanqi, et al. Accumulation models and numerical models of tight oil: A case study from Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(1): 4-10, 20. | |
28 | 刘惠民, 张关龙, 范婕, 等. 准噶尔盆地腹部征沙村地区征10井的勘探发现与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1118-1128. |
LIU Huimin, ZHANG Guanlong, FAN Jie, et al. Exploration discoveries and implications of Well Zheng 10 in the Zhengshacun area of the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1118-1128. | |
29 | 霍智颖, 何生, 王永诗, 等. 渤海湾盆地惠民凹陷临南洼陷沙河街组现今超压分布特征及成因[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(6): 938-945. |
HUO Zhiying, HE Sheng, WANG Yongshi, et al. Distribution and causes of present-day overpressure of Shahejie Formation in Linnan subsag, Huimin Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(6): 938-945. | |
30 | 王永诗, 邱贻博. 济阳坳陷超压结构差异性及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 430-437. |
WANG Yongshi, QIU Yibo. Overpressure structure dissimilarity and its controlling factors in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 430-437. | |
31 | 李纯泉, 刘惠民. 临南洼陷沙三段异常地层压力及其演化特征[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2013, 38(1): 105-111. |
LI Chunquan, LIU Huimin. Abnormal formation pressure and its evolution features of the third member, Shahejie Formation, Linnan Sag[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2013, 38(1): 105-111. | |
32 | 王翘楚. 惠民凹陷沙三段复杂压力特征、演化与成藏效应[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2022. |
WANG Qiaochu. Complex fluid pressure distribution, evolution and the its effects on hydrocarbon accumulation in the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Huimin Depression[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2022. | |
33 | 郭小文, 何生, 郑伦举, 等. 生油增压定量模型及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(4): 637-644. |
GUO Xiaowen, HE Sheng, ZHENG Lunju, et al. A quantitative model for the overpressure caused by oil generation and its influential factors[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(4): 637-644. | |
34 | 孙明亮, 柳广弟, 李剑. 超压盆地内剩余压力梯度与天然气成藏的关系[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(3): 19-22, 29. |
SUN Mingliang, LIU Guangdi, LI Jian. Relationship between excess-pressure gradient and gas accumulation in overpressured basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2008, 32(3): 19-22, 29. | |
35 | WANG Fuwei, CHEN Dongxia, WANG Qiaochu, et al. Evolution characteristics of transtensional faults and their impacts on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation: A case study from the Huimin Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, eastern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 120: 104507. |
36 | 李继岩, 宋国奇, 赵仲祥, 等. 惠民凹陷南部地区断层输导与封闭性能研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(4): 17-20, 112. |
LI Jiyan, SONG Guoqi, ZHAO Zhongxiang, et al. Main controlling factors analysis and evaluation on transporting and sealing performance of fault, south region of Huimin Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(4): 17-20, 112. | |
37 | 刘鹏, 张磊, 王胜奎, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油运移路径探讨及其石油地质意义[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6): 89-98. |
LIU Peng, ZHANG Lei, WANG Shengkui, et al. Discussion on migration path of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2022, 46(6): 89-98. | |
38 | 葛云锦, 任来义, 贺永红, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县—甘泉地区三叠系延长组7油层组致密油富集主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1190-1200. |
GE Yunjin, REN Laiyi, HE Yonghong, et al. Main factors controlling the tight oil enrichment in the 7th oil layer group of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Fuxian-Ganquan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6): 1190-1200. | |
39 | 孙沛沛, 操应长, 周立宏, 等. 大港探区扣村潜山带二叠系优质砂岩储层成因机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(2): 12-24. |
SUN Peipei, CAO Yingchang, ZHOU Lihong, et al. Genetic mechanisms of high quality sandstones reservoirs in Permian of Koucun buried hill, Dagang exploration area[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2022, 46(2): 12-24. | |
40 | 张英男, 白青林, 束青林, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘浅埋藏储层致密化成因[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 24-36. |
ZHANG Yingnan, BAI Qinglin, SHU Qinglin, et al. Mechanism of tight sandstone reservoirs with shallow burial in southwest of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2024, 48(2): 24-36. | |
41 | CUI Ronghao, HASSANIZADEH S M, SUN Shuyu. Pore-network modeling of flow in shale nanopores: Network structure, flow principles, and computational algorithms[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 234: 104203. |
42 | CLARKSON C R, JENSEN J L, PEDERSEN P K, et al. Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(2): 355-374. |
43 | 潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 等. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价——以四川盆地川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组二段1亚段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485. |
PAN Hui, JIANG Yuqiang, ZHU Xun, et al. Evaluation of geological sweet spots in fluvial tight sandstone gas: A case study of the first submember of the second member of the Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 471-485. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||