深埋条件下微生物碳酸盐岩成岩作用与孔隙演化——以四川盆地西部中三叠统雷口坡组为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20230105

Abstract

Abstract:

The microbial dolomite reservoir in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation， western Sichuan Basin， has been one of the exploration targets with a buried depth excessing 5 000 m and it serves as an excellent object of study for diagenetic fluids and pore evolution that are probably accountable for the formation of deeply-buried microbial carbonate reservoirs. Samples and data from more than 10 wells and several outcrops and seismic sections were studied with multi-technical methods， such as cast thin section observation， cathodoluminescence microscopy （CL）， scanning electron microscopy+energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy （SEM-EDS）， fluid inclusion microthermometry， carbon and oxygen isotope analysis via microsampling， carbonate clumped isotopes thermometer （△47）， U-Pb dating of calcite， FIB-SEM and so on. The results show that there are three early diagenetic subsystems： open， closed and semi-open （transition）， which respectively correspond to the intensive meteoric water influx in algal dolostone in intertidal-subtidal zones under humid climate， the weak meteoric water influx in evaporate rock-algal lamellated micritic dolostone in supratidal-intertidal zones under arid climate and the interaction between bacteria & microbial and carbonate mud druing an early supergene-shallow burial period. Large-scale dolomitzation and de-dolomitization during the burial-tectonic epochs are believed to take place repecitvely in the Carnian（226.50 ± 9.68 Ma）and Norian（211.50 ± 1.50 Ma）stages of Late Triassic， with temperatures of 43 ℃ to 54 ℃ and 50 ℃， respectively. Four to five successive dolomitization and calcite cementation stages have been identified， showing that the δ¹⁸O_water （PDB‰） of parent fluids varies between -0.83 ‰ and 9.70 ‰ for dolomite， and between -1.16 ‰ and 12.94 ‰ for calcites， while with the enlargement of cement crystalline， the overall δ¹⁸O_water slowly reduces， indicating an increase in temperature and fluctuationg salinity. Statistics reveal that vugs and solution-enlarged fractures （43.69 %）， framework pores （32.38 %） and micro-poros are the major pore types of microbial carbonate rocks. The micropores are well connected as organic acid-rich pore fluid inhibiting large-scale cementation and result in the partial preservion of pores with a good connectivity. Thereby， the shallow subtidal to supratidal zones with a development of shallow-up Mirokovich sedimentary cycle for microbial carbonate rocks， combined with the open to semi-open early diagenetic system， are the basis of reservoir porosity development and preservation， and the superposition and transformation of burial diagenetic fluids leads to the overall reduction of porosity.

Key words: pore evolution, diagenetic fluid, microbial carbonate rocks, Leikoupo Formation, Middle Triassic, western Sichuan Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.1

Yixiong QIAN, Hengzhi WU, Lingfang ZHOU, Shaofeng DONG, Qiongxian WANG, Xiaobo SONG, Meizhou DENG, Yong LI. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of microbial carbonate rocks undergone a deep burial history： Taking the Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in western Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 55-74.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig. 1

Fig.2

Table 1

Characteristics of cements （calcites， dolomites and quartzes） in microbial carbonate rocks and their vugs and fractures in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation， western Sichuan Basin"

胶结物/阴极发光	样品数量/个	δ¹⁸C_Carb（PDB）/‰			样品数量/个	均一温度Th/℃			δ¹⁸O_carb δ¹⁸O_cement-Water（PDB）/‰			样品数量/个	盐度Wt _NaClequ %
胶结物/阴极发光	样品数量/个	平均值	最大值	最小值	样品数量/个	平均值	最小值	最大值	平均值	最大值	最小值	样品数量/个	平均值（及范围）
D_{0/Anh/暗紫-浅紫红}^［6］	42	1.95	3.10	0.30	—	—	—	—	-1.67	-1.10	-6.60	—	—
D_{0/中橙紫红-浅紫红}^［6］	21	2.08	2.80	0.40	—	—	—	—	-2.28	-1.00	-5.80	—	—
D₀- D_{Ⅰ/中橙红-橙紫红}^［6］	24	2.46	2.90	1.90	—	—	—	—	-4.00	-2.70	-6.80	—	—
C_{AC/RFC /暗紫/不发光/橙黄红}^［6］	14	2.12	2.69	1.70	—	—	—	—	-3.22	1.20	-6.63	—	—
C_{Ⅰ/灰紫-浅黄粉红-橙黄粉红}	15	-4.75	-3.46	-6.68	10	61.8	50.2	68.0	-2.32	-1.16	-3.70	8	21.9（19.21 ~ 22.78）
C_{Ⅱ-1/暗紫-不发光}	26	-8.13	-6.20	-10.60	48	78.9	66.0	91.0	-5.25	-3.31	-7.65	21	1.7（0.71 ~ 5.56）
C_{Ⅱ-2/不发光}	26	-6.62	-4.30	-11.70	48	—	—	—	—	—	—	21	—
C_{Ⅲ-1/暗紫-橙黄红-亮粉红}	18	-7.70	-6.80	-12.29	347	111.1	86.5	129.8	-6.21	-4.73	-10.52	65	15.2（8.58 ~ 23.50）
C_{Ⅲ-2/暗紫-橙黄红-亮粉红}	18	-7.70	-6.80	-12.29	176	116.6	76.0	165.9	-6.34	-4.24	-11.21	130	11.3（6.45 ~ 23.18）
C_{Ⅳ-1/浅紫红-不发光}	11	-9.75	-7.20	-13.30	91	118.8	91.3	161.2	-8.08	-5.21	-12.06	77	2.2（0.35 ~ 5.71）
C_{Ⅳ-2/浅紫红-不发光}	8	-11.40	-9.40	-14.18	167	140.5	121.8	166.2	-10.00	-7.87	-12.94	58	12.4（6.74 ~ 19.29）
CD_{AC/RFC /暗紫-紫（橙）红}	27	2.11	2.98	1.90	—	—	—	—	-3.17	0.84	-5.84	—	—
D_{Ⅰ/中亮粉红、中粉紫红}	12	-4.51	-3.94	-5.91	1	43.0	—	—	-0.83	—	—	—	—
D_{Ⅱ/暗紫红-粉红/玫瑰-紫红}	11	-6.02	-4.41	-7.22	75	100.7	62.3	124.7	-4.46	-1.98	-5.96	13	5.0（0.35 ~ 9.73）
D_{Ⅲ/玫瑰红-紫红/亮橙红}	4	-5.97	-5.69	-6.77	156	115.6	92.5	143.1	-4.77	-3.98	-5.87	30	13.8（10.01 ~ 18.63）
D_{Ⅲ-Ⅳ/玫瑰红-亮橙红}	2	—	—	—	36	116.4	78.0	149.0	—	—	—	36	11.6（1.40 ~ 23.18）
D_{Ⅳ-1/浅紫红-玫瑰红/亮橙红}	4	-8.55	-7.44	-10.45	94	138.9	124.6	164.2	-7.34	-6.14	-9.39	15	9.2（1.40 ~ 10.73）
D_{Ⅳ-2/浅紫红-玫瑰红/亮橙红}	4	-8.55	-7.44	-10.45	138	148.4	125.7	192.5	-7.49	-6.16	-9.70	25	16.9（11.22 ~ 21.68）
Q_/不发光	8	—	—	—	—	156.8	140.0	168.0	—	—	—	—	11.9（9.60 ~ 15.76）

Table 1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table.2

Stable carbon and oxygen isotopes， △47， T-△47 values of carbonate rocks （fluids） in the Maantang-Leikoupo Formations in the Middle and Upper Triassic， western Sichuan Basin"

样号	埋深/m	层位	对象/CL发光	δ¹³C_carb（PDB）/‰	δ¹⁸O_carb（PDB）/‰	△47 （ARF）	△47（STF）	δ¹³C_carb（PDB）平均值/‰	δ¹⁸O_carb（PDB）平均值/‰	△47 平均值	T-△47（℃）	δ¹⁸O_水（PDB）/ ‰^［30-31］
XS1-21101	5 520.20	T₃m	粗枝藻-有孔虫凝块石灰岩/ 橙黄红-C_0b	2.01	-4.81	0.4802	0.470	2.02	-4.93	0.451	172	-4.53
XS1-21101	5 520.20	T₃m	粗枝藻-有孔虫凝块石灰岩/ 橙黄红-C_0b	2.03	-5.05	0.4200	0.432
XS1-21104	5 525.62	T₃m	去云化的泥粉晶云岩/ 紫红/-D₀-D_Ⅰ	2.05	-4.95	0.4570	0.447	2.02	-5.28	0.477	145	-4.60
				2.07	-5.29	0.4790	0.493
				1.93	-5.60	0.4770	0.490
XS1-21201	5 547.36	T₂l⁴	藻纹层灰质粉晶云岩/暗紫红/D_Ⅰ	2.56	-1.22	0.5648	0.553	2.61	-1.28	0.535	99	-0.94
XS1-21201	5 547.36	T₂l⁴	藻纹层灰质粉晶云岩/暗紫红/D_Ⅰ	2.67	-1.33	0.5020	0.517
XQS1-21101	5 702.72	T₃m	弱白云石化生屑凝块石灰岩/ 暗橙红/DC_0T	1.77	-6.87	0.4093	0.399	1.73	-6.95	0.404	239	-6.68
XQS1-21101	5 702.72	T₃m	弱白云石化生屑凝块石灰岩/ 暗橙红/DC_0T	1.69	-7.02	0.3970	0.409
XQS1-21201	5 706.50	T₃m	含生屑藻纹层泥晶云岩/ 橘红色/D_0bS	2.51	-2.55	0.4618	0.451	2.48	-2.68	0.449	175	-2.45
XQS1-21201	5 706.50	T₃m	含生屑藻纹层泥晶云岩/ 橘红色/D_0bS	2.45	-2.82	0.4340	0.446
YX1-206	5 714.76	T₂l⁴	去云化泥粉晶云岩/橙红/ C（D₀-D_Ⅰ）	1.40	-2.84	0.5162	0.505	1.42	-2.91	0.489	134	-2.47
YX1-206	5 714.76	T₂l⁴	去云化泥粉晶云岩/橙红/ C（D₀-D_Ⅰ）	1.45	-2.99	0.4600	0.473
YX1-207	5 714.90	T₂l⁴	去云化泥粉晶云岩/中橙红/ C（D₀-D_Ⅰ）	0.87	-2.38	0.5412	0.530	1.09	-2.13	0.524	106	-1.63
YX1-207	5 714.90	T₂l⁴	去云化泥粉晶云岩/中橙红/ C（D₀-D_Ⅰ）	1.32	-1.88	0.5040	0.519
YX1-214	5 716.78	T₂l⁴	泥粉晶云岩/中等橙红/D₀-D_Ⅰ	0.91	-2.82	0.5578	0.546	0.93	-2.92	0.543	94	-2.06
YX1-214	5 716.78	T₂l⁴	泥粉晶云岩/中等橙红/D₀-D_Ⅰ	0.94	-3.03	0.5240	0.539
DYS1-010	5 874.23	T₂l^4（3下）	泥粉晶云岩、弱重结晶/中橙红/D₀-D_Ⅰ	2.45	-0.95	0.5211	0.510	2.38	-1.27	0.540	95	-0.91
				2.35	-1.32	0.5370	0.552
				2.33	-1.53	0.5430	0.558
MJ1-002	6 148.20	T₂l^4（3上）	去云化藻球粒粉晶云岩/中橙红/ CD_ⅠP	2.39	-4.56	0.4976	0.487	2.44	-4.50	0.502	123	-3.69
MJ1-002	6 148.20	T₂l^4（3上）	去云化藻球粒粉晶云岩/中橙红/ CD_ⅠP	2.50	-4.44	0.5040	0.518
MJ1-003	6 148.32	T₂l^4（3上）	藻纹层-球粒泥粉晶云岩（橙红） D_ⅠPS	2.53	-4.24	0.4955	0.485	2.41	-4.54	0.476	146	-3.96
MJ1-003	6 148.32	T₂l^4（3上）	藻纹层-球粒泥粉晶云岩（橙红） D_ⅠPS	2.29	-4.84	0.4530	0.466
SYS1-029	6 177.41	T₂l⁴	弱云化含生屑藻球粒灰岩/ 中暗紫/DC_0bp	1.09	-5.94	0.4414	0.431	1.07	-6.11	0.423	209	-5.78
SYS1-029	6 177.41	T₂l⁴	弱云化含生屑藻球粒灰岩/ 中暗紫/DC_0bp	1.05	-6.28	0.4030	0.414
SYS1-046	6 180.10	T₂l⁴	弱云化藻球粒灰岩/中等紫/DC_0p	2.45	-2.34	0.5781	0.567	2.44	-2.44	0.557	85	-1.68
SYS1-046	6 180.10	T₂l⁴	弱云化藻球粒灰岩/中等紫/DC_0p	2.43	-2.55	0.5320	0.547
XSXQ-17076		T₂l²	藻纹层泥晶云岩/暗紫/D_0S	2.71	-1.50	0.6317	0.620	2.65	-1.83	0.641	43	-0.34
				2.61	-2.02	0.6480	0.667
				2.63	-1.97	0.6190	0.637
XSXQ-070		T₂l²	含膏泥晶云岩/中等紫/D₀	1.96	-0.18	0.5965	0.576	1.96	-0.18	0.594	64.7	-0.08
XSXQ-070		T₂l²	含膏泥晶云岩/中等紫/D₀			0.6116	0.612
YL-128		T₂l²	含膏泥晶云岩/中等紫/D₀	-0.29	-8.07	0.6337	0.610	0.02	-0.33	0.610	56.5	-3.03
				-0.28	-8.14	0.5875	0.593
				-0.28	-8.13	0.6225	0.628

Table.2

Fig. 5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

References 46

1	曾德铭，王兴志，康保平. 川西北雷口坡组储层原生孔隙内胶结物研究［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2006， 17（4）： 459-462.
	ZENG Deming， WANG Xingzhi， KANG Baoping. A study on cement in primary pore of the Leikoupo Formation reservoir in the northwest of Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2006， 17（4）： 459-462.
2	曾德铭，王兴志，张帆，等. 四川盆地西北部中三叠统雷口坡组储层研究［J］. 古地理学报， 2007， 9（3）： 253-266.
	ZENG Deming， WANG Xingzhi， ZHANG Fan， et al. Study on reservoir of the Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in northwestern Sichuan Basin［J］. Journal of Palaeogeography， 2007， 9（3）： 253-266.
3	刘树根，宋金民，罗平，等. 四川盆地深层微生物碳酸盐岩储层特征及其油气勘探前景［J］. 成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）， 2016， 43（2）： 129-152.
	LIU Shugen， SONG Jinmin， LUO Ping， et al. Characteristics of microbial carbonate reservoir and its hydrocarbon exploring outlook in the Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology（Science & Technology Edition）， 2016， 43（2）： 129-152.
4	李宏涛，胡向阳，史云清，等. 四川盆地川西坳陷龙门山前雷口坡组四段气藏层序划分及储层发育控制因素［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2017， 38（4）： 753-763.
	LI Hongtao， HU Xiangyang， SHI Yunqing， et al. Sequence division and controlling factors of reservoir development of the 4th Member of Leikoupo Formation in foreland of Longmen Mountains in the Western Sichuan Depression， Sichuan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2017， 38（4）： 753-763.
5	刘树根，孙玮，宋金民，等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气勘探的关键地质问题［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2019， 30（2）： 151-167.
	LIU Shugen， SUN Wei， SONG Jinmin， et al. The key geological problems of natural gas exploration in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2019， 30（2）： 151-167.
6	钱一雄，武恒志，周凌方，等. 川西中三叠统雷口坡组三段-四段白云岩特征与成因——来自于岩相学及地球化学的约束［J］. 岩石学报， 2019， 35（4）： 1161-1180.
	QIAN Yixiong， WU Hengzhi， ZHOU Lingfang， et al. Characteristic and origin of dolomites in the third and fourth members of Leikoupo Formation of the Middle Triassic in NW Sichuan Basin： Constraints in mineralogical， petrographic and geochemical data［J］. Acta Petrologica Sinica， 2019， 35（4）： 1161-1180.
7	周凌方，钱一雄，宋晓波，等. 四川盆地西部彭州气田中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段白云岩孔隙表征、分布及成因［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2020， 41（1）： 177-188.
	ZHOU Lingfang， QIAN Yixiong， SONG Xiaobo， et al. Characteristics， distribution and origin of dolomite reservoir in the upper Lei 4 member of the Middle Triassic， Pengzhou Gas Field， western Sichuan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2020， 41（1）： 177-188.
8	李宸，郎兴海，邓煜霖，等. 四川盆地峨眉山雷口坡组底部黏土岩（绿豆岩）的年代学及地球化学特征［J］. 矿物岩石地球化学通报， 2020， 39（4）： 810-825.
	LI Chen， LANG Xinghai， DENG Yulin， et al. Geochronological and geochemical characteristics of the claystone （mung bean rock） at the bottom of the Leikoupo Formation in the Emeishan area， Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Bulletin of Mineralogy， Petrology and Geochemistry， 2020， 39（4）： 810-825.
9	李国蓉，刘正中，谢子潇，等. 四川盆地西部雷口坡组非热液成因鞍形白云石的发现及意义［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2020， 41（1）： 164-176.
	LI Guorong， LIU Zhengzhong， XIE Zixiao， et al. Discovery of non-hydrothermal saddle-shaped dolomite in Leikoupo Formation， western Sichuan Basin and its significance［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2020， 41（1）： 164-176.
10	段金宝，金民东，范志伟，等. 四川盆地东北部中三叠统雷口坡组四段优质储层发育特征及勘探方向［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2021， 42（4）： 898-908.
	DUAN Jinbao， JIN Mindong， FAN Zhiwei， et al. Characteristics and favorable plays for high-quality reservoirs in the Middle Triassic Lei 4 Member， Yuanba area， northeastern Sichuan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2021， 42（4）： 898-908.
11	孙豪飞，罗冰，文龙，等. 四川盆地雷口坡组富有机质页岩的发现及盐下勘探新领域［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2021， 32（2）： 233-247.
	SUN Haofei， LUO Bing， WEN Long， et al. The first discovery of organic-rich shale in Leikoupo Formation and new areas of sub-salt exploration， Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2021， 32（2）： 233-247.
12	杨威，刘满仓，魏国齐，等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组岩相古地理与规模储集体特征［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2021， 32（6）： 781-793.
	YANG Wei， LIU Mancang， WEI Guoqi， et al. Sedimentary characteristics and sequence lithofacies paleogeography of the semi-closed carbonate platform of the Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2021， 32（6）： 781-793.
13	熊中玉，丁林，谢静. 碳酸盐耦合同位素（Δ₄₇）温度计及其在古高度重建中的应用［J］. 科学通报， 2019， 64（16）： 1722-1737.
	XIONG Zhongyu， DING Lin， XIE Jing. Carbonate clumped isotope （Δ₄₇） thermometry and its application in paleoelevation reconstruction［J］. Chinese Science Bulletin， 2019， 64（16）： 1722-1737.
14	陈家旭，王斌，郭小文，等. 应用方解石激光原位U-Pb同位素定年确定多旋回叠合盆地油气成藏绝对时间——以塔里木盆地塔河油田为例［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2021， 42（6）： 1365-1375.
	CHEN Jiaxu， WANG Bin， GUO Xiaowen， et al. Application of laser in-situ U-Pb dating of calcite to determination of the absolute time of hydrocarbon accumulation in polycyclic superimposed basins： A case study on Tahe Oilfield， Tarim Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2021， 42（6）： 1365-1375.
15	WINKELSTERN I Z， LOHMANN K C. Shallow burial alteration of dolomite and limestone clumped isotope geochemistry［J］. Geology， 2016， 44（6）： 467-470.
16	WINKELSTERN I Z， KACZMAREK S E， LOHMANN K C， et al. Calibration of dolomite clumped isotope thermometry［J］. Chemical Geology， 2016， 443： 32-38.
17	BONIFACIE M， CALMELS D， EILER J M， et al. Calibration of the dolomite clumped isotope thermometer from 25 to 350 ℃， and implications for a universal calibration for all （Ca， Mg， Fe）CO₃ carbonates［J］. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 2017， 200： 255-279.
18	CAME R E， AZMY K， TRIPATI A， et al. Comparison of clumped isotope signatures of dolomite cements to fluid inclusion thermometry in the temperature range of 73-176 ℃［J］. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 2017， 199： 31-47.
19	MANGENOT X， GASPARRINI M， ROUCHON V， et al. Basin-scale thermal and fluid flow histories revealed by carbonate clumped isotopes （Δ₄₇）-Middle Jurassic carbonates of the Paris Basin depocentre［J］. Sedimentology， 2018， 65（1）： 123-150.
20	HONLET R， GASPARRINI M， MUCHEZ P， et al. A new approach to geobarometry by combining fluid inclusion and clumped isotope thermometry in hydrothermal carbonates［J］. Terra Nova， 2018， 30（3）： 199-206.
21	LUKOCZKI G， HAAS J， GREGG J M， et al. Multi-phase dolomitization and recrystallization of Middle Triassic shallow marine-peritidal carbonates from the Mecsek Mts. （SW Hungary）， as inferred from petrography， carbon， oxygen， strontium and clumped isotope data［J］. Marine and Petroleum Geology， 2019， 101： 440-458.
22	KIM S T， O’NEIL J R. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium oxygen isotope effects in synthetic carbonates［J］. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 1997， 61（16）： 3461-3475.
23	HORITA J. Oxygen and carbon isotope fractionation in the system dolomite-water-CO₂ to elevated temperatures［J］. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 2014， 129： 111-124.
24	MOORBATH S， TAYLOR P N， ORPEN J L， et al. First direct radiometric dating of Archaean stromatolitic limestone［J］. Nature， 1987， 326（6116）： 865-867.
25	WINTER B L， JOHNSON C M. U-Pb dating of a carbonate subaerial exposure event［J］. Earth and Planetary Science Letters， 1995， 131（3/4）： 177-187.
26	WOODHEAD J， PICKERING R. Beyond 500 ka： Progress and prospects in the U-Pb chronology of speleothems， and their application to studies in palaeoclimate， human evolution， biodiversity and tectonics［J］. Chemical Geology， 2012， 322-323： 290-299.
27	LI Q， PARRISH R R， HORSTWOOD M S A， et al. U-Pb dating of cements in Mesozoic ammonites［J］. Chemical Geology， 2014， 376： 76-83.
28	LAWSON M， SHENTON B J， STOLPER D A， et al. Deciphering the diagenetic history of the El Abra Formation of eastern Mexico using reordered clumped isotope temperatures and U-Pb dating［J］. GSA Bulletin， 2018， 130（3/4）： 617-629.
29	HANSMAN R J， ALBERT R， GERDES A， et al. Absolute ages of multiple generations of brittle structures by U-Pb dating of calcite［J］. Geology， 2018， 46（3）： 207-210.
30	GODEAU N， DESCHAMPS P， GUIHOU A， et al. U-Pb dating of calcite cement and diagenetic history in microporous carbonate reservoirs： Case of the Urgonian Limestone， France［J］. Geology， 2018， 46（3）： 247-250.
31	SHEN Jiangng， HU Anping， CHENG Ting， et al. Laser ablation in situ U-Pb dating and its application to diagenesis-porosity evolution of carbonate reservoirs［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development， 2019， 46（6）： 1127-1140.
32	ENGEL J， MAAS R， WOODHEAD J， et al. A single-column extraction chemistry for isotope dilution U-Pb dating of carbonate［J］. Chemical Geology， 2020， 531： 119311.
33	张杰，寿建峰，文应初，等. 去白云石化作用机理及其对储集层的改造［J］. 古地理学报， 2012， 14（1）： 69-84.
	ZHANG Jie， SHOU Jianfeng， WEN Yingchu， et al. Mechanism of dedolomitization and its rebuilding to reservoir［J］. Journal of Palaeogeography， 2012， 14（1）： 69-84.
34	FLÜGEL E. Microfacies of carbonate rocks： Analysis， interpretation and application［M］. Berlin： Springer， 2004： 369-396.
35	GERDES G. What are microbial mats？［M］//SECKBACH J， OREN A， ed. Microbial Mats： Modern and Ancient Microorganisms in Stratified Systems. Dordrecht： Springer， 2010： 3-25.
36	PLANAVSKY N， GINSBURG R N. Taphonomy of modern marine Bahamian microbialites［J］. Palaios， 2009， 24（1）： 5-17.
37	PLANAVSKY N， REID R P， LYONS T W， et al. Formation and diagenesis of modern marine calcified cyanobacteria［J］. Geobiology， 2009， 7（5）： 566-576.
38	WARTHMANN R， VAN LITH Y， VASCONCELOS C， et al. Bacterially induced dolomite precipitation in anoxic culture experiments［J］. Geology， 2000， 28（12）： 1091-1094.
39	DUPRAZ C， REID R P， BRAISSANT O， et al. Processes of carbonate precipitation in modern microbial mats［J］. Earth-Science Reviews， 2009， 96（3）： 141-162.
40	朱光有，张水昌，梁英波，等. TSR对深部碳酸盐岩储层的溶蚀改造——四川盆地深部碳酸盐岩优质储层形成的重要方式［J］. 岩石学报， 2006， 22（8）： 2182-2194.
	ZHU Guangyou， ZHANG Shuichang， LIANG Yingbo， et al. Dissolution and alteration of the deep carbonate reservoirs by TSR： An important type of deep-buried high-quality carbonate reservoirs in Sichuan Basin［J］. Acta Petrologica Sinica， 2006， 22（8）： 2182-2194.
41	MOSHIER S O. Microporosity in micritic limestones： A review［J］. Sedimentary Geology， 1989， 63（3/4）： 191-213.
42	LUCIA F J. Rock-fabric/petrophysical classification of carbonate pore space for reservoir characterization［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 1995， 79（9）： 1275-1300.
43	EHRENBERG S N， WALDERHAUG O， BJØRLYKKE K. Carbonate porosity creation by mesogenetic dissolution： Reality or illusion？［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2012， 96（2）： 217-233.
44	CHAFETZ H S. Porosity in bacterially induced carbonates： Focus on micropores［J］. AAPG Bulletin， 2013， 97（11）： 2103-2111.
45	LOUCKS R G， LUCIA F J， WAITE L E. Origin and description of the micropore network within the Lower Cretaceous Stuart City trend tight-gas limestone reservoir in pawnee field in South Texas［J］. GCAGS Journal， 2013， 2： 29-41.
46	EHRENBERG S N， WALDERHAUG O. Preferential calcite cementation of macropores in microporous limestones［J］. Journal of Sedimentary Research， 2015， 85（7）： 780-793.

[1]	Changbo ZHAI, Liangbiao LIN, Donghua YOU, Fengbin LIU, Siyu LIU. Sedimentary microfacies characteristics and organic matter enrichment pattern of the 1^st member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation， southwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 440-456.
[2]	Hui TIAN, Zijin WU, Haifeng GAI, Xing WANG. Experimental study on late gas generation characteristics of the Middle Devonian sapropelic source rocks of in Northwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 46-54.
[3]	Yueqing HAN, Juntao ZHANG, Zhiliang HE, Zhenkui JIN, Wenbiao HAN, Ping GAO, Yunqing HAO, Wei SUN, Chongyang WU. Characteristics and genesis of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation dolostone in western Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 75-88.
[4]	Guohui Chen, Shu Jiang, Chun Li, Sisi Li, Peng Peng, Lan Mo, Yuying Zhang, Luchuan Zhang, Tianyu Zhang. Progress in shale reservoir upgrading through in-situ heating [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 286-296.
[5]	Liang Xu, Wei Yang, Zhenxue Jiang, Dongxia Chen, Yaohua Wang, Jiankang Lu, Mingzhu Zhao, Lan Li. Evolution and genesis of organic pores in Triassic Xujiahe Formation shale， Western Sichuan Depression， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 325-340.
[6]	Chengpeng Su, Ying He, Xiaobo Song, Bo Dong, Xiaoqi Wu. Reinterpretation of gas sources in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Western Sichuan gas field， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 341-352.
[7]	Xiaoqi Wu, Yingbin Chen, Changbo Zhai, Lingfang Zhou, Xiaojin Zhou, Jun Yang, Yanqing Wang, Xiaobo Song. Geochemical characteristics of bitumen and tracing of gas source in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation， Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 407-418.
[8]	Shiqi Liu, Senran Chen, Bo Liu, Kaibo Shi, Yuyang Liu, Haofu Zheng, Qingqing Luo. Pore evolution of the Permian Qixia-Maokou Formations dolomite in Sichuan Basin based on in-situ dissolution simulation experiment [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 702-716.
[9]	Bin Deng, Yu He, Jiaqiang Huang, Qiang Luo, Rongjun Yang, Hao Yu, Jing Zhang, Shugen Liu. Analogue modeling insights to foreland basin growth: A case study on the Longmenshan thrust belt in western Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(2): 401-415.
[10]	Mo Deng, Xinguo Duan, Changbo Zhai, Shengxiang Long, Zhenheng Yang, Lunju Zheng, Zhangchang Li, Taotao Cao. Variation in liquid hydrocarbon content during thermal simulation and its influence on physical property of shale [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6): 1310-1320.
[11]	Longlong Guo, Hongde Cheng, Xiaobo Huang, Jun Wang, Chong Feng. Quantitative analysis on pore evolution in feldspar-rich coarse clastic sandstone: A case study of Es² in the north part of Liaodong uplift [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 874-883.
[12]	Qiangfu Kong, Cai Yang, Hao Li, Chao Geng, Jian Deng. A lithology recognition method based on multi-resolution graph-based clustering and K-Nearest Neighbor:A case study from the Leikoupo Formation carbonate reservoirs in western Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 884-890.
[13]	Jiaqing Liu, Zhong Li, Mengke Yan, K.Swart Peter, Liu Yang, Chaojin Lu. Diagenetic fluid evolution of dolomite from the Lower Ordovician in Tazhong area, Tarim Basin: Clumped isotopic evidence [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 68-82.
[14]	Qingqing Luo, Bo Liu, Weimin Jiang, Jinxin Yu, Shiqi Liu, Yuanchong Wang, Liubin Wei, Zhenghong Cai. Diagenesis and pore evolution of dolomite reservoir in the 5th member of the Ordovician Majiagou Formation, central Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 102-115.
[15]	Guorong Li, Zhengzhong Liu, Zixiao Xie, Yongmin Duan, Sai He, Meizhou Deng, Yuchen Wang, Yong Li, Zhangzhi Wu. Discovery of non-hydrothermal saddle-shaped dolomite in Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Basin and its significance [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 164-176.

Diagenesis and porosity evolution of microbial carbonate rocks undergone a deep burial history： Taking the Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in western Sichuan Basin as an example

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 46

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics