川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变

doi:10.11743/ogg20240211

Abstract

Abstract:

In recent years， industrial gas flow has been obtained in the Permian Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin， underscoring the great significance of exploring the sedimentary microfacies and environmental evolution of the formation for oil and gas exploration. This study focuses on the Yangjiao section in Wulong District， Chongqing， China. Based on the field observations of sedimentary characteristics， coupled with thin section observation and geochemical analysis， we delve into the sedimentary microfacies and sedimentary environmental evolution characteristics of the Maokou Formation. The results reveal the predominant distribution of five sedimentary microfacies. Bioclast-bearing micrites and micrites， deposits in a deep-water， low-energy environment， prevail in the lower formation. The middle formation exhibits the primary distribution of sparry bioclastic limestones， micritic bioclastic limestones， bioclastic micrites， and bioclastic micrites， and the presence of sparry bioclastic limestones suggests a shallow-water， high-energy sedimentary environment. The upper formation predominantly contains micritic bioclastic limestones， bioclastic micrites， and bioclast-bearing micrites， and the water becomes deeper again. Geochemical analysis reveals that the lower Maokou Formation exhibits low δ¹³C_carb values with an average of 3.00 ‰， while its middle and upper portions show δ¹³C_carb values mostly exceeding 4.00 ‰. These findings suggest that the formation’s first member was deposited in an anoxic environment， which converted into a dysoxic environment with an increase in oxidation and then recovered to an anoxic environment in the late depositional stage. The sedimentary microfacies characteristics and the sea-level changes in the Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin were affected by glacial periods， with the global sea-level drop serving as the dominant factor in the sedimentary environment transitions. The shallow-water sedimentary environment created favorable geological conditions for the emergence of high-energy grainstone shoals， which is， in turn， the main cause of the formation of high-quality reservoirs in the middle and upper Maokou Formation in the basin.

Key words: carbonate microfacies, geochemical proxy, sedimentary environment, Maokou Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin, Sichuan Basin

CLC Number:

TE121.3

Heyi ZHANG, Shuai YANG, Xihua ZHANG, Hanlin PENG, Qian LI, Cong CHEN, Zhaolong GAO, Anqing CHEN. Sedimentary microfacies and environmental evolution of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin： A case study of the Yangjiao section in Wulong District， Chongqing， China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Experimental data and calculation results for the Maokou Formation in the Yangjiao section， Wulong District"

样品号	厚度/m	碳、氧同位素值/‰		微量元素含量/10^-6								微量元素含量比值
样品号	厚度/m	δ¹⁸O	δ¹³C_carb	Sr	Ba	Rb	Th	U	V	Ni	Co	Sr/Ba	Rb/Sr	Th/U	V/（V+Ni）	Ni/Co
YJ-B-1	367.62	-4.67	3.21	1 252.6	8.1	0.5	0.3	3.2	10.7	2.6	0.2	155.23	0.000 4	0.08	0.80	15.74
YJ-B-2	354.73	-4.93	3.25	1 508.9	14.8	0.6	0.2	5.0	4.5	1.3	0.1	101.96	0.000 4	0.03	0.78	13.75
YJ-B-3	348.83	-4.28	3.40	1 882.7	10.2	1.4	0.1	6.9	7.5	1.4	0.1	184.72	0.000 7	0.02	0.85	11.83
YJ-B-4	341.24	-4.43	3.24	1 776.5	9.2	1.2	0.1	4.2	6.2	1.2	0.1	193.39	0.000 7	0.02	0.83	10.23
YJ-B-5	337.35	-4.77	3.40	2 919.3	42.0	0.6	0.1	5.8	4.0	1.0	0.1	69.53	0.000 2	0.02	0.80	11.30
YJ-B-6	333.41	-5.44	3.48	1 637.1	7.2	0.5	0.1	5.1	4.4	0.9	0.1	228.61	0.000 3	0.03	0.83	11.63
YJ-B-7	328.68	-5.01	3.29	2 461.9	10.5	1.7	0.3	10.0	15.3	2.2	0.1	233.43	0.000 7	0.03	0.87	17.80
YJ-B-8	326.55	-4.25	3.28	1 421.5	8.1	1.2	0.1	5.3	14.5	1.7	0.1	176.28	0.000 9	0.02	0.90	12.22
YJ-B-9	284.53	-4.86	2.32	4 182.9	15.2	2.1	0.2	2.5	25.5	8.1	0.3	274.74	0.000 5	0.10	0.76	23.92
YJ-B-10	272.48	-4.71	3.89	1 866.8	8.6	0.8	0.1	2.3	5.0	1.8	0.2	216.76	0.000 4	0.04	0.73	11.48
YJ-B-11	266.45	-3.86	3.72	3 509.5	32.6	0.9	0.2	8.8	37.9	3.0	0.2	107.63	0.000 2	0.02	0.93	20.01
YJ-B-12	264.34	-4.77	2.83	2 687.7	13.6	1.7	0.2	3.6	25.2	3.9	0.2	197.96	0.000 6	0.05	0.86	20.52
YJ-B-13	253.77	-4.35	3.30	1 275.0	8.1	0.8	0.1	3.3	5.7	1.0	0.1	157.08	0.000 6	0.04	0.86	9.97
YJ-B-14	248.98	-5.37	3.91	3 125.6	9.2	0.4	0.1	4.9	18.5	0.8	0.1	340.74	0.000 1	0.01	0.96	10.14
YJ-B-15	245.74	-7.02	1.93	1 057.4	10.7	0.3	0.0	9.4	5.6	0.8	0.1	99.14	0.000 3	0.00	0.88	8.87
YJ-B-16	226.3	-5.73	3.43	2 332.2	15.7	2.8	0.2	4.4	97.7	13.9	0.2	148.50	0.001 2	0.04	0.88	62.76
YJ-B-17	202.95	-5.74	3.66	2 797.5	8.4	0.8	0.1	14.6	26.2	2.2	0.1	332.12	0.000 3	0.01	0.92	17.39
YJ-B-18	200.36	-4.46	3.71	5 233.7	8.4	0.8	0.1	2.8	24.3	2.0	0.2	619.44	0.000 1	0.04	0.92	12.37
YJ-B-19	193.8	-4.59	3.95	1 446.2	12.1	4.1	0.5	12.8	52.2	13.1	0.6	119.35	0.002 8	0.04	0.80	23.25
YJ-B-20	187.95	-4.88	3.72	1 570.0	11.0	3.3	0.2	7.9	73.3	5.6	0.2	142.33	0.002 1	0.03	0.93	25.75
YJ-B-21	171.32	-4.84	3.94	1 868.0	9.0	1.1	0.4	6.1	12.3	1.6	0.2	206.43	0.000 6	0.07	0.88	8.37
YJ-B-22	166.15	-7.10	4.38	2 835.7	8.7	0.9	0.2	1.9	12.6	2.3	0.2	326.65	0.000 3	0.11	0.84	12.75
YJ-B-23	151.9	-5.47	4.85	1 109.7	6.6	0.7	0.2	2.3	26.2	2.4	0.1	169.42	0.000 7	0.09	0.92	17.84
YJ-B-24	124.08	-5.91	4.86	834.2	6.3	0.9	0.3	3.2	13.7	4.0	0.2	132.14	0.001 0	0.09	0.77	26.43
YJ-B-25	110.85	-5.06	4.29	567.9	8.0	1.9	0.3	3.3	9.0	4.4	0.3	71.06	0.003 3	0.08	0.67	17.62
YJ-B-26	104.89	-6.64	2.97	879.1	10.7	2.0	0.3	1.8	5.9	9.4	0.5	82.33	0.002 3	0.19	0.39	19.28
YJ-B-27	97.08	-6.46	4.26	156.0	5.9	0.8	0.3	1.7	6.0	6.6	0.2	26.22	0.005 0	0.18	0.48	41.58
YJ-B-28	86.91	-5.65	4.07	976.3	7.9	1.4	0.9	5.3	43.2	9.4	0.2	123.37	0.001 4	0.16	0.82	51.46
YJ-B-29	71.77	-6.92	3.99	1 015.5	15.1	4.4	0.9	7.3	119.6	37.2	0.4	67.08	0.004 3	0.12	0.76	97.76
YJ-B-30	65.55	-8.24	3.79	1 512.6	9.2	0.5	1.2	3.0	31.5	7.4	0.1	163.86	0.000 3	0.38	0.81	57.66
YJ-B-31	61.3	-6.55	4.26	2 150.5	13.1	0.5	0.2	3.1	32.5	3.4	0.1	164.51	0.000 2	0.08	0.90	36.13
YJ-B-32	52.79	-6.99	4.06	1 545.1	13.8	3.7	1.5	7.5	104.3	9.1	0.5	111.99	0.002 4	0.19	0.92	18.13
YJ-B-33	39.63	-5.24	4.43	2 315.1	13.2	3.1	1.0	4.6	144.1	6.7	0.5	175.42	0.001 4	0.21	0.96	14.45
YJ-B-34	32.36	-5.01	4.67	1 243.0	8.4	2.3	0.8	8.4	68.3	6.2	0.3	148.17	0.001 9	0.10	0.92	23.94
YJ-B-35	23.09	-5.79	4.55	1 851.3	6.1	1.4	0.4	3.9	19.7	3.7	0.2	301.27	0.000 8	0.10	0.84	21.52
YJ-B-36	11.34	-4.85	3.59	1 534.9	8.2	0.8	0.2	8.0	9.5	9.4	0.2	186.39	0.000 5	0.02	0.50	47.61

Table 1

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

References 52

1	CHEN Z Q， GEORGE A D， YANG W R， et al. Effects of Middle-Late Permian sea-level changes and mass extinction on the formation of the Tieqiao skeletal mound in the Laibin area， South China［J］. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences， 2009， 56（6）： 745-763.
2	HAQ B U， SCHUTTER S R. A chronology of Paleozoic sea-level changes［J］. Science， 2008， 322（5898）： 64-68.
3	QIU Zhen， WANG Qingchen， ZOU Caineng， et al. Transgressive-regressive sequences on the slope of an isolated carbonate platform （Middle-Late Permian， Laibin， South China）［J］. Facies， 2014， 60（1）： 327-345.
4	杨雨，谢继容，赵路子，等. 四川盆地茅口组滩相孔隙型白云岩储层天然气勘探的突破及启示——以川中北部地区JT1井天然气立体勘探为例［J］. 天然气工业， 2021， 41（2）： 1-9.
	YANG Yu， XIE Jirong， ZHAO Luzi， et al. Breakthrough of natural gas exploration in the beach facies porous dolomite reservoir of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its enlightenment： A case study of the tridimensional exploration of Well JT1 in the central-northern Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Industry， 2021， 41（2）： 1-9.
5	刘宣威，田亚铭，张慧，等. 川北地区中二叠统茅二段储层特征及控制因素分析［J］. 断块油气田， 2022， 29（4）： 463-468.
	LIU Xuanwei， TIAN Yaming， ZHANG Hui， et al. Reservoir characteristics and its controlling factor of the second member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northern Sichuan region［J］. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field， 2022， 29（4）： 463-468.
6	胡昊，许国明，高峰，等. 四川盆地西部茅口组多类型储集层成因与启示［J］. 新疆石油地质， 2016， 37（5）： 512-518.
	HU Hao， XU Guoming， GAO Feng， et al. Maokou multi-type reservoirs in western Sichuan basin： Genesis and implications［J］. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology， 2016， 37（5）： 512-518.
7	肖钦仁，袁海锋，叶子旭，等. 川中北部地区八角场构造二叠系茅口组白云岩储层成因机制［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2023， 34（7）： 1218-1236.
	XIAO Qinren， YUAN Haifeng， YE Zixu， et al. Genetic mechanism of dolomite reservoir in Permian Maokou Formation in Bajiaochang structure in North Central Sichuan［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2023， 34（7）： 1218-1236.
8	张宇，曹清古，罗开平，等. 四川盆地二叠系茅口组油气藏勘探发现与启示［J］.石油与天然气地质， 2022， 43（3）： 610-620.
	ZHANG Yu， CAO Qinggu， LUO Kaiping， et al. Reservoir exploration of the Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin and enlightenment obtained［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2022， 43（3）： 610-620.
9	范建平，宋金民，江青春，等. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组一段储层特征与形成模式［J］. 石油与天然气地质， 2022， 43（6）： 1413-1430.
	FAN Jianping， SONG jinmin， JIANG Qingchun， et al. Reservoir characteristics and development model of the Middle Permian Mao-1 Member in eastern Sichuan Basin［J］. Oil & Gas Geology， 2022， 43（6）： 1413-1430.
10	刘昇，范存辉，张本健，等.四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组孤峰段展布特征及其油气地质意义［J］.石油与天然气地质，2023，44（4）：993-1008.
	LIU Sheng， FAN Cunhui， ZHANG Benjian， et al.Distribution characteristics of Gufeng Member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation， eastern Sichuan Basin and its petrogeological significance［J］.Oil & Gas Geology，2023，44（4）：993-1008.
11	冯增昭，杨玉卿，金振奎，等. 中国南方二叠纪岩相古地理［J］. 沉积学报， 1996， 14（2）： 1-11.
	FENG Zengzhao， YANG Yuqing， JIN Zhenkui， et al. Permian lithofacies paleogeography of southern China［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica， 1996， 14（2）： 1-11.
12	韩月卿，李双建，韩文彪，等. 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组灰泥灰岩储层孔隙特征［J］. 石油实验地质， 2022， 44（4）： 666-676.
	HAN Yueqing， LI Shuangjian， HAN Wenbiao， et al. Pore characteristics of marl reservoir in Maokou Formation of Middle Permian，southeastern Sichuan Basin［J］. Petroleum Geology & Experiment， 2022， 44（4）： 666-676.
13	姜智利，朱祥. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组油气成藏特征及主控因素［J］. 石油实验地质， 2022， 44（4）： 639-646.
	JIANG Zhili， ZHU Xiang. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors for Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area，Sichuan Basin［J］. Petroleum Geology & Experiment， 2022， 44（4）： 639-646.
14	山克强，孟晓荣. 云南镇雄二叠系栖霞组—茅口组沉积微相及沉积环境演变［J］. 地层学杂志， 2022， 46（1）： 68-85.
	SHAN Keqiang， MENG Xiaorong. Carbonate microfacies analysis and evolution of depositional environment of the Chihsia Formation and the Maokou Formation （Middle Permian） in Zhenxiong， Yunnan［J］. Journal of Stratigraphy， 2022， 46（1）： 68-85.
15	王秀平，王启宇，安显银. 川南地区二叠系沉积环境及其演化特征——以四川古蔺芭蕉村剖面为例［J］. 沉积与特提斯地质， 2022， 42（3）： 398-412.
	WANG Xiuping， WANG Qiyu， AN Xianyin. Characteristics of sedimentary environment and evolution of Permian in southern Sichuan Basin： An example from the profile of Gulin Bajiaocun in Sichuan Province［J］. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology， 2022， 42（3）： 398-412.
16	杨虎城，林良彪，余瑜，等. 川西南天全地区中二叠统碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及其古环境意义［J］. 矿物岩石， 2022， 42（2）： 47-59.
	YANG Hucheng， LIN Liangbiao， YU Yu， et al. Geochemical characteristics and paleo-environmental significance of Middle Permian carbonate rocks in Tianquan area， southwestern Sichuan Province， China［J］. Mineralogy and Petrology， 2022， 42（2）： 47-59.
17	李乾，徐胜林，陈洪德，等. 川北旺苍地区茅口组地球化学特征及古环境记录［J］. 成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）， 2018， 45（3）： 268-281.
	LI Qian， XU Shenglin， CHEN Hongde， et al. Geochemical characteristics and palaeo-environmental implication of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Wangcang region， Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology（Science & Technology Edition）， 2018， 45（3）： 268-281.
18	李蓉，苏成鹏，石国山，等. 川南地区二叠系茅口组一段瘤状灰岩储层成因［J］. 天然气地球科学， 2021， 32（6）： 806-815.
	LI Rong， SU Chengpeng， SHI Guoshan， et al. The genesis of nodular limestone reservoirs of the first period of Maokou Formation of Permian in southern Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2021， 32（6）： 806-815.
19	余瑜，林良彪，任天龙，等. 川东南茅口组硅质岩地球化学特征及沉积背景［J］. 成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）， 2016， 43（5）： 564-573.
	YU Yu， LIN Liangbiao， REN Tianlong， et al. Geochemical characteristics of silicalites from the Middle Permian Maokou Formation and research of its formation environment in Southeast Sichuan Basin， China［J］. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology（Science & Technology Edition）， 2016， 43（5）： 564-573.
20	苏成鹏. 川东地区茅口组眼球状石灰岩成因机制及地质意义［D］. 成都：西南石油大学， 2017.
	SU Chengpeng. Genetic mechanism and geological significance of the oculus limestone of Maokou Formation in eastern Sichuan［D］. Chengdu： Southwest Petroleum University， 2017.
21	杨帅，陈安清，张玺华，等. 四川盆地二叠纪栖霞—茅口期古地理格局转换及勘探启示［J］. 沉积学报， 2021， 39（6）： 1466-1477.
	YANG Shuai， CHEN Anqing， ZHANG Xihua， et al. Paleogeographic transition of the Permian Chihsia-Maokou period in the Sichuan Basin and indications for oil-gas exploration［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica， 2021， 39（6）： 1466-1477.
22	沈树忠，张华，张以春，等. 中国二叠纪综合地层和时间框架［J］. 中国科学（地球科学）， 2019， 49（1）： 160-193.
	SHEN Shuzhong， ZHANG Hua， ZHANG Yichun， et al. Permian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China［J］. Scientia Sinica（Terrae）， 2019， 49（1）： 160-193.
23	YAO Xu， ZHOU Yaoqi， HINNOV L A. Astronomical forcing of a Middle Permian chert sequence in Chaohu， South China［J］. Earth and Planetary Science Letters， 2015， 422： 206-221.
24	冯增昭，何幼斌，吴胜和. 中下扬子地区二叠纪岩相古地理［J］. 沉积学报， 1993， 11（3）： 13-24.
	FENG Zengzhao， HE Youbin， WU Shenghe. Listhofacies paleogeography of Permian Middle and Lower Yangtze region［J］. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica， 1993， 11（3）： 13-24.
25	曾允孚，夏文杰. 沉积岩石学［M］. 北京：地质出版社， 1986.
	ZENG Yunfu， XIA Wenjie. Sedimentary petrology［M］. Beijing： Geological Publishing House， 1986.
26	FOLK R L. Spectral subdivision of limestone types［M］//HAM W E. Classification of Carbonate Rocks—A Symposium. Tulsa： American Association of Petroleum Geologists， 1962： 62-84.
27	DUNHAM R J. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture［M］//HAM W E. Classification of Carbonate Rocks—A Symposium. Tulsa： American Association of Petroleum Geologists， 1962： 108-121.
28	VEIZER J. Chemical diagenesis of carbonates： theory and application of trace element technique［M］//ARTHUR M A， ANDERSON T F， KAPLAN I R， et al. Stable Isotopes in Sedimentary Geology. Broken Arrow： SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology， 1983： 3-1-3-100.
29	DERRY L A， KAUFMAN A J， JACOBSEN S B. Sedimentary cycling and environmental change in the Late Proterozoic： Evidence from stable and radiogenic isotopes［J］. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta， 1992， 56（3）： 1317-1329.
30	KUMP L R， ARTHUR M A. Interpreting carbon-isotope excursions： Carbonates and organic matter［J］. Chemical Geology， 1999， 161（1/3）： 181-198.
31	KAUFMAN A J， KNOLL A H. Neoproterozoic variations in the C-isotopic composition of seawater： stratigraphic and biogeochemical implications［J］. Precambrian Research， 1995， 73（1/4）： 27-49.
32	WIGNALL P B. Black shales［M］. New York： Oxford University Press， 1994： 127.
33	WIGNALL P B， TWITCHETT R J. Oceanic anoxia and the end Permian mass extinction［J］. Science， 1996， 272（5265）： 1155-1158.
34	JONES B， MANNING D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones［J］. Chemical Geology， 1994， 111（1/4）： 111-129.
35	TRIBOVILLARD N， ALGEO T J， LYONS T， et al. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies： An update［J］. Chemical Geology， 2006， 232（1/2）： 12-32.
36	SCHOEPFER S D， SHEN Jun， WEI Hengye， et al. Total organic carbon， organic phosphorus， and biogenic barium fluxes as proxies for paleomarine productivity［J］. Earth-Science Reviews， 2015， 149： 23-52.
37	许中杰，程日辉，张莉，等. 华南陆缘晚三叠—早、中侏罗世海平面相对升降与古气候演化的地球化学记录［J］. 地球科学（中国地质大学学报）， 2012， 37（1）： 113-124.
	XU Zhongjie， CHENG Rihui， ZHANG Li， et al. The geochemistry records of sea-level relative movement and paleoclimatic evolution of the South China continental margin in Late Triassic-Early-Middle Jurassic［J］. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences， 2012， 37（1）： 113-124.
38	SUN Shi， CHEN Anqing， HOU Mingcai， et al. Rapid climatic fluctuations during the Guadalupian-Lopingian transition： Implications from weathering indices recorded in acid-insoluble residues of carbonate rocks， South China［J］. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences， 2022， 230： 105222.
39	METCALFE I， CROWLEY J L， NICOLL R S， et al. High-precision U-Pb CA-TIMS calibration of Middle Permian to Lower Triassic sequences， mass extinction and extreme climate-change in eastern Australian Gondwana［J］. Gondwana Research， 2015， 28（1）： 61-81.
40	SHI Zejin， LI Wenjie， LUO Qichao， et al. Emeishan mantle plume activity and carbon isotope responses in the Middle Permian， South China［J］. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences， 2020， 189： 104145.
41	ISOZAKI Y， KAWAHATA H， MINOSHIMA K. The Capitanian （Permian） Kamura cooling event： The beginning of the Paleozoic-Mesozoic transition［J］. Palaeoworld， 2007， 16（1/3）： 16-30.
42	ISOZAKI Y， ALJINOVIĆ D， KAWAHATA H. The Guadalupian （Permian） Kamura event in European Tethys［J］. Palaeogeography， Palaeoclimatology， Palaeoecology， 2011， 308（1/2）： 12-21.
43	KORTE C， JASPER T， KOZUR H W， et al. δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C of Permian brachiopods： A record of seawater evolution and continental glaciation［J］. Palaeogeography， Palaeoclimatology， Palaeoecology， 2005， 224（4）： 333-351.
44	LAYA J C， TUCKER M E， GRÖCKE D R， et al. Carbon， oxygen and strontium isotopic composition of low-latitude Permian carbonates （Venezuelan Andes）： Climate proxies of tropical Pangea［J］. Geological Society， London， Special Publications， 2013， 376（1）： 367-385.
45	BOND D P G， WIGNALL P B， WANG W， et al. The mid-Capitanian （Middle Permian） mass extinction and carbon isotope record of South China［J］. Palaeogeography， Palaeoclimatology， Palaeoecology， 2010， 292（1/2）： 282-294.
46	CAO Changqun， CUI Can， CHEN Jun， et al. A positive C-isotope excursion induced by sea-level fall in the middle Capitanian of South China［J］. Palaeogeography， Palaeoclimatology， Palaeoecology， 2018， 505： 305-316.
47	LUO Genming， HUANG Junhua， BAI Xiao， et al. Absence of Middle Permian Kamura event in the Paleo-Tethys Ocean［J］. Journal of Earth Science， 2010， 21（1）： 86-89.
48	JOST A B， MUNDIL R， HE Bin， et al. Constraining the cause of the end-Guadalupian extinction with coupled records of carbon and calcium isotopes［J］. Earth and Planetary Science Letters， 2014， 396： 201-212.
49	VEIZER J， ALA D， AZMY K， et al. ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr， δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater［J］. Chemical Geology， 1999， 161（1/3）： 59-88.
50	LI Qian， AZMY K， YANG Shuai， et al. Early-Middle Permian strontium isotope stratigraphy of marine carbonates from the northern marginal areas of South China： Controlling factors and implications［J］. Geological Journal， 2021， 56（3）： 1658-1672.
51	AZMY K， STOUGE S， BRAND U， et al. High-resolution chemostratigraphy of the Cambrian-Ordovician GSSP： Enhanced global correlation tool［J］. Palaeogeography， Palaeoclimatology， Palaeoecology， 2014， 409： 135-144.
52	JARVIS I， MABROUK A， MOODY R T J， et al. Late Cretaceous （Campanian） carbon isotope events， sea-level change and correlation of the Tethyan and Boreal realms［J］. Palaeogeography， Palaeoclimatology， Palaeoecology， 2022， 188（3/4）： 215-248.

[1]	Xiugang PU, Jiangchang DONG, Gongquan CHAI, Shunyao SONG, Zhannan SHI, Wenzhong HAN, Wei ZHANG, Delu XIE. Enrichment model of high-abundance organic matter in shales in the 2^nd member of the Paleogene Kongdian Formation， Cangdong Sag， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 696-709.
[2]	Rui FANG, Yuqiang JIANG, Changcheng YANG, Haibo DENG, Chan JIANG, Haitao HONG, Song TANG, Yifan GU, Xun ZHU, Shasha SUN, Guangyin CAI. Occurrence states and mobility of shale oil in different lithologic assemblages in the Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[3]	Xiao HE, Maja ZHENG, Yong LIU, Qun ZHAO, Xuewen Shi, Zhenxue Jiang, Wei WU, Ya WU, Shitan NING, Xianglu TANG, Dadong LIU. Characteristics and differential origin of Qiongzhusi Formation shale reservoirs under the “aulacogen-uplift” tectonic setting， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[4]	Changbo ZHAI, Liangbiao LIN, Donghua YOU, Fengbin LIU, Siyu LIU. Sedimentary microfacies characteristics and organic matter enrichment pattern of the 1^st member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation， southwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 440-456.
[5]	Hui PAN, Yuqiang JIANG, Xun ZHU, Haibo DENG, Linke SONG, Zhanlei WANG, Miao LI, Yadong ZHOU, Linjie FENG, Yongliang YUAN, Meng WANG. Evaluation of geological sweet spots in fluvial tight sandstone gas： A case study of the first submember of the second member of the Jurassic Shaximiao Formation， central Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[6]	Baoshou ZHANG, Benjian ZHANG, Hua WANG, Jianfa CHEN, Kaixuan LIU, Shuang DOU, Xin DAI, Shuangling CHEN. The Jinqiu gas field in the Sichuan Basin： A typical helium-bearing to helium-rich gas field with the Mesozoic sedimentary rocks as helium source rocks [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[7]	Zhili ZHANG, Yanping QIAO, Shuang DOU, Kunyu LI, Yuan ZHONG, Luya WU, Baoshou ZHANG, Xin Dai, Xin JIN, Bin WANG, Jinmin SONG. Karst paleogeomorphology and reservoir control model of the 2^nd member of Dengying Formation in Penglai gas area， Sichuan Basin， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[8]	Guangfu WANG, Fengxia LI, Haibo WANG, Tong ZHOU, Yaxiong ZHANG, Ruyue WANG, Ning LI, Yuxin CHEN, Xiaofei XIONG. Difficulties and countermeasures for fracturing of various shale gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[9]	Zongquan HU, Ruyue WANG, Jing LU, Dongjun FENG, Yuejiao LIU, Baojian SHEN, Zhongbao LIU, Guanping WANG, Jianhua HE. Storage characteristic comparison of pores between lacustrine shales and their interbeds and differential evolutionary patterns [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[10]	Dongfeng HU, Zhihong WEI, Ruobing LIU, Xiangfeng WEI, Wei WANG, Qingbo WANG. Discovery of the Qijiang shale gas field in a structurally complex region on the southeastern margin of the Sichuan Basin and its implications [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1418-1429.
[11]	Hongyan WANG, Shangwen ZHOU, Qun ZHAO, Zhensheng SHI, Dexun LIU, Pengfei JIAO. Enrichment characteristics， exploration and exploitation progress， and prospects of deep shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[12]	Zhensheng SHI, Shengxian ZHAO, Tianqi ZHOU, Shasha SUN, Yuan YUAN, Chenglin ZHANG, Bo LI, Ling QI. Types and genesis of horizontal bedding of marine gas-bearing shale and its significance for shale gas： A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1499-1514.
[13]	Ruikang BIAN, Chuanxiang SUN, Haikuan NIE, Zhujiang LIU, Wei DU, Pei LI, Ruyue WANG. Types， characteristics， and exploration targets of deep shale gas reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations， southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[14]	Shuangjian LI, Zhi LI, Lei ZHANG, Yingqiang LI, Xianwu MENG, Haijun WANG. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration targets of the Triassic subsalt ultra-deep sequences in the western Sichuan Depression， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[15]	Jianhui ZENG, Yaxiong ZHANG, Zaizhen ZHANG, Juncheng QIAO, Maoyun WANG, Dongxia CHEN, Jingli YAO, Jingchen DING, Liang XIONG, Yazhou LIU, Weibo ZHAO, Kebo REN. Complex gas-water contacts in tight sandstone gas reservoirs： Distribution pattern and dominant factors controlling their formation and distribution [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.

Sedimentary microfacies and environmental evolution of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin： A case study of the Yangjiao section in Wulong District， Chongqing， China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 52

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics