低阶煤吸附孔特征及分形表征

doi:10.11743/ogg20180216

Abstract

Abstract: We collected 8 kinds of low rank coal (LRC) with distinguished macrolithotypes,carried out some experiments like the low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption and isothermal methane adsorption,discussed the LRC adsorption pore characteristics,and established the relationship between fractal model suitable for LRC adsorption pores and fractal dimension with pore structures and adsorption capacities.From this,the LRC absorption/desorption curves are divided into four categories with 4 corresponding pore types:taper-shaped pores with one end closed being dominant in bright coal,ink-bottle-shaped pores dominating semi-bright coal,open-cylindric pores and wedge-shaped ones occurring in semidull coal,and open-cylindric pores being predominant in dull coal.Results show that (1) compared with the BET model,the FHH model is more appropriate for the characterization of LRC pores in respect of fractal nature;(2) the various macrolithotypes in FHH model show different adsorption characteristics at relative pressure 0~0.5 and 0.5~0.5 and have fractal dimensions D₂₁ and D₂₂ respectively,with D₂₁ representing the surface roughness of adsorption pores and D₂₂ the irregularity of the pore structures.As D₂₁ gets bigger,the pore specific surface area increases,whereas the bigger D₂₂ gets,the smaller the average pore size becomes,the higher the micropore content is,and the larger the pore heterogeneity is;(3) D₂₁ is more effective than D₂₂ in controlling the adsorption capacity of LRC.When the coal is characterized by high D₂₁ and low D₂₂,the adsorption capacity is the strongest,and the adsorption capacity enlarges as the fractal dimension of cumulative specific surface area increases.The LRC adsorption process subsequently shows transition from predominance of monomolecular layer adsorption to predominance of polymolecular layer adsorption with increasing pressure.

Key words: specific surface area, FHH model, low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption, fractal dimension, pore structure, LRC

CLC Number:

TE132.2

Zhou Sandong, Liu Dameng, Cai Yidong, Yao Yanbin, Jiao Yongyan, Ren Shijun. Characterization and fractal nature of adsorption pores in low rank coal[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2): 373-383.

References

[1] 杨起,刘大锰,黄文辉,等.中国西北煤层气地质与资源综合评价[M].北京:地质出版社,2005:77-150. Yang Qi,Liu Dameng,Huang Wenhui,et al.Coalbed methane geology and resources comprehensive evaluation in Northwest China[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2005:77-150.
[2] 简阔,傅雪海,王可新,等.中国长焰煤物性特征及其煤层气资源潜力[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(9):1065-1074. Jian Kuo,Fu Xuehai,Wang Kexin,et al.Physical characteristics and CBM resources potential of long flame coal in China[J].Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(9):1065-1074.
[3] 韩德馨.中国煤岩学[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1996:5-60. Han Dexin.Coal petrology of China[M].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology Press,1996:5-60.
[4] 李俊乾,卢双舫,薛海涛,等,张萍高阶煤层气储层非均质性及其定量评价-以沁水盆地南部郑庄区块为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):72-79. Li Junqian,Lu Shuangfang,Xue Haitao,et al.Intra-stratal heterogeneity of high rank coabed methane reservoirs and their quantitative evaluation:A case study from Zhengzhuang block in the southern Qinshui Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):72-79.
[5] 喻廷旭,汤达祯,许浩,等.柳林矿区不同煤岩类型煤的孔隙特征[J].煤炭科学技术,2013,S2,362-366. Yu Tingxu,Tang Dazhen,Xu Hao,et al.Pore characteristics of diffe-rent coal types by Lustre in Liulin Mining area[J].Coal Science and Technology,2013,S2,362-366.
[6] Chalmers G R,Bustin R M.On theeffects of petrographic composition on coalbed methane sortion[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2007,69(4):288-304.
[7] Bustin R M,Clarkson C R.Geological controls on coalbed methane reservoir capacity and gas content[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,1998,38(1-2):3-26.
[8] Galimov E M.Sources and mechanisms of formation of gaseous hydrocarbons in sedimentary rock[J].Chemical Geology,1988,71(1):77-95.
[9] Hodot BB.Outburst of coal and coalbed Gas (Chinese translation)[M].Beijing:China Industry Press,1966,310-318.
[10] 降文萍,宋孝忠,钟玲文.基于低温液氮实验的不同煤体结构煤的孔隙特征及其对瓦斯突出影响[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(4):609-614. Jiang Wenping,Song Xiaozhong,Zhong Linwen.Research on the pore properties of different coal body structure coals and the effects on gas outburst based on the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption method[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(4):609-614.
[11] 范俊佳,琚宜文,侯泉林,等.不同变质变形煤储层孔隙特征与煤层气可采性[J].地学前缘,2010,17(5):325-335. Fan Junjia,Ju Yiwen,Hou Quanlin,et al.Pore structure characteristics of different metamorphic-deformed coal reservoirs and its restriction on recovery of coalbed methane[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2010,17(5):325-335.
[12] 宋晓夏,唐跃刚,李伟,等.中梁山南矿构造煤吸附孔分形特征[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(1):134-139. Song Xiaoxia,Tang Yuegang,Li Wei,et al.Fractal characteristics of adsorption pores of tectonic coal from Zhongliangshan southern coalmine[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(1):134-139.
[13] 陈萍,唐秀义.低温氮吸附法与煤中微孔隙特征的研究[J].煤炭学报,2001,26(5):552-556. Chen Ping,Tang Xiuyi.The research on the adsorption of nitrogen in low temperature and micro-pore properties in coal[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2001,26(5):552-556.
[14] 姚艳斌,刘大锰,黄文辉,等.两淮煤田煤储层孔-裂隙系统与煤层气产出性能研究[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(2):163-168. Yao Yanbin,Liu Dameng,Huang Wenhui,et al.Research on the pore-fractures system properties of coalbed methane reservoirs and recovery in Huainan and Huaibei coal-fields[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2006,31(2):163-168.
[15] Yao Y B,Liu D M,Tang D Z,et al.Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from North China:an investigation on CH₄ adsorption capacity of coals[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2008,73(1):27-42.
[16] Hu S,Sun X,Xiang J,et al.Correlation characteristics and simulations of the fractal structure of coal char[J].Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,2004,9(3):291-303.
[17] Hu S,Li M,Xiang J,et al.Fractal characteristic of three Chinese coals[J].Fuel,2004,83(10):1307-1313.
[18] 严继民,张启元.吸附与凝聚[M].北京:科学出版社,1979:108-145. Yan Jimin,Zhang Qiyuan.Adsorption and condensation[M].Beijing:Science Press,1979:108-145.
[19] Lee G J,Pyun S I,Rhee C K.Characterisation of geometric and structural properties of pore surfaces of reactivated microporous carbons based upon image analysis and gas adsorption[J].Microporous and Mesoporous Materials,2006,93:217-225.
[20] Pfeifer P,Avnir D.Chemistry nonintegral dimensions between two and three[J].The Journal of Physical Chemistry,1983,79:3369-3558.
[21] Wee J H.Effect of cerium addition to Ni-Cr anode electrode for molten carbonate fuel cells:Surface fractal dimensions,wettability and cell performance[J].Materials Chemistry and Physics,2006,101:322-328.
[22] Zhang S H,Tang S H,Tang D Z,et al.Determining fractal dimensions of coal pores by FHH model:Problems and effects[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2014,21:929-939.
[23] 童宏树,胡宝林.鄂尔多斯盆地煤储层低温氮吸附孔隙分形特征研究[J].煤炭技术,2004,23(7):1-3. Tong Hongshu,Hu Baolin.Research on the fractal characteristics of pore of coal reservoirs tested with cryogenic nitrogen adsorption in the ordos basin[J].Coal Technology,2004,23(7):1-3.
[24] 蔡益栋,刘大锰,姚艳斌,等.温度控制下的煤层气储层物性动态演化研究[J].地学前缘,2014,21(1):240-248. Cai Yidong,Liu Dameng,Yao Yanbin,et al.The evoluation of petrophysical properties of coalbed methane reservoirs under the heat treatment[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2014,21(1):240-248.
[25] 姚艳斌,刘大锰.煤储层精细定量表征与综合评价模型[M].北京:地质出版社,2013:40-62. Yao Yanbin,Liu Dameng.Advanced quantitative characterization and comprehensive evaluation model of coalbed methane reservoirs[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013:40-62.
[26] Khalili NR,Pan M,Sandí G.Determination of fractal dimension of solid carbons from gas and liquid phase adsorption isotherms[J].Carbon,2000,38(4):573-588.

Characterization and fractal nature of adsorption pores in low rank coal

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Hongguo ZHANG, Haifeng YANG, Wen SU, Chunqiang XU, Zhi HUANG, Yanjun CHENG. Key stages in hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in layers outside source rocks and the evaluation methods related： A case study of the lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation， Bozhong Sag， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 281-292.
[2]	Junliang LI, Xin WANG, Weiqing WANG, Bo LI, Jianhui ZENG, Kunkun JIA, Juncheng QIAO, Kangting WANG. Influence of sand-mud assemblages in tight sandstones on reservoir storage spaces： A case study of the lower submember of the 3^rd member of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Linnan sub-sag， Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1173-1187.
[3]	Hongbo WANG, Cunfei MA, Zheng CAO, Zhipeng LI, Changcheng HAN, Wenming JI, Yi YANG. Differential diagenesis and reservoir physical property responses of tight sandstone based on lithofacies： A case study on the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in Moxizhuang area， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 976-992.
[4]	Jing XU, Yunjin GE, Yonghong HE, Renhai PU, Linyu LIU, Liang DUAN, Kefeng DU. Quantitative characterization and dynamic evolution of pore structure in shale reservoirs of Chang 7 oil layer group in Yanchang area， Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 292-307.
[5]	Zezhang SONG, Abula ABIDE, Mingyang LYU, Yueqiao ZHANG, Fujie JIANG, Zheyu LIU, Wei ZHENG, Xiayang WANG. Quantitative analysis of nitrogen adsorption hysteresis loop and its indicative significance to pore structure characterization：A case study on the Upper Triassic Chang 7 Member， Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 495-509.
[6]	Jianping Fan, Jinmin Song, Qingchun Jiang, Shugen Liu, Yuehao Ye, Shipeng Huang, Jiarui Wang, Wang Su, Liji Li, Xin Jin, Yuxiang Feng. Reservoir characteristics and development model of the Middle Permian Mao-1 Member in eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1413-1430.
[7]	Yan Zhang, Dong Hui, Jian Zhang, Deliang Zhang, Rui Jiang. Characteristics and main controlling factors of water vapor adsorption in marine shale： A case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shales in southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1431-1444.
[8]	Liang Yue, Qingqiang Meng, Ziliang Liu, Wei Yang, Hui Jin, Fang Shen, Junjian Zhang, Sibing Liu. Physical property and heterogeneity of tight sandstone reservoirs： A case of the Upper Triassic 6^th member of Xujiahe Formation， Guang’an， central Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 597-609.
[9]	Linsheng Wang, Yiping Ye, Jianhua Qin, Yang Gao, Yuan Deng, Yingyan Li, Dianshi Xiao. Microscopic pore structure characterization and oil-bearing property evaluation of lacustrine shale reservoir： A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag， Junggar Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 149-160.
[10]	Tao Jiang, Zhijun Jin, Guangxiang Liu, Zongquan Hu, Quanyou Liu, Zhongbao Liu, Pengwei Wang, Ruyue Wang, Tao Yang, Guanping Wang. Pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Ziliujing Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 909-918.
[11]	Zhenxue Jiang, Xin Li, Xingmeng Wang, Guozhen Wang, Hengyuan Qiu, Deyu Zhu, Hongyang Jiang. Characteristic differences and controlling factors of pores in typical South China shale [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 41-53.
[12]	Ruyue Wang, Zongquan Hu, Li Dong, Bo Gao, Chuanxiang Sun, Tao Yang, Guanping Wang, Shuai Yin. Advancement and trends of shale gas reservoir characterization and evaluation [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 54-65.
[13]	Jianfeng Huo, Jian Gao, Xiaowen Guo, Jizheng Yi, Zhiguo Shu, Hanyong Bao, Rui Yang, Tao Luo, Sheng He. Characteristics and controlling factors of pore structures of various lithofacies in shales of Longmaxi Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175.
[14]	Peng Wang, Linghui Sun, He Wang, Zi'an Li. Microscopic pore structure of Ahe tight sand gas reservoirs of the Low Jurassic in Kuqa Depression and its controls on tight gas enrichment [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 295-304.
[15]	Tianbo Yang, Zhiliang He, Zhenkui Jin, Juntao Zhang, Shuangjian Li. Pore structure and controlling factors of the ultra-deep Middle Permian dolomite reservoirs, northwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 116-131.