Oil & Gas Geology ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1256-1269.doi: 10.11743/ogg20230514
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yingzhao ZHANG(), Wei ZOU, Zhongyun CHEN, Yiming JIANG, Hui DIAO()
Received:
2023-02-01
Revised:
2023-05-31
Online:
2023-10-19
Published:
2023-10-19
Contact:
Hui DIAO
E-mail:zhangyingzh@cnooc.com.cn;diaohui@cnooc.com.cn
CLC Number:
Yingzhao ZHANG, Wei ZOU, Zhongyun CHEN, Yiming JIANG, Hui DIAO. The mechanism of “convergence ahead of accumulation” and its geological significance for gas reservoirs in Paleogene Huagang Formation across the central inverted structural zone of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1256-1269.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Fig.3
Diagrams showing the matching between simulated and measured Ro for Well C1 (a), the hydrocarbon generation evolution of the top middle Pinghu Fm. (T32) in the north central Xihu Depression (b) and the thermal simulation and hydrocarbon generation of dark mudstone in the slope zone (c) (modified after [24])"
Table 1
Carbon isotope data of natural gas components in the north central Xihu Depression"
井号 | 深度/m | 层位 | 测试方法 | δ13C/‰ | 甲烷碳同位素计算Ro/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | |||||
D1 | 4 298.00 | H6砂组 | 包裹体击碎 | -43.8 | — | — | 1.02 |
A4 | 4 333.90 | H3砂组 | 包裹体击碎 | -30.6 | — | — | 1.72 |
C1 | 3 188.00 | H2砂组 | 天然气 | -30.8 | -25.2 | -23.5 | 1.70 |
C1 | 3 724.00 | H3砂组 | 天然气 | -31.5 | -27.5 | -26.0 | 1.66 |
C2 | 4 296.38 | H5砂组 | 天然气 | -32.2 | -26.6 | -23.8 | 1.61 |
A2 | 4 585.00 | H5砂组 | 天然气 | -32.1 | -24.1 | -22.7 | 1.62 |
A3 | 4 571.58 | H5砂组 | 天然气 | -31.4 | -25.0 | -23.2 | 1.66 |
1 | 周荔青, 江东辉, 周兴海, 等. 东海西湖凹陷西斜坡断层—岩性油气藏富集评价体系与勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 747-754. |
ZHOU Liqing, JIANG Donghui, ZHOU Xinghai, et al. Evaluation system and exploration optimization for fault-lithologic reservoir on the western slope of Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 747-754. | |
2 | 陈波, 程超, 李文俊. 东海西湖凹陷少井区中深层薄砂体识别及潜力分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(2): 11-16. |
CHEN Bo, CHENG Chao, LI Wenjun. Identification and potential analysis of thin sand bodies in middle and deep layers of few well blocks in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(2): 11-16. | |
3 | 孙思尧, 范昌育, 蒲仁海, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带断裂垂向封闭性研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(3): 353-359. |
SUN Siyao, FAN Changyu, PU Renhai, et al. Research on vertical sealing of faults in Pinghu structural belt of Xihu Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(3): 353-359. | |
4 | 江东辉, 杜学斌, 李昆, 等. 东海西湖凹陷保俶斜坡带平湖组“古地貌—古水系—古坡折”特征及其对沉积体系的控制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 771-779. |
JIANG Donghui, DU Xuebin, LI Kun, et al. Distribution of sedimentary system multi-controlled by palaeo-geomorphology, water system and break during the deposition of Pinghu Formation, Baochu slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 771-779. | |
5 | 陈忠云, 杜学斌, 李帅. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带平湖组沉积体系平面分区特征及差异性展布[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 780-789. |
CHEN Zhongyun, DU Xuebin, LI Shuai. Distributional signatures of depositional system of Pinghu Formation, Pinghu slope, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 780-789. | |
6 | 张武, 肖晓光, 苗清, 等. 西湖凹陷中北部花港组优质储层主控因素及强溶蚀区预测[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(5): 597-607. |
ZHANG Wu, XIAO Xiaoguang, MIAO Qing, et al. Main controlling factor of high quality reservoir and prediction of strong dissolution area in Huagang Formation, north-central Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 46(5): 597-607. | |
7 | 钟韬, 张武, 苗清. 东海西湖凹陷中北部花港组砂岩异常高孔带特征及成因[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(4): 478-486. |
ZHONG Tao, ZHANG Wu, MIAO Qing. Characteristics and Genesis of anomalously high porosity zones in the Huagang Formation sandstones in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 45(4): 478-486. | |
8 | 张武, 蒋一鸣, 肖晓光, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中北部花港组储层致密化过程分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 86-95. |
ZHANG Wu, JIANG Yiming, XIAO Xiaoguang, et al. Densification process of Huagang Formation in northern and central Xihu Sag of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment 2021, 43(1): 86-95. | |
9 | 刘欢, 许长海, 申雯龙, 等. 东海陆架盆地丽水凹陷构造演化特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 949-957. |
LIU Huan, XU Changhai, SHEN Wenlong, et al. Tectonic evolution characteristics of Lishui Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 949-957. | |
10 | 高梦天, 陆永潮, 杜学斌, 等. 致密砂岩多因子储层精细分级评价方法——以东海盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组上段H3砂组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 1097-1106. |
GAO Mengtian, LU Yongchao, DU Xuebin, et al. Multi-factor evaluation for fine grading of tight sandstone reservoirs: a case study from H3 sand group in the upper section of Oligocene Huagang Formation, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 1097-1106. | |
11 | 周荔青, 江东辉, 张尚虎, 等. 东海西湖凹陷大中型油气田形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 803-812. |
ZHOU Liqing, JIANG Donghui, ZHANG Shanghu, et al.Formation conditions and exploration direction of large and medium oil and gas reservoirs in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 803-812. | |
12 | 张国华, 张建培. 东海陆架盆地构造反转特征及成因机制探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(1): 260-270. |
ZHANG Guohua, ZHANG Jianpei. A discussion on the tectonic inversion and its genetic mechanism in the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1): 260-270. | |
13 | 徐国盛, 徐芳艮, 袁海锋, 等. 西湖凹陷中央反转构造带花港组致密砂岩储层成岩环境演变与孔隙演化[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(4): 385-395. |
XU Guosheng, XU Fanggen, YUAN Haifeng, et al. Evolution of pore and diagenetic environment for the tight sandstone reservoir of Paleogene Huagang Formation in the central reversal structural belt in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(4): 385-395. | |
14 | 陈智远, 徐志星, 徐国盛, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带异常高压与油气成藏的耦合关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 570-581. |
CHEN Zhiyuan, XU Zhixing, XU Guosheng, et al. Coupling relationship between abnormal overpressure and hydrocarbon accumulation in a central overturned structural belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 570-581. | |
15 | 徐昉昊, 徐国盛, 刘勇, 等. 东海西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组致密砂岩储集层控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 98-109. |
XU Fanghao, XU Guosheng, LIU Yong, et al. Factors controlling the development of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Huagang Formation of the central inverted structural belt in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 98-109. | |
16 | 李顺利, 李竞, 陈彬滔, 等. 西湖凹陷渐新统花港组大型沿岸砂坝沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(3): 493-503. |
LI Shunli, LI Jing, CHEN Bintao, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of large-scale longshore bar in the Oligocene Huagang Formation, Xihu Sag[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2020, 22(3): 493-503. | |
17 | ZHANG Jingyu, LU Yongchao, KRIJGSMAN W, et al. Source to sink transport in the Oligocene Huagang Formation of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 98: 733-745. |
18 | 刘贤, 葛家旺, 赵晓明, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组年代标尺及层序界面定量识别[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4): 990-1004. |
LIU Xian, GE Jiawang, ZHAO Xiaoming, et al. Time scale and quantitative identification of sequence boundaries for the Oligocene Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 990-1004. | |
19 | 李天军, 黄志龙, 郭小波, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平北斜坡带平湖组煤系原油地球化学特征与油-源精细对比[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 432-444. |
LI Tianjun, HUANG Zhilong, GUO Xiaobo, et al. Geochemical characteristics of crude oil from coal measure source rocks and fine oil-source correlation in the Pinghu Formation in Pingbei slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 432-444. | |
20 | 蒋一鸣, 邹玮, 刘金水, 等. 东海西湖凹陷中新世末反转背斜构造成因机制: 来自基底结构差异的新认识[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(3): 968-979. |
JIANG Yiming, ZOU Wei, LIU Jinshui, et al. Genetic mechanism of inversion anticline structure at the end of Miocene in Xihu Sag, East China Sea: A new understanding of basement structure difference[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(3): 968-979. | |
21 | 宋小勇, 储呈林, 芮志峰. 东海盆地西湖凹陷构造样式及其演化[J]. 高校地质学报, 2010, 16(1): 86-93. |
SONG Xiaoyong, CHU Chenglin, RUI Zhifeng. Structural framework and evolution of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2010, 16(1): 86-93. | |
22 | LI Chunfeng, ZHOU Zuyi, GE Heping, et al. Rifting process of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin[J]. Tectonophysics, 2009, 472(1/4): 135-147. |
23 | 沈伟锋, 于仲坤, 刁慧, 等. 西湖凹陷热流演化史模拟及成藏意义[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(1): 42-53. |
SHEN Weifeng, YU Zhongkun, DIAO Hui, et al. Simulation of heat flow evolution history in Xihu Sag and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(1): 42-53. | |
24 | 徐陈杰, 叶加仁, 刘金水, 等. 东海西湖凹陷平湖组Ⅲ型干酪根暗色泥岩生排烃模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 359-366. |
XU Chenjie, YE Jiaren, LIU Jinshui, et al. Simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion for the dark mudstone with type-Ⅲ kerogen in the Pinghu Formation of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 359-366. | |
25 | 徐国盛, 崔恒远, 刘勇, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系花港组砂岩储层致密化与油气充注关系[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(3): 20-29. |
XU Guosheng, CUI Hengyuan, LIU Yong, et al. Relationship between sandstone reservoirs densification and hydrocarbon charging in the Paleogene Huagang Formation of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(3): 20-29. | |
26 | 刘勇, 徐国盛, 曾兵, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷花港组储层孔隙演化与油气充注关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(2): 168-176. |
LIU Yong, XU Guosheng, ZENG Bing, et al. Relationship between porosity evolution and hydrocarbon charging in tight sandstone reservoirs in Oligocene Huagang Formation, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2018, 40(2): 168-176. | |
27 | 周心怀, 徐国盛, 崔恒远, 等. 东海西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组致密砂岩储集层裂缝发育特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3): 462-475. |
ZHOU Xinhuai, XU Guosheng, CUI Hengyuan, et al. Fracture development and hydrocarbon accumulation in tight sandstone reservoirs of the Paleogene Huagang Formation in the central reversal tectonic belt of the Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3): 462-475. | |
28 | 陈智远, 徐志星, 陈飞, 等. 异常高压与油气充注的耦合性——以东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷花港组和平湖组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(2): 186-194. |
CHEN Zhiyuan, XU Zhixing, CHEN Fei, et al. Coupling of abnormal overpressure and hydrocarbon charging: A case from the Huagang and Pinghu formations of Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2017, 39(2): 186-194. | |
29 | 赖生华, 麻建明, 廖林. 缅甸中央沉降带Chindwin盆地油气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2005, 25(11): 21-24. |
LAI Shenghua, MA Jianming, LIAO Lin. The oil-gas exploration potential of Chindwin Sag in the central basin in Burma[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(11): 21-24. | |
30 | 杨磊. 缅甸D区块油气成藏条件分析[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2011: 14-64. |
YANG Lei. Analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions in D areas of Myanmar[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011: 14-64. | |
31 | 王营, 辛仁臣. 缅甸含油气盆地群形成演化及其地球动力学背景[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 27-35, 48. |
WANG Ying, XIN Renchen. Evolution and geodynamic background of Myanmar petroliferous basin group[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 27-35, 48. | |
32 | 黄众, 胡孝林, 郭刚, 等. 苏门答腊裂谷盆地带构造分带及其成藏模式[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2018, 34(8): 61-67. |
HUANG Zhong, HU Xiaolin, GUO Gang, et al. Structural zonation and hydrocarbon accumulation model of the Sumatra back arc rift basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2018, 34(8): 61-67. | |
33 | 田鑫. 印尼南苏门答腊盆地油气成藏规律研究及油气藏精细勘探[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2016: 10-56. |
TIAN Xin. Study of the hydrocarbon accumulation rules and fine exploration of hydrocarbon reservoirs of South Sumatra Basin, Indonesia[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2016: 10-56. | |
34 | 杨磊. 中苏门答腊盆地石油地质特征与油气勘探潜力[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(3): 329-331. |
YANG Lei. Petroleum geology and exploration potential analysis in central Sumatra Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(3): 329-331. | |
35 | RODRIGUEZ N D, PAUL PHILP R. Productivity and paleoclimatic controls on source rock character in the Aman Trough, north central Sumatra, Indonesia[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2012, 45: 18-28. |
36 | LUNT P. Partitioned transtensional Cenozoic stratigraphic development of North Sumatra[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 106: 1-16. |
37 | 张国华, 刘金水, 秦兰芝, 等. 西湖凹陷渐新统花港组大型辫状河沉积体系特征[J]. 中国海上油气, 2018, 30(3): 10-18. |
ZHANG Guohua, LIU Jinshui, QIN Lanzhi, et al. Characteristics of the large braided river depositional system of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 30(3): 10-18. | |
38 | 蒋一鸣, 邵龙义, 李帅, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组沉积体系及层序地层研究[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(1): 141-153. |
JIANG Yiming, SHAO Longyi, LI Shuai, et al. Deposition system and stratigraphy of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu tectonic belt, Xihu Sag[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(1): 141-153. | |
39 | 周心怀, 高顺莉, 高伟中, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平北斜坡带海陆过渡型岩性油气藏形成与分布预测[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 153-164. |
ZHOU Xinhuai, GAO Shunli, GAO Weizhong, et al. Formation and distribution of marine-continental transitional lithologic reservoirs in Pingbei slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(2): 153-164. | |
40 | 杨风丽, 王敏雪, 庄建建, 等. 西湖凹陷反转构造定量运动学过程及对油气的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(4): 596-601. |
YANG Fengli, WANG Minxue, ZHUANG Jianjian, et al. Kinematical processes of inversion structure and its contribution to hydrocarbon accumulation in Xihu Depression of East China Sea Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(4): 596-601. | |
41 | WANG Yingxun, CHEN Jianfa, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of tertiary coaly source rocks and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Xihu Sag of the East China Sea Shelf Basin, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2022, 229: 105170. |
42 | QIAN Wendao, SUN Qiliang, JONES S J, et al. Diagenesis and controlling factors of Oligocene Huagang Formation tight sandstone reservoir in the south of Xihu Sag, the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 215(Part A): 110579. |
43 | XU Fanghao, XU Guosheng, LIU Yong, et al. Factors controlling the development of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Huagang Formation of the central inverted structural belt in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 101-113. |
44 | WANG Wenguang, LIN Chengyan, ZHANG Xianguo, et al. Provenance, clastic composition and their impact on diagenesis: A case study of the Oligocene sandstone in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 126: 104890. |
45 | 胡明毅, 沈娇, 胡蝶. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组砂岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2): 185-191. |
HU Mingyi, SHEN Jiao, HU Die. Reservoir characteristics and its main controlling factors of the Pinghu Formation in Pinghu structural belt, Xihu Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(2): 185-191. | |
46 | 戴金星. 各类烷烃气的鉴别[J]. 中国科学: 化学, 1992(2): 185-193. |
DAI Jinxing. Identification of various types of alkane gases[J]. Scientia Sinica(Chimica), 1992(2): 185-193. | |
47 | 沈平, 申歧祥, 王先彬, 等. 气态烃同位素组成特征及煤型气判识[J]. 中国科学: 化学, 1987(6): 647-656. |
SHEN Ping, SHEN Qixiang, WANG Xianbin, et al. Isotopic composition characteristics of gaseous hydrocarbons and identification of coal type gas[J]. Scientia Sinica(Chimica), 1987(6): 647-656. | |
48 | 庞雄奇. 判别混源气母质转化程度的定量模式及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2000, 21(5): 16-20. |
PANG Xiongqi. The quantitative identification model of the evolution degree of mixing natural gas source material and the application of this model[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, 21(5): 16-20. | |
49 | 戴金星, 戚厚发, 宋岩. 鉴别煤成气和油型气若干指标的初步探讨[J]. 石油学报, 1985, 6(2): 31-38. |
DAI Jinxing, QI Houfa, SONG Yan. Preliminary discussion on several indicators for distinguishing coal formed gas and oil formed gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1985, 6(2): 31-38. | |
50 | 程熊, 侯读杰, 赵喆, 等. 西湖凹陷天然气成因及来源分析[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3): 50-60. |
CHENG Xiong, HOU Dujie, ZHAO Zhe, et al. Analysis on the genesis and source of natural gas in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3): 50-60. |
[1] | Xinxu DONG, Xinghai ZHOU, Kun LI, Renhai PU, Aiguo WANG, Yunwen GUAN, Peng ZHANG. Seismic sedimentological characterization of an offshore area with sparse well control under the constraint of a high-resolution stratigraphic framework: A case study of the Paleogene Huagang Formation in block X of the central anticlinal zone in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 293-308. |
[2] | Zhenjun ZHU, Qi LI, Hehe CHEN, Jian LI, Weiping ZHANG, Fengfan YANG, Yingzhao ZHANG, Jun QIN, Fengxun LI, Shuaiqiang SHAN. Source-to-sink coupling and temporal-spatial evolution in the Lishui Sag of East China Sea Shelf Basin during the Paleocene [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 735-752. |
[3] | Lang YU, Yixin YU, Yiming JIANG, Wei ZOU, Shi Chen, Xianjun TANG, Xinxin LIANG, Xinjian HE, Dongxia CHEN. Characteristics and forming mechanisms of transform zone in the Tiantai slope, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 753-763. |
[4] | Xian Liu, Jiawang Ge, Xiaoming Zhao, Guofeng Yin, Xuesong Zhou, Jianwei Wang, Maolin Dai, Li Sun, Tingen Fan. Time scale and quantitative identification of sequence boundaries for the Oligocene Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 990-1004. |
[5] | Xiaoqi Wu, Yingbin Chen, Changbo Zhai, Lingfang Zhou, Xiaojin Zhou, Jun Yang, Yanqing Wang, Xiaobo Song. Geochemical characteristics of bitumen and tracing of gas source in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 407-418. |
[6] | Tianjun Li, Zhilong Huang, Xiaobo Guo, Jing Zhao, Yiming Jiang, Sizhe Tan. Geochemical characteristics of crude oil from coal measure source rocks and fine oil-source correlation in the Pinghu Formation in Pingbei slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 432-444. |
[7] | Weitao Wu, Jingzhou Zhao, Qi'an Meng, Tiefeng Lin, Ge Zhang, Jinyou Zhang, Shanghua Si, Yubin Bai. Accumulation mechanism of tight sandstone oil in Gaotaizi reservoir in Qijia area, Songliao Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(6): 1376-1388. |
[8] | Chang Liu, Daomin Zhang, Chao Li, Yuanyuan Lu, Shanshan Yu, Mingqiang Guo. Upper Paleozoic tight gas sandstone reservoirs and main controls, Linxing block, Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1146-1158. |
[9] | Shixiang Li, Xiaobing Niu, Guangdi Liu, Jihong Li, Mingliang Sun, Fuliang You, Haonan He. Formation and accumulation mechanism of shale oil in the 7th member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 719-729. |
[10] | Zhe Chen, Changmin Zhang, Guowei Hou, Wenjie Feng, Qinghai Xu. Fault distribution patterns and their control on sand bodies in Pinghu Formation of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 824-837. |
[11] | Chenjie Xu, Jiaren Ye, Jinshui Liu, Qiang Cao, Yiyong Sheng, Hanwen Yu. Simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion for the dark mudstone with Type-Ⅲ kerogen in the Pinghu Formation of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 359-366. |
[12] | Zhu Yixiu, Huang Daowu, Wang Huan, He Xianke, Shi Yuan, She Yaming. Sedimentary setting of thick sandstone in the 3rd member of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in A gas field in the Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1226-1235. |
[13] | Lin Jianli, Zhang Xianguo, Lin Chengyan, Duan Dongping, Huang Xin, Sun Xiaolong, Dong Chunmei. Diagenetic evolution characteristics constrained by lithofacies in deep tight sand gas reservoir [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 886-899. |
[14] | Xu Hong, Zhang Weiwei, Ji Zhaopeng, Wang Li, Wang Qing, Su Dapeng, Lei Baohua, Yang Yanqiu. Dynamic characteristics and model of hydrocarbon accumulation in the large Chunxiao oil and gas field in the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(1): 1-11. |
[15] | Zhao Zhongxiang, Dong Chunmei, Lin Chengyan, Zhang Xianguo, Duan Dongping, Huang Xin, Zeng Fang. Classification and origin of “sweet spots” in deep low permeability tight gas reservoirs,Xihu Sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 778-790. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||