合肥盆地热演化特征

doi:10.11743/ogg20040609

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 644-649.doi: 10.11743/ogg20040609

合肥盆地热演化特征

陈刚^1,2, 赵重远¹, 李丕龙², 任战利¹, 李向平¹, 李宗亮¹

1. 西北大学地质学系,大陆动力学重点实验室,陕西西安 710069;
2. 中国石化胜利油田有限公司,山东东营 257022

收稿日期:2004-10-26 出版日期:2004-12-25 发布日期:2012-01-16
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划973项目(2003CB214601)

Analysis of characteristics of thermal evolution in Hefei basin

Chen Gang^1,2, Zhao Zhongyuan¹, Li Pilong², Ren Zhanli¹, Li Xiangping¹, Li Zongliang ¹

1. Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi;
2. Shengli Oilfield Co. Ltd, SINOPEC, Dongying, Shandong

Received:2004-10-26 Online:2004-12-25 Published:2012-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过5口钻井23个样品镜质体反射率(Ro)数据的统计分析,运用镜质体反射率-深度(Ro-H)剖面斜率及其对应地温梯度的筛分对比方法,综合研究了合肥盆地中新生代的热演化特征。结果表明,盆地不同区块二叠系、下侏罗统和下白垩统的Ro数值大小存在较大差异,介于0.82%～2.70%,但其相应的Ro-H剖面斜率均显著大于上白垩统和下第三系,表明上、下白垩统之间存在明显的间断。下白垩统的地温梯度分布在70.80～130.90℃/km,相对稳定区接近70.80℃/km,表明早白垩世存在一次规模较大的区域性构造-热事件。上白垩统和下第三系Ro集中分布在0.40%～0.74%,地温梯度为38.30℃/km。晚第三纪以来,盆地整体抬升冷却,地温梯度降至现今的27.50℃/km。

关键词: 合肥盆地, 镜质体反射率(Ro), 古地温场, 构造-热演化

Abstract:

Based on statistical analysis of vitrinite reflectance (Ro) data of 23 mudstone samples from five wells in Hefei basin, the thermal evolution characteristics of the basin during Mesozoic and Cenozoic are comprehensively studied by sieve correlating the slope of vitrinite reflectance vs. depth profile (Ro H ) and the corresponding geothermal gradients. TheRo values of the Permian, Lower Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous in different blocks of the basin vary significantly and range from 0.82% to 2.70%, while the slopes of the correspondingRo H profiles are remarkably larger than that of the Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary, indicating an obvious hiatus between the Lower and Upper Cretaceous. The geothermal gradient in the Lower Cretaceous ranges between 70.80℃/km and 130.90℃/km, and that in relatively stable area is near 70.80℃/km, which indicate that there have been a relatively large regional tectonic thermal event during the Early Cretaceous. TheRo of the Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary distribute narrowly between 0.40% and 0.74% and the geothermal gradient is 38.30℃/km. The basin has been uplifted, as a whole, and cooled down since Late Tertiary, lowering the geothermal gradient to the current 27.50℃/km.

Key words: Hefei basin, vitrinite reflectance (Ro ), palaeogeothermal field, tectonic thermal evolution

中图分类号:

TE122.9

陈刚,赵重远,李丕龙,等. 合肥盆地热演化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(6): 644-649. doi: 10.11743/ogg20040609 Chen Gang,Zhao Zhongyuan,Li Pilong,et al. Analysis of characteristics of thermal evolution in Hefei basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004, 25(6): 644-649. doi: 10.11743/ogg20040609

参考文献

[1] 王清晨,从柏林,马力. 大别造山带与合肥盆地的构造耦合[J].科学通报,1997,42(6):575～580
[2] 周进高,赵宗举,邓红婴. 合肥盆地构造演化及含油气性分析[J].地质学报,1999,13(1):15～23
[3] 曹高社,李学田,刘德良,等.合肥盆地与北淮阳构造带印支期的推覆构造及其油气意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(2):116～122
[4] 孙晓猛,张梅生,龙胜祥,等. 秦岭-大别造山带北部逆冲推覆构造与合肥盆地、周口坳陷控盆断裂[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):191～198
[5] 李丕龙,李学田,宋明水,等. 合肥盆地石油地质与地球物理特征研究及进展[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.88～179
[6] 薛爱民,金维浚. 合肥盆地油气地质及其与大别造山带构造耦合[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001. 36～103
[7] 陈刚,李丕龙,李学田. 合肥盆地原型恢复与油气评价的研究方法思考[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(3):200～203
[8] 胡圣标,汪集旸.沉积盆地热体制研究的基本原理和进展[J]. 地学前缘,1995,2(3～4):171～180
[9] 罗晓容. 沉积盆地数值模型的概念、设计及检验[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(3):196～204
[10] 周中毅,潘长春. 沉积盆地古地温测定方法及其应用[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1992.1～103
[11] Suggate R P. Relations between depth of burial, vitrinite reflectance and geothermal gradient[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1998, 21(1):5～32
[12] Barker C E. Temperature and time in the thermal maturation of sedimentary organic mature[A]. In:Naeser N D, McCulloh T H. Thermal history of sedimentary basin-methods and case histories[C]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1989.73～98
[13] Barker C E. Implications for organic maturation studies and evidence for a geologically rapid increase and stabilization of vitrinite reflectance at peak temperature:Cerro Prieto geothermal system, Mexico[J].AAPG Bull, 1991, 75:1852～1863
[14] 何生,王青玲.关于镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的问题讨论[J]. 地质论评,1989,35(2):120～125
[15] 任战利. 中国北方沉积盆地热演化史的对比[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(1):33～37
[16] 肖贤明,刘祖发,申家贵,等. 确定含油气盆地古地温梯度的一种新方法--镜质组反射率梯度法[J]. 科学通报,1998,43(21):2340～2343
[17] 陈刚,赵重远,李丕龙,等. Ro反演的盆地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4):345～346
[18] Barker C E,Pawlewicz M J.The correlation of vitrinite reflectance with maximum temperature in humic organic mature[A].In:Buntebarth G, Stegena L.Paleogeothermics[C].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1986.79～93
[19] Marshall J E A. The Silurian of Saudi Arabia:thermal maturity, burial history and geotectonic environment[J]. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 1995, 89:145～150
[20] 张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚. 秦岭造山带与大陆动力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.171～282
[21] Jiang L L, Wu W P, Chu D R, et al. Post-collisional extensional and thrust-nappe structures in northern part of Dabie mountains[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2003, 48(21):2378～2385
[22] Zhu G, Song C Z, Wang D X, et al. Studies on ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar thermochronology of strike-slip time of the Tan-Lu fault zone and their tectonic implication[J]. Science in China (series D), 2001, 44(11):1002～1008
[23] 林银山,郭福生,辜骏如,等. 北淮阳燕山期岩浆岩地球化学特征及其构造环境[J].中国区域地质,2001,20(1):100～106
[24] 陈廷愚,牛宝贵,刘志刚,等. 大别山腹地燕山期岩浆作用和变质作用的同位素年代学研究及其地质意义[J].地质学报,1991, 65(4):329～336
[25] 简平,马昌前,杨坤光. 大别造山带东部燕山晚期区域变质-岩浆活动与区域构造抬升的同位素地质年代学证据[J].地球科学,1996, 21(5):519～523
[26] 陈江峰,谢智,刘顺生,等.大别造山带冷却年龄的⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar和裂变径迹年龄的测定[J].中国科学(D),1995,25(10):1086～1091
[27] 吴堑虹,刘顺生,Jonckheere R,等. 东大别地区磷灰石裂变径迹年龄的构造意义初析[J].地质科学,2002,37(3):343～349
[28] 杨坤光,马昌前,许长海,等. 北淮阳构造带与大别造山带的差异性隆升[J].中国科学(D辑),1999,29(2):97～103
[29] Reiners P W, Zhou Z Y, Ehlers T A, et al. Post-orogenic evolution of the Dabie Shan, eastern China, from (U-Th)/He and fission-track thermochronology[J].American Journal of Science, 2003, 303:489～518
[30] Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the Southern Tan-Lu fault zone, apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabieshan (eastern China) [J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 359(3～4):225～253

合肥盆地热演化特征

Analysis of characteristics of thermal evolution in Hefei basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	孙晓猛, 张梅生, 龙胜祥, 郝福江, 刘鹏举, 刘长垠. 秦岭-大别造山带北部逆冲推覆构造与合肥盆地、周口坳陷控盆断裂[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(2): 191-198.
[2]	曹高社, 李学田, 刘德良, 周松兴, 高一军. 合肥盆地与北淮阳构造带印支期的推覆构造及其油气意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(2): 116-122.