下生上储式油气运移优势路径确定方法及其应用

doi:10.11743/ogg20180613

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 1237-1245.doi: 10.11743/ogg20180613

下生上储式油气运移优势路径确定方法及其应用

王浩然¹, 付广¹, 宿碧霖², 孙同文³, 汤文浩⁴

1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江大庆 163318;
2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司第四采油厂, 黑龙江大庆 163318;
3. 广东石油化工学院, 广东茂名 525000;
4. 河北思科立珂石油科技有限责任公司, 河北沧州 062650

收稿日期:2017-08-23 修回日期:2018-08-22 出版日期:2018-12-28 发布日期:2018-10-22
通讯作者: 付广(1962-),男,博士、教授,油气藏形成与保存。E-mail:fuguang2008@126.com。 E-mail:fuguang2008@126.com
作者简介:王浩然(1989-),男,博士研究生,油气藏形成与保存。E-mail:wanghaoranpro@163.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05007003003）；中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技项目（2016D-0702）；国家自然科学基金项目（41372153，41872157）；东北石油大学研究生创新科研项目（YJSCX2017-003NEPU）。

A method to determine preferential pathways for hydrocarbon migration in “lower source rock and upper reservoir” combination and its application

Wang Haoran¹, Fu Guang¹, Su Bilin², Sun Tongwen³, Tang Wenhao⁴

1. College of Earth Science, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China;
2. The 4^thOil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., PetroChina, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China;
3. Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming, Guangdong 525000, China;
4. Hebei Scoilmic Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd, Cangzhou, Hebei 062650, China

Received:2017-08-23 Revised:2018-08-22 Online:2018-12-28 Published:2018-10-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于下生上储式油气运移模式及特征，结合三维地震资料、测井和录井资料，分别利用油气成藏期断层活动速率与断面油气势能相结合、砂地比与砂体顶面流体势能相结合的理论，建立了一套下生上储式油气运移优势路径的确定方法，进而可得到下生上储式油气优势成藏范围。将该方法应用到了海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷局部构造南屯组一段下生上储式油气成藏中。结果表明：南屯组一段下生上储式油气成藏分为油气垂向运移模式和先垂向后侧向运移模式，分别确定其中油气运移优势路径有17个和11个，相应的油气优势成藏范围分别为2.3 km和1 km。与研究区内油气实际分布规律相对比，计算结果与实际情况吻合，表明该方法可以用于确定下生上储式油气运移优势路径，有利于划定下生上储式油气优势成藏范围，可以为油气勘探提供指导作用。

关键词: 下生上储, 成藏组合, 油气运移, 优势路径, 南屯组, 海拉尔盆地

Abstract: The study is based on the analysis of characters of hydrocarbon migration within a lower source rock-upper reservoir combination,and 3D seismic and logging data.We worked out a method to determine the preferential pathways for hydrocarbon migration through combining fault activity ratio with hydrocarbon potential energy on fault plane and combining net-to-gross ratio with fluid potential on top of sand bodies.It can be used to define the scope of preferential hydrocarbon accumulation in this mode.Its application in the 1^st member of Nantun Formation (K₁n¹) within a local structure of Bei’er Sag,Hailar Basin,reveals that hydrocarbon migration in the reservoir could be divided into two modes:the mode of vertical migration and the mode of vertical migration followed by lateral migration.There are 17 preferential migration pathways for the former and 11 for the latter.Correspondingly,their scopes of preferential hydrocarbon accumulation are within 2.3 km and 1km respectively,just coinciding with the practical hydrocarbon distribution.It demonstrates that this method is feasible for determining preferential pathways in hydrocarbon migration within a lower source rock-upper reservoir combination,and conducive to delineating the scope of petroliferous region in the reservoir.In conclusion,it is of importance to guide future petroleum exploration.

Key words: combination of “lower source rock with upper reservoir”, hydrocarbon accumulation assemblage, hydrocarbon migration, preferential pathway, Nantun Formation, Hailar Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.1

王浩然,付广,宿碧霖,等. 下生上储式油气运移优势路径确定方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1237-1245. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180613 Wang Haoran,Fu Guang,Su Bilin,et al. A method to determine preferential pathways for hydrocarbon migration in “lower source rock and upper reservoir” combination and its application[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6): 1237-1245. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180613

参考文献

[1] Emmons W H.Experiments on accumulation of oil in sands:[J].AAPG Bulletin,1921,5(1):103-104.
[2] 金之钧,张发强.油气运移研究现状及主要进展[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(3):263-270. Jin Zhijun,Zhang Faqiang.Status and major advancements in study of hydrocarbon migration[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(3):263-270.
[3] Hubbert M K.Entrapment of petroleum under hydrodynamic conditions[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,1953,37(8):1954-2026.
[4] Catalan L.An experimental study of secondary oil migration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1992,76(76):638-650.
[5] 周波,金之钧,王毅.油气二次运移数值模拟分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(4):527-532. Zhou Bo,Jin Zhijun,Wang Yi.Numerical simulation analysis of se-condary hydrocarbon migration[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2008,29(4):527-532.
[6] 徐波,杜岳松,杨志博,等.油气二次运移研究现状及发展趋势[J].特种油气藏,2011,18(1):1-6. Xu Bo,Du Yuesong,Yang Zhibo,et al.Current situation and development trend of the study on secondary hydrocarbon migration[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2011,18(1):1-6.
[7] 张树林,田世澄,朱水安,等.南堡凹陷的断裂构造与油气三次运移[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(4):262-267. Zhang Shulin,Tian Shicheng,Zhu Shuian,et al.Fracture structures and hydrocarbon third migration in Nanpu depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1996,17(4):262-267.
[8] 罗晓容.油气初次运移的动力学背景与条件[J].石油学报,2001,22(6):24-29. Luo Xiaorong.Dynamic background and conditions for petroleum primary migration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,22(6):24-29.
[9] 付广,展铭望.油气沿断裂垂向与砂体侧向运移转换条件分析——以渤海湾盆地局部构造为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(2):336-344. Fu Guang,Zhan Mingwang.Conversion condition analysis for vertical migration along faults and lateral migration along sandbodies of oil and gas:taking the local structure of Bohai Bay basin as an example[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(2):336-344.
[10] 刘华,蒋有录,徐昊清,等.冀中坳陷新近系油气成藏机理与成藏模式[J].石油学报,2011,32(6):928-936. Liu Hua,Jiang Youlu,Xu Haoqing,et al.Accumulation mechanisms and modes of Neogene hydrocarbon in Jizhong Depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):928-936.
[11] 沈扬,贾东,宋国奇,等.源外地区油气成藏特征、主控因素及地质评价——以准噶尔盆地西缘车排子凸起春光油田为例[J].地质论评,2010,56(1):51-59. Shen Yang,Jia Dong,Song Guoqi,et al.Reservoir-forming characters,key control factors and geological evaluation in the area outside oil source——take the Chunguang oilfield in Chepaizi uplift in weste- rn Junggar Basin as an example[J].Geological Review,2010,56(1):51-59.
[12] 付广,吴伟.乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷油气成藏模式及其主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(1):14-20. Fu Guang,Wu Wei.Oil-gas accumulation models and their main controlling factors in Wuerxun-Beier Depression[J].Lithologic Rese- rvoirs,2015,27(1):14-20.
[13] 王浩然,付广,孙同文.油源断裂古转换带恢复及其输导油气的有利条件——以南堡凹陷2号构造F10断裂为例[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(10):1848-1854. Wang Haoran,Fu Guang,Sun Tongwen.Recovery of oil-source fault ancient transfer zone and its favorable conditions to oil-gas transportation:Taking fault F10 in No.2 structure of Nanpu Sag as an example[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(10):1848-1854.
[14] 罗晓容,雷裕红,张立宽,等.油气运移输导层研究及量化表征方法[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):428-436. Luo Xiaorong,Lei Yuhong,Zhang Likuan,et al.Characterization of carrier formation for hydrocarbon migration:concepts and approaches[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):428-436.
[15] 李浩,高先志.高邮凹陷有效砂岩输导层分布及控藏作用[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(2):53-59. Li Hao,Gao Xianzhi.Effective sand carrier beds distribution and its reservoir forming control in Gaoyou sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Science and Technology,2012,36(2):53-59.
[16] Jackson M D,Yoshida S J,Muggeridge A H,et al.Three-dimensional reservoir characterization and flow simulation of heterolithic tidal sandstones[J].AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(4):507-528.
[17] 雷裕红,罗晓容,潘坚,等.大庆油田西部地区姚一段油气成藏动力学过程模拟[J].石油学报,2010,31(2):204-210. Lei Yuhong,Luo Xiaorong,Pan Jian,et al.Simulation on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation dynamics of the first member of Yaojia Formation in the west of Daqing Oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):204-210.
[18] Thorsen C E.Age of growth faulting in Southeast Louisiana[J].Transactions,Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies,1963,13:103-110.
[19] 李勤英,罗凤芝,苗翠芝.断层活动速率研究方法及应用探讨[J].断块油气田,2000,7(2):15-17. Li Qinying,Luo Fengzhi,Miao Cuizhi.Research on fault activity ratio and its application[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2000,7(2):15-17.
[20] 周心怀,牛成民,滕长宇.环渤中地区新构造运动期断裂活动与油气成藏关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(4):469-475. Zhou Xinhuai,Niu Chengmin,Teng Changyu.Relationship between faulting and hydrocarbon pooling during the Neotectonic movement around the central Bohai Bay[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(4):469-475.
[21] 王冠民,熊周海,张健,等.渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷油藏断裂特征及对成藏的控制作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(1):62-70. Wang Guanmin,Xiong Zhouhai,Zhang Jian,et al.Characterization of fault system and its control on reservoirs in the Bozhong Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(1):62-70.
[22] Jiang H,Pang X,Shi H,et al.Effects of fault activities on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the Zhu I Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin,South China Sea[J].Australian Journal of Earth Scie- nces,2015,62(6):775-788.
[23] 平贵东,吕延防,范立民,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷油气富集规律及主控因素分析[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,44(10):4167-4178. Ping Guidong,Lv Yanfang,Fan Limin,et al.Rules and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon enrichment of Urxun-Beier Depression,Hailar basin[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2013,44(10):4167-4178.
[24] 李文科,张研,方杰,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷岩性油藏成藏控制因素[J].石油学报,2015,36(3):337-346. Li Wenke,Zhang Yan,Fang Jie,et al.Control factors of hydrocarbon accumulation for lithologic reservoirs in Beier depression,Hailar Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(3):337-346.
[25] 杨勉,陈艳丽,付广.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷盖层发育特征及封闭性[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(4):1-6. Yang Mian,Chen Yanli,Fu Guang.Development characteristics and sealing evaluation for the cap rocks in Beier sag of Hailar Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2013,32(4):1-6.
[26] 付广,胡欣蕾.盖层封闭天然气有效性定量评价方法及应用[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,34(4):28-36. Fu Guang,Hu Xinlei.Quantitative evaluation method of sealing gas efficieacy of caprock and its application[J].Journal of Shandong Universiy.of Science and Technology(Natural Science),2015,34(4):28-36.
[27] 黄劲松,吕延防,刘长国,等.利用断储排替压力差定量评价断层封闭性——以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷贝301区块为例[J].科学技术与工程,2011,11(13):2902-2909. Huang Jinsong,Lv Yanfang,Liu Changguo,et al.Quantitative evaluation method discussion of fault sealing by use of different displacement pressure between fault and reservoir——taking Bei 301 block in Beier depression Hailaer as example[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2011,11(13):2902-2909.
[28] 刘哲,吕延防,付晓飞,等.贝尔凹陷断层侧向封闭能力定量研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(2):353-361. Liu Zhe,Lv Yanfang,Fu Xiaofei,et al.Quantitative research on lateral seal ability of faults in Beier depression[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2012,42(2):353-361.

下生上储式油气运移优势路径确定方法及其应用

A method to determine preferential pathways for hydrocarbon migration in “lower source rock and upper reservoir” combination and its application

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	梅啸寒, 张琴, 王雅芸, 吴欣松, 刘景彦, 赵家宏, 王武学. 松辽盆地扶新隆起带扶杨油层地层水化学特征及其与油气运聚关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 328-338, 358.
[2]	孙同文, 高喜成, 吕延防, 付广, 王海学, 王浩然. 断裂转换带作为油气侧向、垂向运移通道的研究进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 1011-1021.
[3]	付红军, 姜洪福, 王运增, 李昂, 付广, 胡慧婷, 樊自立. 断-砂配置侧向输导油气能力研究方法的改进及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 1048-1055.
[4]	田纳新, 殷进垠, 陶崇智, 孔凡军. 中东-中亚地区重点盆地油气地质特征及资源评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 582-591.
[5]	江宁, 何敏, 刘军, 薛怀艳, 郑金云, 张青林. 珠江口盆地靖海凹陷多边形断层系统成因及油气成藏意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(2): 363-370.
[6]	王伟, 孙同文, 曹兰柱, 吕延防, 付广, 鲁秀芹, 邓玮, 张桓. 油气由断裂向砂体侧向分流能力定量评价方法——以渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷留楚构造为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 979-989.
[7]	吴文祥, 张海翔, 李占东, 梁鹏, 刘赛, 李萌, 鲍储慧. 层序地层地球化学方法在烃源岩评价中的应用——以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(4): 701-710.
[8]	崔军平, 任战利, 李金翔, 阴玲玲, 王文青. 海拉尔盆地呼伦湖凹陷热演化史恢复[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1): 35-42.
[9]	王君, 楼章华, 朱蓉, 何钰, 朱振宏, 王同军, 钱月红. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷文留地区现今地层水化学与油气运聚[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(4): 449-455.
[10]	胡慧婷, 王龙, 刘岩, 秦培锐, 付红军. 超压泥岩盖层中断层垂向封闭能力研究方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(3): 359-364.
[11]	郭彤楼. 四川盆地奥陶系储层发育特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(3): 372-378.
[12]	刘宗堡, 赵容生, 闫力, 于英华. 海-塔盆地塔南凹陷南屯组一段沉积体系特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(6): 743-750.
[13]	李爱荣, 王维喜, 武富礼, 赵靖舟, 张惠. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安三角洲长4+5和长6油气聚集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(5): 667-671.
[14]	代寒松, 洪亮, 张明军, 张静, 张亚军, 王鑫. 南图尔盖盆地Doshan地区底辟构造的发现及勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(4): 528-532.
[15]	任国选, 侯读杰, 史玉玲, 鲁秀芹, 杨志东, 李红. 准噶尔盆地西北缘红山嘴油田地层水特征与油气藏聚集关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2): 179-184.