松辽盆地扶新隆起带扶杨油层地层水化学特征及其与油气运聚关系

doi:10.11743/ogg20200209

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 328-338, 358.doi: 10.11743/ogg20200209

松辽盆地扶新隆起带扶杨油层地层水化学特征及其与油气运聚关系

梅啸寒¹(), 张琴^2,^3,*(), 王雅芸⁴, 吴欣松^2,³, 刘景彦¹, 赵家宏⁵, 王武学⁵

1. 中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京, 100083
2. 中国石油大学(北京) 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249
3. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249
4. 中国石油青海油田分公司采油三厂, 青海茫崖 816400
5. 中国石油吉林油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 吉林松原 138000

收稿日期:2019-09-12 出版日期:2020-04-28 发布日期:2020-04-03
通讯作者: 张琴 E-mail:mxh198987@126.com;zhangqin@cup.edu.cn
第一作者简介:梅啸寒(1989-),男,博士研究生,油气成藏及石油地质。E-mail:mxh198987@126.com

Hydrochemical characteristics of formation water and its relationship with hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Fuyang oil layer in Fuxin Uplift, Songliao Basin

Xiaohan Mei¹(), Qin Zhang^2,^3,*(), Yayun Wang⁴, Xinsong Wu^2,³, Jingyan Liu¹, Jiahong Zhao⁵, Wuxue Wang⁵

1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
3. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
4. No.3 Oil Production Plant, Qinghai Oil Field Branch Company Ltd., PetroChina, Mangya, Qinghai 816400, China
5. Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Jilin Oilfield Branch Company Ltd., PetroChina, Songyuan, Jilin 138000, China

Received:2019-09-12 Online:2020-04-28 Published:2020-04-03
Contact: Qin Zhang E-mail:mxh198987@126.com;zhangqin@cup.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

扶新隆起带扶杨油层经历了近60年的勘探开发依然是松辽盆地南部最主要的油气富集区之一。然而，扶新隆起带构造条件复杂，断层密集，油、气、水分布极其复杂，油气运聚过程及油气富集规律尚不明确，极大制约了进一步油气勘探开发效果。在分析扶新隆起带北坡扶杨油层地层水来源以及纵向上和平面上分布规律基础上，解剖重点区典型的油藏剖面，结合地层压力及烃源岩条件，深入探讨扶新隆起带扶杨油层地层水特征，与油气运聚和富集的耦合关系。垂向上，扶新隆起带水化学可划分为大气水下渗淡化带、压实水淡化带、溶蚀浓缩带、粘土矿物脱水淡化带以及越流浓缩带5个区带；平面上，扶新隆起带新北鼻状构造带和新立鼻状构造带为是两大离心流发生集中越流泄水的区域，形成了高矿化度、高钠氯系数区域与油气富集区高度的一致性。源内成藏区、源边成藏区油源条件较好，地层受扰动深度较深，成藏条件良好。而在源外成藏区部烃源岩成熟度低，含油气流体影响深度较浅，油源条件较差。

关键词: 地层水化学, 油气运移, 油气聚集, 扶新隆起带, 松辽盆地

Abstract:

After nearly 60 years of exploration and development, Fuyang oil layer in Fuxin Uplift still remains one of the most important hydrocarbon accumulation zones in Southern Songliao Basin.However, the structural setting of Fuxin Uplift is complex:faults are densely developed, the contacts between oil, gas and water layers are extremely complex, and the process of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation and the hydrocarbon enrichment pattern stay to be identified.These factors greatly restrict further efforts made for hydrocarbon exploration and development.Following the analysis of the origin and the vertical and horizontal distribution patterns of formation water in Fuyang oil layer on the northern slope of Fuxin Uplift, we dissected the typical reservoir profiles in key areas, and made an in-depth discussion on the coupling relations between formation water characteristics and hydrocarbon migration, accumulation and enrichment in Fuyang oil layer in Fuxin Uplift in combination with analysis of formation pressure and source rocks.Vertically, five hydrochemical zones can be identified in Fuxin Uplift:diluted zones from meteoric water percolation, diluted zone from compaction, concentrated zone from dissolution, diluted zone from clay mineral dehydration, as well as concentrated zone from over flow.In the plane, the Xinbei and Xinli nose-like structural zones in the study area are the areas where two major centrifugal flows converge and result in cross-formational flow, leading to the high consistency between zones of high salinity and high sodium chloride coefficient and zones of hydrocarbon enrichment.The oil source conditions are relatively better in the intra-source and near-source hydrocarbon accumulation zones, and the depth of hydrocarbon-bearing fluid disturbance is deeper, favorable for hydrocarbon accumulation.However, the source rocks in out-of-source hydrocarbon accumulation zones are low in maturity, and the depth of hydrocarbon-bearing fluid disturbance is shallow, unfavorable for hydrocarbon accumulation.

Key words: hydrochemistry of formation water, hydrocarbon migration, hydrocarbon accumulation, Fuxin Uplift, Songliao Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.1

梅啸寒,张琴,王雅芸,等. 松辽盆地扶新隆起带扶杨油层地层水化学特征及其与油气运聚关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 328-338, 358. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200209 Xiaohan Mei,Qin Zhang,Yayun Wang,et al. Hydrochemical characteristics of formation water and its relationship with hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Fuyang oil layer in Fuxin Uplift, Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 328-338, 358. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200209

图/表 10

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 26

1	李建森, 李廷伟, 彭喜明, 等. 柴达木盆地西部第三系油田水水文地球化学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35 (1): 50- 55.
	Li Jiansen , Li Tingwei , Peng Ximing , et al. Hydrogeochemical beha-viors of oilfield water in the Tertiary in western Qaidam Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35 (1): 50- 55.
2	康保平, 黄小燕, 郭淑萍, 等. 川西坳陷须二气藏气田水成因、运移及其成藏演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (2): 309- 317.
	Kang Baoping , Huang Xiaoyan , Guo Shuping , et al. Origin, migration, and accumulation evolution of reservoir water in the gas field with Xu 2 gas reservoir, western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (2): 309- 317.
3	张宗峰, 查明, 高长海. 大港油田埕北断阶区地层水化学特征与油气成藏[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30 (3): 268- 274.
	Zhang Zongfeng , Zha Ming , Gao Changhai . Hydrochemical characte-ristics and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Chengbei fault terrace zone of Dagang oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30 (3): 268- 274.
4	Uliasz-Misiak B , Winid B . The origin and evolution of waters in the Jurassic formations of the Marginal Trough area(Poland)[J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2017, 50 (4): 426- 437.
5	卢双舫, 黄文彪, 李文浩, 等. 松辽盆地南部致密油源岩下限与分级评价标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44 (3): 473- 480.
	Lu Shuangfang , Huang Wenbiao , Li Wenhao , et al. Lower limits and grading evaluation criteria of tight oil source rocks of southern Song-liao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44 (3): 473- 480.
6	唐振兴, 白连德, 桂盼, 等. 松辽盆地南部扶新隆起老油区勘探实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2009, 14 (4): 17- 20.
	Tang Zhenxing , Bai Liande , Gui Pan , et al. Exploration practice in old oil regions of Fuxin Uplift in southern Songliao Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2009, 14 (4): 17- 20.
7	吴欣松, 郭娟娟, 黄永建, 等. 松辽盆地晚白垩世古气候变化的测井替代指标[J]. 古地理学报, 2011, 13 (1): 103- 110.
	Wu Xinsong , Guo Juanjuan , Huang Yongjian , et al. Well logging proxy of the Late Cretaceous palaeoclimate change in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13 (1): 103- 110.
8	万晓樵, 吴怀春, 席党鹏, 等. 中国东北地区白垩纪温室时期陆相生物群与气候环境演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24 (1): 18- 31.
	Wan Xiaoqiao , Wu Huaichun , Xi Dangpeng , et al. Terrestrial biota and climate during Cretaceous in NE China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24 (1): 18- 31.
9	陈瑞银, 王汇彤, 陈建平, 等. 实验方法评价松辽盆地烃源岩的生排烃效率[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (5): 915- 921.
	Chen Ruiyin , Wang Huitong , Chen Jianping , et al. An experimental method to evaluate the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion efficiency in the Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (5): 915- 921.
10	楼章华, 金爱民, 孙毛明, 等. 松辽盆地北部东区扶杨油层地下水动力场演化与油气藏形成[J]. 天然气工业, 2003, 23 (2): 6- 9.
	Lou Zhanghua , Jin Aimin , Sun Maoming , et al. Evolution of ground-water dynamic field and oil and gas reservoir formation in Fuyang reservoir in the east part of north Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2003, 23 (2): 6- 9.
11	楼章华, 程军蕊, 金爱民. 沉积盆地地下水动力场特征研究——以松辽盆地为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 24 (2): 193- 201.
	Lou Zhanghua , Cheng Junrui , Jin Aimin , et al. Origin and evolution of the hydrodynamics in sedimentary basins-A case study of the Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2006, 24 (2): 193- 201.
12	王君, 楼章华, 朱蓉, 等. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷文留地区现今地层水化学与油气运聚[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35 (4): 449- 455.
	Wang Jun , Lou Zhanghua , Zhu Rong , et al. Hydrochemistry of Paleogene formation water and its relationship with hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Wenliu Region in Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35 (4): 449- 455.
13	曾溅辉, 吴琼, 杨海军, 等. 塔里木盆地塔中地区地层水化学特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29 (2): 223- 229.
	Zeng Jianhui , Wu Qiong , Yang Haijun , et al. Chemical characteristics of formation water in Tazhong area of the Tarim Basin and their petroleum geologic significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29 (2): 223- 229.
14	梁积伟, 李荣西, 陈玉良. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西部盒8段地层水地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (5): 625- 630.
	Liang Jiwei , Li Rongxi , Chen Yuliang . Geochemical behaviors and genesis of formation water in 8^th Member of Xiashihezi Formation in western Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (5): 625- 630.
15	任国选, 侯读杰, 史玉玲, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘红山嘴油田地层水特征与油气藏聚集关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (2): 179- 184.
	Ren Guoxuan , Hou Dujie , Shi Yuling , et al. Relationship between formation water characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation in Hongshanzui oilfield in the northwestern margin of the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (2): 179- 184.
16	赵志平, 官大勇, 韦阿娟, 等. 渤海海域新生界地层水化学特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28 (9): 1396- 1405.
	Zhao Zhiping , Guan Dayong , Wei Ajuan , et al. Chemical characteristics of Neogene Formation water and the research of their key controlling factors in Bohai sea area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28 (9): 1396- 1405.
17	Li Qingguang , Ju Yiwen , Lu Weiqi , et al. Water-rock interaction and methanogenesis in formation water in the southeast Huaibei coalfield, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 77, 435- 447.
18	胡绪龙, 李瑾, 张敏, 等. 地层水化学特征参数判断气藏保存条件——以呼图壁、霍尔果斯油气田为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2008, 31 (4): 23- 26.
	Hu Xulong , Li Jin , Zhang Min , et al. Judge gas reservoir preservation by chemical characteristic parameters of formation water examples from Hutubi and Huo'grguosi oil-gasfields[J]. Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2008, 31 (4): 23- 26.
19	张汪明, 曾溅辉, 李飞, 等. 柴西地区古近系和新近系地层水化学特征及其成因[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2016, 38 (4): 558- 568.
	Zhang Wangming , Zeng Jianhui , Li Fei , et al. Hydrochemistry characteristics and origin of formation water of Paleogene and Neogene in the western Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2016, 38 (4): 558- 568.
20	李伟, 杨金利, 姜均伟, 等. 四川盆地中部上三叠统地层水成因与天然气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36 (4): 428- 435.
	Li Wei , Yang Jinli , Jiang Junwei , et al. Origin of Upper Triassic formation water in middle Sichuan Basin and its natural gas significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2009, 36 (4): 428- 435.
21	史婷婷, 成建梅, 解习农, 等. 松辽盆地北部地层水同位素特征及其地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2012, 30 (2): 399- 404.
	Shi Tingting , Cheng Jianmei , Xie Xinong , et al. Isotopic characteristics of formation waters in the north of Songliao Basin and its geological significances[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30 (2): 399- 404.
22	李伟, 秦胜飞. 四川盆地须家河组地层水微量元素与氢氧同位素特征[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33 (1): 55- 63.
	Li Wei , Qin Shengfei . Characteristics of trace elements and hydrogen and formation water of the Xujiahe Formation oxygen isotopes in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33 (1): 55- 63.
23	王晓梅, 赵靖舟, 刘新社, 等. 苏里格气田西区致密砂岩储层地层水分布特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33 (5): 802- 810.
	Wang Xiaomei , Zhao Jingzhou , Liu Xinshe , et al. Distribution of formation water in tight sandstone reservoirs of western Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33 (5): 802- 810.
24	Bozau E , Sattler C , Van B W . Hydrogeochemical classification of deep formation waters[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2015, 52, 23- 30.
25	楼章华, 李梅, 金爱民, 等. 松辽盆地油田水化学的垂直分带性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30 (2): 195- 202.
	Lou Zhanghua , Li Mei , Jin Aimin , et al. Vertical zonation of oilfield groundwater chemistry fields in the Songliao Basin, China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30 (2): 195- 202.
26	Peter B , Bernardo M G , Carlos M , et al. Origin and evolution of formation water at the Jujo-Tecominoacan oil reservoir, Gulf of Mexico.Part 1:Chemical evolution and water-rock interaction[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2009, 30 (2): 543- 554.

井号	深度/(m)	层位	离子浓度						TDS/(mg·L^-1)	r(Ca⁺)/r(Cl^-)	r(Ca²⁺)/r(Mg²⁺)	r(Cl^-)/r(Mg²⁺)	r(SO₄^2-)×100/r(Mg²⁺)	水型	油气显示
井号	深度/(m)	层位	Na⁺+K⁺	Ca²⁺	Mg²⁺	Cl^-	SO₄^2-	HCO₃^-	TDS/(mg·L^-1)	r(Ca⁺)/r(Cl^-)	r(Ca²⁺)/r(Mg²⁺)	r(Cl^-)/r(Mg²⁺)	r(SO₄^2-)×100/r(Mg²⁺)	水型	油气显示
庙108	1 320~1 326	K₁q⁴	1 677.4	149.7	32.2	2 278.0	46.1	1 089.8	5 273.2	1.046	2.79	23.91	1.562	NaHCO₃	油迹
庙116	1 400~1 407	K₁q⁴	2 510.0	244.9	11.4	3 841.0	38.4	805.5	7 450.9	0.928	12.89	113.90	0.772	NaHCO₃	油斑
庙130	1 318~1 331	K₁q³	1 869.3	212.0	22.0	2 819.0	98.9	739.6	5 760.8	0.942	5.78	43.31	2.758	Na₂SO₄	油斑
民45	930~933	K₁q⁴	2 077.1	82.8	9.4	2 268.8	74.4	1 812.3	6 324.8	1.300	5.29	81.59	2.531	NaHCO₃	油斑
民51	917~925	K₁q⁴	2 256.7	69.9	18.1	3 216.0	167.6	544.9	6 273.2	0.996	2.32	60.06	4.022	NaHCO₃	油斑
民66	1 083~1 089	K₁q³	2 156.7	332.9	11.4	2 831.7	1 171.9	455.8	6 969.4	1.086	17.52	83.96	31.941	Na₂SO₄	荧光
新104	1 176~1 180	K₁q⁴	6 199.9	15.2	7.2	2 756.3	49.8	10 852.0	20 312.0	3.194	1.27	130.30	1.393	NaHCO₃	油迹
新213	1 308~1 311	K₁q⁴	2 899.3	311.8	3.2	4 402.5	342.9	646.8	8 606.5	0.935	58.46	465.11	6.011	NaHCO₃	油浸
新215	1 474~1 478	K₁q³	2 244.1	206.0	2.8	3 546.8	171.9	247.0	6 445.6	0.898	44.14	428.23	3.741	CaCl₂	无
新330	1 629~1 646	K₁q⁴	2 343.4	227.1	18.4	2 481.5	1 251.2	1 142.3	7 463.9	1.341	7.41	45.59	38.913	NaHCO₃	油斑
新342	1 788~1 796	K₁q³	1 770.5	186.8	3.0	1 456.6	1 464.4	915.3	5 796.6	1.726	37.36	164.14	77.592	NaHCO₃	荧光
木16	1 241~1 245	K₁q⁴	2 318.4	168.3	3.1	3 772.8	49.4	124.5	6 436.4	0.873	33.01	416.81	1.011	CaCl₂	荧光
木254	843~848	K₁q⁴	2 499.9	126.1	14.0	3 550.7	62.9	897.6	7 151.2	0.999	5.40	85.73	1.266	NaHCO₃	油斑
扶126	257~265	K₁q⁴	1 572.1	20.0	18.2	1 482.9	96.1	1 039.2	4 529.2	1.505	0.67	27.54	5.001	NaHCO₃	含油
扶深4	462~467	K₁q³	1 692.3	30.9	6.2	1 885.9	12.5	1 354.6	4 982.4	1.274	2.99	102.82	0.512	NaHCO₃	油斑

系数	计算公式	影响因素	地质意义	扶余油层(泉四段)	杨大城子油层(泉三段)	塔里木油田塔中地区志留系	鄂尔多斯呼图壁气田古近系
钠氯系数	r(Na⁺)/r(CT)	浓缩变质	地层封闭性越高，钠氯系数越小	$\frac{0.84 \sim 6.0}{1.51(258)}$	$\frac{0.85 \sim 3.29}{1.27(136)}$	$\frac{0.33 \sim 1.38}{1.87(48)}$	$\frac{0.16 \sim 1.24}{0.84}$
变质系数	[r(Cl^-)-r(Na⁺+K⁺)]/r(Mg²⁺)	变质作用阳离子交换	地层封闭时间越长，变质时间越长，变质系数越大	$\frac{-3390 \sim 614.9}{-22.63(243)}$	$\frac{-536.4\sim 955.85}{79.9(117)}$	$\frac{-129.99 \sim 61.95}{5.54(50)}$
脱硫系数	r(SO₄^2-)×100/r(Cl^-)	脱硫酸作用	SO₄^2-与烃类反应，脱硫系数越小，越有利于油气保存	$\frac{0.05 \sim 87.08}{11.54(257)}$	$\frac{0.17 \sim 157.86}{17.95(136)}$	$\frac{0 \sim 101.77}{7.38(50)}$	1.15~114.92
氯镁系数	r(Cl^-)/r(Mg²⁺)	阳离子交换	地层封闭性越高，钠氯系数越大	$\frac{13.04 \sim 780.8}{126.67(243)}$	$\frac{8.67 \sim 893.87}{171.89(118)}$		$\frac{42.94 \sim 375.61}{167.83}$

[1]	李宁, 李瑞磊, 苗贺, 曹开芳, 田军. 松辽盆地深层中-基性火山岩有利相带及储层“甜点”逐级识别[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 801-815.
[2]	柳波, 蒙启安, 付晓飞, 林铁锋, 白云风, 田善思, 张金友, 姚瑶, 程心阳, 刘召. 松辽盆地白垩系青山口组一段页岩生、排烃组分特征及页岩油相态演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 406-419.
[3]	孙龙德, 王小军, 冯子辉, 邵红梅, 曾花森, 高波, 江航. 松辽盆地古龙页岩纳米孔缝形成机制与页岩油富集特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1350-1365.
[4]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[5]	何春波, 张亚雄, 于英华, 袁红旗. 断裂诱发砂体输导油气变径部位预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1300-1307.
[6]	刘合, 孟思炜, 王素玲, 董康兴, 杨柳, 陶嘉平, 梁立豪. 古龙页岩力学特征与裂缝扩展机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 820-828.
[7]	白斌, 戴朝成, 侯秀林, 杨亮, 王瑞, 王岚, 孟思炜, 董若婧, 刘羽汐. 松辽盆地白垩系青山口组页岩层系非均质地质特征与页岩油甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 846-856.
[8]	吕丹, 王华建, 李罡, 张江永, 付秀丽, 刘畅, 王晓梅, 朱如凯, 张水昌. 松辽盆地青山口组页岩沉积水体环境演变的古生物学证据[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 857-868.
[9]	张天舒, 朱如凯, 蔡毅, 王华建, 吕丹, 周海燕, 付秀丽, 刘畅, 崔坤宁, 张素荣, 王浡, 吴松涛, 张婧雅, 姜晓华, 冯有良, 刘合. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩层序等时格架下的有机质分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 869-886.
[10]	李威, 徐建永, 刘志峰, 李友川, 朱文奇. 幔源CO₂对渤海海域秦皇岛29构造带油气成藏的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 418-428.
[11]	严刚, 徐耀辉, 刘保磊, 孙砚泽, 李姗姗, 赵守钰, 钟鸣. 烷基二苯并噻吩类化合物的运移示踪：基于驱替实验和分子模拟的研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 510-520.
[12]	李忠诚, 鲍志东, 魏兆胜, 张国一, 史燕青, 胡明毅, 邓庆杰. 箕状断陷湖盆初始裂陷期层序地层与沉积充填特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3): 670-681.
[13]	吴伟涛, 赵靖舟, 蒙启安, 林铁锋, 张革, 张金友, 斯尚华, 白玉彬. 松辽盆地齐家地区高台子油层致密砂岩油成藏机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(6): 1376-1388.
[14]	白龙辉, 柳波, 迟亚奥, 李士超, 闻迅. 二维核磁共振技术表征页岩所含流体特征的应用——以松辽盆地青山口组富有机质页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(6): 1389-1400.
[15]	李美俊, 刘晓强, 韩秋雅, 肖洪, 方镕慧, 何大祥, 高志伟. 分子模拟在油气地球化学中的应用研究进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 919-930.

松辽盆地扶新隆起带扶杨油层地层水化学特征及其与油气运聚关系

Hydrochemical characteristics of formation water and its relationship with hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Fuyang oil layer in Fuxin Uplift, Songliao Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics