南襄盆地南阳凹陷地质结构与形成演化

doi:10.11743/ogg20210215

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

南阳凹陷属南襄盆地次级构造单元，是发育在秦岭-大别褶皱造山带之上的富油气断陷。研究其地质结构特征和形成演化过程，对凹陷油气勘探和认识秦岭-大别褶皱造山带晚白垩世以来隆升剥蚀作用的盆地构造-沉积响应均具有重要意义。综合利用凹陷内2/3D地震、钻井、测录井资料，识别区域性不整合面，划分构造-地层层序，刻画主要断裂的构造特征及凹陷平、剖面形态；运用平衡剖面技术，恢复南阳凹陷晚白垩世以来的形成演化过程。结果表明，南阳凹陷发育胡岗组底部（T_g）、玉皇顶组底部（T₇）、核桃园组底部（T₅）、上寺组底部（T₁）4个区域性不整合面，将凹陷地层划分为基底构造层、胡岗组构造层、玉皇顶组-大仓房组构造层、核桃园组-廖庄组构造层、上寺组-平原组构造层共5套构造-地层层序。受新野断层、禹桐断层、师岗断层等基底断层控制，南阳凹陷表现出南北分带、东西分块、隆凹相间的构造格局。凹陷经历了初始断陷期、持续断陷期、强烈断陷期、断-拗转换期和拗陷期共5期构造演化阶段。基底结构复杂、边界断层形态差异及分段差异沉降是凹陷地质结构的主要控制因素。

关键词: 不整合面, 断裂系统, 地质结构, 形成演化, 差异沉降, 南阳凹陷

Abstract:

Nanyang Depression, a secondary structural unit to the Nanxiang Basin, is a petroliferous fault depression developed in the Qinling-Dabie fold orogenic belt.The study on its geological structure features is of great significance to the hydrocarbon exploration in the depression and the understanding of basional structural-sedimentary responses by the uplifting and denudation of Qinling-Dabie fold orogenic belt.Based on 2D and 3D seismic survey results as well as drilling and log data of the area, this study identified regional unconformities, divided structural-stratigraphic sequences, and characterized the main faults as well as the planar and sectional features of the depression.The evolution process of the depression was also rebuilt with balanced section restoration.The results show that the Nanyang Sag has four regional unconformities at the bottom of Hugang (T_g), Yuhuangding (T₇), Hetaoyuan (T₅) and Shangsi Formations (T₁), and five recognizable structural-stratigraphic sequences, namely the basement, Hugang Formation, Yuhuangding-Dacangfang Formations, Hetaoyuan-Liaozhuang Formations and Shangsi-Pingyuan Formations.Controlled by several basement faults, i.e.the Xinye Fault, Yutong Fault and Shigang Fault, the Sag is characterized by a tectonic pattern of NS zonation, EW partition and alternate uplift and sag.Five tectonic evolution stages are suggested to have successively shaped the Sag from the initial rift depression to continuous fault depression, strong fault depression, fault-depression transition and final depression.It is therefore concluded that the Nanyang Sag is structurally controlled by its complex basement structure, boundary fault variations and sectional subsidence differentiations.

Key words: unconformity, fault system, geologic architecture, tectonic evolution, differential subduction, Nanyang Sag

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李智,张志业,杨云飞,等. 南襄盆地南阳凹陷地质结构与形成演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 456-468. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210215 Zhi Li,Zhiye Zhang,Yunfei Yang,et al. Geologic architecture and tectonic evolution of Nanyang Sag, Nanxiang Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(2): 456-468. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210215

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 26

1	童晓光. 塔里木盆地的地质结构和油气聚集[C]//童晓光, 梁狄刚. 塔里木盆地油气勘探论文集. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆科技卫生出版社, 1992: 17-22.
	Tong Xiaoguang. Geologic architecture and hydrocarbon accumulation of Tarim Basin[C]//Tong Xiaoguang, Liang Digang. Papers on oil and gas exploration in Tarim Basin. Urumqi: Xinjiang Science and Technology Health Press, 1992: 17-22.
2	单帅强, 张煜颖, 张锐锋. 渤海湾盆地徐水凹陷地质结构与构造演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (5): 1037- 1047.
	Shan Shuaiqaing , Zhang Yuying , Zhang Ruifeng . Geologic architecture and tectonic evolution of Xushui Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (5): 1037- 1047.
3	李智. 阿姆河右岸东部山前地质结构与油气聚集[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015.
	Li Zhi. Geologic structure and hydrocarbon accumulation of Eastern Foreland in Amu Darya Right Bank[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2015.
4	何登发, 马永生, 蔡勋育, 等. 中国西部海相盆地地质结构控制油气分布的比较研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33 (4): 1037- 1057.
	He Dengfa , Ma Yongsheng , Cai Xunyu , et al. Comparison study on controls of geologic structural frameeork upon hydrocarbon distribution of marine basins in western China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33 (4): 1037- 1057.
5	易泽军. 准噶尔盆地东部二叠系地质结构及成因机制[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2018.
	Yi Zejun. Permian geological architecture and formation mechanism of Eastern Junggar Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2018.
6	张永, 何登发, 刘长磊. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起的三维地质结构及成因机制[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26 (1): 134- 148.
	Zhang Yong , He Dengfa , Liu Changlei . Three-dimensional geological structure and genetic mechanism of the Bachu uplift in the Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26 (1): 134- 148.
7	李智, 张志业, 何登发, 等. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷与南阳凹陷油气地质特征类比及勘探启示[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39 (2): 74- 84.
	Li Zhi , Zhang Zhiye , He Dengfa , et al. Comparison in petroleum geology between Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression in Nanxiang Basin and its exploration significance[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39 (2): 74- 84.
8	杨道庆, 赵追, 贾曙光, 等. 东庄次凹边缘断层坡折带对油气成藏的作用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2002, 21 (3): 14- 15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2002.03.004
	Yang Daoqing , Zhao Zhui , Jia Shuguang , et al. Reservoir-forming conditions in fault slope break at the Margin of Dongzhuang Sub-depression[J]. Petroleum geology & Oilfield development in Daqing, 2002, 21 (3): 14- 15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2002.03.004
9	程学峰, 于群达, 吴跃通, 等. 层序地层学研究及隐蔽油气藏预测——以南阳凹陷古近系为例[J]. 新疆地质, 2003, 21 (2): 206- 209.
	Cheng Xuefeng , Yu Qunda , Wu yuetong , et al. Sequence stratigraphic research and prediction about subtle pools[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2003, 21 (2): 206- 209.
10	陆建林. 南阳凹陷北部坡折带隐蔽油气藏勘探[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31 (3): 38- 40. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2004.03.010
	Lu Jianlin . Subtle reservoir exploration in the slope-break belt of the north Nanyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31 (3): 38- 40. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2004.03.010
11	史忠生, 何生, 杨道庆. 南阳油田东庄次凹核桃园组烃源岩热演化史模拟研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2005, 24 (2): 85- 89.
	Shi Zhongsheng , He Sheng , Yang Daoqing . A study of source rock thermal evolution modeling of Hetaoyuan Formation in Dongzhuang Sag of Nanyang Oilfield[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2005, 24 (2): 85- 89.
12	蔡佳, 王华, 罗家群. 基于层序地层格架的南阳凹陷油气成藏模式[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33 (3): 67- 73.
	Cai Jia , Wang Hua , Luo Jiaqun . Hydrocarbon generation models based on the sequence stratigraphic framework in Nanyang Sag[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33 (3): 67- 73.
13	吕久明. 南襄盆地南阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33 (3): 392- 398.
	Liu Mingjiu . Re-evaluation of source rocks and petroleum resources of Nanyang depression in Nanxiang Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33 (3): 392- 398.
14	罗家群, 彭金宁, 杨云飞, 等. 南襄盆地南阳凹陷核桃园组"源势相导"控藏作用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (3): 319- 325.
	Luo Jiaqun , Peng Jinning , Yang Yunfei , et al. Reservoir forming control of "source-potential-facies-migration" in Hetaoyuan Formation of Nanyang Sag, Nanxiang Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (3): 319- 325.
15	潘作枢, 丁凤仪, 王宝林. 南-襄盆地深部过程分析及重磁异常[J]. 西安地质学院学报, 1986, 8 (1): 56- 62.
	Pan Zuoshu , Ding Fengyi , Wang Baolin . Analysis of deep processes and gravity and magnetic anomalies in Nan-Xiang Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Institute of Geology, 1986, 8 (1): 56- 62.
16	卢顺荣, 温长顺, 许顺山. 南阳凹陷构造模拟实验及其成因机制的探讨[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 1989, 14 (增刊): 97- 105.
	Lu Rongshun , Wen changshun , Xu Shunshan . The structural model experiment and mechanism of Nanyang depression[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1989, 14 (s): 97- 105.
17	冯国奇, 李吉君, 刘洁文, 等. 泌阳凹陷页岩油富集及可动性探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1236- 1246.
	Feng Guoqi , Li Jijun , Liu Jiewen , et al. Discussion on the enrichment and mobility of continental shale oil in Biyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1236- 1246.
18	何涛华, 李文浩, 谭昭昭, 等. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组页岩油富集机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1259- 1269.
	He Taohua , Li Wenhao , Tan Zhaozhao , et al. Mechanism of shale oil accumulation in the Hetaoyuan Formation from the Biyang Depression, Nanxiang Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1259- 1269.
19	梁宇生, 何登发, 甄宇, 等. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷构造-地层层序与盆地演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (5): 943- 954.
	Liang Yusheng , He Dengfa , Zhen Yu , et al. Tectono-stratigraphic sequence and basin evolution of Shawan Sag in the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (5): 943- 954.
20	张磊, 何登发, 李涤, 等. 准噶尔盆地陆东地区石炭系地震波组及构造-地层层序特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (5): 918- 931.
	Zhang Lei , He Dengfa , Li Di , et al. Characteristics of seismic wave groups and tectono-stratigraphic sequences of the Carboniferous, eastern Luliang uplift, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (5): 918- 931.
21	李智, 张志业, 何登发, 等. 唐河-栗园-泌阳断层的几何学和运动学特征——兼论桐柏造山带与泌阳凹陷的盆-山关系[J]. 地质科学, 2020, 55 (3): 921- 938.
	Li Zhi , Zhang Zhiye , He Dengfa , et al. Geometry and kinematics of the Tanghe-Liyuan-Biyang fault and its implication on the relationship between Tongbai orogenic belt and Biyang Depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2020, 55 (3): 921- 938.
22	朱红卫, 崔炜霞, 南科为, 等. 南襄盆地邓参1井晚白垩世的轮藻化石及古环境探讨[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2009, 23 (1): 35- 37.
	Zhu Hongwei , Cui Weixia , Nan Kewei , et al. Discussion on charophyta fossil of cretaceous period in DC1 well in Nanxiang basin and palaeoenvironment[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2009, 23 (1): 35- 37.
23	王定一, 车自成, 张树田, 等. 南襄盆地构造发育特征及形成机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1987, 8 (4): 363- 371.
	Wang Dingyi , Che Zicheng , Zhang Shutian , et al. Characteristics of tectonic evolution and formation mechanism in the Nanxiang Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1987, 8 (4): 363- 371.
24	李智, 张志业, 何登发, 等. 南阳凹陷边界断层三维几何学及运动学特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42 (5): 48- 62.
	Li Zhi , Zhang Zhiye , He Dengfa , et al. 3D geometrical and kinematic characteristics of the boundary fault in Nanyang Depression[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science&Technology Edition), 2020, 42 (5): 48- 62.
25	王忠楠, 柳广弟, 陈婉, 等. 利用声波速度计算南阳凹陷古近纪末地层抬升量[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26 (6): 69- 74.
	Wang Zhongnan , Liu Guangdi , Chen Wan , et al. Quantification of late Paleogene uplift in Nanyang Sag using acoustic velocity[J]. Litholo-gic Reservoirs, 2014, 26 (6): 69- 74.
26	许志琴, 李源, 梁凤华, 等. "秦岭-大别-苏鲁"造山带中"古特提斯缝合带"的连接[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89 (4): 671- 680.
	Xu Zhiqin , Li Yuan , Liang Fenghua , et al. A Connection between of the Paleo-Tethys Suture Zone in the Qinling-Dabie-Sulu Orogenic Belt[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89 (4): 671- 680.

[1]	牛月萌, 韩俊, 余一欣, 黄诚, 林波, 杨帆, 余浪, 陈俊宇. 塔里木盆地顺北西部地区火成岩侵入体发育特征及其与断裂耦合关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 231-242.
[2]	张军涛, 张玉银, 谷宁, 金晓辉, 张涛, 刘四洪, 贾会冲, 杨佳奇, 刘玲, 高晓鹏. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审旗隆起东北侧怀远运动不整合特征及其对岩溶储层形成的意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(1): 101-109.
[3]	何登发, 包洪平, 开百泽, 许艳华, 鲁人齐, 张才利, 魏柳斌, 成祥. 鄂尔多斯克拉通地块活化了吗？[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(6): 1271-1291.
[4]	李相博, 王宏波, 黄军平, 张才利, 张艳, 王雅婷, 张雷, 王菁, 刘化清. 鄂尔多斯盆地怀远运动不整合面特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1043-1055.
[5]	陈槚俊, 何登发, 孙方源, 田方磊. 塔北隆起晚奥陶世—中泥盆世古隆起格局演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 285-298.
[6]	杨金赫. 盆-山转换带构造变形特征及成因机制——以四川盆地东南部桑木场背斜为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 416-429.
[7]	韩品龙, 肖敦清, 王居峰. 渤海湾盆地大港探区加里东期不整合面特征再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 430-442.
[8]	宫越, 林畅松, 何敏, 张忠涛, 张博, 舒梁峰, 冯轩, 洪芳浩. 中国南海北部珠江口盆地早渐新世末破裂不整合特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 851-863.
[9]	何登发, 张磊, 吴松涛, 李涤, 甄宇. 准噶尔盆地构造演化阶段及其特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 845-861.
[10]	易泽军, 何登发. 准噶尔盆地东部构造地层层序及盆地演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 932-942.
[11]	梁宇生, 何登发, 甄宇, 张磊, 田爱军. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷构造-地层层序与盆地演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 943-954.
[12]	单帅强, 张煜颖, 张锐锋. 渤海湾盆地徐水凹陷地质结构与构造演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 1037-1047.
[13]	黄太柱. 塔里木盆地玉北地区断裂系统解析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(1): 98-106.
[14]	杨圣彬, 刘军, 李慧莉, 张仲培, 李婧婧. 塔中北围斜区北东向走滑断裂特征及其控油作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(6): 797-802.
[15]	吕明久. 南襄盆地南阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(3): 392-398.