四川盆地西部彭州气田中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段白云岩孔隙表征、分布及成因

doi:10.11743/ogg20200116

Abstract

Abstract:

Microbiological and micritic-calcisiltic dolomites have been regarded as the dominant reservoir lithology in the upper section of the 4th member of the Leikoupo Formation in Pengzhou gas field. Multiple analytical and statistical methods are applied to study the pore types, physical properties, and pore structure parameters, as well as their impact on lithofacies (especially for microbialite) and crystal size of the dolomites. Besides, four types of reservoirs and the tight zones (interlayers) are identified. The main factors controlling pore formation and distribution are hereby proposed. The results show that dolomites with various microbial textures account for nearly 3/4 of the total formation, most of which are silty-micritic and calcisiltic dolomites. In a high-frequency cycle, the dolomite textures vary upwards from algal clot, to algal spheroid (or algal arene), to algal lamina, and then to laminated silty types. In terms of grain size, a cycle is composed regularly of grained, very fine-(fine-) crystal, micritic, and silty dolomites from the bottom to the top. A dry, hot and alkaline sedimentary environment of hypersalinity prevailed during the Middle Triassic, favorable for the development of microbialites. The meter-scale shallowing-upward cycles of thin (algal) laminae, that is, from the thrombolites and stromatolites in the upper part of the subtidal zone to the intertidal algal laminae-stromatolites, and then to the thin (algal) laminae in the supratidal zone, caused the well development of zones of high porosity and permeability in the upper and middle parts of the sequence. In addition, factors including rapid seepage reflux dolomitization and meteoric freshwater dissolution, early hydrocarbon charging in the shallow burial stage, and multi-stage tectonic fracturing, all play an important role in pore development and preservation.

Key words: reservoir characterization, distribution of reservoirs, origin of reservoirs, dolomite, Leikoupo Formation, Pengzhou gas field, Sichuan Basin

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Lingfang Zhou, Yixiong Qian, Xiaobo Song, Bo Cao, Donghua You, Yong Li. Characteristics, distribution and origin of dolomite reservoir in the upper Lei 4 member of the Middle Triassic, Pengzhou gas field, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 177-188.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 2

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 3

Fig.8

Table 4

The lithology, microfacies, depositional cycle, and diagenesis of the cored interval, and the correlation of pore development and physical property in Well PZ1 in Pengzhou gas field"

埋深/m	层段	主要岩性	微相与旋回	成岩作用(胶结类型及比例)	不同类型孔隙比例	实测物性
5 763.95~ 5 767.77	T₂l⁴ (3-1)	有孔虫球粒-砂屑-核形石灰岩	SMF18, 21, 13	C0-CⅠ(1%0~15%)、剩余孔隙1%~2%、溶缝孔5%~10%(CⅠ-CⅡ)全部胶结，缝合线白云化(1%~3%)，微裂隙孔隙1%~2%	溶缝31%，BC-IP16%，藻溶孔53%(n=19)	孔隙度< 2%，个别样品达4%，渗透率< 0.1×10^-³ μm²
5 808.00~ 5 815.30	T₂l⁴ (3-2)	砂屑-球粒-叠层石白云质灰岩	向上变深, SMF11, 16, 21, 19	泥晶套	溶缝17%，MO+FE(7.0%)，BC-IP27%，藻溶孔27.6%(n=29)
5 808.00~ 5 815.30	T₂l⁴ (3-2)	残余藻球粒-粉晶-泥晶白云岩、灰质白云岩	向上变深, SMF11, 16, 21, 19	雾心亮边、去白云化、偶含硬石膏、扩溶缝	溶缝17%，MO+FE(7.0%)，BC-IP27%，藻溶孔27.6%(n=29)	孔隙度为2%~5%，渗透率介于0.01×10^-3~0.1×10^-3μm²
5 817.80~ 5 821.00	T₂l⁴ (3-3)	粉晶-凝块-球粒-微晶与凝块白云岩夹薄层残余藻球粒灰质白云岩	2个向上变深, SMF17，13	非组构扩溶缝洞、FE、渗流砂	溶缝18.8%，MO+FE(8.3%)，BC-IP41.7%，藻溶孔31.25%(n=29)	孔隙度部分大于5%，渗透率介于0.1×10^-3~10×10^-3 μm²
5 821.60~ 5 825.80	T₂l⁴ (3-4)	砂屑-凝块-球粒-泥晶白云岩	向上变浅, SMF16	棘皮(纤状C00+粒状C01：10%)-巨晶CⅡ(20%~30%)，云化50%~60%(5 821.88 m),溶孔(CⅠ)+裂隙CⅠ(10%)(5 822.95 m)		孔隙度为2%~3%，渗透率介于0.1×10^-3~1.0×10^-3 μm²
5 825.80~ 5 828.80		含生屑球粒-凝块-粉晶-砂屑灰质白云岩	向上变深	砂屑-凝块(纤状-粒状C00-C01, 10%)，溶孔CⅠ(5%~8%)，MO(1%~2%); FE5%~8%，CⅠ，扩溶孔，泡沬状，FE3%~5%(CⅠ1%~2%胶结)
5 825.80~ 5 828.80		粉晶-泥粉晶-粉细晶白云岩	强白云化, SMF18	晶间孔、晶间溶孔、微裂隙		孔隙度为2%~5%，渗透率介于0.1×10^-3~1.0×10^-3 μm²

Table 4

Fig.9

References 27

1	曾德铭.川西北地区中三叠统雷口坡组储层研究[D].成都:西南石油学院, 2005: 15-45.
	Zeng Deming.Reservoir study of the Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in northwest Sichuan Province[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2005: 15-45.
2	王琼仙, 宋晓波, 王东, 等. 川西龙门山前雷口坡组四段储层特征及形成机理[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39 (4): 491- 497.
	Wang Qiongxian , Song Xiaobo , Wang Dong , et al. Reservoircharacte-ristics and formation mechanism of the 4th member of the Leikoupo Formation in Longmen Mountain Front[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2017, 39 (4): 491- 497.
3	高恒逸, 邓美洲, 李勇, 等. 川西彭州地区中三叠统雷口坡组四段储层特征及成岩作用[J]. 海相油气地质, 2018, 23 (1): 37- 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2018.01.005
	Gao Hengyi , Deng Meizhou , Li Yong , et al. Diagenesis and reservoir characteristics in the Middle Triassic Lei-4 Member of Leikoupo Formation in Pengzhou area of western Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2018, 23 (1): 37- 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2018.01.005
4	刘树根, 孙玮, 宋金民, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气勘探的关键地质问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30 (2): 151- 167.
	Liu Shugen , Sun Wei , Song Jinmin , et al. The key geological problems of natural gas exporation in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30 (2): 151- 167.
5	孙伟. 龙门山前雷口坡组储层孔隙结构特征及开发评价意义探讨[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2018, 8 (2): 318- 330.
	Sun Wei . Pore structure characteristics and significance of development evaluation of Leikoupo Formation reservoir in Longmen Mountain Front[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2018, 8 (2): 318- 330.
6	Choquette P W , Pray L C . Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1970, 54 (2): 207- 250.
7	Lucia F J . Rock-fabric/petrophysical classification of carbonate pore space for reservoir characterization[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79 (9): 1275- 1300.
8	Hollis C , Vahrenkamp V , Tull S , et al. Pore system characterisation in heterogeneous carbonates:An alternative approach to widely used rock-typing methodologies[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2010, 27 (4): 772- 793. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.12.002
9	赵新伟, 许红. 基于微焦X-CT的碳酸盐岩孔隙结构的精细表征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23 (1): 127- 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2016.01.029
	Zhao Xinwei , Xu Hong . Microfocus X-CT based fine characterization of carbonate pore texture[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2016, 23 (1): 127- 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2016.01.029
10	Saller AH , Henderson N . Distribution of porosity and permeability in platform dolomitesInsight from the Permian of West Texas-Reply[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (3): 530- 532.
11	刘宏, 谭秀成, 李凌, 等. 孔隙型碳酸盐岩储集层特征及主控因素-以川西南嘉陵江组嘉5段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38 (6): 651- 663.
	Liu Hong , Tan Xiucheng , Li Ling , et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of porous carbonate reservoirs:A case from the Jia 5 Member of the Jialingjiang Formation, southwest Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38 (6): 651- 663.
12	Sibley D F , Gregg J M . Classification of dolomite rocks textures[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1987, 57, 967- 975.
13	钱一雄, 武恒志, 周凌方, 等. 川西中三叠统雷口坡组三段-四段白云岩特征与成因-来自于岩相学及地球化学的约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35 (4): 1161- 1180.
	Qian Yixiong , Wu Hengzhi , Zhou Lingfang , et al. Characteristic and origin of dolomites in the third and fourth member of Leikoupo Formation of The Middle Triassic in NW Sichuan Basin-Constraints in mineralogical&petrographic and geochemical data[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2019, 35 (4): 1161- 1180.
14	田英姿, 陈克复. 用压汞法和氮吸附法测定孔径分布及比表面积[J]. 中国造纸, 2004, 23 (4): 21- 23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-508X.2004.04.007
	Tian Yingzi , Chen Kefu . Determination of pore size distribution and surface area of several materials using mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption[J]. China Pulp&Paper, 2004, 23 (4): 21- 23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-508X.2004.04.007
15	秦瑞宝, 李雄炎, 刘春成, 等. 碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构的影响因素与储层参数的定量评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22 (1): 251- 259.
	Qin Ruibao , Li Xiongyan , Liu Chuncheng , et al. Influential factors of pore structure and quantitative evaluation of reservoir parameters in carbonate reservoirs[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22 (1): 251- 259.
16	郭振华, 李光辉, 吴蕾, 等. 碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构评价方法--以土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸气田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32 (3): 459- 465.
	Guo Zhenhua , Li Guanghui , Wu Lei , et al. Pore texture evaluation of carbonate reservoirs in Gasfield A, Turkmenistan[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32 (3): 459- 465.
17	NdiamihajaS, PadmanabhanE, Ben-AwuahJ, 等. 静态条件下碳酸盐岩三维孔隙网络的溶蚀改造及其对孔隙结构的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46 (2): 361- 369.
	Ndiamihaja S , Padmanabhan E , Ben-Awuah J , et al. Static dissolution-induced 3D pore network modification and its impact on critical pore attributes of carbonate rocks[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46 (2): 361- 369.
18	颜其彬, 陈明江, 汪娟, 等. 碳酸盐岩储层渗透率与孔隙度、喉道半径的关系[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35 (6): 30- 36. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.06.004
	Yan Qibin , Chen Mingjiang , Wang Juan , et al. Correlation among permeability, porosity and pore throat radius of carbonate reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35 (6): 30- 36. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.06.004
19	张翔, 张伟, 靳秀菊, 等. 普光地区碳酸盐岩储层孔隙类型测井识别及孔渗关系[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41 (12): 2019- 2026.
	Zhang Xiang , Zhang Wei , Jin Xiuju , et al. Identification ofpore types and study of poroperm relationships based on logging data in Puguang carbonate reservoir[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41 (12): 2019- 2026.
20	屈海洲, 周子坤, 张云峰, 等. 微生物碳酸盐岩孔隙研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36 (4): 651- 663.
	Qu Haizhou , Zhou Zikun , Zhang Yunfeng , et al. Research progress of porosity in microbial carbonates[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36 (4): 651- 663.
21	王龙, KhalidL, MuhammadR, 等. 微生物碳酸盐岩的成因、分类以及问题与展望--来自华北地台寒武系微生物碳酸盐岩研究的启示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33 (10): 1005- 1023. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.10.1005.
	Wang Long , Khalid L , Muhammad R , et al. The genesis, classification, problems and prospects of microbial carbonates:Implications from the Cambrian carbonate of North China Platform[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2018, 33 (10): 1005- 1023. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.10.1005.
22	Hip K , Haas J , Poros Z , et al. Dolomitization of Triassic microbial mat deposits (Hungary):Origin of microcrystalline dolomite[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2015, 318, 113- 129. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.12.002
23	吕修祥, 陈佩佩, 陈坤, 等. 深层碳酸盐岩差异成岩作用对油气分层聚集的影响--以塔里木盆地塔中隆起北斜坡鹰山组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 957- 971.
	Lyu Xiuxiang , Chen Peipei , Chen Kun , et al. Effects of differential diagenesis of deep carbonate rocks on hydrocarbon zonation and accumulation:A case study of Yingshan Formation on northern slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 957- 971.
24	王鸣川, 段太忠, 杜秀娟, 等. 沉积相耦合岩石物理类型的孔隙型碳酸盐岩油藏建模方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (2): 253- 259.
	Wang Mingchuan , Duan Taizhong , Du Xiujuan , et al. Geological modeling method based on sedimentary facies coupled rock type for porous carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2018, 40 (2): 253- 259.
25	刘宇坤, 何生, 何治亮, 等. 碳酸盐岩超压岩石物理模拟实验及超压预测理论模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (4): 716- 724.
	Liu Yukun , He Sheng , He Zhiliang , et al. The rock physics modeling experiment under overpressure and theoretical model for overpressure prediction in carbonate rocks[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (4): 716- 724.
26	王义武, 蒋飞虎, 慕小水, 等. 湖相碳酸盐岩成因及其石油地质意义:以东濮凹陷沙河街组四段为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25 (5): 568- 572.
	Wang Yiwu , Jiang Feihu , Mu Xiaoshui , et al. Origin of lacustrine carbonate rocks and its significance to petroleum geology:taking fourth Member of Shahejie Formation in Dongpu Sag as an example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2018, 25 (5): 568- 572.
27	赫俊民, 王小垚, 孙建芳, 等. 塔里木盆地塔河地区中-下奥陶统碳酸盐岩储层天然裂缝发育特征及主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 1022- 1030.
	Hao Junmin , Wang Xiaoyao , Sun Jianfang , et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of natural fractures in the Lower-to-Middle Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe area, Northern Tarim Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 1022- 1030.

类型	组构选择性	种类及特征
A	组构选择性溶蚀	粒间孔IP、晶间孔BC、粒内孔WP、窗格孔FE、遮蔽孔SH，铸模孔MO、与生物有关格架(GF)、微生物席(凝块、核形石、藻纹层-叠层石等)藻菌有关的有机孔OM、膏溶模孔、生物扰动-钻孔-遗迹、潜穴BO-BU等
B	组构-非组构溶蚀	角砾间(溶)孔，窗格溶孔(洞)、膏溶孔洞、各种残余孔(洞)等
C	裂隙-非组构溶蚀	张扭裂隙、压扭剪切(X共轭、雁行排列)、扩溶缝(洞)、溶孔洞(穴)、溶沟-渠道等
D	微孔隙	0.02~10 μm孔隙，泥晶白云石、方解石晶间微孔；凝块、叠层石、藻纹层中微孔、粘土有机质中微孔以及晶体内微孔(石膏、天青石、萤石、黄铁矿等)

岩石类型	储集空间	孔隙结构	排驱压力/MPa	孔喉半径/μm	孔隙度/%	渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)
泥微晶白云岩	微裂隙和微孔隙	纳米孔喉，连通性差	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.14 \sim 4.34}}}}{{{\rm{1.90(7)}}}}$	$\frac{{{\rm{0.17 \sim 5.23}}}}{{{\rm{1.10(7)}}}} $	$ \frac{{{\rm{1.08 \sim 3.70}}}}{{{\rm{2.32(7)}}}}$	$\frac{{{\rm{0.004 \sim 0.542}}}}{{{\rm{0.106(6)}}}} $
微粉晶白云岩	晶间(溶)孔	大孔喉，连通性好	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.18 \sim 1.93}}}}{{{\rm{0.63(5)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.38 \sim 5.32}}}}{{{\rm{2.62(5)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{2.46 \sim 5.77}}}}{{{\rm{3.94(5)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.070 \sim 14.100}}}}{{{\rm{3.156(5)}}}}$
藻凝块(藻团块)白云岩	(藻)格架孔、粒间(溶)孔	亚微米孔喉，连通性一般	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.14 \sim 0.45}}}}{{{\rm{0.32(5)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{1.62 \sim 5.31}}}}{{{\rm{2.75(5)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{2.63 \sim 7.61}}}}{{{\rm{5.61(5)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.030 \sim 2.120}}}}{{{\rm{0.913(5)}}}}$
藻球粒(藻砂屑)白云岩	(藻)格架孔、粒间(溶)孔和微孔隙	亚微米孔喉，连通性一般	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.14 \sim 1.79}}}}{{{\rm{0.66(7)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.41 \sim 5.23}}}}{{{\rm{2.1(7)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{2.66 \sim 8.89}}}}{{{\rm{5.68(7)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.004 \sim 1.520}}}}{{{\rm{0.491(7)}}}}$
藻纹层藻粘结白云岩	(藻)格架孔晶间(溶孔)	大孔喉，连通性好	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.07 \sim 1.15}}}}{{{\rm{0.32(21)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.64 \sim 103.58}}}}{{{\rm{10.82(21)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{2.19 \sim 15.13}}}}{{{\rm{6.15(21)}}}}$	$ \frac{{{\rm{0.056 \sim 10.300}}}}{{{\rm{1.133(20)}}}}$

储层分类	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ(致密层)
孔隙度/%	>10	10~5	5~2	< 2
渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	>5	5~0.1	0.1~0.01	< 0.01
平均孔喉半径/μm	>0.3	0.3~0.1	0.1~0.05	< 0.05
主要岩石类型	藻纹层-球粒、叠层石云岩、藻纹层-藻粘结云岩及藻砂屑(凝块)云岩、粉细晶云岩	藻球粒-藻纹层-藻粘结云岩、粉(细)晶云岩、藻凝块云岩、藻砂屑(凝块)云岩	残余藻球粒(或纹层)(含灰)泥粉晶云岩、砂屑(凝块)-藻粘结云岩、含灰粉晶云岩	含灰(膏)泥(粉)晶云岩、含云的泥晶灰岩或藻粘结灰岩、含云的生屑泥晶灰岩
孔隙类型	窗格(扩)溶孔洞、藻格架孔、溶孔洞、粒内溶孔、晶间(溶)孔及裂隙、扩溶缝、角砾状溶孔	晶间(溶)孔、窗格(扩溶)孔、粒内(间)孔、溶孔(洞)、残留孔隙、微裂隙、扩溶缝	晶间孔、粒内孔(微孔隙)、窗格孔、角砾状孔、微裂隙、铸模孔、扩溶缝、残余孔	晶(粒)间孔、粒间(内)孔、微孔隙
其他特征	无或较弱的胶结、油斑或油迹	白云石、方解石胶结或充填等、少量油斑	去云化、白云石、方解石胶结或充填等	微生物矿化、白云岩化、去云化、石膏胶结

[1]	Rui FANG, Yuqiang JIANG, Changcheng YANG, Haibo DENG, Chan JIANG, Haitao HONG, Song TANG, Yifan GU, Xun ZHU, Shasha SUN, Guangyin CAI. Occurrence states and mobility of shale oil in different lithologic assemblages in the Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	Xiao HE, Maja ZHENG, Yong LIU, Qun ZHAO, Xuewen Shi, Zhenxue Jiang, Wei WU, Ya WU, Shitan NING, Xianglu TANG, Dadong LIU. Characteristics and differential origin of Qiongzhusi Formation shale reservoirs under the “aulacogen-uplift” tectonic setting， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	Changbo ZHAI, Liangbiao LIN, Donghua YOU, Fengbin LIU, Siyu LIU. Sedimentary microfacies characteristics and organic matter enrichment pattern of the 1^st member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation， southwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 440-456.
[4]	Heyi ZHANG, Shuai YANG, Xihua ZHANG, Hanlin PENG, Qian LI, Cong CHEN, Zhaolong GAO, Anqing CHEN. Sedimentary microfacies and environmental evolution of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin： A case study of the Yangjiao section in Wulong District， Chongqing， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[5]	Hui PAN, Yuqiang JIANG, Xun ZHU, Haibo DENG, Linke SONG, Zhanlei WANG, Miao LI, Yadong ZHOU, Linjie FENG, Yongliang YUAN, Meng WANG. Evaluation of geological sweet spots in fluvial tight sandstone gas： A case study of the first submember of the second member of the Jurassic Shaximiao Formation， central Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[6]	Baoshou ZHANG, Benjian ZHANG, Hua WANG, Jianfa CHEN, Kaixuan LIU, Shuang DOU, Xin DAI, Shuangling CHEN. The Jinqiu gas field in the Sichuan Basin： A typical helium-bearing to helium-rich gas field with the Mesozoic sedimentary rocks as helium source rocks [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[7]	Zhili ZHANG, Yanping QIAO, Shuang DOU, Kunyu LI, Yuan ZHONG, Luya WU, Baoshou ZHANG, Xin Dai, Xin JIN, Bin WANG, Jinmin SONG. Karst paleogeomorphology and reservoir control model of the 2^nd member of Dengying Formation in Penglai gas area， Sichuan Basin， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[8]	Guangfu WANG, Fengxia LI, Haibo WANG, Tong ZHOU, Yaxiong ZHANG, Ruyue WANG, Ning LI, Yuxin CHEN, Xiaofei XIONG. Difficulties and countermeasures for fracturing of various shale gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[9]	Zongquan HU, Ruyue WANG, Jing LU, Dongjun FENG, Yuejiao LIU, Baojian SHEN, Zhongbao LIU, Guanping WANG, Jianhua HE. Storage characteristic comparison of pores between lacustrine shales and their interbeds and differential evolutionary patterns [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[10]	Dongfeng HU, Zhihong WEI, Ruobing LIU, Xiangfeng WEI, Wei WANG, Qingbo WANG. Discovery of the Qijiang shale gas field in a structurally complex region on the southeastern margin of the Sichuan Basin and its implications [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1418-1429.
[11]	Hongyan WANG, Shangwen ZHOU, Qun ZHAO, Zhensheng SHI, Dexun LIU, Pengfei JIAO. Enrichment characteristics， exploration and exploitation progress， and prospects of deep shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[12]	Zhensheng SHI, Shengxian ZHAO, Tianqi ZHOU, Shasha SUN, Yuan YUAN, Chenglin ZHANG, Bo LI, Ling QI. Types and genesis of horizontal bedding of marine gas-bearing shale and its significance for shale gas： A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin， China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1499-1514.
[13]	Ruikang BIAN, Chuanxiang SUN, Haikuan NIE, Zhujiang LIU, Wei DU, Pei LI, Ruyue WANG. Types， characteristics， and exploration targets of deep shale gas reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations， southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[14]	Shuangjian LI, Zhi LI, Lei ZHANG, Yingqiang LI, Xianwu MENG, Haijun WANG. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration targets of the Triassic subsalt ultra-deep sequences in the western Sichuan Depression， Sichuan Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[15]	Jianhui ZENG, Yaxiong ZHANG, Zaizhen ZHANG, Juncheng QIAO, Maoyun WANG, Dongxia CHEN, Jingli YAO, Jingchen DING, Liang XIONG, Yazhou LIU, Weibo ZHAO, Kebo REN. Complex gas-water contacts in tight sandstone gas reservoirs： Distribution pattern and dominant factors controlling their formation and distribution [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.

Characteristics, distribution and origin of dolomite reservoir in the upper Lei 4 member of the Middle Triassic, Pengzhou gas field, western Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics