地震道反演面临的问题与进展

doi:10.11743/ogg20020403

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2002, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 321-325.doi: 10.11743/ogg20020403

地震道反演面临的问题与进展

马劲风¹, 许升辉², 王桂水¹, 高乐¹

1. 西北大学地质学系, 陕西西安, 710069;
2. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所, 北京, 100101

收稿日期:2002-04-20 出版日期:2002-12-25 发布日期:2012-01-16
基金项目:
本研究由国家自然科学基金项目"纵波与转换波(P-SV)弹性阻抗的联合反演(H40144017)"资助

PROBLEMS AND PROGRESS IN SEISMIC TRACE INVERSION

Ma Jinfeng¹, Xu Shenghui², Wang Guishui¹, Gao Le¹

1. Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaaxi;
2. Geological and Geophysical Institute, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

Received:2002-04-20 Online:2002-12-25 Published:2012-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

常规叠后地震道反演技术,受多种因素的影响。在实用中,很难获得准确的结果。从地震道反演的主要技术环节来看,造成地震道反演错误或解释陷井的原因主要集中在噪声、假设条件、子波提取、时深转换、低频分量、约束条件等方面。Patrick Connolly提出的弹性阻抗(elastic impedance)的思想,改进了反射系数垂直入射假设的错误,巧妙地将AVO问题与地震道反演相结合,将地震道反演技术向前推进了一步。在此基础上建立的适合常规叠后资料的、非零炮检距纵波资料的广义弹性阻抗(generalized elastic impedance)模型不仅包含波阻抗,还包含了纵横波速度等岩性信息。进一步发展纵波与转换波弹性阻抗的联合反演,能更准确地获得纵横波速度信息,还能获得流体饱和度及渗透特性的信息,是地震反演发展的最新方向

关键词: 波阻抗, 陷井, 地震道反演, 弹性阻抗, 递推公式

Abstract:

Routine post-stack seismic trace inversion techniques are affected by many factors. It is difficult to gain satisfied results in practice. Possible reasons of causing wrong inversion results and interpretation pitfalls were analyzed in terms of main technique details of seismic trace inversion, chiefly concentrating on the aspects of noise, assumed conditions, w(t) extraction, transition of time and depth, low frequency component and restrained conditions etc. The concept of Elastic Impedance put forward by Patric Connolly has improved the reflectivity of normal incidence assumption which combines AVO problems and seismic trace inversion method in a skillful way so as to promote the seismic trace inversion method. Moreover, a model of Generalized Elastic Impedance established on this base suiting the routine post-stack, non-zero offset seismic data was put forward by us. Generalized Elastic Impedance which does not only include acoustic impedance but also include lithologic information of P and S-wave velocity. More accurate P and S-wave velocity and fluid, saturation, penetration information can be got by making a further study on joint P-wave and P-SV elastic impedance inversion. This is the new trend for seismic trace inversion.

Key words: acoustic impedance, pitfall, seismic trace inversion, elastic impedance, recursive formula

中图分类号:

P631.4

马劲风,许升辉,王桂水,等. 地震道反演面临的问题与进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(4): 321-325. doi: 10.11743/ogg20020403 Ma Jinfeng,Xu Shenghui,Wang Guishui,et al. PROBLEMS AND PROGRESS IN SEISMIC TRACE INVERSION[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(4): 321-325. doi: 10.11743/ogg20020403

参考文献

[1] 李庆忠.走向精确勘探的道路--高分辨率地震勘探系统工程剖析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.5,154～177
[2] Latimer R B, Davison R, van Riel P. An interpreter's guide to understanding and working with seismic-derived accoustic impedance data[J].The Leading Edge,2000,19(3) :242～256
[3] Lindseth R O. Synthetic sonic logs-a process for stratigraphic interpretation[J]. Geophysics, 1978,44(1): 3～26
[4] Russell B H, Hampson D P. A comparison of post-stack seismic inversion [R]. 61^th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1991.876～878
[5] Cooke D A, Schneider W A. Generalized linear inversion of reflection seismic data[J]. Geophysics, 1983,48(6) :665～676
[6] 杨文采.地震道的非线性混沌反演-I,理论和数值试验[J].地球物理学报,1993,36(3):376～386
[7] 李庆忠.符合小层对比原则的砂层内插技术[J].石油物探,1989,28(1):12～21
[8] 马劲风,王学军,钟俊,等.测井资料约束的波阻抗反演中的多解性问题[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):7～10
[9] 刘雯林.油气田开发地震技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[10] Connolly P. Elastic impedance[J]. The Leading Edge, 1999, 18(4):438～452
[11] Hanna R W. Virgil kauffman award for Patrick Connolly[J]. The Leading Edge,2001,20(11): 1926～1301
[12] Whitcombe D N, Connolly P A, Reagan R L, et al. Extended elastic impedance for fluid and lithology prediction [R]. 70^th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2000
[13] Savic M, Masters R, Sena A, et al. Elastic impedance inversion in practice[R]. 70^th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2000
[14] Cambois G. AVO and elastic impedance[R].70^th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2000, AVO 2.4
[15] Mukerji T,Jorstad A, Avseth P, et al. Mapping lithofacies and porefluid probabilities in a North Sea reservoir seismic inversions and statistical rock physics[J]. Geophysics,2001,66(4) :988～1001
[16] Hiherman F J, van Schuyver C, Sbar M. AVO examples of long-offset 2-D data in the Gulf of Mexico[J]. The Leading Edge, 2000,19(11):1200～1213
[17] 马劲风,贾春环,李庆春,等.转换波人工合成地震记录与速度反演方法研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,1999,34(5):509～519
[18] Rogno H, Kristensen A, Amundsen L. The statfjord 3-D, 4C OBC survey[J].The Leading Edge, 1999,18(11): 1300～1305
[19] Landro M, Duffaut K, Rogno H. Well calibration of seabed seismic data [R].69^th SEG Annual Meeting,Expanded Abstracts, 1999, SAVOMC6

地震道反演面临的问题与进展

PROBLEMS AND PROGRESS IN SEISMIC TRACE INVERSION

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘玲, 沃玉进, 张涛, 孙炜. 运用岩性因子预测四川盆地涪陵地区茅口组白云岩储层[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 144-156.
[2]	谭学群, 廉培庆, 邱茂君, 李艳华, 董广为. 基于岩石类型约束的碳酸盐岩油藏地质建模方法——以扎格罗斯盆地碳酸盐岩油藏A为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(4): 558-563.
[3]	韩敏强, 蒲仁海, 刘海娟, 郭向东, 刘宝平. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区奥陶纪末古地貌恢复与储层预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(5): 760-767.
[4]	单敬福, 王峰, 孙海雷, 孙继刚, 韩喜. 基于地震波阻抗反演的小层砂体预测技术——在大庆油田州57水平井区块的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(2): 212-218.
[5]	王光付. 溶洞型碳酸盐岩油藏高效开发实践—以塔河油田11区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(5): 703-708.
[6]	靖辉, 张晓武, 赵铭海. 新近系馆陶组上段储层预测方法——以济阳坳陷沾化凹陷垦东北部地区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(3): 401-406.
[7]	林会喜. 河流相地层波阻抗特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(5): 524-527.
[8]	陈振林, 罗开平, 陈晓. 通南巴构造石炭系分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(3): 293-294.
[9]	李宗杰, 王勤聪. 塔北超深层碳酸盐岩储层预测方法和技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(1): 35-40.
[10]	张玉芬, 凌峰, 程冰洁. 井约束地震道反演和多项式拟合的联合应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(4): 388-390.
[11]	朱伟, 朱玲, 吴新民. 宽带约束反演在江陵凹陷谢凤桥油田储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(3): 273-276.
[12]	马劲风, 张忠伟, 王家珉. 垂直入射假设对井旁地震道子波提取的影响及改进措施[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2000, 21(3): 191-196.
[13]	徐峰, 杨金华, 张耀堂, 徐振宏. 轮南地区碳酸盐岩油气藏的地震响应特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20(3): 228-231.
[14]	马劲风, 王学军, 钟俊, 许亚军. 测井资料约束的波阻抗反演中的多解性问题[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20(1): 7-10.