石油与天然气地质 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 419-428.doi: 10.11743/ogg20180301

• 油气勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

黔北地区安页1井下志留统松坎组天然气成因

张金川1, 雷怀玉2, 张福3, 李龙3, 刘子驿1, 刘飏1, 张鹏1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京) 页岩气勘查与评价国土资源部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国华电集团 清洁能源有限公司, 北京 100160;
    3. 贵州产投能源有限责任公司, 贵州 遵义 563400
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-30 修回日期:2018-02-06 出版日期:2018-06-28 发布日期:2018-06-21
  • 第一作者简介:张金川(1964-),男,教授、博士生导师,非常规油气资源评价。E-mail:zhangjc@edu.cn。
  • 基金项目:
    中国地质调查局地质调查项目(12120115007201,DD20160185)。

Origin of on natural gas in the Lower Silurian Songkan Formation from Well Anye 1,north Guizhou area

Zhang Jinchuan1, Lei Huaiyu2, Zhang Fu3, Li Long3, Liu Ziyi1, Liu Yang1, Zhang Peng1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration and Evaluation(Ministry of Land and Resources), China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Chian Huadian Green Energy Co., Ltd., Beijing 100160, China;
    3. Guizhou Industrial Investment Energy Co., Ltd., Zunyi, Guizhou 563400, China
  • Received:2017-06-30 Revised:2018-02-06 Online:2018-06-28 Published:2018-06-21

摘要: 黔北安页1井是四川盆地外围获得重大油气突破的页岩气井,该井下志留统松坎组具有较好的油气资源潜力。为了对该区出气地层(松坎组)天然气的成因进行深入研究,我们将该区下志留统松坎组与下志留统石牛栏组以示区分,并对松坎组展开了地球化学、气体组分和气体同位素等一系列实验。实验结果表明:该区松坎组特殊岩性组合条件下的TOC均值为0.16%,Ro分布在2.75%~2.92%,均值为2.95%,干酪根类型以Ⅱ1型为主;松坎组气体烃类组分主要以甲烷为主(96%以上),含少量的乙烷、丙烷及其它烃类气体。研究区松坎组天然气干燥系数明显小于五峰-龙马溪组页岩气干燥系数,同时研究区新滩组的CO2含量明显高于上覆松坎组和下伏五峰-龙马溪组的CO2含量。松坎组气体同位素δ13C1值在-33.2‰~-33.9‰,均值为-33.5‰;δ13C2值在-36.5‰~-37.0‰,均值为-36.8‰;δDCH4值在-145.8‰~-156.6‰,均值为-150.0‰;该组干酪根碳同位素值在-32.9‰~-32.6‰,均值为-32.75‰。结合CO2示踪天然气运移理论、天然气干燥系数以及气源对比特征,说明安页1井松坎组地层中的天然气主要来源于本层泥页岩热裂解生成的页岩气。

关键词: 天然气干燥系数, CO2示踪天然气运移, 气源对比, 安页1井, 页岩气, 松坎组, 黔北地区

Abstract: The Well Anye(AY)1 of north Guizhou,in the Sichuan Basin,is a shale gas well of major breakthrough in oil and gas exploration of the basin.The Lower Silurian Songkan Formation of this well has good resources of potential of oil and gas.To better understand the genesis of natural gas in the gas reservoir of the formation,we distinguished the Lower Silurian Songkan and Shiniulan Formation in the area,and made a series of experiments in geochemistry,gas composition,gas isotopes.The experimental results show that(1)under special lithologial combinations,the average content of TOC of the Songkan Formation in this area is 0.16%,the Ro value varies from 2.75% to 2.92% with the average of 2.95%,and the kerogen type is mainly Type Ⅱ;meanwhile its gas accumulation is dominated by methane(over 96%),plus a small amount of ethane,propane,and other hydrocarbon gases;(2)the natural gas drying coefficient of the Songkan Formation in the study area is much smaller than that of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,and the CO2 content of the Xintan Formation is significantly higher than that of the Songkan and Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation;(3)the δ13C1 value of gas isotopes in the Songkan Formation ranges from -33.2‰ to -33.9‰,with the average of -33.5‰;δ13C2 value is in the range between -36.5‰ and -37.0‰,and the average is -36.8‰,while the δD(CH4) value is within the range between -145.8‰ and -156.6‰,averaging at -150.0‰,and the kerogen carbon isotope value in the formation is from -32.9‰ to -32.6‰,with the average of -32.75‰.Combining CO2 tracer gas migration theory,gas drying coefficient and gas source correlation characteristics,we conclude that the natural gas of the Songkan Formation strata from Well AY1 is mainly derived from the formation's mudstone shale gas after heat cracking.

Key words: gas drying coefficient, CO2 tracer gas migration, gas source correlation, Well AY1, shale gas, Songkan Formation, north Guizhou

中图分类号: