润湿性影响下低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组长81段为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20200220

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 442-448.doi: 10.11743/ogg20200220

• 方法技术 • 上一篇

润湿性影响下低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组长8¹段为例

冯程¹(), 樊海涛², 石玉江³, 陈雪昆⁴, 李高仁³, 毛志强^5,*()

1. 中国石油大学(北京)克拉玛依校区石油学院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000
2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000
3. 中国石油长庆油田分公司, 陕西西安 710018
4. 中国石油新疆油田分公司采油一厂, 新疆克拉玛依 834000
5. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球物理学院, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2018-04-04 出版日期:2020-04-01 发布日期:2020-04-03
通讯作者: 毛志强 E-mail:fcvip0808@126.com;maozq@cup.edu.cn
第一作者简介:冯程(1988-),男,博士、副教授,岩石物理,复杂及非常规储层测井评价。E-mail:fcvip0808@126.com
基金项目:
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金青年基金(2017D01B57)

Prediction for the formation water salinity in low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability: A case study of the Triassic Chang 8¹ member, Longdong area, Ordos Basin

Cheng Feng¹(), Haitao Fan², Yujiang Shi³, Xuekun Chen⁴, Gaoren Li³, Zhiqiang Mao^5,*()

1. Faculty of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum(Beijing) at Karamay, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Xinjiang Oilfield Branch Company Ltd., PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
3. Changqing Oilfield Branch Company Ltd., PetroChina, Xi'an, Shannxi 710018, China
4. No.1 Oil Production Plant of Xinjiang Oilfield Branch Company Ltd., PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
5. College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

Received:2018-04-04 Online:2020-04-01 Published:2020-04-03
Contact: Zhiqiang Mao E-mail:fcvip0808@126.com;maozq@cup.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

测试资料表明，鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区低渗透储层地层水矿化度变化很大，且储层受到复杂润湿性影响，基于自然电位和储层电阻率~孔隙度组合预测地层水矿化度等经典方法均失效，给储层含油饱和度预测带来巨大困难。因此，在假设储层地层水矿化度与邻近泥岩层束缚水矿化度近似相等的前提下，首先选取邻近泥岩层中稳定部分（高自然伽马、未扩径和低电阻率），读取电阻率和声波时差数据。其次，完成邻近泥岩层声波时差数据的压实校正。然后，通过电阻率和校正后声波时差交会图，实现对不同矿化度下（0~20，20~40，40~60以及大于60 g/L）邻近泥岩层识别，进而提出一种利用邻近泥岩信息确定储层地层水矿化度的方法，预测结果得到了实验分析数据的验证。最后，利用该方法预测了106口井长8¹储层地层水矿化度资料，结合69份地层水分析矿化度，绘制了陇东地区长8¹储层地层水矿化度平面分布等值线图，有助于地层水矿化度的准确选择和平面分布规律研究。同时，为润湿性影响下的低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测提供了一种可行的解决办法，并具有普遍适用性。

关键词: 湿润性, 地层水矿化度, 低渗透储层, 延长组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract:

The testing data indicate that formation water salinity of low-permeability reservoirs varies in a wide range.What's worse, under the impact of complex wettability, classical methods including spontaneous potential and a combination of reservoir resistivity and porosity fail to predict formation water salinity.This leads to great difficulty in the prediction of reservoir oil saturation.To this end, we proposed a new method to predict the formation water salinity with the results verified by experiments.The new method is shown as follows:assuming the salinity of formation water was approximately equal to that of irreducible water in adjacent mudstones, we carried out resistivity and acoustic logging in the relatively stable parts with high natural gamma ray, without borehole enlargement and low resistivity in adjacent mudstones; then conducted compaction correction of the interval transit time; and at last identified the mudstones of diverse salinity (0-20 g/L, 20-40 g/L, 40-60 g/L and >60 g/L) via cross-plotting the resistivity vs.corrected interval transit time.In practice, a contour map of formation water salinity of the study area was drawn by using the formation water salinity of Chang 8¹ member in 106 wells predicted by this method and in combination with the test results of 69 formation water samples.This is conducive to the selection of formation water salinity and the planar distribution pattern study of salinity.In addition, the newly proposed method in the study serves as a feasible method for the prediction of formation water salinity in low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability, and is universally applicable.

Key words: wettability, formation water salinity, low-permeability reservoir, Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

冯程,樊海涛,石玉江,等. 润湿性影响下低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组长8¹段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 442-448. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200220 Cheng Feng,Haitao Fan,Yujiang Shi,et al. Prediction for the formation water salinity in low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability: A case study of the Triassic Chang 8¹ member, Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 442-448. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200220

图/表 7

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 24

1	Archie G E . The electricalresistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir of characteristics[J]. Petroleum Technology, 1942, 54- 60.
2	高锡兴. 中国含油气盆地油田水[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994.
	Gao Xixing . Oil field water in oil-gas-bearing basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1994.
3	Henry J, Cunningham W.A new method for determination of formation waterresistivity from the spontaneous potential curve[C]//Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 1962.
4	Smits L J M . SP log interpretation in shaly sands[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1968, 8 (2): 123- 136.
5	洪有密. 测井原理与综合解释[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2007.
	Hong Youmi . Logging principles and comprehensive interpretation[M]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2007.
6	赵发展, 戚洪彬, 王赟. 地层水矿化度检测的地球物理测井方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2002, 17 (3): 551- 558.
	Zhao Fazhan , Qi Hongbin , Wang Yun . A geophysical logging method to detect the water mineralization intensity underground[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2002, 17 (3): 551- 558.
7	Feng C, Mao Z, Fu J, et al.Research on evaluation of formation water salinity and origin of its big variation in ultra-low permeability clastic reservoir[C]//International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2015.
8	Oruwori A E, Ikiensikimama S S.Determination of water salinities in hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs of some Niger Delta fields-Nigeria[C]//SPE 34th International Conference and Exhibition, 2010.
9	Salazar J M , Wang G L , Verdin C T , et al. Combined simulation and inversion of SP and resistivity logs for the estimation of connate water resistivity and Archie's cementation exponent[J]. SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium, 2007.
10	李厚义 . 对油层水电阻率的思考[J]. 测井技术, 1996, (4): 303- 307.
	Li Houyi.Notes on water resistivity of oil zone, Well Logging Technology, 1996(4): 303-307.
11	Chen S, Hursan G.A new method for estimating formation water Rw using NMR logging data[C]//SPWLA 51th Annual Logging Symposium, 2010.
12	Clinch S , Shafer J , Wei W , et al. Determining formation water salinity in the hydrocarbon leg using cores and logs[J]. Petrophysics, 2010, 52 (2): 108- 123.
13	Dusenbery R A, Osoba J S.Determination of formation water resistivity using shale properties[C]//The Permian Basin Oil & Gas Recovery Conference of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1986.
14	Cannon D E.Shales: An alternate source for water resistivities[C]//SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium, 1995.
15	张宪生, 贺佳印, 王宇虹, 等. 确定泥质砂岩储层地层水电阻率新方法探索[J]. 测井技术, 2003, 27 (5): 386- 388.
	Zhang Xiansheng , He Jiayin , Wang Yuhong , et al. A new method to determine formation water resistivity of shaly-sand reservoirs[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2003, 27 (5): 386- 388.
16	冯程, 毛志强, 殷文, 等. 低渗透复杂润湿性储层电阻率实验及导电机理研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60 (3): 1211- 1220.
	Feng Cheng , Mao Zhiqiang , Yin Wen , et al. Study on resistivity experiments and conductive mechanism in low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60 (3): 1211- 1220.
17	冯程, 石玉江, 郝建飞, 等. 低渗透复杂润湿性储集层核磁共振特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44 (2): 252- 257.
	Feng Cheng , Shi Yujiang , Hao Jianfei , et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance features of low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44 (2): 252- 257.
18	Perrier R , Quiblier J . Thickness changes in sedimentary layers during compaction history:Methods for quantitative evaluation[J]. Aapg Bulletin, 1974, 58 (3): 507- 520.
19	罗晓容, 王家华. 江汉盆地地层埋藏史研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 1989, (4): 369- 378.
	Luo Xiaorong , Wang Jiahua . Study on burial history of the strata in Jianghan basin[J]. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 1989, (4): 369- 378.
20	陈朝兵, 杨友运, 邵金辉, 等. 鄂尔多斯东北部致密砂岩气藏地层水成因及分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 313- 325.
	Chen Zhaobing , Yang Youyun , Shao Jinhui , et al. Origin and distribution of formation water in tight sandstone reservoirs in the northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 313- 325.
21	李鹏春, 刘春晓, 张渊, 等. 塔中奥陶系地层水化学特征及其成因与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28 (6): 802- 808.
	Li Pengchun , Liu Chunxiao , Zhang Yuan , et al. Geochemical behaviors of the Ordovician formation water in the Tazhong area and its origin and evolution[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2007, 28 (6): 802- 808.
22	李阳. 东胜气田锦66井区盒2+3段地层水特征及地质意义[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33 (2): 59- 63.
	Li Yang . Characteristics and geological significance of the formation water for 2+3th memberof Xiashihezi formation in Jin 66 well block of Dongsheng gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2019, 33 (2): 59- 63.
23	刘福田, 李荣西, 左智峰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部地区上三叠统延长组6段地层水成因及其油气意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (6): 1179- 1189.
	Liu Futian , Li Rongxi , Zuo Zhifeng , et al. Genesis of formation water in the 6th member of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin and its petroleum significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (6): 1179- 1189.
24	曾溅辉, 吴琼, 杨海军, 等. 塔里木盆地塔中地区地层水化学特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29 (2): 223- 229.
	Zeng Jianhui , Wu Qiong , Yang Haijun , et al. Chemical characteristics of formation water in Tazhong area of the Tarim Basin and their petroleum geological significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29 (2): 223- 229.

井	总矿化度/(g·L^-1)	井	总矿化度/(g·L^-1)	井	总矿化度/(g·L^-1)	井	总矿化度/(g·L^-1)
Well 1	7.51	Well 2	9.96	Well 3	12.15	Well 4	16.17
Well 5	17.14	Well 6	18.25	Well 7	18.6	Well 8	18.72
Well 9	19.97	Well 10	20.82	Well 11	20.86	Well 12	21.16
Well 13	23.03	Well 14	23.40	Well 15	23.74	Well 16	24.26
Well 17	24.58	Well 18	24.89	Well 19	25.11	Well 20	26.79
Well 21	26.80	Well 22	26.92	Well 23	27.34	Well 24	27.43
Well 25	27.62	Well 26	27.72	Well 27	28.29	Well 28	28.60
Well 29	28.98	Well 30	29.44	Well 31	29.99	Well 32	31.77
Well 33	33.44	Well 34	33.95	Well 35	34.78	Well 36	35.74
Well 37	37.25	Well 38	39.75	Well 39	41.35	Well 40	42.06
Well 41	43.25	Well 42	44.23	Well 43	44.30	Well 44	44.56
Well 45	45.05	Well 46	47.24	Well 47	47.70	Well 48	48.09
Well 49	48.10	Well 50	48.83	Well 51	49.09	Well 52	50.23
Well 53	53.90	Well 54	54.05	Well 55	55.19	Well 56	56.82
Well 57	57.27	Well 58	59.90	Well 59	61.22	Well 60	62.97
Well 61	64.15	Well 62	64.62	Well 63	69.65	Well 64	72.59
Well 65	82.05	Well 66	84.97	Well 67	89.69	Well 68	104.10
Well 69	106.53

[1]	吴伟涛, 冯炎松, 费世祥, 王一妃, 吴和源, 杨旭东. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木气田二叠系石千峰组5段致密气富集因素及有利区预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 739-751.
[2]	刘成林, 丁振刚, 范立勇, 康锐, 洪思婕, 朱玉新, 陈践发, 王海东, 许诺. 鄂尔多斯盆地含氦天然气地球化学特征与富集影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 384-392.
[3]	万俊雨, 朱建辉, 姚素平, 张毅, 李春堂, 张威, 姜海健, 王杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地中、东部奥陶系马家沟组成烃生物及烃源岩地球生物学评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 393-405.
[4]	杨丽华, 刘池洋, 黄雷, 周义军, 刘永涛, 秦阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地古峰庄地区疑似侵入岩体的发现及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 142-156.
[5]	师良, 范柏江, 李忠厚, 余紫巍, 蔺子瑾, 戴欣洋. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部三叠系延长组7段烃组分的运移分异作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 157-168.
[6]	曹江骏, 王继平, 张道锋, 王龙, 李笑天, 李娅, 张园园, 夏辉, 于占海. 深层致密砂岩储层成岩演化对含气性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 169-184.
[7]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[8]	刘成林, 丁振刚, 陈践发, 范立勇, 康锐, 王海东, 洪思婕, 田安琦, 陈学勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地氦源岩特征及生氦潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1546-1554.
[9]	李勇, 朱治同, 吴鹏, 申陈州, 高计县. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘上古生界致密储层含气系统压力演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1568-1581.
[10]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[11]	梁岳立, 赵晓明, 张喜, 李树新, 葛家旺, 聂志宏, 张廷山, 祝海华. 轨道周期约束下海-陆过渡相页岩层系高精度层序界面识别及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1231-1242.
[12]	李涵, 付金华, 季汉成, 张雷, 佘钰蔚, 官伟, 井向辉, 王红伟, 曹茜, 刘刚, 魏嘉怡. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上古生界风化壳型铝土岩系发育过程及优势储层分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1243-1255.
[13]	李晓, 郭鹏, 胡彦智, 李士祥, 杨伟伟. 陆相页岩压裂试验与数值模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1009-1019.
[14]	高嘉洪, 金之钧, 梁新平, 李士祥, 杨伟伟, 朱如凯, 杜晓宇, 刘全有, 李彤, 董琳, 李鹏, 张旺. 火山活动对鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段淡水湖盆富营养化与沉积水体介质环境的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 887-898.
[15]	王梓毅, 付金华, 刘显阳, 李士祥, 张昌虎, 梁新平, 董琳. 鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组7段埋藏期热液活动对页岩油储层的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 899-909.

润湿性影响下低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组长8¹段为例

Prediction for the formation water salinity in low-permeability reservoirs with complex wettability: A case study of the Triassic Chang 8¹ member, Longdong area, Ordos Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)