四川盆地西部雷口坡组非热液成因鞍形白云石的发现及意义

doi:10.11743/ogg20200115

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

鞍形白云石通常由热液作用形成，四川盆地西部雷口坡组广泛发育的鞍形白云石也被许多学者归为热液作用成因，并由此将雷口坡组白云岩储层归为热液成因储层。为了进一步认识这些鞍形白云石的成因，并为储层研究提供指引，本文通过对四川盆地西部雷口坡组鞍形白云石的岩石学及地球化学特征分析，较深入地开展了雷口坡组鞍形白云石研究。研究指出区内雷口坡组存在两种成因类型的鞍形白云石；构造裂缝内的鞍形白云石在阴极射线下发亮桔红色光或不发光，氧同位素值相对较高、富集稀土元素、并具负Eu异常、锶-钾-铁-锰含量较高，明显不同于围岩，可能是深部与中酸性岩浆活动有关的岩浆期后热液作用的产物；灰岩中的鞍形白云石斑块、白云岩溶蚀缝孔洞内鞍形白云石沉淀物在阴极射线下发玫瑰红色光，氧同位素值相对较低、贫稀土元素、缺乏Eu异常、锶-钾-铁-锰含量较低，与白云岩围岩极其相似，代表了白云石化流体及物质来源于地层本身，是非热液成因的鞍形白云石，是中-深埋藏条件下，白云岩地层内部流体白云石化作用的产物。区内雷口坡组热液成因鞍形白云石发育分布有限，广泛发育分布的是非热液成因鞍形白云石，指示了雷口坡组储层并非热液作用成因；埋藏条件下，地层流体及热液流体活动较弱，大量的有效储集空间得以保存下来。

关键词: 非热液成因, 储集意义, 鞍形白云石, 雷口坡组, 四川盆地西部

Abstract:

Since saddle-shaped dolomites are usually formed by hydrothermal fluid, multiple scholars have considered the saddle-shaped dolomite in the Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Basin, as hydrothermal origin and ascribed the reservoir therein as a product of hydrothermal process. The study made an in-depth analysis of the petrology and geochemistry of saddle-shaped dolomite in the area, in order to further identify the origin of the dolomite and the genetic mechanism of the dolomite reservoir. Two origin types of saddle-shaped dolomite were identified-the hydrothermal saddle-shaped dolomite and the non-hydrothermal one. The former developed inside tectonic fractures emits bright orange red light or is non-luminant under cathodoluminescence, featuring relatively high content of δ¹⁸O and Sr-K-Fe-Mn elements, rich rare-earth elements, and negative-Eu abnormality. It's quite different from the matrix rocks, and may be a product of post-magmatic hydrothermal processes following intermediate to acidic magma activities in depth. However, the latter is a product of the dolomitization of medium-to-deep fluids inside the dolomite reservoir. Its saddle-shaped dolomite plaques in limestone and the saddle-shaped dolomite precipitates in dissolved pores or cavities in dolomite emit rose-bengal light under cathodoluminescence, featuring relatively lower content of δ¹⁸O and Sr-K-Fe-Mn elements, as well as deficiency in rare-earth element and Eu abnormality. They are quite similar to the surrounding dolomites, indicating that dolomitization fluids and substance have originated from within the same reservoir. The fact of limited distribution of the saddle-shaped dolomite of hydrothermal origin and wide distribution of the saddle-shaped. dolomite of non-hydrothermal origin in the Leikoupo Formation, indicates that the Leikoupo reservoir is not of hydrothermal origin. The relatively subdued activities of formation and hydrothermal fluids in burial have led to good preservation of effective reservoir space.

Key words: non-hydrothermal origin, reserving significance, saddle-shaped dolomite, Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李国蓉,刘正中,谢子潇,等. 四川盆地西部雷口坡组非热液成因鞍形白云石的发现及意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 164-176. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200115 Guorong Li,Zhengzhong Liu,Zixiao Xie,et al. Discovery of non-hydrothermal saddle-shaped dolomite in Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 164-176. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200115

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

表1

四川盆地西部雷口坡组白云石碳、氧稳定同位素分析结果统计"

序号	井号	层位	产状描述	δ¹³C(PDB)/‰	δ¹⁸O(PDB)/‰	备注
1	羊深1	雷四下储层段	微晶云岩	2.21	0.72	微晶白云石
2	羊深1	雷四下储层段	粉-微晶云岩	2.61	-1.63	微晶白云石
3	新深1	雷四段	微晶云岩	2.65	-0.64	微晶白云石
4	龙深1	雷三段	微晶云岩	0.11	-0.89	微晶白云石
5	孝深1	雷四上储层段	微晶云岩	0.94	0.22	微晶白云石
6	孝深1	雷四上储层段	微晶云岩	0.65	0.19	微晶白云石
7	孝深1	雷四上储层段	微晶云岩	1.89	-1.05	微晶白云石
8	彭州103	雷四上储层段	粉-微晶云岩	1.02	-0.31	微晶白云石
9	彭州115	雷四上储层段	粉-微晶云岩	1.96	0.44	微晶白云石
10	彭州115	雷四上储层段	粉-微晶云岩	1.64	0.51	微晶白云石
11	彭州115	雷四上储层段	粉-微晶云岩	1.83	0.17	微晶白云石
12	邑深1	雷四上储层段	微晶云岩	1.57	-0.18	微晶白云石
13	羊深1	雷四下储层段	粉-细晶自形白云石呈层	1.56	-5.74	粉-细晶自形白云石
14	鸭深1	雷四下储层段	粉-细晶自形白云石密集	2.39	-6.94	粉-细晶自形白云石
15	鸭深1	雷四上储层段	微-粉晶自形白云石呈层	1.96	-6.86	粉-细晶自形白云石
16	彭州1	雷四上储层段	交代成因鞍形白云石斑块	2.57	-5.52	交代成因鞍形白云石
17	鸭深1	雷四下储层段	交代成因鞍形白云石斑块	-1.33	-6.53	交代成因鞍形白云石
18	彭州103	雷四下储层段	交代成因鞍形白云石斑块	1.30	-7.87	交代成因鞍形白云石
19	羊深1	雷四下储层段	孔洞内鞍形白云石	0.34	-5.22	溶蚀孔洞内鞍形白云石
20	彭州1	雷四下储层段	孔洞内鞍形白云石	2.57	-5.28	溶蚀孔洞内鞍形白云石
21	鸭深1	雷四下储层段	缝洞内鞍形白云石	-0.52	-7.56	溶蚀孔洞内鞍形白云石
22	鸭深1	雷四下储层段	孔洞内鞍形白云石	-0.62	-6.41	溶蚀孔洞内鞍形白云石
23	鸭深1	雷四下储层段	孔洞内鞍形白云石	-0.72	-6.65	溶蚀孔洞内鞍形白云石
24	鸭深1	雷四下储层段	孔洞内鞍形白云石	-0.71	-7.50	溶蚀孔洞内鞍形白云石
25	新深1	雷四段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	2.69	-1.97	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
26	彭州115	雷四段	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石	1.45	-3.91	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
27	龙深1	雷三段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	1.53	-4.06	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
28	龙深1	雷三段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	1.51	-4.21	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
29	龙深1	雷三段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	0.42	-5.24	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
30	龙深1	雷三段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	0.53	-4.23	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
31	龙深1	雷三段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	0.57	-5.35	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石
32	龙深1	雷三段	构造裂缝内脏鞍形白云石	0.38	-4.58	构造裂缝内鞍形白云石

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 55

1	李群, 包志伟. 热液白云岩的研究现状及展望[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2018, 42 (04): 699- 717.
	Li Qun , Bao Zhiwei . Research status and prospects of hydrothermal dolomite[J]. Geotectonics and Metallogenesis, 2018, 42 (04): 699- 717.
2	Kretz R . Carousel model for the crystallization of saddle dolomite[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1992, 62 (2): 190- 195.
3	Al-Aasm I , Lonnee J , Clarke J , et al. Multiple fluid flow events and the formation of saddle dolomite:examples from Middle Devonian carbonates of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2000, 38 (4): 11- 15.
4	Al-Aasm I , Lonnee J , Clarke J . Multiple fluid flow events and the formation of saddle dolomite:case studies from the Middle Devonian of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2002, 19 (3): 209- 217. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8172(02)00013-2
5	Al-Aasm I . Origin and characterization of hydrothermal dolomite in the WestreN Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2003, 78 (1): 9- 15.
6	Luczaj J A . Evidence against the Dorag (mixing-zone) model for dolomitization along the Wisconsin arch-A case for hydrothermal diagenesis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1719- 1738. doi: 10.1306/01130605077
7	Lonnee J , Machel H G . Pervasive dolomitization with subsequent hydrothermal alteration in the Clarke Lake gas field, Middle Devonian Slave Point Formation, British Columbia, Canada[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1739- 1761. doi: 10.1306/03060605069
8	Diehl S F , Hofstra A H , Koenig A E , et al. Hydrothermal Zebra Dolomite in the Great Basin, Nevada-Attributes and Relation to Paleozoic Stratigraphy, Tectonics, and Ore Deposits[J]. Geosphere, 2010, 6 (5): 663- 690. doi: 10.1130/GES00530.1
9	Davies G R , Smith Jr L B . Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies:An overview[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1641- 1690. doi: 10.1306/05220605164
10	Luczaj J A , Harrison W B , Williams N S . Fractured hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs in the Devonian Dundee Formation of the central Michigan Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1787- 1801. doi: 10.1306/06270605082
11	Jiao C L , He Z L , Xing X J , et al. Tectonic hydrothermal dolomite and its significance of reservoirs in Tarim basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27 (1): 277- 284.
12	Liu S G , HuangW M , Jansa L F , et al. Hydrothermal Dolomite in the Upper Sinian (Upper Proterozoic) Dengying Formation, East Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88 (5): 1466- 1487. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.12312
13	Ogiesoba O C , Hart B S . Fault imaging in hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs:A case study[J]. Geophysics, 2009, 74 (3): B71- B82. doi: 10.1190/1.3106722
14	Pearce M A , Timms N E , Hough R M , et al. Reaction mechanism for the replacement of calcite by dolomite and siderite:implications for geochemistry, microstructure and porosity evolution during hydrothermal mineralisation[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2013, 166 (4): 995- 1009. doi: 10.1007/s00410-013-0905-2
15	Swennen R , Vandeginste V , Ellam R . Genesis of zebra dolomites (Cathedral Formation:CanadianCordillera Fold and Thrust Belt, British Columbia)[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2003, 78-79, 571- 577. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(03)00065-7
16	Smith Jr L B , Davies G R . Structurally controlled hydrothermal alteration of carbonate reservoirs:Introduction[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1635- 1640. doi: 10.1306/intro901106
17	Williams G E . Hydrothermal alteration of Britain's oldest palaeosols:saddle dolomite and smectite at the Lewisian-Torridon Group (early Neoproterozoic) unconformity, NW Scotland[J]. Scottish Journal of Geology, 2015, 51 (1): 63- 68. doi: 10.1144/sjg2014-014
18	Hans G M , Jeff L . Hydrothermal dolomite-a product of poor definition and imagination[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2002, 152 (3-4): 163- 171. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(02)00259-2
19	卿海若, 陈代钊. 非热液成因的鞍形白云石:来自加拿大萨斯喀彻温省东南部奥陶系Yeoman组的岩石学和地球化学证据[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28 (05): 980- 986.
	Qing Hairuo , Chen Daizhen . Saddle-shaped dolomite with non-hydrothermal genesis:evidence of petrology and geochemistry from the Yeoman Formation of the Ordovician in southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada[J]. Journal of Sedimentation, 2010, 28 (05): 980- 986.
20	沈安江, 周进高, 辛勇光, 等. 四川盆地雷口坡组白云岩储层类型及成因[J]. 海相油气地质, 2008, (04): 19- 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2008.04.004
	Shen Anjiang , Zhou Jingao , Xin Yongguang , et al. Types and genesis of dolomite reservoirs in the Leikoupo Formation of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2008, (04): 19- 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2008.04.004
21	曾德铭.川西北地区中三叠统雷口坡组储层研究[D].四川成都:西南石油学院, 2005.
	Zeng Deming. Research on the reservoir of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the northwestern Sichuan Basin[D]. Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2005.
22	汪华.四川盆地中西部中三叠统天然气藏特征及成藏机理研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2009.
	Wang Hua. Characteristics and accumulation mechanism of the Middle Triassic natural gas reservoirs in the central and western Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2009.
23	秦川.川中南部地区中三叠统雷口坡组储层特征[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2009.
	Qin Chuan. Reservoir characteristics of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the central and southern Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2009.
24	李德星.川中龙女寺-磨溪地区雷口坡组雷四~雷三段古岩溶储层研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2010.
	Li Dexing. Study on the paleo-karst reservoirs ofthe Lei 4~Lei 3 Member of the Leikoupo Formation in the Moxi area of Chuanzhong[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2010.
25	许国明.川西地区中古生界海相油气地质条件研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2010.
	Xu Guoming. Study on marine oil and gas geological conditions of the Middle Paleozoic in western Sichuan[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2010.
26	陈昭国.川西地区海相碳酸盐岩储层预测研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2011.
	Chen Zhaoguo. Prediction of marine carbonate reservoirs in western Sichuan[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
27	秦川.川西坳陷中北部三叠系雷口坡组-马鞍塘组储层特征及油气勘探前景[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2012.
	Qin Chuan. Reservoir characteristics and oil and gas exploration prospects of the Triassic Leikoupo Formation-Maantang Formation in the central and northern Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012.
28	林彤.川西地区中部中三叠统雷四段储层特征[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2016.
	Lin Tong. Reservoir characteristics of the third member of the Middle Triassic in the central Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2016.
29	余永强.川西中-北段中三叠统雷四~3亚段储层特征[D].四川成都:成都理工大学, 2017.
	Yu Yongqiang. Reservoir characteristics of the Middle Triassic Lei 4~3 sub-section in the middle-north segment of western Sichuan[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2017.
30	彭靖淞, 刘树根, 张长俊, 等. 龙门山前缘中三叠统雷口坡组储集层成岩作用差异性[J]. 古地理学报, 2014, 16 (06): 790- 801.
	Peng Jingzhen , Liu Shugen , Zhang Changjun , et al. Diagenesis of the reservoir of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the front of the Longmen Mountains[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014, 16 (06): 790- 801.
31	黄泽光, 高长林, 范小林. 中国中西部晚古生代-中三叠世沉积盆地原型[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34 (01): 1- 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2012.01.001
	Huang Zeguang , Gao Changlin , Fan Xiaolin . The prototype of Late Paleozoic-Middle Triassic Sedimentary Basin in Central and Western China[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2012, 34 (01): 1- 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2012.01.001
32	殷鸿福, 吴顺宝, 杜远生, 等. 华南是特提斯多岛洋体系的一部分[J]. 地球科学, 1999, (01): 3- 14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.1999.01.020
	Yin Hongfu , Wu Shunbao , Du Yuansheng , et al. South China is part of the Tethys Island Ocean System[J]. Earth Science, 1999, (01): 3- 14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.1999.01.020
33	罗建宁, 彭勇民, 潘桂棠. 东特提斯板块会聚边缘与岛弧造山作用[J]. 岩相古地理, 1996, (03): 1- 15+46.
	Luo Jianning , Peng Yongmin , Pan Guizhen . The Convergent Edge and Island Arc Aeotomy of the East Tethys Plate[J]. Rock Facies and Palaeogeography, 1996, (03): 1- 15+46.
34	潘桂棠, 陈智樑, 李兴振, 等. 东特提斯多弧一盆系统演化模式[J]. 岩相古地理, 1996, 16 (02): 52- 65.
	Pan Guizhen , Chen Zhiliang , Li Xingzhen , et al. Evolution model of the East Tethys multiarc basin system[J]. Cryistry and Paleoge-ography, 1996, 16 (02): 52- 65.
35	孙晓猛, 杨遵仪, 张梅生. 滇西北金沙江古特提斯造山带地层及构造演化[J]. 长春科技大学学报, 1999, (01): 21- 25.
	Sun Xiaomeng , Yang Zunyi , Zhang Meisheng . Stratigraphy and tectonic evolution of the PaleoTethys orogenic belt in Jinshajiang, Northwestern Guizhou[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology, 1999, (01): 21- 25.
36	杨丽贞, 刘融涛, 白艳萍. 广西南部钦州地区早-中三叠世火山事件——台马碎斑熔岩[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30 (01): 95- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.01.009
	Yang Lizhen , Liu Rongtao , Bai Yanping . The Early-Middle Triassic Volcanic Events in Qinzhou Area of Southwestern Guangxi-Taiwanese plaque lava[J]. Geological Notification, 2011, 30 (01): 95- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.01.009
37	廖世勇, 尹福光, 王冬兵. 滇西"三江"地区临沧花岗岩基中三叠世碱长花岗岩的发现及其意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2014, 3- 14.
	Liao Shiyong , Yin Fuguang , Wang Dongbing . Discovery and significance of the Middle Triassic alkali granitic granite in the Lincang granite base in the Sanjiang area, western Yunnan[J]. Journal of Rock Mineralogy, 2014, 3- 14.
38	路晓平, 王仁善, 刘卫东, 等. 青海省都兰县江各早-中三叠世火山岩岩石学特征及构造环境[J]. 山东国土资源, 2014, 30 (08): 16- 20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6979.2014.08.004
	Lu Xiaoping , Wang Renshan , Liu Weidong , et al. The petrological characteristics and tectonic setting of the volcanic rocks of the Early-Middle Triassic in Dulan County, Qinghai Province[J]. Land and Resources in Shandong, 2014, 30 (08): 16- 20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6979.2014.08.004
39	邓莉, 刘君龙, 钱玉贵, 张世华, 王天云, 于海跃. 川西地区龙门山前带侏罗系物源与沉积体系演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 380- 391.
	Deng Li , Liu Junlong , Qian Yugui , Zhang Shihua , Wang Tianyun , Yu Haiyue . Provenance and sedimentary system of the Jurassic successions in the front of Longmen Mountain in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 380- 391.
40	魏新善, 陈娟萍, 吕奇奇, 赵小会, 贾亚妮. 白云岩与砂岩致密储集体质量的差异性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 294- 301.
	Wei Xinshan , Chen Juanping , Lyu Qiqi , Zhao Xiaohui , Jia Ya'ni . Quality differences between dolomite and tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 294- 301.
41	颜佳新. 东特提斯地区二叠-三叠纪古气候特征及其古地理意义[J]. 地球科学, 1999, (01): 15- 22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.1999.01.021
	Yan Jiaxin . The Paleoclimate Characteristics of the Permian-Triassic in the Eastern Tethys and Its Paleogeographic Significance[J]. Earth Science, 1999, (01): 15- 22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.1999.01.021
42	颜佳新, 赵坤. 二叠-三叠纪东特提斯地区古地理、古气候和古海洋演化与地球表层多圈层事件耦合[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2002, (09): 751- 759.
	Yan Jiaxin , Zhao Kun . Coupling of paleogeography, paleoclimate and paleo-ocean evolution of the Permian-Triassic East Tethys region with multi-layer events of the earth's surface layer[J]. Chinese Science (Series D:Earth Sciences), 2002, (09): 751- 759.
43	陈昱林, 曾焱, 段永明, 等. 川西龙门山前雷口坡组四段白云岩储层孔隙结构特征及储层分类[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (5): 621- 631.
	CHEN Yulin , ZENG Yan , DUAN Yongming , et al. Pore structure characteristics and reservoir classification of dolomite reservoirs in fourth member of Leikoupo Formation, Longmen Mountain front, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2018, 40 (5): 621- 631.
44	周喜裕. 对湖南印支运动的认识[J]. 石油实验地质, 1982, (04): 296- 301.
	Zhou Xiyu . Awareness of the Indosinian movement in Hunan[J]. Petroleum Experimental Geology, 1982, (04): 296- 301.
45	任纪舜. 印支运动及其在中国大地构造演化中的意义[J]. 中国地质科学院院报, 1984, (02): 31- 44.
	Ren Jizhen . Indosinian movement and its significance in the Tectonic Evolution of China[J]. Journal of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 1984, (02): 31- 44.
46	陈世悦, 李聪, 张鹏飞, 等. 江南-雪峰地区加里东期和印支期不整合分布规律[J]. 中国地质, 2011, 38 (05): 1212- 1219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2011.05.008
	Chen Shiyue , Li Cong , Zhang Pengfei , et al. Unconformity distribution of Caledonian and Indosinian periods in Jiangnan-Xuefeng area[J]. Chinese Geology, 2011, 38 (05): 1212- 1219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2011.05.008
47	李勇, 苏德辰, 董顺利. 龙门山前陆盆地底部不整合面:被动大陆边缘到前陆盆地的转换[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, (08): 203- 212.
	Li Yong , Su Dechen , Dong Shunli . Unconformity at the bottom of the Longmenshan foreland basin:conversi-on from passive continental margin to foreland basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, (08): 203- 212.
48	何鲤, 李梅, 熊亮, 等. 再谈四川盆地上三叠统层序地层划分方案[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31 (06): 28- 33+123. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.06.004
	He Wei , Li Mei , Xiong Liang , et al. Discussion on the sequence stratigraphic division scheme of the Upper Triassic in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31 (06): 28- 33+123. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.06.004
49	金文正, 汤良杰, 杨克明. 龙门山冲断带构造特征研究主要进展及存在问题探讨[J]. 地质论评, 2008, (01): 39- 48.
	Jin Wenzheng , Tang Liangjie , Yang Keming . Study on the main progress and existing problems of structural characteristics of the Longmenshan thrust belt[J]. Geological Review, 2008, (01): 39- 48.
50	孙海涛, 张玉银, 柳慧林, 等. 四川盆地东部下寒武统龙王庙组白云岩类型及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (2): 318- 329.
	Sun Haitao , Zhang Yuyin , Liu Huilin , et al. Typological analysis and genetic mechanism of dolomite in the lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (2): 318- 329.
51	厚东琳. 白云石化对储层发育的控制作用——以普光、元坝气田飞仙关组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26 (04): 449- 452.
	Hou Donglin . Control effect of dolomitization on reservoir development:taking Feixianguan Formation in Puguang and Yanba gas fields for example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26 (04): 449- 452.
52	刘树根, 罗志立, 戴苏兰. 龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J]. 地质学报, 1995, (03): 15- 24.
	Liu Shugen , Luo Zhili , Dai Sulan . The uplift of the Longmenshan thrust belt and the settlement of the western Sichuan foreland basin[J]. Journal of Geology, 1995, (03): 15- 24.
53	刘树根, 赵锡奎, 罗志立. 龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统构造事件研究[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2001, (03): 4- 13.
	Liu Shugen , Zhao Xikui , Luo Zhili . Study on Systematic Structural Events of the Longmenshan Orogenic Belt-Western Sichuan Foreland Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu Institute of Technology, 2001, (03): 4- 13.
54	李勇. 论龙门山前陆盆地与龙门山造山带的耦合关系[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 1998, (02): 10- 14.
	Li Yong . On the Coupling Relationship between the Longmenshan Foreland Basin and the Longmenshan Orogenic Belt[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology, 1998, (02): 10- 14.
55	林耀庭, 熊淑君, 宋鹤彬. 氢氧同位素习性及其在四川盆地卤水成因分类的研究[J]. 四川地质学报, 2001, 21 (3): 153- 158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2001.03.007
	Lin Yaoting , Xiong Shujun , Song Hebin . Hydrogen and oxygen isotope habits and their classification of brine genesis in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Sichuan Journal of Geology, 2001, 21 (3): 153- 158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2001.03.007

[1]	孔强夫, 杨才, 李浩, 耿超, 邓健. 基于图论聚类和最小临近算法的岩性识别方法——以四川盆地西部雷口坡组碳酸盐岩储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 884-890.
[2]	郝哲敏, 许国明, 陈洪德, 王琼仙, 隆轲, 王文楷, 王强. 川西坳陷马井地区中三叠统雷四³亚段储层孔隙类型与面孔率定量研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 380-392, 422.
[3]	周凌方, 钱一雄, 宋晓波, 曹波, 尤东华, 李勇. 四川盆地西部彭州气田中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段白云岩孔隙表征、分布及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 177-188.
[4]	孙春燕, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 邓庆杰. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组沉积特征及有利储集相带[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 498-512.
[5]	赵向原, 胡向阳, 肖开华, 贾跃玮. 川西彭州地区雷口坡组碳酸盐岩储层裂缝特征及主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(1): 30-39,152.
[6]	李宏涛, 胡向阳, 史云清, 肖开华, 贾跃玮, 魏修平, 冯琼. 四川盆地川西坳陷龙门山前雷口坡组四段气藏层序划分及储层发育控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(4): 753-763.
[7]	张帅, 夏国清, 伊海生, 蔡占虎, 李启来. 羌塘盆地南部隆鄂尼地区布曲组鞍形白云石成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 483-489.
[8]	唐宇. 川西地区雷口坡组沉积与其顶部风化壳储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(1): 42-47.
[9]	秦伟军, 邹伟. 川东北地区雷口坡组储层特征及其形成条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(5): 785-790,795.
[10]	吴世祥，李宏涛，龙胜祥，柳智利，王春连，张军涛. 川西雷口坡组碳酸盐岩储层特征及成岩作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(4): 542-550，559.
[11]	刘树根, 杨荣军, 吴熙纯, 孙玮, 陈杨. 四川盆地西部晚三叠世海相碳酸盐岩—碎屑岩的转换过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(5): 556-565.