马岭油田北三区延10油层注水开发中储层伤害研究

doi:10.11743/ogg20060219

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

马岭油田北三区延10油层粘土矿物主要成份依次为伊利石、伊/蒙混层、高岭石、绿泥石,对储层的潜在危害依次为伊利石、伊/蒙混层和高岭石所造成的水敏和速敏。本文利用马岭油田北三区延10油层真实砂岩模型进行的伤害研究表明,1)马岭油田北三区延10油层存在弱速敏,临界速度的大小与渗透率呈正相关,一般渗透率越小,临界速度也越小。由于实际注入水的矿化度较实验用地层水的矿化度要低,故注水开发中的速敏伤害较实验结果要强。2)马岭油田北三区延10油层存在弱一中等程度的水敏,K+的存在和注入水盐度的提高会减轻水敏伤害的程度,注入水的盐度以5-10 g/L为宜。3)水敏伤害条件下的驱油效率较无水敏伤害条件下的驱油效率低11.35%,宏观波及系数也明显降低,从而降低了油层采收率。建议加强对马岭油田北三区延10油层注水开发中的储层保护研究,在注水开发中采取更有效的储层保护措施,以提高油层采收率。

关键词: 粘土矿物, 储层伤害, 速敏, 水敏, 驱油效率, 采收率, 马岭油田北三区延10油层

Abstract:

In YanlO reservoir of North-Ⅲ block, Maling oilfield, the clay minerals are dominated by illite, mixed illite/smectite, kaolinite and chlorite. The potential damages to the reservoir are water and velocity sensitivities caused by illite, mixed illite/smectite and kaolinite. Based on reservoir damage study by using real sandstone model in the study area, the following understandings are achieved. (1) The velocity sensitivity of reservoir is weak in the study area, and the critical velocity is in positive correlation to permeability. The reservoir damage caused by velocity sensitivity is actually stronger than the experimental results, as the salinity of injection water is lower than that of the formation water used in the experiment. (2) The reservoir in the study area is characterized by weak-to-moderate water sensitivity, and the existence of K⁺ and the increase of injection water salinity may alleviate reservoir damage from water sensitivity. The injection water salinity would be appropriate in the range from 5 to 10 g/L. (3) The oil displacement efficiency with water sensitivity damage is 11.35% lower than that without water sensitivity damage, and the overall displacement efficiency also remarkably lowers, resulting in a lower recovery ratio.

Key words: clay mineral, reservoir damage, velocity sensitivity, water sensitivity, oil displacement efficiency, recovery ratio, Yan10 reservoir of North-Ⅲblock in Maline oilfield

中图分类号:

TE258

朱玉双,李庆印,王小孟. 马岭油田北三区延10油层注水开发中储层伤害研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(2): 263-268. doi: 10.11743/ogg20060219 Zhu Yushuang,Li Qingyin,Wang Xiaomeng. A study on reservoir damage during waterflooding in Yan10 Reservoir of North-Ⅲ block, Maling oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(2): 263-268. doi: 10.11743/ogg20060219

参考文献

[1] 朱玉双,曲志浩,孔令荣,等.砂岩模型两相驱替实验中油层润湿性的判断[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(3):220～223Zhu Yushuang,Qu Zhihao,Kong Lingrong,et al.Determination of oil reservoir wettability in two-phase displacement experiment of sandrock model[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1999,20 (3):220-223
[2] 朱玉双,曲志浩,蔺昉晓,等.油层受水敏伤害时水驱油渗流特征[J].石油学报,2004,25(2):59～64Zhu Yushuang,Qu Zhihao,Lin Fangxiao,et al.Seepage flow characters of oil displacement with water drive in water-sensitive formation of Mubo Yan10 reservoir.[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(2):59-64
[3] 潘爱芳,曲志浩,马润勇.油田注水开发中水源混配防垢技术[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):97～101Pan Aifang,Qu Zhihao,Ma Runyong.Scale control through water mixing in waterflooding oilfields[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(1):97-101
[4] 朱玉双,曲志浩,孔令荣,等.靖安油田长6、长2油层驱油效率影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(4):333～335Zhu Yushuang,Qu Zhihao,Kong Lingrong,et al.Effective factors of oil displacement efficiency in Chang-6 and Chang-2 reservoirs,Jing'an oilfield[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1999,20 (4):333-335
[5] 陈忠,唐洪明,沈明道,等.川南香溪群四段低渗裂缝性砂岩储层保护[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):340～344Chen Zhong,Tang Hongming,Shen Mingdao,et al.Reservoir protection of low permeable fractured sandstones from Xiangxi Group of Southern Sichuan[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1998,19(4):340-344
[6] 王随继,黄杏珍,任明达,等.柴达木盆地第三系碎屑岩中粘土矿物特征及储层保护措施[J].兰州大学学报,1998,34(1):112～118Wang Suiji,Huang Xingzhen,Ren Mingda,et al.The characteristics of clay minerals in clastic rock and the reservoir protection in Tertiary system; Qaidam basin[J].Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences),1998,34 (1):112-118
[7] 张守鹏,李怀渊,张成玉,等.岩石微观分析判别油层伤害的技术方法与应用[J].石油学报,2000,21(5):52～57Zhang Shoupeng,Li Huaiyuan,Zhang Chengyu,et al.Technical method and application for reservoir damaged identification by microexaminating rock construction[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2000,21(5):52-57
[8] 裘亦楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.284～336Qiu Yinan,Xue Shuhao.The evaluation technology of petroleum reservoir[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997.284-336
[9] 鞠斌山,武增贵,邱晓凤,等.油层伤害问题的概况与进展.西安石油学院学报[J],2001,16(3):12～16Ju Binshan,Wu Zenggui,Qiu Xiaofeng,et al.Present situation and progress in the research of formation damage[J].Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute (Natural Science Edition),2001,16(3):12-16
[10] 唐洪明,曾凡刚,陈忠,等.莲花油层中粘土矿物规律研究[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):233～238Tang Hongming,Zeng Fangang,Chen Zhong,et al.The study of clay minerals distribution in Lianhua reservoir[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2001,19 (2):233-238

[1]	孙焕泉, 杨勇, 方吉超, 凡哲元, 吴光焕, 元福卿, 杨元亮, 吴永超. 提高油气田采收率技术协同方法与应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 600-608.
[2]	柏明星, 张志超, 陈巧珍, 徐龙, 杜思宇, 刘业新. 二氧化碳置换法开采天然气水合物研究进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 553-564.
[3]	计秉玉, 郑松青, 顾浩. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏开发技术的认识与思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(6): 1459-1465.
[4]	张莉. 中国石化东部老油田提高采收率技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3): 717-723.
[5]	陈国辉, 蒋恕, 李醇, 李思思, 彭鹏, 莫兰, 张钰莹, 张鲁川, 张天宇. 加热过程中页岩储层改质效果研究进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 286-296.
[6]	陈朝兵, 赵振宇, 付玲, 高建荣, 宋微, 陈新晶. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组6段深水致密砂岩填隙物特征及对储层发育的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1098-1111.
[7]	计秉玉, 王友启, 张莉. 基于地质储量结构变化的采收率演变趋势[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1257-1262.
[8]	孙焕泉. 薄储层超稠油热化学复合采油方法与技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1100-1106.
[9]	康志江, 李阳, 计秉玉, 张允. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏提高采收率关键技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 434-441.
[10]	赵清民, 伦增珉, 章晓庆, 郎东江, 王海涛. 页岩油注CO₂动用机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1333-1338.
[11]	王伟, 赵延伟, 毛锐, 孙中春, 牟立伟. 页岩油储层核磁有效孔隙度起算时间的确定——以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 550-557.
[12]	胡渤. 高温高盐油藏化学驱数值模拟技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1305-1310.
[13]	王建忠, 于新畅, 孙志刚, 李荣强, 徐进杰. 胜利油田低渗透水驱油藏含水变化特征及影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 833-838.
[14]	吴忠维, 崔传智, 杨勇, 黄迎松, 刘志宏. 高含水期大孔道渗流特征及定量描述方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 839-844.
[15]	王勃, 姚红星, 王红娜, 赵洋, 李梦溪, 胡秋嘉, 樊梅荣, 杨春莉. 沁水盆地成庄区块煤层气成藏优势及富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 366-372.