油气运聚定量模拟技术现状、问题及设想

doi:10.11743/ogg20090101

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对于定量模拟技术的研发及应用,首先简要讨论初次运移(排烃),然后主要重点放在二次运移(烃类运移聚集)。关于初次运移,建议采用简单但争议少的方法计算排烃,其正确性由二次运移的模拟结果是否接近勘探实际来判别。关于二次运移,目前有4种运聚定量模拟技术:多相达西流法、流径法、混合法(多相达西流法+流径法)和侵入逾渗法。然而,这4个技术近10年来虽然各自有了较大的改进,但在克服各自的最大缺点问题上基本上没有突破:①多相达西流法虽有完整的时间模拟功能,但因受计算机资源所限而实用价值较差;②流径法和侵入逾渗法基本上没有时间模拟功能,即模拟对象通常仅是现今(0 Ma)的地质体,而能在关键时间(≠0 Ma)进行模拟尚在探索中;③由于混合法的实用价值主要来源于流径法,故严格来说混合法也基本上没有时间模拟功能。对于每一技术,概要介绍其技术背景、技术方法和应用效果;通过对比,指出各自的优缺点和适用条件,为未来研发提出改进方案。通过上述分析研究,提出了一个具有时间模拟功能的运聚定量模拟技术方案:在全时空的三维网格上,采用单相(水)达西流法技术计算超压,在数据稀少时采用流径法,在数据密集时采用侵入逾渗法。

关键词: 达西流法, 流径法, 混合法, 侵入逾渗法, 初次运移, 二次运移, 盆地模拟

Abstract:

After a brief discussion of the development and application of quantitative modeling techniques for primary migration(hydrocarbon expulsion),and this paper focuses on the study of modeling techniques in se-condary migration(hydrocarbon migration-accumulation).For primary migration,it is proposed to adopt simplified but less-debated methods for hydrocarbon expulsion calculation and verify their validity through comparing modeling results of secondary migration with real exploration data.As for secondary migration,at present there are four quantitative modeling techniques available:multi-phase Darcy flow,flowpath,hybrid method(multi-phase Darcy flow+flowpath),and invasion percolation.Though great improvements have been made in these four techniques in the past 10 years,their particular disadvantages have not been by and large overcome.Their disadvantages include(1) though the multi-phase Darcy flow has excellent ability to model various times,it cannot generally be effectively applied due to limited computer resources;(2) both flowpath and invasion percolation are basically unable to model different geologic times,i.e.,usually the modeled object is only the present-day(0 Ma) geologic body,while the modeling of other geologic times(≠0 Ma) is still under research;(3) since the practical value of the hybrid method results mostly from the flowpath method,strictly speaking the hybrid method also basically has no ability to model different geologic times.Herein summarizes the background,method and application of each technique,expounds the advantages,disadvantages,and applicability of each method,and proposes a plan for their future modification and development.The paper recommends a comprehensive scheme utilizing quantitative modeling techniques with the ability to model various geologic times.It uses single-phase(water) Darcy flow for calculating overpressure in full space-time.The flowpath modeling is adop-ted when the data is sparse and invasion percolation is employed when the data is dense.

Key words: Darcy flow, flowpath, hybrid method, invasion percolation, primary migration, secondary migration, basin modeling

中图分类号:

TE121.1

石广仁. 油气运聚定量模拟技术现状、问题及设想[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090101 Shi Guangren. Status,problems and proposals of the quantitative modeling techniques for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090101

参考文献

[1] Yukler M A,Cornford C,Welte D H.One-dimensional model to simulate geologic,hydrodynamic and thermodynamic development of a sedimentary basin[J].Geol Rundschau,1978,67(3):960-979
[2] Nakayama K,Van Siclen D C.Simulation model for petroleum exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1981,65(7):1 230-1 255
[3] Ungerer P,Bessis F,Chenet P Y,et al.Geological and geochemical models in oil exploration:principles and practical examples[A].In:Demaison G,ed.Petroleum geochemistry and basin evaluation[C].AAPG Memoir 35,1984.53-77
[4] Welte D H,Hantschel T,Wygrala B,et al.Aspects of petroleum migration modelling[J].J Geochem Expl,2000,69-70:711-714
[5] Hantschel T,Kauerauf A I.Fundamentals of basin modeling[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,2009
[6] 石广仁,张庆春.烃源岩压实渗流排油模型[J].石油学报,2004,25(5):34～37
[7] 米石云,石广仁,李阿梅.有机质成气膨胀运移模型研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(6):35～39
[8] 石广仁,张庆春.库车坳陷的油气运移全定量模拟[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2004,29(4):391～396
[9] England W A,Mackenzie A S,Mann D M,et al.The movement and entrapment of petroleum fluids in the subsurface[J].Journal of the Geological Society of London,1987,144:327-347
[10] Wilkinson D.Percolation model of immiscible displacement in the presence of buoyancy forces[J].Physical Review A,1984,30:520-531
[11] Dembicki H Jr,Anderson M J.Secondary migration of oil:experiments supporting efficient movement of separate,buoyant oil phase along limited conduits[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(8):1 018-1 021
[12] Catalan L,Xiaowen F,Chatzis I,et al.An experimental study of secondary oil migration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1992,76:638-650
[13] Carruthers D,Ringrose P.Secondary oil migration:oil-rock contact volumes,flow behaviour and rates[A].In:Parnell J,ed.Dating and duration of fluid flow and fluid-rock interaction[C].London:Geol Soc Spec Pub No 144,1998.205-220
[14] Sylta Φ.Hydrocarbon migration modelling and exploration risk[D].Trondheim,Norway:Norwegian University of Science and Technology,2004
[15] Sylta Φ.New techniques and their application in the analysis of secondary migration[A].In:Doré A G,ed.Basin modelling advances and applications[C].Amsterdam,Holand:NPF Spec Publ,1993.385-398
[16] Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence(2^nd edition)[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1984
[17] Berg R R.Hydrocarbon leakage-fill-spill patterns in the Heimdal area[J].AAPG Bulletin,1975,59(6):939-956
[18] Schowalter T T.Mechanics of secondary hydrocarbon migration and entrapment[J].AAPG Bulletin,1979,63(5):723-760
[19] 石广仁,郭宗汾.沉积盆地综合动态模拟系统(一)[J].石油物探,1988,27(3):1～15
[20] 石广仁,郭宗汾.沉积盆地综合动态模拟系统(二)[J].石油物探,1988,27(4):29～46,95
[21] Ungerer P,Burrus J,Doligez B,et al.Basin evaluation by integra-ted two-dimensional modeling of heat transfer,fluid flow,hydrocarbon generation,and migration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(3):309-335
[22] 袁益让,赵卫东,程爱杰,等.油水运移聚集数值模拟和分析[J].应用数学和力学,1999,20(4):386～392
[23] Hantschel T,Kauerauf A I,Wygrala B.Finite element analysis and ray tracing modeling of petroleum migration[J].Marine & Petro Geol,2000,17(7):815-820
[24] 袁益让,赵卫东,程爱杰,等.多层油资源运移聚集的数值模拟和实际应用[J].应用数学和力学,2002,23(8):827～836
[25] 石广仁,张庆春,马进山,等.三维三相烃类二次运移模型[J].石油学报,2003,24(2):38～42
[26] 李长峰,袁益让.三维两相渗流驱动问题迎风区域分裂显隐差分法[J].计算数学,2007,29(2):113～136
[27] 李大伟,李明诚,王晓莲.歧口凹陷油气聚集量模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(2):167～171
[28] Sylta Φ.Modelling of secondary migration and entrapment of a multicomponent hydrocarbon mixture using equation of state and ray-tracing modelling techniques[J].Spec Publ Geol Soc Lon,1991,59:111-122
[29] Ritter U,Zwach C,Sylta Φ.Hydrocarbon leakage-fill-spill patterns in the Heimdal area,Viking Graben[J].J Geochem Expl,2000,69-70:679-683
[30] Sylta Φ.Quantifying secondary migration efficiencies[J].Geo-fluids,2002,2:285-298
[31] Sylta Φ.A probabilistic approach to improved geological knowledge and reduced exploration risks using hydrocarbon migration mode-ling[J].Petrol Geosc,2004,10:187-198
[32] 乔永富,毛小平,辛广柱.油气运移聚集定量化模拟[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2005,30(5):617～622
[33] 石广仁,李阿梅,张庆春.盆地模拟技术新进展(二)-油气运移平面分层模拟方法[J].石油勘探与开发,1997,24(4):33～37
[34] Shi Guangren.Basin modeling in the Kuqa Depression of the Tarim Basin(western China) a fully temperature-dependent model of overpressure history[J].Mathematical Geosciences,2008,40(1):47-62
[35] Wilkinson D,Willemsen J F.Invasion percolation a new form of percolation theory[J].J Phys A,1983,16:3 365-3 376
[36] Meakin P.Invasion percolation on substrates with correlated disorder[J].Physica A,1991,173(3):305-324
[37] Hirsch L M,Thompson A H.Size-dependent scaling of capillary invasion including buoyancy and pore size distribution effects[J].Phys Rev E,1994,50:2 069-2 086
[38] Hirsch L M,Thompson A H.Minimum saturations and buoyancy in secondary migration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1995,79:696-710
[39] Wagner G,Birovljev A,Meakin P,et al.Fragmentation and migration of invasion percolation cluster:experiments and simulations[J].Phys Rev E,1997,55:7 015-7 029
[40] Carruthers D.Transport modeling of secondary oil migration using gradient-driven,invasion percolation techniques[D].Edinburgh,UK:Heriot-Watt University,1998
[41] Carruthers D,de Lind van Wijngaarden M.Modelling viscous-do-minated fluid transport using modified invasion percolation techniques[J].J Geochem Expl,2000,69-70:669-672
[42] Meakin P,Wagner G,Vedvik A,et al.Invasion percolation and secondary migration:experiments and simulations[J].Marine & Petro Geol,2000,17(7):777-795
[43] Carruthers D.Modeling of secondary petroleum migration using invasion percolation techniques[A].In:Düppenbecker S,Marzi R,eds.Multidimensional basin modeling[C].AAPG Datapages Discovery Series,2003,7:21-37
[44] 周波,金之钧,罗晓容,等.尺度放大时逾渗模型中的油气运移路径变化规律探讨[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):175～180
[45] 罗晓容,张立宽,廖前进,等.埕北断阶带沙河街组油气运移动力学过程模拟分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):191～197,215
[46] 罗晓容,喻建,张发强,等.二次运移数学模型及其在鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长8段石油运移研究中的应用[J].中国科学(D辑),2007,37(A01):73～82
[47] 周波,金之钧,罗晓容,等.油气二次运移过程中的运移效率探讨[J].石油学报,2008,29(4):522～526
[48] Stolz A K,Graves R M.Choosing the best integrated model for re servoir simulation[Z].Paris,France:AAPG International Confe-rence and Exhibition Extended Abstract No 99042,2005
[49] Magoon L B,Dow W G.The petroleum system:from source to trap[A].AAPG Memoir 60,1994
[50] 宋建国,窦立荣.中国东北区晚中生代盆地构造与含油气系统[J].石油学报,1996,17(4):1～7
[51] 宋建国,张光亚.中国油气系统分类与勘探方向[A].见:胡见义,编.中国含油气系统的应用与进展[C].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.25～32
[52] 赵宗举.油气系统成因分类及其勘探思路[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1):1～10
[53] 田世澄,孙自明,傅金华,等.论成藏动力学与成藏动力系统[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):129～138
[54] 李明诚,单秀琴,马成华,等.砂岩透镜体成藏的动力学机制[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):209～215
[55] 庞雄奇,陈冬霞,姜振学,等.隐伏砂岩透镜体成藏动力学机制与基本模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):216～228
[56] 罗晓容.油气成藏动力学研究之我见[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(2):149～156
[57] 金之钧.中国典型叠合盆地及其油气成藏研究新进展(之一)-叠合盆地划分与研究方法[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(5):553～562
[58] 金之钧.中国典型叠合盆地油气成藏研究新进展(之二)-以塔里木盆地为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(3):281～288,294
[59] 金之钧,王清晨.中国典型叠合盆地与油气成藏研究新进展-以塔里木盆地为例[J].中国科学(D辑),2004,34(A01):1～12
[60] 罗志立.试论中国油气地质条件的特殊性[J].勘探家,1999,4(2):1～7
[61] 王庭斌.天然气运移理论对我国天然气地质学建立的重要贡献[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(4):4～10
[62] 王庭斌.天然气与石油成藏条件差异及中国气田成藏模式[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(2):79～86
[63] 张渝昌,徐旭辉,江兴歌,等.展望盆地模拟[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):29～36