川西北中二叠统超深层白云岩储层孔隙结构及控制因素

doi:10.11743/ogg20200111

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 116-131.doi: 10.11743/ogg20200111

川西北中二叠统超深层白云岩储层孔隙结构及控制因素

杨天博^1,^2,³(), 何治亮^3,^4,*(), 金振奎⁵, 张军涛^2,³, 李双建^2,³

1. 中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083
2. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
3. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院构造与沉积储层实验室, 北京 100083
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司, 北京 100728
5. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2020-02-01 发布日期:2020-01-19
通讯作者: 何治亮 E-mail:3006180012@cugb.edu.com;hezl.syky@sinopec.com
作者简介:杨天博(1993-),男,博士研究生,碳酸盐岩储层。E-mail:3006180012@cugb.edu.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05005);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(U1663209);中国科学院A类战略性先导项目(XDA14010201)

Pore structure and controlling factors of the ultra-deep Middle Permian dolomite reservoirs, northwestern Sichuan Basin

Tianbo Yang^1,^2,³(), Zhiliang He^3,^4,*(), Zhenkui Jin⁵, Juntao Zhang^2,³, Shuangjian Li^2,³

1. College of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China
3. Laboratory of Structural and Sedimentological Reservoir Geology, Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China
4. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, Beijing 100728, China
5. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

Received:2019-07-29 Online:2020-02-01 Published:2020-01-19
Contact: Zhiliang He E-mail:3006180012@cugb.edu.com;hezl.syky@sinopec.com
Supported by:
国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05005);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(U1663209);中国科学院A类战略性先导项目(XDA14010201)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地西北部龙门山山前中二叠统白云岩储层埋藏深度大，经历了漫长的埋藏期成岩演化，现今仍有丰富的储集空间保存，并发现了孔隙式白云岩气藏，但白云岩储层质量的非均质性较强，不同类型的白云岩储层中储集空间的形成和保持机理还有待更深入的研究。结合物性测试、压汞实验和CT扫描，白云岩储层中可识别出3种孔喉结构类型，其中Ⅰ类孔喉配位数高、连通性较好，大孔粗喉型的孔喉组合占主导，Ⅱ类包括了大孔中喉型和中孔中喉型两套孔喉组合，孔喉非均质性强，Ⅲ类受压溶作用影响较强主要发育小孔细喉型孔喉组合。白云岩储层孔喉结构的差异性主要取决于先驱灰岩的岩石组构和后期多种成岩作用的叠加耦合。Ⅰ，Ⅱ类储层一般由多孔颗粒灰岩经白云化形成，白云化作用进行得较彻底，主要发育在平直自形-半自形白云岩中，但Ⅰ类储层比Ⅱ类储层受中晚期溶蚀作用的改造更强且过度白云化作用影响较弱；而残余结构白云岩和非平直他形白云岩由于抗压溶能力更弱和后期过度白云化作用更强因而仅能形成Ⅲ类储层。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 白云化作用, 溶蚀作用, 超深层储层, 中二叠统, 四川盆地

Abstract:

The Middle Permian dolomite reservoirs in the piedmont of Longmen Mountain, northwestern Sichuan Basin, were deeply buried and experienced long-term diagenetic evolution during burial, but abundant reservoir space is still well preserved at present, and even porous dolomite gas reservoirs have been discovered in such ultra-deep reservoirs. However, these reservoirs feature high heterogeneity, and the formation and preservation mechanism of reservoir space still need further study. Three types of pore structures are recognized via physical property analysis, mercury injection porosimetry and CT scanning. TypeⅠ is dominated by large pore and coarse throat with large pore-throat coordination number and high connectivity. Type Ⅱ has two sets of pore-throat combinations (larger pore-medium throat and medium pore-medium throat), and shows higher pore throat heterogeneity. Type Ⅲ is characterized by small pore-fine throat combination resulting from strong pressure solution. The difference in pore-throat structures is mainly controlled by rock fabric of precursor limestone and the overprint of various kinds of diagenesis. Type Ⅰ and Ⅱ reservoirs, usually originating from porous grainstones, went through thorough dolomitization, and were well developed in planar, automorphic-hypautomorphic dolomites. Nevertheless, in comparison with Type Ⅱ reservoirs, Type Ⅰ reservoirs are stronger in modification by burial dissolution at middle-late stages but weaker in over-dolomitization. Furthermore, relict dolomite and non-planar, xenomorphic dolomite are most likely to form Type Ⅲ reservoirs due to their weaker anti-pressure-solution capacity and stronger late over-dolomitization.

Key words: pore structure, dolomitization, dissolution, ultra-deep reservoir, Middle Permian, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

杨天博,何治亮,金振奎,等. 川西北中二叠统超深层白云岩储层孔隙结构及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 116-131. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200111 Tianbo Yang,Zhiliang He,Zhenkui Jin,et al. Pore structure and controlling factors of the ultra-deep Middle Permian dolomite reservoirs, northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 116-131. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200111

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 43

1	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 深层超深层碳酸盐岩优质储层发育机理和"三元控储"模式——以四川普光气田为例[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84 (08): 1087- 1094.
	Ma Yongsheng , Cai Xunyu , Zhao Peirong , et al. Formation mechanism of meep-buried carbonate reservoir and Its model of three-element controlling reservoir:A case study from the Puguang Oilfield in Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2010, 84 (08): 1087- 1094.
2	赵文智, 沈安江, 胡素云, 等. 中国碳酸盐岩储集层大型化发育的地质条件与分布特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39 (1): 1- 12.
	Zhao Wenzhi , Shen Anjiang , Hu Suyun , et al. Geological conditions and distributional features of large-scale carbonate reservoirs onshore China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39 (1): 1- 14.
3	何治亮, 金晓辉, 沃玉进, 等. 中国海相超深层碳酸盐岩油气成藏特点及勘探领域[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21 (01): 3- 14.
	He Zhiliang , Jin Xiaohui , Wo Yujin , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and exploration domains of ultra-deep marine carbonates in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21 (01): 3- 14.
4	何治亮, 张军涛, 丁茜, 等. 深层-超深层优质碳酸盐岩储层形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38 (04): 633- 644.
	He Zhiliang , Zhang Juntao , Ding Qian , et al. Factors controlling the formation of high-quality deep to ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38 (4): 633- 644.
5	Schmoker J W , Halley R B . Carbonate porosity versus depth:a predictable relation for south Florida[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1982, 66 (12): 2561- 2570.
6	Sun S Q . Dolomite reservoirs:porosity evolution and reservoir characteristics[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79 (2): 186- 204.
7	Warren J . Dolomite:occurrence, evolution and economically important associations[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2000, 52 (1-3): 1- 81. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00022-2
8	Moore C H , Wade W J . Carbonate reservoirs:Porosity and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework[M]. Newnes, 2013.
9	陈代钊, 钱一雄. 深层-超深层白云岩储集层:机遇与挑战[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19 (2): 187- 196.
	Chen Daizhao , Qian Yixiong . Deep or super-deep dolostone reservoirs:Opportunities and challenges[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 19 (2): 187- 196.
10	沈平, 张健, 宋家荣, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35 (07): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.07.001
	Shen Ping , Zhang Jian , Song Jiarong , et al. Significance of new breakthrough in and favorable targets of gas explorationin the Middle Permian system, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35 (07): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.07.001
11	杨光, 汪华, 沈浩, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统储层特征与勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35 (7): 10- 16. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.07.002
	Yang Guang , Wang Hua , Shen Hao , et al. Characteristics and exploration prospects of Middle Permian reservoirsin the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35 (7): 10- 16. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.07.002
12	石新, 王兴志, 张帆, 等. 川西北地区栖霞组白云岩储集层研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2005, 27 (2): 13- 16. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2005.02.004
	Shi Xin , Wang Xingzhi , Zhang Fan , et al. The study of dolomite reservoirs in Qixia Formation in the northwest of Sichuan Region[J]. Journal of Southwestern Petroleum Institute, 2005, 27 (2): 13- 16. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2005.02.004
13	郝毅, 周进高, 张建勇, 等. 川西北中二叠统栖霞组白云岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2013, 33 (1): 68- 74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2013.01.011
	Hao Yi , Zhou Jingao , Zhang Jianyong , et al. The dolostone reservoirs from the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin:Characteristics and controlling factors[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2013, 33 (1): 68- 74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2013.01.011
14	何登发, 李德生, 张国伟, 等. 四川多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J]. 地质科学, 2011, (3): 589- 606. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2011.03.001
	He Dengfa , Li Desheng , Zhang Guowei , et al. Formation and evolution of multi-cycle superposed Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2011, (3): 589- 606. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2011.03.001
15	贾东, 陈竹新, 贾承造, 等. 龙门山前陆褶皱冲断带构造解析与川西前陆盆地的发育[J]. 高校地质学报, 2003, (03): 402- 410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2003.03.010
	Jia Dong , Chen Zhuxin , Jia Chengzao , et al. Structrual features of the Longmen Shan Fold and thrust belt and development of the Western Sichuan Foreland Basin, Central China[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2003, (03): 402- 410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2003.03.010
16	郭正吾, 邓康龄, 韩永辉, 等. 四川盆地形成与演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996.
	Guo Zhengwu , Deng Kangling , Han Yonghui , et al. Formation and evolution of Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 1996.
17	陈竹新, 贾东, 魏国齐, 等. 龙门山北段冲断前锋构造带特征[J]. 石油学报, 2008, (05): 657- 662. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2008.05.005
	Chen Zhuxin , Jia Dong , Wei Guoqi , et al. Characteristics of thrust structures in the northern Longmenshan front belt[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, (05): 657- 662. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2008.05.005
18	邓莉, 刘君龙, 钱玉贵, 等. 川西地区龙门山前带侏罗系物源与沉积体系演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 380- 391.
	Deng Li , Liu Junlong , Qian Yugui , et al. Provenance and sedimentary system of the Jurassic successions in the front of Longmen Mountain in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 380- 391.
19	李大军, 陈辉, 陈洪德, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组储层形成与古构造演化关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (05): 756- 763.
	Li Dajun , Chen Hui , Chen Hongde , et al. Relationship between reservoir development in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation and paleostructure evolution in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (05): 756- 763.
20	魏国齐, 杨威, 朱永刚, 等. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积体系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (04): 442- 448.
	Wei Guoqi , Yang Wei , Zhu Yonggang , et al. Depositional system of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (04): 442- 448.
21	黎荣, 胡明毅, 杨威, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统沉积相模式及有利储集体分布[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 369- 379.
	Li Rong , Hu Mingyi , Yang Wei , et al. Sedimentary facies model and favorable reservoir distribution of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 369- 379.
22	郑超, 王宇峰, 汤兴宇, 等. 双鱼石地区栖霞组层序地层划分及沉积相分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25 (4): 39- 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2018.04.008
	Zheng Chao , Wang Yufeng , Tang Xingyu , et al. Sequence stratigraphic division and sedimentary facies analysis of Qixia Formation in the Shuangyushi Block[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25 (4): 39- 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2018.04.008
23	于海跃, 尹伟, 刘君龙. 龙门山山前带侏罗系近源冲积体系沉积特征与成因模式[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26 (03): 273- 278.
	Yu Haiyue , Yin Wei , Liu Junlong . Sedimentary characteristics and genetic model of Jurassic alluvial deposits in piedmont zone of Longmen Mountain[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26 (03): 273- 278.
24	Machel H G . Concepts and models of dolomitization:a critical reappraisal[J]. Geological Society, 2004, 235 (1): 7- 63. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.02
25	王丹, 陈代钊, 杨长春, 等. 埋藏环境白云石结构类型[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28 (01): 17- 25.
	Wang Dan , Chen Daizhao , Yang Changchun , et al. Classification of texture in burial dolomite[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28 (01): 17- 25.
26	Gregg J M , Sibley D F . Epigenetic dolomitization and the origin of xenotopic dolomite texture[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1984, 54 (3): 908- 931.
27	Sibley D F , Gregg J M . Classification of dolomite rock textures[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1987, 57 (6): 967- 975.
28	Davies G R , Smith Jr L B . Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies:An overview[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1641- 1690. doi: 10.1306/05220605164
29	Machel H G . Saddle dolomite as a by-product of chemical compaction and thermochemical sulfate reduction[J]. Geology, 1987, 15 (10): 1301- 1306.
30	纪友亮. 油气储层地质学[M]. 北京: 中国石油大学出版社, 2009.
	Ji Youliang . Oiland gas reservoir geology[M]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum Press, 2009.
31	罗蛰潭. 油气储集层的孔隙结构[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986.
	Luo Zhetan . Pore structure of oil and gas reservoirs[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1986.
32	吴元燕, 徐龙, 张昌明. 油气储层地质[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996.
	Wu Yuanyan , Xu Long , Zhang Changming . Oil and gas reservoir geology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996.
33	胡安平, 潘立银, 郝毅, 等. 四川盆地二叠系栖霞组、茅口组白云岩储层特征、成因和分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2018, 23 (02): 39- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2018.02.006
	Hu Anping , Pan Liyin , Hao Yi , et al. Origin, characteristics and distribution of dolostone reservoir in Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2018, 23 (02): 39- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2018.02.006
34	朱传庆, 徐明, 袁玉松, 等. 峨眉山玄武岩喷发在四川盆地的地热学响应[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55 (6): 474- 482.
	Zhu Chuanqing , Xu Ming , Yuan Yusong , et al. Palaeo-geothermal response and record of the effusing of Emeishan basalts in Sichuan Basin[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55 (6): 474- 482.
35	Zhu C , Hu S , Qiu N , et al. Geothermal constraints on Emeishan mantle plume magmatism:paleotemperature reconstruction of the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2018, 107 (1): 71- 88. doi: 10.1007/s00531-016-1404-2
36	黄思静, 潘小强, 吕杰, 等. 川西栖霞组的热液白云化作用及其后的倒退溶解——不彻底的回头白云化作用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40 (3): 288- 300. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.03.09
	Huang Sijing , Pan Xiaoqiang , Lyu Jie , et al. Hydrothermal dolomitization and subsequent retrograde dissolution in Qixia Formation, West Sichuan:A case study of incomplete and halfway-back dolomitization[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology.Science & Technology Edition, 2013, 40 (3): 288- 300. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.03.09
37	孟森, 周进高, 杨柳, 等. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组中-粗晶白云岩成因[J]. 海相油气地质, 2017, 22 (01): 75- 83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2017.01.010
	Meng Sen , Zhou Jingao , Yang Liu , et al. Genesis of medium-coarse crystalline dolomite of Middle Permian Qixia Formation, Western Sichuan[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2017, 22 (01): 75- 83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2017.01.010
38	黄思静. 碳酸盐岩的成岩作用[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010.
	Huang Sijing . Carbonate diagenesis[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 2010.
39	Machel H , Mountjoy E W . Chemistry and environments of dolomitization-A reappraisal[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 1986, 23 (3): 175- 222. doi: 10.1016/0012-8252(86)90017-6
40	Murray R C . Origin of porosity in carbonate rocks[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1960, 30 (1): 59- 84.
41	Wardlaw N C . Pore geometry of carbonate rocks as revealed by pore casts and capillary pressure[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1976, 60 (2): 245- 257.
42	Wierzbicki R , Dravis J J , Al-Aasm I , et al. Burial dolomitization and dissolution of Upper Jurassic Abenaki platform carbonates, Deep Panuke reservoir, Nova Scotia, Canada[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90 (11): 1843- 1861. doi: 10.1306/03200605074
43	丁茜, 何治亮, 沃玉进, 等. 高温高压条件下碳酸盐岩溶蚀过程控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38 (04): 784- 791.
	Ding Qian , He Zhiliang , Wo Yujin , et al. Factors controlling carbonate rock dissolution under high temperature and pressure[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38 (04): 784- 791.

	孔隙结构类别	Ⅰ类	Ⅱ类	Ⅲ类	Ⅳ类
	孔隙结构总体特征	中孔低渗大孔粗喉型	中-低孔特低渗中孔中喉型	低孔特低渗小孔细喉型	特低孔特低渗微孔微喉型
物性特征	孔隙度/%	> 6	4~6	2~4	< 2
物性特征	渗透率/(10^-3μm²)	> 1.0	0.1~1.0	< 0.1	< 0.1
压汞曲线	排驱压力/MPa	< 0.2	0.2~0.4	0.4~1.0	> 1.0
	最大连通孔喉半径/μm	> 3.68	1.84~3.68	0.74~1.84	< 0.74
	饱和度中值压力/MPa	< 1.2	1.2~4.0	4.0~8.0	> 8.0
	饱和度中值半径/μm	> 0.61	0.18~0.61	0.09~0.18	< 0.09
	分选系数	> 2.0	1.5~2.0	< 1.5	< 1.5
	最大进汞饱和度/%	> 75	65~75	50~65	< 50
	渗透率分布峰位/μm	> 1.00	0.50~1.00	0.25~0.50	< 0.25
CT扫描	CT平均孔隙半径/μm	> 80	50~80	< 50	—
	CT平均喉道半径/μm	50~80	25~50	< 25	—
	平均孔喉配位数	> 5	3~5	< 3	—
岩石学特征	岩性产状	块状白云岩	块状白云岩	块状白云岩、斑状白云岩	灰岩
	微观结构类型	A1平直晶面自形晶白云岩、A2平直晶面半自形晶白云岩	A1平直晶面自形晶白云岩、A2平直晶面半自形晶白云岩、A3过渡型白云岩	A3过渡型白云岩、A4非平直晶面他形晶白云岩、B残余结构白云岩	(含)泥质灰泥生屑灰岩、(含)生屑灰泥灰岩、(含)泥质灰泥灰岩
	主要孔隙类型	晶间溶孔、溶洞	晶间孔、晶间溶孔	晶间孔、晶间微孔	晶间微孔、粒间微孔
	主要喉道类型	规则-短喉型、孔隙缩小型	规则-短喉型、孔隙缩小型	弯曲-曲折型、孔隙缩小型	—
	储层分类评价	Ⅰ类储层	Ⅱ类储层	Ⅲ类储层	非储层

[1]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 李双建, 刘光祥, 丁江辉, 边瑞康, 卢志远. 特提斯域板块构造约束下上扬子地区二叠系龙潭组页岩气的差异性赋存[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 1-15.
[2]	姜振学, 李鑫, 王幸蒙, 王国臻, 仇恒远, 朱德宇, 姜鸿阳. 中国南方典型页岩孔隙特征差异及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 41-53.
[3]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 董立, 高波, 孙川翔, 杨滔, 王冠平, 尹帅. 页岩气储层表征评价技术进展与思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 54-65.
[4]	王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 张磊夫. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75.
[5]	沈骋, 任岚, 赵金洲, 陈铭培. 页岩岩相组合划分标准及其对缝网形成的影响——以四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 98-106, 123.
[6]	孙莎莎, 董大忠, 李育聪, 王红岩, 施振生, 黄世伟, 昌燕, 拜文华. 四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 124-135.
[7]	刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 刘珠江, 刘晧天, 郝景宇, 王鹏威, 李鹏. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145.
[8]	朱洪建, 琚宜文, 孙岩, 黄骋, 冯宏业, AliRaza, 余坤, 乔鹏, 肖蕾. 构造变形作用下页岩孔裂隙结构演化特征及其模式——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界海相页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 186-200, 240.
[9]	舒志国, 周林, 李雄, 刘皓天, 曾勇, 谢洪光, 姚明君, 王艳春. 四川盆地东部复兴地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩凝析气藏地质特征及勘探开发前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 212-223.
[10]	陆亚秋, 梁榜, 王超, 刘超, 吉靖. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田江东区块下古生界深层页岩气勘探开发实践与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 241-250.
[11]	霍建峰, 高健, 郭小文, 易积正, 舒志国, 包汉勇, 杨锐, 罗涛, 何生. 川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175.
[12]	马德芹, 田景春, 林小兵, 文龙, 徐亮. 四川盆地二叠系长兴组生物礁发育的差异性及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1176-1187.
[13]	祖克威, 范凌霄, 王波, 曹东升, 管聪, 李中超, 程秀申. 四川盆地普光地区嘉陵江组二段碳酸盐岩储层裂缝发育规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1188-1196.
[14]	邓模, 段新国, 翟常博, 龙胜祥, 杨振恒, 郑伦举, 李章畅, 曹涛涛. 页岩热模拟过程中液态烃含量变化及对物性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1310-1320.
[15]	庹秀松, 陈孔全, 罗顺社, 汤济广, 张斗中, 沈均均. 四川盆地东南缘齐岳山断裂构造特征与页岩气保存条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1017-1027.

川西北中二叠统超深层白云岩储层孔隙结构及控制因素

Pore structure and controlling factors of the ultra-deep Middle Permian dolomite reservoirs, northwestern Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics