东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组断层组合样式及其控砂机制

doi:10.11743/ogg20200415

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷是中国沿海重要的含油气区，勘探实践中发现其内部断层及砂体分布规律复杂、勘探难度大，亟待解决砂体分布控制因素问题，深化砂体分布规律认识。运用岩心、测井及三维地震资料，采用古地貌和地震属性叠合精细砂体解释技术，对西湖凹陷平湖组同沉积断层分布及组合特征对砂体的控制作用开展了研究。根据同沉积断层发育规模的差异，划分出3个级别的断层，分别控制了凹陷格局、斜坡特征及砂体展布3个层次，分析了三级同沉积断层组合样式对砂体垂向沉积特征及平面展布方向的控制作用。研究表明，研究区发育6种断层控砂模式，分别为正向断阶阶梯型、正向断阶掀斜型、正向断阶叠覆型、墙角型、反向断阶型和正反向断阶复合型控砂模式。其中由正向断层构成的断层组合样式有利于砂体向凹陷中央搬运，扩大了储层在凹陷内的分布规模，而由反向断层构成的断层组合样式，其富砂作用显著、油气聚集条件优越。在6种断层控砂模式的指导下，有利于发现砂体垂向富集段及横向富集带，判断砂体展布方向及预测储层发育位置。

关键词: 同沉积断层, 反向断层, 控砂机制, 砂体分布, 平湖组, 西湖凹陷, 东海陆架盆地

Abstract:

Xihu Sag in the East China Sea Shelf Basin is an important petroliferous area along the coast of China. Exploration activities in the sag reveal complex distribution of (syndepositional) faults and sand bodies but the controlling factors on the distribution of the sand bodies are still unclear. In this study, core observation, logging and 3D seismic data are combined with fine sand body interpretation based on paleogeomorphology and seismic attributes to study the effect of synsedimentary faults on the sand bodies in the Pinghu Formation of the sag. According to the different development scale, the syndepositional faults can be divided into three levels, which serve to control the sag pattern, slope characteristics and sand body distribution, respectively. In addition, the controlling effect of the three levels of the syndepositional fault distribution patterns on the vertical sedimentation and plane extension of the sand bodies is analyzed. The results show that there are six fault combination patterns controlling the sandstone development in the study area, namely the forward fault-step type, forward fault-step-tilt type, forward fault-step overlying type, corner type, reverse fault step type, and composite type with both forward and reverse faults and steps. Of which, forward types facilitated the transportation of sand bodies to the center of the sag and enlarged the distribution of reservoirs within the sag, and reverse types had significant sand-rich effect and provided superior conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation. The six combination patterns are helpful in guiding the finding of vertical and horizontal enrichment zones of sand bodies, determining the distribution of sand bodies and predicting the locations of reservoirs.

Key words: syndepositional fault, reverse fault, sand body control mechanism, sand body distribution, Pinghu Formation, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.1

陈哲,张昌民,侯国伟,等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组断层组合样式及其控砂机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 824-837. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200415 Zhe Chen,Changmin Zhang,Guowei Hou,et al. Fault distribution patterns and their control on sand bodies in Pinghu Formation of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 824-837. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200415

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 46

1	陶晓风, 刘登忠, 朱利东. 陆相盆地沉积作用与构造作用的关系[J]. 沉积学报, 2001, (3): 410- 414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2001.03.016
	Tao Xiaofeng , Liu Dengzhong , Zhu Lidong . Relationship between sedi-mentary process in terrestrial basin and tectonic process[J]. ActaSedimentologica Sinica, 2001, (3): 410- 414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2001.03.016
2	林畅松, 潘元林, 肖建新, 等. "构造坡折带"——断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J]. 地球科学, 2000, (3): 260- 266.
	Lin Changsong , Pan Yuanlin , Xiao Jianxin , et al. Structuralslope-break zone:Keyconcept for stratigraphic sequence analysisand petroleum forecastingin fault subsidence basins[J]. Earth Science, 2000, (3): 260- 266.
3	王英民, 金武弟, 刘书会, 等. 断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, (3): 199- 203+214. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2003.03.002
	Wang Yingmin , Jin Wudi , Liu Shuhui , et al. Genetic types, distribution and exploration significance of multistage slope breaks in rift lacustrine basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, (3): 199- 203+214. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2003.03.002
4	冯有良. 断陷湖盆沟谷及构造坡折对砂体的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2006, (1): 13- 16. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.01.003
	Feng Youliang . Control of valley and tectonic slope-break zone on sand bodies in rift-subsidence basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, (1): 13- 16. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.01.003
5	Feng Y , Jiang S , Hu S , et al. Sequence stratigraphy and importance of syndepositional structural slope-break for architecture of Paleogene syn-rift lacustrine strata, Bohai Bay Basin, E.China[J]. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2016, 69, 183- 204.
6	董桂玉, 何幼斌. 陆相断陷盆地基准面调控下的古地貌要素耦合控砂机制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43 (4): 529- 539.
	Dong Guiyu , He Youbin . Mechanism of sand body prediction in a continental rift basin by coupling paleogeomorphic elements under the control of base level[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43 (4): 529- 539.
7	辛云路, 任建业, 李建平. 构造-古地貌对沉积的控制作用——以渤海南部莱州湾凹陷沙三段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40 (3): 302- 308.
	Xin Yunlu , Ren Jianye , Li Jianping . Control of tectonic-paleogeomorphology on deposition:A case from the Shahejie Formation Sha 3 member, Laizhouwan Sag, southern BohaiSea[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40 (3): 302- 308.
8	Normark W R . Growth patterns of deep sea fans[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1970, 54 (11): 2170- 2195.
9	Nardin T R , Heln F J , Gorsline D S , et al. A review of mass movement processes, sediment and acoustic characteristics, and contrasts in slope and base-of-slope systems versus canyon-fan-basin floor systems[M]. Tulsa: SEPM Special Publication, 1979: 61- 73.
10	孔凡仙. 东营凹陷北带砂砾岩扇体勘探技术与实践[J]. 石油学报, 2000, (5): 27- 31+6-5. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2000.05.006
	Kong Fanxian . Exploration technique and practice of sandy-conglome-ratic fans in the northern part of Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, (5): 27- 31+6-5. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2000.05.006
11	董道涛, 邱隆伟, 马永达, 等. 多断湖盆构造控砂与沉积充填过程——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷东部始新统为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (4): 653- 663.
	Dong Daotao , Qiu Longwei , Ma Yongda , et al. Control of tectonics on sedimentation of sandstone and process of sediment filling in multi-fault lacustrine basins:A case study on the Eocene in eastern Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (4): 653- 663.
12	赵贤正, 周立宏, 肖敦清, 等. 歧口凹陷斜坡区油气成藏与勘探实践[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37 (S2): 1- 9.
	Zhao Xianzheng , Zhou Lihong , Xiao Dunqing , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration practice of slope area in Qikousag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37 (S2): 1- 9.
13	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆斜坡区油气富集理论与勘探实践——以黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22 (2): 13- 24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.02.002
	Zhao Xianzheng , Zhou Lihong , Pu Xiugang , et al. Hydrocarbon enrichment theory and exploration practice in the slope of fault lake basin-a case study of Paleogene in Huanghuadepression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22 (2): 13- 24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.02.002
14	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 王家豪, 等. 断陷盆地缓坡区控砂控藏机制与勘探发现——以歧口凹陷歧北缓坡带为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38 (7): 729- 739.
	Zhao Xianzheng , Pu xiugang , Wang Jiahao , et al. Sand and reservoir controlling mechanism and exploration discovery in the gentle slope of fault basin:a case study of Qibei slope in Qikou sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38 (7): 729- 739.
15	赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 李玉帮, 等. 断陷盆地斜坡带类型与油气运聚成藏机制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43 (6): 841- 849.
	Zhao Xianzheng , Jin Fengming , Li Yubang , et al. Slope belt types and hydrocarbon migration and accumulation mechanisms in rift basins[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43 (6): 841- 849.
16	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷盆地洼槽聚油理论的发展与勘探实践——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (6): 1092- 1102.
	Zhao Xianzheng , Zhou Lihong , Pu Xiugang , et al. Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration breakthrough in a lacustrine basin:A case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (6): 1092- 1102.
17	林畅松, 郑和荣, 任建业, 等. 渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2003, (11): 1025- 1036.
	Lin Changsong , Zheng Herong , Ren Jianye , et al. The control of syndepositional faulting on the Eogene sedimentary basin fills of Dongying and Zhanhua sags, Bohaiwanrift basin[J]. Science in China(Series D), 2003, (11): 1025- 1036.
18	蔡华, 张建培. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带断层特征及其封闭性[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29 (4): 20- 26.
	Cai Hua , Zhang Jianpei . Characteristics of faults on the Pinghu slope of XihuSag, the East China Sea Shelf Basin and their sealing capacity[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2013, 29 (4): 20- 26.
19	张建培. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带断裂系统特征及成因机制探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2013, 48 (1): 291- 303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2013.01.020
	Zhang Jianpei . Fault system and its geneticmechanismin the Pinghuslope of the Xihu Sag in East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2013, 48 (1): 291- 303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2013.01.020
20	蔡华, 张建培, 唐贤君. 西湖凹陷断裂系统特征及其控藏机制[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (10): 18- 26. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.10.003
	Cai Hua , Zhang Jianpei , Tang Xianjun . Characteristics of the fault systems and their control on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (10): 18- 26. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.10.003
21	杨彩虹, 曾广东, 李上卿, 等. 东海西湖凹陷平北地区断裂发育特征与油气聚集[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36 (1): 64- 69+82.
	Yang Caihong , Zeng Guangdong , Li Shangqing , et al. Fault development characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation in Pingbei area of Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36 (1): 64- 69+82.
22	张绍亮, 张建培, 唐贤君, 等. 东海西湖凹陷断裂系统几何学特征及其成因机制[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014, 34 (1): 87- 94.
	Zhang Shaoliang , Zhang Jianpei , Tang Xianjun , et al. Geometry chara-cteristic of the fault system in Xihu Sag in East China Sea and Its formation mechanism[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2014, 34 (1): 87- 94.
23	周祥林, 高伟中, 张建培, 等. 东海西湖凹陷平北断裂特征及其对油气成藏的控制[J]. 上海国土资源, 2014, 35 (2): 54- 57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1329.2014.02.014
	Zhou Xianglin , Gao Weizhong , Zhang Jianpei , et al. Fractures in the Pingbei area and their control on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Xihu sag of the East China Sea[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2014, 35 (2): 54- 57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1329.2014.02.014
24	刘晓晨.西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带平湖组砂体精细刻画及时空演化研究[D].中国地质大学, 2018.
	Liu Xiaochen.Fine characterization and evolution of sand body of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu Slope, Xihu Sag[D].China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 2018.
25	周心怀, 高顺莉, 高伟中, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平北斜坡带海陆过渡型岩性油气藏形成与分布预测[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, (2): 153- 164.
	Zhou Xinhua , Gao Shunli , Gao Weizhong , et al. Formation and distribution of marine-continental transitional lithologic reservoirs in Pingbei slope belt, Xihu sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, (2): 153- 164.
26	陶士振, 邹才能. 东海盆地西湖凹陷天然气成藏及分布规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, (4): 103- 110. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.04.017
	Tao Shizhen , Zou Caineng . Accumulation and distribution of natural gases in Xihu sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, (4): 103- 110. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.04.017
27	刘金水, 唐健程. 西湖凹陷低渗储层微观孔隙结构与渗流特征及其地质意义——以HY构造花港组为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2013, 25 (2): 18- 23.
	Liu Jinshui , Tang Jiancheng . Mircoscopic pore texture and percolation features in the low permeability reservoirs and their geological significance in Xihu sag:a case of Huagang Formation in HY structure[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25 (2): 18- 23.
28	高伟中, 孙鹏, 赵洪, 等. 西湖凹陷花港组深部储层特征及控制因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43 (4): 396- 404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.04.02
	Gao Weizhong , Sun Peng , Zhao Hong , et al. Study of deep reservoirs characters and main control factors of Huagang Formation in Xihu sag, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2016, 43 (4): 396- 404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.04.02
29	林承焰, 孙小龙, 马存飞, 等. 西湖凹陷中央反转构造带花港组储层物性演化[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2017, 46 (4): 820- 829.
	Lin Chengyan , Sun Xiaolong , Ma Cunfei , et al. Physical property evolution of Huagang formation in central inversion tectonic belt in Xihudepression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2017, 46 (4): 820- 829.
30	刘金水, 曹冰, 徐志星, 等. 西湖凹陷某构造花港组沉积相及致密砂岩储层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 39 (2): 130- 136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2012.02.003
	Liu Jinshui , Cao Bing , Xu Zhixing , et al. Sedimentary facies and the characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs of Huagang Formation in Xihu depression, East China Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2012, 39 (2): 130- 136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2012.02.003
31	于兴河, 李顺利, 曹冰, 等. 西湖凹陷渐新世层序地层格架与沉积充填响应[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35 (2): 299- 314.
	Yu Xinghe , Li Shunli , Cao Bing , et al. Oligocene sequence framework and depositional response in the XihuDepression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35 (2): 299- 314.
32	Ge Z , Nemec W , Gawthorpe R L , et al. Response of unconfined turbidity current to normal-fault topography[J]. Sedimentology, 2016.
33	漆家福. 裂陷盆地中的构造变换带及其石油地质意义[J]. 海相油气地质, 2007, (4): 43- 50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2007.04.007
	Qi Jiafu . Structural transfer zones and significance for hydrocarbon accumulation in rifting basins[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2007, (4): 43- 50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2007.04.007
34	付志方, 汤达祯, 许浩, 等. 箕状凹陷坡折带成因及对同生断层和沉积的控制——以南襄盆地南阳凹陷为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2006, (5): 430- 433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2006.05.005
	Fu Zhifang , Tang Dazhen , Xu Hao , et al. Forming mechanism of slope-break and Its control on syn-depositional fault and deposition in Halfgraben Sag-A Case Study of the NangyangSag, theNanxiang basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2006, 28 (5): 430- 433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2006.05.005
35	杨晓利, 张自力, 孙明, 等. 同沉积断层控砂模式——以南堡凹陷南部地区Es~1段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35 (4): 526- 533.
	Yang Xiaoli , Zhang Zili , Sun Ming , et al. Models of contemporaneous fault controlling sandstone deposition:a case study of Es~1 in southern Nanpu Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35 (4): 526- 533.
36	葛家旺, 朱筱敏, 陶文芳, 等. 惠州凹陷HZ25转换带构造特征与成藏条件[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39 (5): 19- 30.
	Ge Jiawang , Zhu Xiaomin , Tao Wenfang , et al. The tectonic characteri-stics and analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions in HZ25 transfer zone in Huizhou Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39 (5): 19- 30.
37	印森林, 唐勇, 胡张明, 等. 构造活动对冲积扇及其油气成藏的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系-三叠系冲积扇为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37 (4): 391- 400.
	Yin Senlin , Tang Yong , Hu Zhangming , et al. Controls of tectonic activity on alluvial fan deposits and hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of Permian and Triassic alluvial fans in Northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37 (4): 391- 400.
38	徐曦, 孙连浦, 肖梦楚, 等. 下扬子区新生代断陷盆地的断裂构造特征与活动规律[J]. 高校地质学报, 2018, 24 (5): 723- 733.
	Xu Xi , Sun Lianpu , Xiao Mengchu , et al. Structural characteristics and activity rules of faults in the Cenozoic faulted-basins in the Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2018, 24 (5): 723- 733.
39	程日辉, 郑和荣, 林畅松. 反向断阶构造样式与砂质沉积体发育[J]. 长春科技大学学报, 2001, (2): 146- 148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5888.2001.02.009
	Cheng Rihui , Zheng Herong , Lin Changsong . The Structural style of antithetic fault terrace and the development of sand bodies[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science & Technology, 2001, (2): 146- 148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5888.2001.02.009
40	Andricc N, Matenco L, Hilgen F, et al.Structural controls on sedimentation during asymmetric extension:The case of Sorbas Basin (SE Spain)[J].Global and Planetary Change, 2018:S0921818117303582.
41	Strachan L J , Rarity F , Gawthorpe R L , et al. Submarine slope processes in rift-margin basins, Miocene Suez Rift, Egypt[J]. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 2013, 125 (1-2): 109- 127. doi: 10.1130/B30665.1
42	李占东, 于鹏, 邵碧莹, 等. 复杂断陷盆地沉积充填演化与构造活动的响应分析——以海拉尔-塔木察格盆地中部断陷带为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44 (5): 853- 860.
	Li Zhandong , Yu Peng , Shao Biying , et al. Response analysis of sedimentary filling evolution and tectonic activity in complicated faulted basin:an example of middle rift belt in Hailar-Tamtsag basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015, 44 (5): 853- 860.
43	郭志强, 王海学, 赵政权, 等. 同向和反向断层形成机制及控圈作用差异性[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36 (3): 1- 6. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2017.03.001
	Guo Zhiqiang , Wang Haixue , Zhao Zhengquan , et al. Forming mechanism of the synthetic and antithetic faults and differences of their controlling action on the traps[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Develo-pment in Daqing, 2017, 36 (3): 1- 6. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2017.03.001
44	Ge J, Zhu X, Wang R, et al.Tectono-sedimentary evolution and hydrocarbon reservoirs in the early cretaceous Tanan Depression, Tamtsag Basin, Mongolia[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018:S026481721830151X.
45	韦丹宁, 付广. 反向断裂下盘较顺向断裂上盘更易富集油气机理的定量解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46 (3): 702- 710.
	Wei Danning , Fu Guang . Quantitative explanation of mechanism about lower wall of antithetic faults accumulating more oil-gas than upper wall of consequent faults[J]. Journal of Jilin University, 2016, 46 (3): 702- 710.
46	关德师, 李建忠. 松辽盆地南部岩性油藏成藏要素及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2003, (3): 24- 27.
	Guan Deshi , Li Jianzhong . Factors for controlling lithologic oil pool formation and exploration prospects in southern SongliaoBasin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, (3): 24- 27.

[1]	董鑫旭, 周兴海, 李昆, 蒲仁海, 王爱国, 关蕴文, 张鹏. 海上稀疏井区高精度地层格架约束下的地震沉积学刻画[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 293-308.
[2]	张迎朝, 邹玮, 陈忠云, 蒋一鸣, 刁慧. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组气藏“先汇后聚”机制及地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1256-1269.
[3]	朱珍君, 李琦, 陈贺贺, 李剑, 张卫平, 杨丰繁, 张迎朝, 覃军, 李风勋, 单帅强. 东海陆架盆地丽水凹陷古新统源-汇系统耦合及时-空演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 735-752.
[4]	余浪, 余一欣, 蒋一鸣, 邹玮, 陈石, 唐贤君, 梁鑫鑫, 何新建, 陈冬霞. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷天台斜坡构造变换带发育特征及形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 753-763.
[5]	朱筱敏, 陈贺贺, 葛家旺, 谈明轩, 刘强虎, 张自力, 张亚雄. 陆相断陷湖盆层序构型与砂体发育分布特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4): 746-762.
[6]	刘贤, 葛家旺, 赵晓明, 阴国峰, 周雪松, 王建伟, 代茂林, 孙莉, 范廷恩. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组年代标尺及层序界面定量识别[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4): 990-1004.
[7]	李天军, 黄志龙, 郭小波, 赵静, 蒋一鸣, 谭思哲. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平北斜坡带平湖组煤系原油地球化学特征与油-源精细对比[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 432-444.
[8]	徐陈杰, 叶加仁, 刘金水, 曹强, 盛溢勇, 余汉文. 东海西湖凹陷平湖组Ⅲ型干酪根暗色泥岩生排烃模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 359-366.
[9]	朱毅秀, 黄导武, 王欢, 何贤科, 师源, 佘亚明. 东海西湖凹陷A气田渐新统花港组三段厚层砂岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1226-1235.
[10]	林建力, 张宪国, 林承焰, 段冬平, 黄鑫, 孙小龙, 董春梅. 岩相约束下的深层致密砂岩气藏储层演化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 886-899.
[11]	张美华, 王春华, 栾颖. 松辽盆地伏龙泉断陷边界断层构造反转率[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 413-422.
[12]	许红, 张威威, 季兆鹏, 王黎, 王晴, 苏大鹏, 雷宝华, 杨艳秋. 东海陆架盆地大春晓油气田成藏动力学特征及成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1): 1-11.
[13]	刘君龙, 孙冬胜, 纪友亮, 朱宏权, 于海跃, 王天云. 川西晚侏罗世前陆盆地浅水三角洲砂体分布特征与叠置模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1164-1178.
[14]	赵仲祥, 董春梅, 林承焰, 张宪国, 段冬平, 黄鑫, 曾芳. 西湖凹陷深层低渗-致密气藏“甜点”类型划分及成因探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 778-790.
[15]	董道涛, 邱隆伟, 马永达, 杨勇强, 邹毓, 代莉, 滕宝刚, 张在鹏. 多断湖盆构造控砂与沉积充填过程——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷东部始新统为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 653-663.