气井多层合采渗流特征及接替生产物理模拟

doi:10.11743/ogg20150616

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对于低孔、低渗气藏，为了提高单井产能和改善气田开发效益，许多生产井都采用了多层合采方式进行生产。为了更真实地认识低渗气藏多层合采的渗流特征以及确定最佳合采接替时机，通过设计室内物理模拟实验，模拟气藏多层合采开发过程，研究了地层压力、渗透率及主控因素共同作用下的气藏渗流特征对开发效果的影响以及合采接替生产时机，认为多层合采时，高压、高渗层产量贡献率始终高于低压、低渗层；而对于低压、高渗层，实验初始阶段低压、高渗层的产量贡献率高于高压、低渗层，实验后期从主产气层变为次产气层；在不同的接替时机下，随着接替点压力的降低，采出程度呈现出降低的趋势；低渗层接替生产要比高渗层接替生产效果要好。采用物理模拟实验研究多层合采产气渗流特征尚属新的尝试，其研究成果对制定类似气藏的合理开发技术策略提供了参考依据。

关键词: 合采接替生产, 渗流特征, 多层合采, 致密低渗透气藏, 大牛地气田, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: In order to increase single-well productivity and improve development economics of low porosity and low permeability gas reservoirs,many production wells adopt the way of commingled production.By laboratory physical experimental analysis,the development process of commingled production was simulated to study the influences of seepage features of gas reservoir under the combined action of formation pressure,permeability and the main controlling factors on the development effect,and also the timing of production conversion.The results suggest that when commingled production is adopted in gas reservoirs,the yield contribution rate of high pressure and high permeability layers is always higher than that of low pressure and low permeability layers;As for low pressure and high permeability layers,their yield contribution rate is higher than that of high pressure and low permeability layers in the initial phase of the experiment,and they turn from the primary gas pay zones to the secondary gas pay zones in the later phase;Along with the pressure at the conversion points going down,the degree of reserve recovery presents a decreasing trend among different times of production conversion;the effect of production conversion of low permeability layers is better than that of high permeability layers.This is still a new attempt to analyses the seepage features of commingled production through physical simulation experiment and the results provide a reference for making a reasonable development technology strategy for similar gas reservoirs.

Key words: commingled production conversion, seepage feature, commingled production, low-permeability tight gas reservoir, Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE37

谭玉涵,郭京哲,郑锋,等. 气井多层合采渗流特征及接替生产物理模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(6): 1009-1015. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150616 Tan Yuhan,Guo Jingzhe,Zheng Feng,et al. Physical simulation on seepage features of commingled production and right time of production conversion for gas wells[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6): 1009-1015. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150616

参考文献

[1] 罗东明,陈舒薇,张广权.大牛地气田上古生界沉积相与天然气富集规律的再认识[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(3):368-374. Luo Dongming,Chen Shuwei,Zhang Guangquan.New understandings of the Upper Paleozoic sedimentary facies and gas accumulation rules in Daniudi gas field[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(3):368-374.
[2] 杨智,何生,邹才能,等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部大牛地气田成岩成藏耦合关系[J].石油学报,2010,31(3):373-378,385. Yang Zhi, He Sheng,Zou Caineng, et al.Coupling relationship between reservoir diagenesis and natural gas accumulation of Daniudi gas field in North Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(3):373-378.
[3] 杨辰雨,田景春,张翔,等.基于砂体构型精细刻画潮坪砂坝优质砂体——以大牛地气田D17井区太原组2段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(2):248-254. Yang Chenyu,Tian Jingchun,Zhang Xiang.et al.Configuration-based fine description of high-quality sand bodies in tidal-flat bar:Taking the tight sandstone reservoir in the 2nd Member of the Taiyuan Formation in D-17 wellblock in Danidi gasfield as an example[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(2):248-254.
[4] 田景春,刘伟伟,王峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地高桥地区上古生界致密砂岩储层非均质性特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):183-189. Tian Jingchun,Liu Weiwei,Wang Feng,et al.Heterogeneity of the Paleozoic tight sandstone reservoirs in Gaoqiao Area of Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(2):183-189.
[5] 尹昕,应文敏.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田上古生界低孔低渗砂岩储层评价[J].矿物岩石,2005,25(2):104-109. Yin Xin,Yin Wenmin.Reservior evaluation for the low porosity and permeability sandstone of upper paleozoic in the Daniudi gas field,Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2005,25(2):104-109.
[6] 罗月明,刘伟新,谭学群,等.鄂尔多斯大牛地气田上古生界储层成岩作用评价[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(4):384-390. Luo Yueming,Liu Weixin,Tan Xuequn,et al.Diagenesis and reservoir evaluation on the upper palaeozonic reservoir sandstones in Daniudi gas field,the Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2007,29(4):384-390.
[7] 郭建民,刘忠群,谢婷.大牛地气田盒3段致密储层评价与预测[J].天然气工业,2007,27(12):55-57. Guo Jianmin,Liu Zhongqun,Xie Ting.Evaluation and prediction for compacted reservoirs in He-3 member of Daniudi gas field[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(12):55-57.
[8] 许杰,何治亮,董宁,等.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田盒3段河道砂岩相控储层预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(6):692-696. Xu Jie,He Zhiliang,DongNing,et al.Facies-constrained reservoir prediction of P₁h³ channel sandstone in Daniudi gas field,the Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(6):692-696.
[9] 侯瑞云.大牛地气田盒一段低孔渗砂岩储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(3):467-478. Hou Ruiyun.Reservoir characteristics of low porosity and permeability sandstone of Member Ⅰ of Xiashihezi Formation in Daniudi gas field,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(3):467-478.
[10] 吴娟娟,李仲东,陈威,等.大牛地气田太2段致密砂岩气层识别研究[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(1):102-106. Wu Juanjuan,Li Zhongdong,Chen Wei,et al.Recognition of compacted sandstone gas reservoirs of Tai 2 member in Daniudi gas field[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(1):102-106.
[11] 张广权,陈舒薇,郭书元.鄂尔多斯地区东北部大牛地气田山西组沉积相[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(3):388-396. Zhang Guangqua,Chen Shuwei,Guo Shuyuan.Sedimentary facies of the Shanxi Formation in Daniudi gas field,northeastern Ordos area[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(3):388-396.
[12] 刘双莲,李浩,周小鹰.大牛地气田大12—大66井区沉积微相与储层产能关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(1):45-49. Liu Shuanglian,Li Hao,Zhou Xiaoying.Relationship between sedimentary microfacies and reservoir productivity in Da12-Da66 wellblock,Daniudi gas field[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(1):45-49.
[13] 郝蜀民,惠宽洋,李良. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地大型低渗气田成藏特征及其勘探开发技术[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(6):762-768. Hao Shumin,Hui Kuanyang,Li Liang. Reservoir characteristics of large gas field with low permeability and exploration and development technology of Daniudi gasfield in Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(6):762-768.
[14] 刘莉莉,徐文,石石,等.苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏有效储层建模方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):47-51. Liu Lili,Xu Wen,Shi Shi,et al.A new effective reservoir modeling method for tight sandstone gas reservoir in Sulige gasfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):47-51.
[15] 杜玉山,杨勇,郭迎春,等.低渗透油藏地层压力保持水平对油水渗流特征的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):72-76. Du Yushan,Yang Yong,Guo Yingchun,et al.Impact of formation pressure maintenance on oil-water seepage characteristics in low permeability reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):72-76.
[16] 侯瑞云,刘忠群.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田致密低渗储层评价与开发对策[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(1):118-128. Hou Ruiyun,Liu Zhongqun.Resevoir evaluation and development strategies of Daniudi tight sand gas field in the Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(1):118-128.
[17] 税蕾蕾,彭平安,黄合庭,等.合采井分层产量贡献地球化学实验监测技术[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(2):314-320. Shui Leilei,Peng Ping'an,Huang Heting,et al.Geochemical monitoring technology of single layer production in commingled producing wells[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(2):314-320.
[18] 王欢,廖新维,赵晓亮,等.超低渗透油藏分段多簇压裂水平井产能影响因素与渗流规律——以鄂尔多斯盆地长8超低渗透油藏为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(6):107-110. Wang Huan,Liao Xinwei,Zhao Xiaoliang,et al.A study on productivity and flow regimes of segmented multi-cluster fractured horizontal well in ultra-low permeability reservoir-a case of Chang8 ultra-low permeability reservoir in Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(6):107-110.
[19] 杨学锋,刘义成,李进,等.两层组气藏分采、合采效果和开采方式优选[J].天然气工业,2012,32(1):57-60,122-123. Yang Xuefeng,Liu Yicheng,Li Jin,et al.Effect of separate layer recovery or multilayer commingled production and the optimal selection of development methods for two-layer gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(1):57-60,122-123.
[20] 郑浩,苏彦春,张迎春,等.裂缝性油藏渗流特征及驱替机理数值模拟研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(4):79-83. Zheng Hao,Su Yanchun,Zhang Yingchun,et al.The numerical simulation study on percolation characteristics and displacement mechanism of fractured reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(4):79-83.
[21] 马洪,李建忠,杨涛,等.中国陆相湖盆致密油成藏主控因素综述[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):668-677. Ma Hong,Li Jianzhong,Yang Tao,et al.Main controlling factors for tight oil accumulation in continental lacustrine basins in China[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):668-677.
[22] 李易隆,贾爱林,吴朝东.松辽盆地长岭断陷致密砂岩成岩作用及其对储层发育的控制[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):698-705. Li Yilong,Jia Ailin,Wu Chaodong.Diagenesis of tight sandstones and its controls on reservoirs genesis,Changling Faulted Depression,Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):698-705.
[23] 熊燕莉,冯曦,杨雅和,等.多层合采气井动态特征及开发效果分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,2005,28(1):21-24. Xiong Yanli,Feng Xi,Yang Yahe,et al.Analysis on performance features and exploitation results of gas wells with multiple-zone production[J]Natural Gas Exploration & Development,2005,28(1):21-24.