渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组富有机质页岩孔隙分类及孔径定量表征

doi:10.11743/ogg20160316

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 422-432,438.doi: 10.11743/ogg20160316

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组富有机质页岩孔隙分类及孔径定量表征

张琴^1,2, 朱筱敏^1,2, 李晨溪¹, 乔李井宇¹, 刘畅³, 梅啸寒¹, 杜会尧⁴, 禄佳景⁴

1. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京) 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
3. 中联煤层气有限责任公司, 北京 100011;
4. 中国石油大港油田第一采油厂, 天津 300280

收稿日期:2016-01-20 修回日期:2016-04-20 出版日期:2016-06-08 发布日期:2016-06-22
作者简介:张琴(1973—),女,博士、副教授,沉积学、层序地层学及储层地质学。E-mail:zhangqin@cup.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41302081);教育部留学回国启动基金项目(ZX20140267)。

Classification and quantitative characterization of microscopic pores in organic-rich shale of the Shahejie Formation in the Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin

Zhang Qin^1,2, Zhu Xiaomin^1,2, Li Chenxi¹, Qiao Lijingyu¹, Liu Chang³, Mei Xiaohan¹, Du Huiyao⁴, Lu Jiajing⁴

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
3. China United Coalbed Methane Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100011, China;
4. The 1^st Oil Plant of Dagang Oilfield, PetroChina, Tianjing 300280, China

Received:2016-01-20 Revised:2016-04-20 Online:2016-06-08 Published:2016-06-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩微观孔隙特征分析和孔径定量表征是页岩油气储层评价和开发的关键。通过岩心观察、薄片鉴定、X-衍射、扫描电镜、氮气吸附等实验手段，分析了渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷富有机质页岩的矿物组成和微观孔隙类型，并对微观孔径进行了定量表征。结果表明：沙河街组页岩具有碳酸盐矿物含量高、粘土矿物含量较低的特征。根据发育位置、成因及产状，将储集空间分为孔隙与裂缝两大类，并制定了孔隙和裂缝的尺度评价标准。孔隙包括矿物基质孔隙和有机质孔隙；裂缝包括构造、层间、超压破裂、成岩和有机质收缩裂缝。氮气吸附等温曲线主要存在3种类型，分别反映了样品中微孔、中孔及宏孔的分布差异。通常氮气吸附实验能更好地表征中孔的发育特征，而扫描电镜所测孔隙更好地表征了宏孔的发育。需要进一步采用二氧化碳吸附、纳米CT及压汞实验定量表征页岩的微孔和宏孔的大小及分布。

关键词: 氮气吸附实验, 孔径定量表征, 微观储集空间, 矿物组成, 富有机质页岩, 沙河街组, 沾化凹陷, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: It is a key step for reservoir evaluation and development of shale gas to analyze characteristics of the microscopic pores in organic-rich shale and quantitatively characterize their pore size distribution.Based on core description,thin section inspection,X-diffraction,SEM and nitrogen adsorption test,this paper analyzed mineral components,classified microscopic pore types and also quantitatively characterized pore size in organic-rich shale samples of the Shahejie Formation in the Zhanhua sag,Bohai Bay Basin.The results show that the samples are characterized by high carbonate content and low clay content.According to their positions in the formation,genetic origin and occurrence,the reservoir spaces are divided into two types,namely pores and fractures,and their size classification criteria are determined.The pores consist of mineral matrix pores and organic pores.The fractures include structural,inter-bedded,over-pressure induced,diagenetic and organic shrinkage fractures.Nitrogen adsorption test mainly displays three types of curves which represent the spatial distribution of micropores,mesopores and macropores in the shale samples respectively.While nitrogen adsorption test mainly measures the mesopores and is relatively insensitive to other pore size types,SEM can reveal the characteristics of macropores much more clearly.It is suggested to further perform measurements of carbon dioxide adsorption,Nano-CT and mercury injection to quantitatively characterize the size and spatial distribution of the micropores and macropores in the shale.

Key words: nitrogen adsorption test, quantitative characterization of pore size, microscopic reservoir space, mineral component, organic-rich shale, Shahejie Formation, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号:

TE132.2

张琴,朱筱敏,李晨溪,等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组富有机质页岩孔隙分类及孔径定量表征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(3): 422-432,438. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160316 Zhang Qin,Zhu Xiaomin,Li Chenxi,et al. Classification and quantitative characterization of microscopic pores in organic-rich shale of the Shahejie Formation in the Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(3): 422-432,438. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160316

参考文献

[1] 焦堃, 姚素平, 吴浩, 等.页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J].高校地质学报, 2014, 20(1):151-161. Jiao Kun, Yao Suping, Wu Hao, et al.Advances in characterization of pore system of gas shales[J].Geological Journal of China Universities, 2014, 20(1):151-161.
[2] 蒲泊伶, 董大忠, 牛嘉玉, 等.页岩气储层研究新进展[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(2):98-104. Pu Boling, Dong Dazhong, Niu Jiayu, et al.Principal progresses in shale gas reservoir research[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(2):98-104.
[3] 伍岳, 樊太亮, 蒋恕, 等.海相页岩储层微观孔隙体系表征技术及分类方案[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(5):91-97. Wu Yue, Fan Tailiang, Jiang Shu, et al.Characterizing techniques and classification methods for microscope pore system in marine shale reservoir [J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(5):91-97.
[4] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864. Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, Bai Bin, et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value [J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864.
[5] Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6):1071-1098.
[6] 卢双舫, 陈国辉, 王民, 等.辽河坳陷大民屯凹陷沙河街组四段页岩油富集资源潜力评价[J].石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1):8-14. Lu Shuangfang,Chen Guohui,Wang Min,et al.Potential evalution of enriched shale oil resource of Member 4 of the Shahejie Formation in the Damintun Sag,Liaohe Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1):8-14.
[7] 陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J].煤炭学报, 2012, 37(3):438-444. Chen Shangbin, Zhu Yanming, Wang Hongyan, et al.Structure cha-racteristics and accumulation significance of nanopores in Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(3):438-444.
[8] 王香增, 张丽霞, 李宗田, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组陆相页岩孔隙类型划分方案及其油气地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1):1-7. Wang Xiangzeng,Zhang lixia,Li Zongtian, et al.Pore type classification scheme for continental Yanchang shale in Ordos Basin and its geological significance[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1):1-7.
[9] 胡宗全, 杜伟, 彭永民, 等.页岩微观孔隙特征及源-储关系-以川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(6):1001-1008. Hu Zongquan, Du Wei, Peng Yongmin, et al.Microscopic pore characteristics and the source-reservoir relationship of shale —A case study from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations in Southeast Sichuan Basin [J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6):1001-1008.
[10] 张林晔, 李政, 朱日房, 等.济阳坳陷古近系存在页岩气资源的可能性[J].天然气工业, 2008, 28(12):26-29. Zhang Linye, Li Zheng, Zhu Rifang, et al.Resource potential of shale gas in Paleogene in Jiyang Depression [J].Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(12):26-29.
[11] 久凯, 丁文龙, 黄文辉, 等.渤海湾盆地济阳拗陷沙三段页岩气地质条件分析[J].大庆石油学院学报, 2012, 36(2):65-70. Jiu Kai, Ding Wenlong, Huang Wenhui, et al.Analysis of geological condition of the formation of Shahejie shale gas in Jiyang Depression in Bohai Bay Basin [J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2012, 36(2):65-70.
[12] 李政, 王秀红, 朱日房, 等.济阳坳陷沙三下亚段和沙四上亚段页岩油地球化学评价[J].新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(5):510-514. Li Zheng, Wang Xiuhong, Zhu Rifang, et al.Geochemical evaluation of shale oil in Lower Es3 and Upper Es4 in Jiyang Depression [J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(5):510-514.
[13] 刘惠民, 张守鹏, 王朴, 等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段页岩岩石学特征[J].油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6):11-15. Liu Huimin, Zhang Shoupeng, Wang Pu,et al.Lithologic characteristics of Lower Es3 shale in Luojia area, Zhanhua sag [J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(6):11-15.
[14] 李超, 朱筱敏, 朱世发, 等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下段泥页岩储层特征[J].沉积学报, 2015, 33(4):795-808. Li Chao, Zhu Xiaomin, Zhu Shifa, et al.Shale Reservoir characteristics of the Lower 3th Member of Shahejie Formation, Luojia Area, Zhanhua Sag [J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinca, 2015, 33(4):795-808.
[15] 王永诗, 王伟庆, 郝运轻.济阳坳陷沾化凹陷罗家地区古近系沙河街组页岩储集特征分析[J].古地理学报, 2013, 15(5):657-662. Wang Yongshi, Wang Weiqing, Hao Yunqing.Shale reservoir characteristics analysis of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Luojia area of Zhanhua sag, Jiyang Depression [J].Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(5):657-662.
[16] 张磊磊, 陆正元, 王军, 等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙三下亚段页岩油层段微观孔隙结构[J].石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1):80-86. Zhang Leilei, Lu Zhengyuan, Wang Jun, et al.Microscopic pore structure of shale oil reservoirs in the Lower 3^rd Member of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1):80-86.
[17] 袁静.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙四段顶部至沙三段泥质岩裂缝特征及其影响因素[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(4):20-23.
Yuan Jing.Characteristics of fractures in argillaceous rocks of Luojia area in Zhanhua Sag [J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,2003,27(4):20-23.
[18] 刘魁元,孙喜新,李琦,等.沾化凹陷泥质岩储层中裂缝类型及其成因研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(4):12-15.
Liu Kuiyuan,Sun Xixin,Li Qi,et al.Fracture pattern and genesis of mudstone reservoir in Zhanhua Depression [J].Journal of University of Petroleum,China,2004,28(4):12-15.
[19] 周闻达,王莹,鲍征宇,等.等温吸附法在页岩孔隙结构测试中的应用[J].科技通报,2015,31(1):12-18.
Zhou Wenda,Wang Ying,Bao Zhengyu,et al.The application of isotherm adsorption in measuring the shale pore structure[J].Bulletin of Science and Technology,2015,31(1):12-18.
[20] 谢晓永,唐洪明,王春华,等.氮气吸附法和压汞法在测试泥页岩孔径分布中的对比[J].天然气工业,2006,26(12):100-102.
Xie Xiaoyong,Tang Hongming,Wang Chunhua,et al.Contrast of nitrogen adsorption method and mercury porosimetry method in analysis of shales pore size distribution[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(12):100-102.
[21] 田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427.
Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.Determination of organic-rich shale pore features by mercury injection and gas adsorption methods [J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):419-427.
[22] 杨峰,宁正福,张世栋,等.基于氮气吸附实验的页岩孔隙结构表征[J].天然气工业,2013,33(4):135-140.
Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Zhang Shidong,et al.Characterization of pore structures in shales through nitrogen adsorption experiment [J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(4):135-140.
[23] Shuai Qin,Huang Ruicheng,Gao Qiang,et al.Research development of analytical techniques for shale gas [J].Rock and mineral analysis,2012,31(6):931-938.
[24] 张琴,刘畅,梅啸寒,等.页岩气储层微观储集空间研究现状及展望[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(4):666-674.
Zhang Qin,Liu Chang,Mei Xiaohan,et al.Status and prospect of research on microscopic shale gas reservoir space[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(4):666-674.
[25] 郭旭升,李宇平,刘若冰,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):9-16.
Guo Xusheng,Li Yuping,Liu Ruobing,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Shale Play in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin [J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):9-16.

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组富有机质页岩孔隙分类及孔径定量表征

Classification and quantitative characterization of microscopic pores in organic-rich shale of the Shahejie Formation in the Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	党伟, 张金川, 王凤琴, 李沛, 单长安, 王睿婧. 富有机质页岩-水蒸气吸附热力学与动力学特性——以鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系山西组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 173-185.
[2]	薛永安, 王奇, 牛成民, 苗全芸, 刘梦醒, 殷杰. 渤海海域渤中凹陷渤中19-6深层潜山凝析气藏的充注成藏过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 891-902.
[3]	胡安文, 王德英, 于海波, 江涛, 孙哲. 渤海湾盆地渤中19-6凝析气田天然气成因及油气成因关系判识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 903-912, 984.
[4]	赵贤正, 曾溅辉, 韩国猛, 冯森, 石倩茹, 刘亚洲, 付东立, 王亚奴, 宗杰, 卢异. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷板桥凹陷深层低渗透(致密)砂岩气藏充注特征及成藏过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 913-927.
[5]	刘华, 李君, 冯月琳, 郝雪峰, 林红梅, 袁飞飞. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷沙河街组三段剩余压力梯度与油气分布关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1083-1091.
[6]	李士祥, 牛小兵, 柳广弟, 李继宏, 孙明亮, 游富粮, 何昊楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段页岩油形成富集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 719-729.
[7]	邓远, 陈世悦, 蒲秀刚, 鄢继华, 陈佳. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段细粒沉积岩形成机理与环境演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 811-823, 890.
[8]	郭龙龙, 陈洪德, 黄晓波, 王峻, 冯冲. 富长石粗碎屑砂岩孔隙演化定量分析——以渤海湾盆地辽东凸起北段沙河街组二段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 874-883.
[9]	王兆生, 董少群, 孟宁宁, 刘道杰, 高微. 渤海湾盆地高尚堡深层低渗透断块油藏缝网系统及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 534-542,626.
[10]	蒋有录, 苏圣民, 刘华, 王永诗, 崔小君. 渤海湾盆地古近系油气富集差异性及主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 248-258.
[11]	杨海风, 徐长贵, 牛成民, 钱赓, 李正宇, 高雁飞, 黄振. 渤海湾盆地黄河口凹陷新近系油气富集模式与成藏主控因素定量评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 259-269.
[12]	沈臻欢, 于炳松, 白辰阳, 韩舒筠, 杨志辉, 费志斌. 长石溶解-沉淀的热力学和动力学特征及其对储层物性的影响——以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷沙三段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 270-283.
[13]	高博乐, 潘仁芳, 金吉能, 张鉴, 赵圣贤, 鄢杰. 富有机质页岩微裂缝地震响应特征——以长宁示范区宁201井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 407-415.
[14]	何涛华, 李文浩, 谭昭昭, 王亚, 张文博, 章新文. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组页岩油富集机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1259-1269.
[15]	张鹏飞, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 薛海涛, 李文镖, 张宇, 王思远, 冯文俊. 湖相页岩油有利甜点区优选方法及应用——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙河街组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1339-1350.