蒸汽驱及化学辅助蒸汽驱提高稠油采收率实验

doi:10.11743/ogg20170519

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1000-1004.doi: 10.11743/ogg20170519

• 技术方法 • 上一篇

蒸汽驱及化学辅助蒸汽驱提高稠油采收率实验

张淑霞¹, 刘帆², 沐宝泉¹

1. 中国石油大学(华东) 化学工程学院, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 中国石油辽河油田公司特种油开发公司地质研究所, 辽宁盘锦 124000

收稿日期:2017-02-14 修回日期:2017-07-10 出版日期:2017-10-28 发布日期:2017-11-10
作者简介:张淑霞(1980-),女,硕士、工程师,化学工程与工艺。E-mail:zshuxia823@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41672125，41302103）。

An experimental study on enhanced heavy oil recovery by steam flooding and chemical assisted steam flooding

Zhang Shuxia¹, Liu Fan², Mu Baoquan¹

1. China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
2. Institute of Geology of Heavy Oil Company, PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin, Liaoning 124000, China

Received:2017-02-14 Revised:2017-07-10 Online:2017-10-28 Published:2017-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 蒸汽驱及化学辅助蒸汽驱是提高稠油油藏采收率的重要方法。为了对比两种开发方式提高稠油采收率的效果，以新疆塔河油田稠油为研究对象，采用蒸汽驱油模拟实验装置，对比评价了不同开发方式下注汽参数对提高稠油采收率的影响。实验结果表明，蒸汽驱提高稠油采收率与注汽温度正相关，对注入压力不敏感；与蒸汽驱相比，加入一定助剂正戊烷、正己烷、正庚烷，对提高稠油采收率有明显效果；同时发现，蒸汽驱稠油采收率随着注汽压力的增加而趋于降低，化学辅助蒸汽驱稠油采收率随着注汽压力的增大而有所增加。

关键词: 辅助剂, 蒸汽驱油, 辅助蒸汽驱油, 采收率, 稠油

Abstract: Steam flooding and chemical assisted steam flooding are important EOR methods for heavy oil reservoirs.In order to compare the two methods,we performed simulated steam flooding experiments on samples from Tahe heavy oil reservoirs in Xinjiang,China,to assess their EOR effects under different steam injection parameters.The results show that,during steam flooding,the oil recovery is positively correlated to injection temperature but insensitive to injection pressure,and that adding some additives,such as n-pentane,n-hexane,and n-heptane,can greatly improve the recovery.It is also noteworthy that the recovery factor of heavy oil tends to lower along with increasing injection pressure during steam flooding,while it increases to some extent along with increasing injection pressure during chemical assisted steam flooding.

Key words: additive, steam flooding, assisted steam flooding, recovery factor, heavy oil

中图分类号:

TE345

张淑霞,刘帆,沐宝泉. 蒸汽驱及化学辅助蒸汽驱提高稠油采收率实验[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5): 1000-1004. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170519 Zhang Shuxia,Liu Fan,Mu Baoquan. An experimental study on enhanced heavy oil recovery by steam flooding and chemical assisted steam flooding[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5): 1000-1004. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170519

参考文献

[1] 沈平平.热力采油提高采收率技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006. Shen Pingping.Enhanced oil recovery by thermal recovery[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2006.
[2] 计秉玉.国内外油田提高采收率技术进展与展望[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(1):111-117. Ji Bingyu.Progress and prospects of enhanced oil recovery technologies at home and abroad[J].Oil&Gas geology,2012,33(1):111-117.
[3] 计秉玉,王友启,聂俊,等.中国石化提高采收率技术研究进展与应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(4):572-576. Ji Bingyu,Wang Yoyqi,Nie Jun,et al.Research progress and application of EOR techniques in SINOPEC[J].Oil & Gas geology,2016,37(4):572-576.
[4] 李阳.塔河油田碳酸盐岩峰洞型油藏开发理论及方法[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):115-121. Li Yang.The eheory and method for development of carbonate fractured-cavity reservoirs in Tahe oilgield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):115-121.
[5] Butler R M,Mokrys I J.Recovery of heavy oils using vaporized hydrocarbon solvents:further development of the vapex process[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2012,32(6).
[6] Lu D.Effect of vapour-liquid phase behaviour of steam-light hydrocarbon systems on assisted gravity drainage process for bitumen recove-ry[J].Fuel,2012,95(1):159-168.
[7] 孙建芳.稠油油藏表面活性剂辅助蒸汽驱适应性评价研究[J].油田化学,2012,29(1):60-64. Sun Jianfang.Adaptability evaluation of surfactant assisted steam flooding for heavy oil reservoir[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2012,29(1):60-64.
[8] 王步娥,郑惠光.改善稠油渗流流变性的试验[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(3):370-373. Wang Bue,Zheng Huiguang.Experimental study of improving rheological characteristics of heavy oil's percolation flow[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(3):370-373.
[9] 王大为,周耐强,牟凯.稠油热采技术现状及发展趋势[J].西部探矿工程,2008,20(12):129-131. Wang Dawei,Zhou Naiqiang,Mou Kai.Present situation and development trend of heavy oil thermal recovery technology[J].West-China Exploration Engineering,2008,20(12):129-131.
[10] 孙建芳,刘东,李丽,等.孤岛油田驱油剂辅助蒸汽驱对稠油性质的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(3):55-57. Sun Jianfang,Liu Dong,Li Li et al.Study on interaction of displacement agent assisted steam flooding for Gudao viscouscrude oil.PGRE,2014,21(3):55-57.
[11] 王顺华.稠油油藏氮气泡沫辅助蒸汽驱驱油效率实验及参数优化[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(3):83-85. Wang Shunhua.Oil sweeping efficiency experiment and parameter optimization of nitrogen foam-assistedsteam flooding in heavy oil reservoir.PGRE,2013,20(3):83-85.
[12] 檀德库.用于蒸汽驱油藏的高温产CO₂气复合驱油剂[J].油田化学,2008,25(3):272-275. Tan Deku.High Temperature Gaseous CO₂ Producing Combinational FloodingFluid for Use in Steam Driving Oil Reservoirs[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2008,25(3):272-275.
[13] 唐亮.稠油油藏化学复合蒸汽驱技术室内研究[J].油田化学,2014,31(1):65-68. Tang Liang.Laboratory study of chemical combination steam flooding for heavy oil reservoir[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2014,31(1):65-68.
[14] 孙建芳.稠油油藏表面活性剂辅助蒸汽驱适应性评价研究[J].油田化学,2012,29(1):60-64. Sun Jianfang. Adaptability evaluation of surfactant assisted steamflooding for heavy oil reservoir[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2012,29(1):60-64.
[15] 刘伟,陈祖华.苏北复杂断块小型油藏CO₂驱油先导性试验研究[J].石油天然气学报,2008,30(2):147-149. Liu Wei,Chen Zhuhua. Pilot test on CO₂ flooding in complex andfault block small reservoirs of North Jiangsu Oilfield[J].Journal ofOil and Gas Technology,2008, 30(2):147-149.

蒸汽驱及化学辅助蒸汽驱提高稠油采收率实验

An experimental study on enhanced heavy oil recovery by steam flooding and chemical assisted steam flooding

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	计秉玉, 王友启, 张莉. 基于地质储量结构变化的采收率演变趋势[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1257-1262.
[2]	孙焕泉. 薄储层超稠油热化学复合采油方法与技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1100-1106.
[3]	王希贤. EBANO油田裂缝-孔隙型灰岩稠油油藏特征及油气富集规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 416-422.
[4]	康志江, 李阳, 计秉玉, 张允. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏提高采收率关键技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 434-441.
[5]	赵清民, 伦增珉, 章晓庆, 郎东江, 王海涛. 页岩油注CO₂动用机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1333-1338.
[6]	汤国民, 王飞龙, 王清斌, 万琳, 燕歌. 渤海海域莱州湾凹陷高硫稠油成因及其成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 284-293.
[7]	胡渤. 高温高盐油藏化学驱数值模拟技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1305-1310.
[8]	吴忠维, 崔传智, 杨勇, 黄迎松, 刘志宏. 高含水期大孔道渗流特征及定量描述方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 839-844.
[9]	王勃, 姚红星, 王红娜, 赵洋, 李梦溪, 胡秋嘉, 樊梅荣, 杨春莉. 沁水盆地成庄区块煤层气成藏优势及富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 366-372.
[10]	付金刚, 杜殿发, 郑洋, 巴忠臣, 李冬冬. 超稠油油藏蒸汽驱动态预测模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(1): 192-197.
[11]	鲁新便, 荣元帅, 李小波, 吴锋. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏注采井网构建及开发意义——以塔河油田为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(4): 658-664.
[12]	史云清, 贾英, 潘伟义, 严谨, 黄磊. 低渗致密气藏注超临界CO₂驱替机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 610-616.
[13]	孙晓飞, 张艳玉, 段学苇, 赵春燕, 李星民. 稠油注气二次泡沫油形成机理及数值模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(2): 391-399.
[14]	王冰洁, 徐长贵, 吴奎, 彭靖淞, 刘丰. 渤海海域辽西凹陷陡坡带LX构造特稠油藏内部油品品质分布及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 79-89.
[15]	薛衡, 赵立强, 刘平礼, 崔明月, 蒋卫东, 梁冲, 叶颉枭, 徐彬. 碳酸盐岩多尺度三维酸蚀蚓孔立体延伸动态模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(5): 792-797.