惠民凹陷临南洼陷古近系沙河街组超压成因机制及分布预测

doi:10.11743/ogg20180402

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 641-652.doi: 10.11743/ogg20180402

惠民凹陷临南洼陷古近系沙河街组超压成因机制及分布预测

王冰¹, 张立宽², 李超², 陈开远¹, 宋国奇³, 罗红梅³

1. 中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所油气资源研究重点实验室, 北京 100029;
3. 中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2018-04-24 修回日期:2018-06-18 出版日期:2018-08-28 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 张立宽(1979-),男,博士、副研究员,油气成藏动力学。E-mail:zhanglikuan@iggcas.ac.com E-mail:zhanglikuan@iggcas.ac.com
第一作者简介:王冰(1993-),男,硕士研究生,异常流体压力与油气成藏机理。E-mail:503041865@qq.com。
基金项目:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（A类）（XDA14010202）；国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05008-004）。

Mechanism and distribution prediction of abnormal high pressure of the Paleocene Shahejie Formation in Linnan Sag,Huimin Depression

Wang Bing¹, Zhang Likuan², Li Chao², Chen Kaiyuan¹, Song Guoqi³, Luo Hongmei³

1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource Research, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
3. Shengli Oilfield Exploration and Development Research Institute, SINOPEC, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

Received:2018-04-24 Revised:2018-06-18 Online:2018-08-28 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海湾盆地惠民凹陷临南洼陷古近系沙河街组油气勘探过程中钻遇不同规模的异常高压，超压成因的不确定性限制了压力预测的可靠性。利用临南洼陷丰富的钻杆测试（DST）压力数据、泥浆密度和测井资料，细致分析了渗透性砂岩流体压力发育特征和超压段泥岩测井响应，依据常压和超压段声波速度、密度测井数据建立判识超压成因的有效应力-测井响应图版，综合讨论了沙河街组超压的成因机制，并预测了异常高压的空间分布。研究发现，临南洼陷沙河街组砂岩储层超压主要发育在3 000 m以深的沙三段（Es³）和沙四段（Es⁴），最高过剩压力分别为23.82 MPa和14.04 MPa；超压段泥岩测井响应表现为偏离正常压实趋势的异常高声波时差、低密度和高中子孔隙度，具有典型的欠压实特征。沙河街组储层超压最主要的成因是相邻泥岩机械压实不平衡作用形成超压的传递，表现为大多数的超压数据均符合加载曲线趋势，只有深洼陷区（埋深为4 000~4 300 m）的超压呈现出卸载特征，可能存在由于富有机质泥岩深埋达到较高成熟度（R_o为0.90%~1.05%）引起的生烃增压贡献。利用平衡深度法计算的流体压力与DST压力数据吻合度高，印证了沙河街组超压主要来自泥岩不均衡压实作用的认识，沙三段过剩压力呈现围绕着洼陷中心呈环状分布，向周围的斜坡区和隆起带逐渐减小为常压。研究成果可以为临南洼陷钻前压力评估提供有价值的指导和借鉴。

关键词: 异常高压, 测井响应, 成因判识, 压实不均衡, 储层, 沙河街组, 临南洼陷, 惠民凹陷

Abstract: In the process of oil and gas exploration,various abnormal high pressures were tested in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Linnan Sag,Huimin Depression.The uncertainty of overpressure origin would reduce the reliability of pressure prediction.This study elaborated both the characteristics of fluid pressure in porous sandstones and the well log responses of overpressured mudstones through such data as drill stem tests (DSTs),mud density and logging. Besides,based on acoustic and density logs in normal and abnormal high pressured intervals,we established an effective stress-log response plot to deduce the origin of overpressure in the Shahejie Formation,and predicted the distribution of abnormal pressures in the study area.The results show that overpressures in the sandstone reservoirs of the Shahejie Formation mainly occur in the 3^rd (Es³) and 4^th (Es⁴)members of the formation with a depth over 3 000 m,and their maximum excessive pressures are 23.82 MPa and 14.04 MPa,respectively.The logging responses of overpressured mudstones typify undercompaction,usually exhibiting abnormally high interval transit time,abnormally low density,and high neutron poro-sity.Overpressures in the formation mainly originate from overpressure transmission among neighboring mudstones induced by disequilibrium compaction.Most overpressure data points follow the trend of loading curves,and only the overpressure data points in local deep depression zones(with burial depth being more than 4 000-4 300 m)follow unloading curves, possibly due to the pressure increase with hydrocarbon generation resulting from a higher maturity (R_o is within 0.9%-1.05%)of the deeply buried organic-rich mudstones.Besides,fluid pressures calculated with equilibrium depth method match well with the pressure data obtained from DSTs. This verifies the conclusion that the abnormal high pressures in the formation are fundamentally caused by disequilibrium compaction. The excessive pressures of the Es³ show a ring-like distribution surrounding the core of the sag and progressively lower towards and become normal in its neighboring slopes and uplifts. These research results will be of valuable guidance for pre-drilling pressure assessment in Linnan Sag.

Key words: abnormal high pressure, logging response, origin identification, disequilibrium compaction, reservioir, Shahejie Formation, Linnan Sag, Huimin Depression

中图分类号:

122.2

王冰,张立宽,李超,等. 惠民凹陷临南洼陷古近系沙河街组超压成因机制及分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 641-652. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180402 Wang Bing,Zhang Likuan,Li Chao,et al. Mechanism and distribution prediction of abnormal high pressure of the Paleocene Shahejie Formation in Linnan Sag,Huimin Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 641-652. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180402

参考文献

[1] 罗晓容,杨计海,王振峰.盆地内渗透性地层超压形成机制及钻前压力预测[J].地质论评,2000,46(1):22-31. Luo Xiaorong,YangJihai,Wang Zhenfeng.The overpressuring mechanisms in aquifers and pressure prediction in basins[J].Geological Review,2000,46(1):22-31.
[2] Zhang J C.Pore pressure prediction from well logs:methods,modifications,and new approaches[J].Earth Science Reviews,2011,108(1-2):50-63.
[3] Tingay M R P,Morley C K,Laird A,et al.Evidence for overpressure generation by kerogen-to-gas maturation in the Northern Malay Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(4):639-672
[4] 吴海生,郑孟林,何文军,等.准噶尔盆地腹部地层压力异常特征与控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(6):1135-1146. Wu Haisheng,Zheng Menglin,He Wenjun,et al.Formation pressure anomalies and controlling factors in central Juggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(6):1135-1146.
[5] Webster M,O'Connor S,Pindar B,et al.Overpressures in the Tara-naki Basin:Distribution,causes,and implications for exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(3):339-370.
[6] 郭小文,刘可禹,宋岩,等.库车坳陷克拉2气田油气充注和超压对储层孔隙的影响[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(6):935-943. Guo Xiaowen,Liu Keyu,Song Yan,et al.Influences of hydrocarbon charging and overpressure on reservoir porosity in Kela-2 gas field of the Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin.[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(6):935-943.
[7] Luo X R,Vasseur G.Overpressure dissipation mechanisms in sedimentary sections consisting of alternating mud-sand layers[J].Marine & Petroleum Geology,2016,78:883-894.
[8] Luo X R,Vasseur G.Geopressuring mechanism of organic matter cracking:numerical modeling[J].AAPG Bulletin,1996,80(6):856-874.
[9] Osborne M J,and Swarbrick R E.Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins; a reevaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(6):1023-1041.
[10] Tingay M R.P,Hillis R R,Swarbrick R E,et al.Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province,Brunei[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(1):51-74.
[11] Shi Y L,Wang C Y.Pore pressure generation in sedimentary basins:overloading versus aquathermal[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth,1986,91(B2):2153-2162.
[12] Luo X R,Vasseur G.Contributions of compaction and aquathermal pressuring to geopressure and the influence of environmental conditions[J].AAPG Bulletin,1992,76(10):1550-1559.
[13] Bowers G L.Pore pressure estimation from velocity data:accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences & Geomech Anics Abstracts,1995,31(6):276-276.
[14] Tingay M R P,Hillis R R,Swarbrick R E,et al.‘Vertically transferred’ overpressures in Brunei:evidence for new mechanism for the formation of high-magnitude overpressure[J].Geology,2007,35(11):1023-1026.
[15] Swarbrick R E.Review of pore-pressure prediction challenges in high-temperature areas[J].The Leading Edge,2012,31(11):1288-1294.
[16] Fan C Y,Wang Z L,Wang A G,et al.Identification and calculation of transfer overpressure in the northern Qaidam Basin,northwest China[J].AAPG Bulletin,2016,100(1):23-39.
[17] 邱隆伟,师政,付大巍,等.临南洼陷沙三段孔隙度控制因素分析与定量模型[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(5):1321-1331. Qiu Longwei,Shi Zheng,Fu Dawei,et al.Controlling factors analysis and quantitative model of shahejie 3rd sandstone porosity in linnan sag[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2016,46(5):1321-1331.
[18] 朱志强,曾溅辉,王建君.惠民凹陷临南洼陷油气运移特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(04):33-38+196 Zhu Zhiqiang,Zeng Jianhui,Wang Jianjun.Hydrocarbon migration characteristics of Linnan Sag in HuiminDepression[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2010,32(04):33-38+196.
[19] 刘晓峰.转换伸展型盆地异常压力的分布与成因机制分析:以惠民凹陷临南洼陷为例[J].地质科技情报,2011,30(5):1-4. Liu Xiaofeng.Distribution and origin of the abnormal pressure in a transtensional basin:a case study from linan subsag,humin sag[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2011,30(5):1-4.
[20] 李纯泉,刘惠民.临南洼陷沙三段异常地层压力及其演化特征[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2013,38(01):105-111. Li Chunquan,Liu Huimin.Abnormal formation pressure and its evolution features of the third member,Shahejie Formation,Linnan Sag[J].Earth Science,2013,38(1):105-111.
[21] 王永诗,邱贻博.济阳坳陷超压结构差异性及其控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(3):430-437. Wang Yongshi,Qiu Yibo.Overpressure structure dissimilarity and its controlling factors in the Jiyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(3):430-437.
[22] 何瑞武.临南洼陷构造、沉积演化及油气成藏研究[D].广东广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所),2005. He Ruiwu.The research on structural,sedimentary evolution and reservoir formation of LinnanSag[D].Guangzhou:Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry(CAS),2005.
[23] 刘中云.临南洼陷油气成藏动力学系统研究[D].广东广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所),2003. Liu Zhongyun.Dynamic system of petroleum accumulation in the Linnandepression[D].Guangzhou Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry),2003.
[24] 郭显令,熊敏,周秦,等.烃源岩生排烃动力学研究——以惠民凹陷临南洼陷沙河街组烃源岩为例[J].沉积学报,2009,27(4):723-731. Guo Xianling,Xiong Min,Zhouqin,et al.petroleum generation and explosion kinetics:a case study of the shahejie formation source rocks from Linnan Sag of HuiminDepression[J].Acta Sedimentological Sinica,2009,27(4):723-731.
[25] Nelson P H,Nicholas J G,Ronald M D.Underpressure in mesozoic and paleozoic rock units in the midcontinent of the united states[J].AAPG Bulletin,2015,99(10):1861-1892.
[26] Bowers G L.Detecting high overpressure[J].The Leading Edge,2002,21(2):174-177.
[27] 赵靖舟,李军,徐泽阳.沉积盆地超压成因研究进展[J].石油学报,2017,38(09):973-998. Zhao Jingzhou,Li Jun,Xu Zeyang.Advances in the origin of overpressures in sedimentary basins[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(9):973-998.
[28] Carcione J M,Helle H B,Pham N H,et al.Pore pressure estimation in reservoir rocks from seismic reflection data[J].Geophysics,2003,68(5):1569-1579.
[29] Winthaegen P L A,Verweij J M.Estimating regional pore pressure distribution using 3D seismicvelocities in the Dutch Central North Sea Graben[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2003,78-79(3):203-207.
[30] Magara K.Compaction and fluid migration[M].Amsterdam-Oxford-New York:Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,1978:1-9.
[31] 陈荷立,罗晓容.泥岩压实曲线研究与油气运移条件分析[J].石油与天然气地质,1987,8(3):233-242. Chen Heli,LuoXiaorong.Study of the shale compaction curve and analysis of the condition of oil/gas migration[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1987,8(3):233-242.
[32] 陈庆春.临南洼陷油藏地球化学研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2008,15-52. Chen Qingchun.Research of oil reservoir geochemistry in LinnanSag[M].Beijing:Geological Press,2008,15-52.

惠民凹陷临南洼陷古近系沙河街组超压成因机制及分布预测

Mechanism and distribution prediction of abnormal high pressure of the Paleocene Shahejie Formation in Linnan Sag,Huimin Depression

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘惠民, 包友书, 黎茂稳, 李政, 吴连波, 朱日房, 王大洋, 王鑫. 页岩油富集可动性地球化学评价参数探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 622-636.
[2]	韩载华, 刘华, 赵兰全, 刘景东, 尹丽娟, 李磊. 渤海湾盆地临南洼陷古近系沙河街组源-储组合类型与致密（低渗）砂岩油差异富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 722-738.
[3]	李宁, 李瑞磊, 苗贺, 曹开芳, 田军. 松辽盆地深层中-基性火山岩有利相带及储层“甜点”逐级识别[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 801-815.
[4]	丁文龙, 李云涛, 韩俊, 黄诚, 王来源, 孟庆修. 碳酸盐岩储层高精度构造应力场模拟与裂缝多参数分布预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 827-851.
[5]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[6]	高和群, 高玉巧, 何希鹏, 聂军. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层岩石力学特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 502-515.
[7]	黎瑞, 杨娇, 柴愈坤, 王华, 戴建文, 邓永辉, 孙爽, 马肖琳, 田腾飞. 大角度波浪控制下的浪成砂坝新模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 530-541.
[8]	曾联波, 巩磊, 宿晓岑, 毛哲. 深层-超深层致密储层天然裂缝分布特征及发育规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 1-14.
[9]	雷文智, 陈冬霞, 王永诗, 巩建强, 邱贻博, 王翘楚, 成铭, 蔡晨阳. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东部深层砂砾岩多类型油气藏成藏机理及模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 113-129.
[10]	曹江骏, 王继平, 张道锋, 王龙, 李笑天, 李娅, 张园园, 夏辉, 于占海. 深层致密砂岩储层成岩演化对含气性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 169-184.
[11]	张益, 张斌, 刘帮华, 柳洁, 魏千盛, 张歧, 陆红军, 朱鹏宇, 王瑞. 页岩气储层吸附渗流研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 256-280.
[12]	远光辉, 彭光荣, 张丽丽, 孙辉, 陈淑慧, 刘浩, 赵晓阳. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系深层高变温背景下储层成岩作用与低渗致密化机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 44-64.
[13]	王冠民, 庞小军, 黄晓波, 张雪芳, 潘凯. 渤海海域辽中凹陷南部古近系东营组三段重力流砂岩优质储层特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 81-95.
[14]	杨小艺, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 李国雄, 冯德浩, 杨韬政, 何志斌, 苏加佳. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷西南洼古近系东营组超压分布特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 96-112.
[15]	米立军, 徐建永, 李威. 渤海海域页岩油资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1366-1377.