四川盆地湖相页岩气源-储配置类型及评价

doi:10.11743/ogg20180605

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 四川盆地湖相页岩气勘探已在建南、涪陵和元坝地区中-下侏罗统获得良好的页岩气显示和工业气流，展示了良好的勘探前景。与海相富有机质页岩相比，湖相泥页岩具有沉积相变快、岩相类型多样（互层、夹层）、有机质丰度较低、储集非均质性强和源-储配置复杂的特点。依据不同的岩相类型，将湖相泥页岩划分为源夹储、源储互层2大类4亚类源-储配置类型。采用有机地化、微观储渗实验及纳米CT等方法技术，在对每一种源-储配置类型进行生烃、储集和可压性特征研究的基础上，将不同的源-储类型作为独立的“源储体”单元，创建了与湖相多类型源-储配置特征相适应的源储体系数进行评价。评价结果表明，碳酸盐湖泊沉积的页岩与介屑灰岩互层型具有良好页岩气生烃、储集、渗透和可压裂配置条件，有利于页岩气的形成和改造，是湖相最有利的源-储配置类型；页岩夹介壳灰岩源-储配置型具有良好页岩气生烃和储集条件，但渗透性和可压性较差，为较有利源-储配置类型，上述两种类型可作为湖相页岩气开发的优选层段。

关键词: 湖相, 岩相, 源-储配置类型, 源储体系数, 页岩气, 四川盆地

Abstract: Exploration of the lacustrine shale gas in Sichuan Basin has discovered strong gas shows and/or commercial gas flow in the Middle and Lower Jurassic of Jiannan,Fuling,and Yuanba areas,east of Sichuan,which are prospective areas for petroleum exploration.Compared with organic-rich marine shale,the lacustrine shale is characterized by fast change of sedimentary facies,diversity of lithofacies(interbed and alternating beds),low abundance of organic matters,strong reservoir heterogeneity and complex source-reservoir configuration.According to the types of lithofacies,the lacustrine shale can be divided into two types of source-reservoir configuration,namely the type of “reservoir interbedded within source rocks” configuration and the type of “source-reservoir alternating” configuration,which can be further subdivided into four subtypes.Through such methods as organic geochemistry,microscopic storage and permeability experiments and nano CT,we stu-died the characteristics of hydrocarbon generation,storage capacity and fracturability for each type of source-reservoir configurations,and established the evaluation model for source-reservoir coefficients conformable to the characteristics of the lacustrine source-reservoir configurations of various types,with each type as an independent “source-reservoir” unit.The evaluation results show that the source-reservoir configuration of the alternating shale and shell limestone deposited in a carbonate lake has favorable conditions for hydrocarbon generation,shale gas storage,permeability and fracturability,beneficial to the formation and stimulation of shale gas reservoirs,thus functions as the most favorable type of source-reservoir configuration of the lacustrine facies.In comparison,the source-reservoir configuration with shell limestone interbedded within shale has favorable hydrocarbon generation and reservoir conditions,but poor permeability and fracturability,thus is fair in quality.The above two types can be taken as the preferred layer for the development of lacustrine shale gas.

Key words: lacustrine facies, lithofacies, source-reservoir configuration type, source-reservoir coefficient, shale gas, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

朱彤,胡宗全,刘忠宝,等. 四川盆地湖相页岩气源-储配置类型及评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1146-1153. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180605 Zhu Tong,Hu Zongquan,Liu Zhongbao,et al. Types and evaluation of the source-reservoir configuration of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6): 1146-1153. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180605

参考文献

[1] 张金川,姜生玲,唐玄,等.我国页岩气富集类型及资源特点[J].天然气工业,2009,29(12):109-114. Zhang Jinchuan,Jiang Shengling,Tang Xuan,et al.Accumulation types and resources characteristics of shale gas in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(12):109-114.
[2] 张金川,聂海宽,徐波,等.四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件[J].天然气工业,2008,28(2):151-156. Zhang Jinchuan,Nie Haikuan,Xu Bo,et al.Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(2):151-156.
[3] 何发岐,朱彤.陆相页岩气突破和建产的有利目标-以四川盆地下侏罗统为例[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(3):246-251. He Faqi,Zhu Tong.Favorable targets of breakthrough and built up of shale gas in continental facies in Lower Jurassic,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(3):246-251.
[4] 郭旭升,胡东风,李宇平,等.海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考:以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):18-28. Guo Xusheng,Hu Dongfeng,LI Yuping,et al.Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas:A case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Daanzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):18-28.
[5] 周德华,焦方正,郭旭升,等.川东南涪陵地区下侏罗统页岩油气地质特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):450-454. Zhou Dehua,Jiao Fangzheng,Guo Xusheng,et al.Geological features of the Lower Jurassic shale gas play in Fuling area,the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(4):450-454.
[6] 郑和荣,高波,彭勇民,等.中上扬子地区下志留统沉积演化与页岩气勘探方向[J].古地理学报.2013,5(5):646-656. Zheng Herong,Gao Bo,Peng Yongmin,et a1.Sedimentary evolution and shale gas exploration direction of the Lower Silurian in Middle-Upper Yangtze area[J],2013,15(5):646-656.
[7] 何治亮,聂海宽,张钰莹.四川盆地及其周缘奥陶系五峰组志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素分析[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):8-17. He Zhiliang,NieHaikuan,Zhang Yuying.The main factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng FormationSilurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):8-17.
[8] 朱彤,包书景,王烽.四川盆地陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发前景[J].天然气工业,2012,32(9):1-6. Zhu Tong,Bao Shujing,Wang Feng.The prospect of exploration and production and forming condition of shale gas inland facies,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(9):1-6.
[9] 朱彤,龙胜祥,王烽,等.四川盆地湖相泥页岩沉积模式及岩石相类型[J].天然气工业,2016,6(8):22-28 Zhu Tong,Long Shengxiang,Wang Feng,et a1.Sedimentary models and lithofacies types of lacustrine mud shale in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,6(8):22-28.
[10] 郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学[J],沉积学报,1998,16(2):42-49. Zheng Rongcai.High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of Daanzhai Formation,Lower Jurassic in Sichuan Basin[J],Act a Sedimentologicl Sinica,1998,16(2):42-49.
[11] 郑荣才,何龙,梁西文,等.川东地区下侏罗统大安寨段页岩气(油)成藏条件[J].天然气工业,2013,33(12):30-40. Zheng Rongcai,He Long,LiangWenxi,et a1.Forming conditions of shale gas(oil)plays in the Lower Jurassic Daanzhai member in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(12):30-40.
[12] 姜振学,唐相路,李卓,等.川东南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构全孔径表征及其对含气性的控制[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):126-134. Jiang Zhenxue,Tang Xianglu,Li Zhuo,et a1.The whole aperture pore structure characteristics and its effect on gas content of the Longmaxi Formation shale in the southeastern Sichuan basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):126-134.
[13] 杨超,张金川,唐玄.鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩微观孔隙类型及对页岩气储渗的影响[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):299-304. Yang Chao,Zhang Jinchuan,Tang Xuan.microscopic pore types and its impact on the storage and permeability of continental shale gas,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):299-304.
[14] 朱彤,王烽,俞凌杰,等.四川盆地页岩气富集控制因素及类型[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(3):399-407. Zhu Tong,Wang Feng,Yu LingJie,et a1.Controlling factors and types of shale gas enrichment in the Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology.2016,37(3):399-407.
[15] 李新景,胡素云,程克明.北美裂缝性页岩气勘探开发的启示[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(4):392-400. Li Xinjing,Hu Suyun,Cheng Keming.Suggestions from the development of fractured shale gas in North America[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(4):392-400.
[16] Loucks R G,Ruppel S C.Mississippian Barnett Shale:Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):523-533.
[17] Hentz T F,Ruppel S C.Regional stratigraphic and rock characteristics of Eagle Ford Shale in its play area:Maverick Basin to east Texas Basin[R].AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition,Houston,Texas,USA,2011,April 10-13.
[18] 胡宗全,杜伟,彭勇民,等.页岩微观孔隙特征及源-储关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(6):1001-1008. Hu Zongquan,Du Wei,Peng Yongmin,et al.Microscopic pore characteristics and the source-reservoir relationship of shale:A case study from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations in Southeast Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(6):1001-1008.
[19] Stephen E.Laubach,Jon E.Olson,Michael R.Gro.Mechanical and fracture stratigraphy[J] AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(11):1413-1426.
[20] 黎从军.川北柏垭地区大安寨一亚段储渗体特征及油气分布[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):81-83. Li Congjun.oil gas prediction and characteristics of reservoir bodies for Daanzhai-1 Submember in Baiya of North Sichuan[J].Oil & Gas Geology.2002,23(1):81-83.
[21] 朱彤,叶军.川西坳陷致密碎屑岩气藏类型划分及特征[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(6):537-546. Zhu Tong,Ye Jun.Types and characteristics of tight clastic rock gas pools in the west Sichuan Depression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment.2004,26(6):537-546.