古地貌恢复及其对三角洲前缘沉积砂体的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地庆阳气田二叠系山西组13亚段为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210511

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

盆地内的微古地貌是控制沉积砂体的重要因素，决定着储集砂体的发育位置及分布规模。基于三维地震资料，结合钻井数据，运用残余厚度法与沉积学综合分析相结合的方法，通过残余厚度求取、去压实校正及古流向分析，恢复鄂尔多斯盆地庆阳气田二叠系山西组1³亚段（山1³亚段）沉积期的微古地貌，分析微古地貌对三角洲前缘砂体的控制作用，进而预测山1³亚段的有利砂体的分布规律，指导井位部署。研究表明：山1³期研究区西部和南部为地貌高地，东北部为低洼区，中部为缓坡过渡带；沉积期的古流向整体呈南西-北东向，自南部高地发育的3~4支分支河道在研究区中北部汇聚，形成叠合砂带；基于预测的山1³亚段砂体展布规律开展井位部署后，直井钻遇砂岩的平均厚度增加0.6m，水平井砂岩钻遇率提高20%，进一步证实了基于古地貌恢复预测砂体方法的可靠性。该方法对庆阳气田其他区块的天然气井位部署和类似地质条件致密气的开发具有借鉴和指导意义。

关键词: 三维地震, 残余厚度法, 古地貌, 去压实校正, 沉积砂体, 致密气, 庆阳气田, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract:

Micro-paleogeomorphology within basin, a key factor controlling the deposition of sand bodies, determines the development scale and position of reservoir sand bodies.In the study, an integration of 3D seismic and log data is applied to the restoration of micro-paleogeomorphology during the Shan 1³ sub-member deposition in the Permian Shanxi Formation in Qingyang gas field, Ordos Basin, by considering the residual stratum thickness, decompression correction and paleo-current direction.Furthermore, the study analyzes the effect of micro-paleogeomorphology on delta-front sand body deposition, which in turn serves to predict the distribution pattern of favorable sand bodies and guide well emplacement therein.The results show that during the Shan 1³ depositional period, the western and southern parts of the study area are topographical highs, the northeast is the bottom land, and the central area is a transitional slope zone; the paleo-current during the depositional period trends mainly SW-NE, and the No.3 to 4 distributary channels sourced from the southern topographical highs converge in the central and northern parts, forming a zone of superimposed sand bodies; with the emplacement of wells in line with the predicted distribution pattern of Shan 1³ sand bodies, the average sandstone thickness penetrated by vertical wells increases by 0.6 m, and the rate of sandstone encountering in drilling of horizontal wells increases by 20%, further suggesting the reliability of paleogeomorphology restoration-based sand body prediction.The method proposed in the study can be of referential and guiding significance to the emplacement of wells in other blocks of Qingyang gas field and the development of tight gas under similar geological conditions.

Key words: 3D seismic data, residual stratum thickness calculation, paleogeomorphology, decompression correction, sendimentary sand body, tight gas, Qingyang gas field, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

李进步,王继平,王龙,等. 古地貌恢复及其对三角洲前缘沉积砂体的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地庆阳气田二叠系山西组1³亚段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1136-1145, 1158. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210511 Jinbu Li,Jiping Wang,Long Wang,et al. Paleogeomorphologic restoration and its controlling effect on deposition of delta-front sand bodies: A case study of Shan 1³ sub-member of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Qingyang gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1136-1145, 1158. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210511

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

参考文献 37

1	郝蜀民. 鄂尔多斯盆地油气勘探的回顾与思考[J]. 天然气工业, 2001, 21 (S1): 1- 4.
	Hao Shumin . Review and thinking on the oil and gasexploration in Erduosi Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2001, 21 (S1): 1- 4.
2	张才利, 刘新社, 杨亚娟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长庆油田油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42 (3): 253- 263.
	Zhang Caili , Liu Xinshe , Yang Yajuan , et al. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment of Changqing Oilfield in Ordos Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42 (3): 253- 263.
3	蒙晓灵, 艾庆琳, 王金成, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆阳气田深层致密砂岩气藏成藏条件[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44 (1): 104- 110.
	Meng Xiaoling , Ai Qinglin , Wang Jincheng , et al. Reservoir forming conditions of deep tight sandstone gas reservoirs, Qingyang Gasfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44 (1): 104- 110.
4	肖晖, 王浩男, 杨引弟, 等. 致密砂岩孔隙演化特征及其成岩作用对储层质量的影响: 以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭南延长组长8储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (6): 800- 811.
	Xiao Hui , Wang Haonan , Yang Yindi , et al. Influence of diagenetic evolution on tight sandstone reservoir flow capacity: Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in southern Maling, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (6): 800- 811.
5	李文厚, 张倩, 李克永, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地及周缘地区晚古生代沉积演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23 (1): 39- 52.
	Li Wenhou , Zhang Qian , Li Keyong , et al. Sedimentary evolution of the late Paleozoic in Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2021, 23 (1): 39- 52.
6	胡华蕊, 邢凤存, 齐荣, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区晚古生代盆缘古地貌控砂及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (4): 491- 497.
	Hu Huarui , Xing Fengcun , Qi Rong , et al. Paleogeomorphologic features and their controls on sandbody distribution on basin margin during Late Paleozoic Era and significance for petroleum exploration, Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (4): 491- 497.
7	郭艳琴, 赵灵生, 郭彬程, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地及周缘地区下二叠统沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23 (1): 65- 80.
	Guo Yanqin , Zhao Lingsheng , Guo Bincheng , et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the lower Permian in Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2021, 23 (1): 65- 80.
8	朱世发, 崔航, 陈嘉豪, 等. 浅水三角洲沉积体系与储层岩石学特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地西部地区山1-盒8段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39 (1): 126- 139.
	Zhu Shifa , Cui Hang , Chen Jiahao , et al. Sedimentary system and sandstone reservoir petrology of a shallow water delta: Case study of the Shan-1 and He-8 members in the western Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39 (1): 126- 139.
9	何登发, 孙方源, 翟咏荷, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘石沟驿向斜的形成演化与致密砂岩气藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42 (2): 370- 389.
	He Dengfa , Sun Fangyuan , Zhai Yonghe , et al. Syncline development and tight sandstone gas accumulate model in Shigouyi area at western margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42 (2): 370- 389.
10	贺敬聪, 朱筱敏, 李明瑞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区二叠系山西组-石盒子组母岩类型和构造背景[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19 (2): 285- 298.
	He Jingcong , Zhu Xiaomin , Li Mingrui , et al. Parent rock types and tectonic setting of the Permian Shanxi and Shihezi Formations in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 19 (2): 285- 298.
11	梁飞, 黄文辉, 牛君. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘二叠系山西组山1段-下石盒子组盒8段物源分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36 (1): 142- 153.
	Liang Fei , Huang Wenhui , Niu Jun . Provenance analysis of Permain Shan1 and He 8 Formation in Permian in Southwest Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36 (1): 142- 153.
12	蒋子文. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部上古生界山1-盒8段物源分析及盆山耦合关系研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2020.
	Jiang Ziwen. The study of provenance and basin mountain coupling of Shan1-H8 Member, Upper Palaeozoic, Southern Ordos Basin[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2020.
13	帅萍. 济阳坳陷古近纪古地貌特点及其对沉积的控制作用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17 (3): 24- 26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2010.03.006
	Shuai Ping . Palaeotopographic features and their depositional control in Palaeogene Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17 (3): 24- 26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2010.03.006
14	王延章, 宋国奇, 王新征, 等. 古地貌对不同类型滩坝沉积的控制作用——以东营凹陷东部南坡地区为例[J]. 油气地质与采收, 2011, 18 (4): 13- 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2011.04.004
	Wang Yanzhang , Song Guoqi , Wang Xinzheng , et al. Controlling effect of paleogeomorphology on deposition of beach and bar sand reservoir-Case study of south slope, east Dongying depression)[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18 (4): 13- 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2011.04.004
15	林畅松, 潘元林, 肖建新, 等. "构造坡折带": 断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2000, 25 (3): 260- 266.
	Lin Changsong , Pan Yuanlin , Xiao Jianxin , et al. Structural slope-breakzone: Key concept for stratigraphic sequence analysis and petroleum forecasting in fault subsidence basins[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2000, 25 (3): 260- 266.
16	Lin Changsong , Yang Haijun , Liu Jingyan , et al. Paleostructural geomorphology of the Paleozoic central uplift belt and its constraint on the development of depositional facies in the Tarim Basin[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2009, 52 (6): 823- 834. doi: 10.1007/s11430-009-0061-8
17	纪友亮, 周勇, 况军, 等. 准噶尔盆地车-莫古隆起形成演化及对沉积相的控制作用[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2010, 40 (10): 1342- 1355.
	Ji Youliang , Zhou Yong , Kuang Jun , et al. The formation and evolution of Chepaizi-Mosuowan paleo-uplift and its control on the distributions of sedimentary facies in the Junggar Basin[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2010, 40 (10): 1342- 1355.
18	姜在兴, 王雯雯, 王俊辉, 等. 风动力场对沉积体系的作用[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35 (5): 863- 876.
	Jiang ZaiXing , Wang WenWen , Wang JunHui , et al. The influence of wind field on depositional systems[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35 (5): 863- 876.
19	付金华, 魏新善, 罗顺社, 等. 庆阳深层煤成气大气田发现与地质认识[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46 (6): 1047- 1061.
	Fu Jinhua , Wei Xinshan , Luo Shunshe , et al. Discovery and geological knowledge of the large deep coal-formed Qingyanggas field, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46 (6): 1047- 1061.
20	李进步, 付斌, 赵忠军, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏储层表征技术及其发展展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 35 (12): 35- 41. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.12.005
	Li Jinbu , Fu Bin , Zhao Zhongjun , et al. Sulige tight sand gas field reservoir characterization technique and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 35 (12): 35- 41. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.12.005
21	王子龙, 郭少斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区山西组泥页岩孔隙表征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (1): 99- 107.
	Wang Zilong , Guo Shaobin . Pore characterization of shale in Shanxi Formation, Yan'an area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (1): 99- 107.
22	蔡勋育, 邱桂强, 孙冬胜, 等. 中国中西部大型盆地致密砂岩油气"甜点"类型与特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (4): 684- 695.
	Cai Xunyu , Qiu Guiqiang , Sun Dongsheng , et al. Types and characteri-stics of tight sandstone sweet spots in large basins of central-western China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (4): 684- 695.
23	赵靖舟, 李军, 曹青, 等. 论致密大油气田成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (5): 573- 583.
	Zhao Jingzhou , Li Jun , Cao Qing , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of large tight oil and gas fields[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (5): 573- 583.
24	陈彬滔, 于兴河, 王天奇, 等. 砂质辫状河岩相与构型特征——以山西大同盆地中侏罗统云冈组露头为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36 (1): 111- 117.
	Chen Bintao , Yu Xinghe , Wang Tianqi , et al. Lithofacies and architectural characteristics of sandy braided river deposits: A case from outcrops of the Middle Jurassic Yungang Formation in the Datong Basin, Shanxi Province[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36 (1): 111- 117.
25	王文胜, 兰义飞, 史红然, 等. 基于砂地比的复合河道沉积期次空间解析方法——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田ST密井网试验区盒8下2为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 1135- 1140.
	Wang Wensheng , Lan Yifei , Shi Hongran , et al. Spatial analysis of the sedimentary stages for composite channels based on sand-stratum ratio: A case study of the 2rd submember of the lower 8th member of Shihezi Formation in the infilled pattern test area of Block ST, Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 1135- 1140.
26	孙六一, 赵靖舟, 李军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区上古生界天然气成藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (11): 2029- 2038. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.11.2029
	Sun Liuyi , Zhao Jingzhou , Li Jun , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of the Upper Paleozoic gas in the Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (11): 2029- 2038. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.11.2029
27	倪春华, 刘光祥, 朱建辉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区上古生界天然气成因及来源[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (2): 193- 199.
	Ni Chunhua , Liu Guangxiang , Zhu Jianhui , et al. Origin and source of natural gas in the Upper Paleozoic in Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (2): 193- 199.
28	庞军刚, 杨友运, 李文厚, 等. 陆相含油气盆地古地貌恢复研究进展[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2013, 33 (4): 424- 430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2013.04.009
	Pang Jungang , Yang Youyun , Li Wenhou , et al. Study development of palaeogeomorphology reconstructions in continental facies hydrocarbon basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2013, 33 (4): 424- 430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2013.04.009
29	赵永刚, 王东旭, 冯强汉, 等. 油气田古地貌恢复方法研究进展[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2017, 39 (4): 516- 529. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2017.04.004
	Zhao Yong gang , Wang Dongxu , Feng Qianghan , et al. Review onpalaeomorphologic reconstruction methods in oil and gas fields[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2017, 39 (4): 516- 529. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2017.04.004
30	赵俊兴, 陈洪德, 时志强. 古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义: 以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2011, 28 (3): 260- 266.
	Zhao Junxing , Chen Hongde , Shi Zhiqiang . The way and mplications of rebuild palaeogeomorphology: Taking the research of palaeogeomoryphology of the Ordos Basin before Jurassic deposition as example[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2011, 28 (3): 260- 266.
31	鲜本忠, 王震, 马立驰, 等. 沉积区-剥蚀区古地貌一体化恢复及古水系研究: 以渤海湾盆地辽东东地区馆陶组为例[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42 (11): 1922- 1925.
	Xian Benzhong , Wang Zheng , Ma Lichi , et al. Paleao-Drainage system and integrated Paleo-geomorphology restoration in depositional and erosional areas: Guantao Formation in Ease liaodong area, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Earth science, 2017, 42 (11): 1922- 1925.
32	左丽群. 古地貌恢复方法综述[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33 (3): 12- 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2019.03.003
	Zuo Liqun . Review on methods of paleo-geomorphologic restoration[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2019, 33 (3): 12- 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2019.03.003
33	周宇成, 姚光明, 魏荷花, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安气田南部岩溶古地貌分级识别及有利区预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27 (6): 102- 107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.06.014
	Zhou Yucheng , Yao Guangming , Wei Hehua , et al. Classification and identification of karst palaeogeomorphology and prediction of favorable areas in Southern Yan'an gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27 (6): 102- 107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.06.014
34	Perrier R , Quilbier J . Thickness changes in sedimentary layers during compaction history[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1974, 58, 507- 520.
35	刘国勇, 金之钧, 张刘平. 碎屑岩成岩压实作用模拟实验研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, (3): 407- 413. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.03.013
	Liu Guoyong , Jin Zhijun , Zhang Liuping . Simulationstudy on clastic rock diagenetic compaction[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2006, (3): 407- 413. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.03.013
36	林承焰, 王文广, 董春梅, 等. 砂岩压实作用研究现状及进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38 (3): 538- 551.
	Lin Chengyan , Wang Wenguang , Dong ChunMei , et al. Statusquo of sandstone compaction research and its advancement[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38 (3): 538- 551.
37	郭秋麟, 陈晓明, 宋焕琪, 等. 泥页岩埋藏过程孔隙度演化与预测模型探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24 (3): 439- 449.
	Guo Qiulin , Chen Xiaoming , Song Huanqi , et al. Evolution and models of shale porosity during burial process[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24 (3): 439- 449.

井号	水平段/m	砂岩长度/m	砂岩钻遇率/%	含气砂岩长度/m	泥岩长度/m
庆AH	1 200	1 164	97.0	1 044	36
庆BH	1 200	1 098	91.5	821	102
前期水平井(37口)	1 065	786	73.8	563	279

[1]	刘池洋, 王建强, 张东东, 赵红格, 赵俊峰, 黄雷, 王文青, 秦阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地油气资源丰富的成因与赋存-成藏特点[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1011-1029.
[2]	任战利, 祁凯, 李进步, 霍小菊, 崔军平, 杨鹏, 王琨, 陈占军, 杨桂林. 鄂尔多斯盆地热动力演化史及其对油气成藏与富集的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1030-1042.
[3]	李相博, 王宏波, 黄军平, 张才利, 张艳, 王雅婷, 张雷, 王菁, 刘化清. 鄂尔多斯盆地怀远运动不整合面特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1043-1055.
[4]	何发岐, 齐荣, 王付斌, 邓杰, 成立, 胡天乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组沟谷体系构造成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1056-1062.
[5]	周新平, 何青, 刘江艳, 李士祥, 杨田. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段深水碎屑流沉积特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1063-1077.
[6]	范柏江, 晋月, 师良, 李亚婷, 陈玮常. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部三叠系延长组7段湖相页岩油勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1078-1088.
[7]	张亚雄. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部地区三叠系延长组7段暗色泥岩烃源岩特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1089-1097.
[8]	陈朝兵, 赵振宇, 付玲, 高建荣, 宋微, 陈新晶. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组6段深水致密砂岩填隙物特征及对储层发育的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1098-1111.
[9]	时保宏, 秦馨雨, 张才利, 刘文, 刘刚, 史婵媛, 张雷, 勇子树. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组6段油藏差异成藏因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1112-1123.
[10]	刘玲, 王琳霖, 吴疆, 陈霞, 杨佳奇. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部彬长区块上石盒子组7段储层识别与预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1124-1135.
[11]	刘畅, 张道旻, 李超, 路媛媛, 于姗姗, 郭明强. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴区块上古生界致密砂岩气藏成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1146-1158.
[12]	张军涛, 金晓辉, 谷宁, 卞昌蓉, 杨佳奇, 何治亮. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部地区马家沟组岩溶储层的差异性和发育模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1159-1168,1242.
[13]	张东东, 刘文汇, 王晓锋, 罗厚勇, 王庆涛, 李忆宁, 李风娇. 深层油气藏成因类型及其特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1169-1180.
[14]	焦方正. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油缝网波及研究及其在体积开发中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1181-1188.
[15]	杨鹏, 任战利, Jianxin Zhao, Ai Duc Nguyen, Yuexing Feng, 祁凯, 王琨. 方解石原位U-Pb测年结合磷灰石裂变径迹方法约束鄂尔多斯盆地西南部构造演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1189-1201.

古地貌恢复及其对三角洲前缘沉积砂体的控制作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地庆阳气田二叠系山西组1³亚段为例

Paleogeomorphologic restoration and its controlling effect on deposition of delta-front sand bodies: A case study of Shan 1³ sub-member of the Permian Shanxi Formation, Qingyang gas field, Ordos Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics