石油与天然气地质 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1127-1140.doi: 10.11743/ogg20220510
李倩文1(), 刘忠宝1, 陈斐然2, 刘光祥1, 张殿伟1, 李鹏1, 王鹏威1
收稿日期:
2021-12-09
修回日期:
2022-07-12
出版日期:
2022-10-01
发布日期:
2022-09-02
第一作者简介:
李倩文(1992—),女,硕士,助理研究员,非常规油气地质评价及勘探规划。E?mail: 基金项目:
Qianwen Li1(), Zhongbao Liu1, Feiran Chen2, Guangxiang Liu1, Dianwei Zhang1, Peng Li1, Pengwei Wang1
Received:
2021-12-09
Revised:
2022-07-12
Online:
2022-10-01
Published:
2022-09-02
摘要:
陆相页岩层系岩性复杂、非均质性强,制约了储层甜点优选和探井部署。为查明四川盆地侏罗系页岩层系不同岩相类型的储集特征和含气能力,以元坝地区Y2井自流井组大安寨段为例,采用有机碳含量测定、全岩X射线衍射、岩石薄片鉴定、聚焦离子束扫描电镜、高压压汞—氮气吸附联合测定以及物性分析等手段,划分了大安寨段二亚段(后文简称大二亚段)页岩及夹层的岩相类型,并针对不同岩相类型开展储集物性、孔隙结构、含气性及可压性研究,在此基础上评选了优势岩相和岩相组合。结果表明,Y2井大二亚段页岩层系可划分为3大类6亚类页岩岩相,2大类6小类夹层岩相以及3种宏观岩相组合。页岩孔隙类型以粘土矿物层间孔、方解石溶蚀孔等无机孔为主,为页岩气的赋存提供了储集空间。计算页岩总含气量为2.59~4.38 m3/t,游离气平均占比67 %,具有较好的勘探潜力,但优势岩相的脆性矿物含量仅为50 %,可压性较差。综合评价认为,AB-Ⅰ型岩相组合中页岩页理和纹理发育,生烃条件好,含气量和游离气比例较高,存在可压性较好的夹层,是元坝地区Y2井大二亚段最有利的勘探储层类型。
中图分类号:
图2
元坝地区Y2井大二亚段页岩层系夹层单偏光镜下岩石学特征照片(铸体薄片)a.埋深3 885.99 m,褐灰色介壳灰岩,粒屑结构,主要由似介壳类颗粒组成,发育1条构造-溶蚀裂缝; b.埋深3 891.66 m,褐灰色介壳灰岩,泥质结构,粘土矿物呈隐晶状,发育数条构造-溶蚀裂缝; c.埋深3 903.99 m,褐灰色介壳灰岩,粒屑结构,主要由似粒屑组成,粒屑由亮晶方解石组成; d.埋深3 893.92 m,灰色含灰细砂岩,细砂-粉砂结构,主要由石英组成,部分颗粒边缘环绕分布粘土膜; e.埋深3 896.3 m,浅灰色粉砂岩,粉砂-细砂结构为主,有机质呈不规则状零星分布于局部粒间; f.埋深3 922.59 m,灰色泥质粉砂岩,粉砂结构,主要由粉砂碎屑颗粒组成,颗粒具不同程度溶蚀"
表1
元坝地区Y2井大二亚段岩相类型特征"
取样深度/m | 岩相类型 | 岩心特征 | 微观特征 | TOC/% | 主要矿物含量/% | 矿物结构与沉积构造 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 909.44 | 中-高碳粘土质页岩相 (A1型) | 2.16 | 粘土矿物:50.0 石英+长石:41.2 碳酸盐矿物:6.9 | 灰黑色,泥质结构为主,页理发育,少许条带富集,黑色矿物呈斑点状、弯曲短细条状密集分布 | ||
3 914.03 | 低-中碳粘土质页岩相 (A2型) | 0.68 | 粘土矿物:55.8 石英+长石:6.6 碳酸盐矿物:0.7 | 深灰色,泥质结构为主,针状白云母定向分布其中,碎屑颗粒以粉砂为主,不均匀分布介壳类颗粒 | ||
3 885.00 | 中碳含介壳页岩相 (B1型) | 1.56 | 粘土矿物:48.9 石英+长石:44.4 碳酸盐矿物:1.2 | 灰黑色,以粘土矿物为主,局部浸染黑色有机质,零星分布少许介壳状、拉长状等颗粒,主要由方解石组成 | ||
3 888.74 | 低-中碳介壳灰质页岩相(B2型) | 1.06 | 粘土矿物:44.4 石英+长石:40.7 碳酸盐矿物:11.2 | 深灰色,以粘土矿物为主,偶见黑色有机质呈团粒状零星分布,不均匀分布似腕足状、介壳状颗粒,长轴定向明显 | ||
3 901.54 | 低-中碳含灰质介壳页岩相(B3型) | 0.98 | 粘土矿物:47.3 石英+长石:47.1 碳酸盐矿物:3.1 | 深灰色,主要成分为粘土矿物,零星分布似介壳、腕足颗粒,部分颗粒边缘环绕分布碎屑颗粒 | ||
3 907.44 | 低-中碳粉砂质页岩相 (C1型) | 1.18 | 粘土矿物:46.9 石英+长石:45.4 碳酸盐矿物:6.0 | 深灰色,主要成分为粘土矿物,黑色矿物不均匀分布,可能为炭屑,碎屑颗粒以粉砂为主,不均匀星散分布 |
1 | 朱彤. 四川盆地陆相页岩油气富集主控因素及类型[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. |
Zhu Tong. Main controlling factors and types of continental shale oil and gas enrichment in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. | |
2 | 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. |
Zou Caineng, Pan Songqi, Jing Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. | |
3 | 刘皓天, 李雄, 万云强, 等. 陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发潜力——以川东涪陵北地区侏罗系东岳庙段为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25(2): 148-154. |
Liu Haotian, Li Xiong, Wan Yunqiang, et al. Formation conditions and exploration and development potential of continental shale gas: a case of Dongyuemiao Member of the Jurassic in north Fuling area, eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(2): 148-154. | |
4 | 胡东风, 魏志红, 刘若冰, 等. 湖湘页岩油气富集主控因素与勘探潜力——以四川盆地涪陵地区侏罗系为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 113-120. |
Hu Dongfeng, Wei Zhihong, Liu Ruobing, et al. Enrichment control factors and exploration potential of lacustrine shale oil and gas: A case study of Jurassic in the Fuling area of the Sichuan Basin [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 113-120. | |
5 | 周德华, 焦方正, 郭旭升, 等. 川东北元坝区块中下侏罗统页岩油气地质分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(6): 596-600. |
Zhou Dehua, Jiao Fangzheng, Guo Xusheng, et al. Geologic analysis of Middle‑Lower Jurassic shale reservoirs in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(6): 596-600. | |
6 | 周德华, 孙川翔, 刘忠宝, 等. 川东北地区大安寨段陆相页岩气藏地质特征[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(5): 32-42. |
Zhou Dehua, Sun Chuanxiang, Liu Zhongbao, et al. Geological characteristics of continental shale gas reservoir in the Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(5): 32-42. | |
7 | 刘忠宝, 刘光祥, 胡宗全, 等. 陆相页岩层系岩相类型、组合特征及其油气勘探意义——以四川盆地中下侏罗统为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(12): 10-21. |
Liu Zhongbao, Liu Guangxiang, Hu Zongquan, et al. Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their significance for shale gas exploration: A case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(12): 10-21. | |
8 | 刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 等. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145. |
Liu Zhongbao, Hu Zongquan, Liu Guangxiang, et al. Pore characteristics and controlling factors of continental shale reservoirs in the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(01): 136-145. | |
9 | 郭彤楼, 李宇平, 魏志红. 四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(1): 1-7. |
Guo Tonglou, Li Yuping, Wei Zhihong, et al. Reservoir‑forming conditions of shale gas in Ziliujing Formation of Yuanba area in Sichuan Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(1): 1-7. | |
10 | 魏祥峰, 黄静, 李宇平, 等. 元坝地区大安寨段陆相页岩气富集高产主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. |
Wei Xiangfeng, Huang Jing, Li Yuping, et al. The main factors controlling the enrichment and high production of Da'anzhai member continental shale gas in Yuanba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. | |
11 | 刘苗苗, 付小平. 元坝地区陆相页岩气勘探潜力再评价[J]. 四川地质学报, 2020, 40(3): 416-421. |
Liu Miaomiao, Fu Xiaoping. Reevaluation of exploration potential of continental shale gas in the Yuanba area[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2020, 40(3): 416-421. | |
12 | 刘昭茜, 罗开平, 唐永, 等. 四川盆地元坝—通南巴地区关键构造期构造特征及陆相致密砂岩天然气成藏响应[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 756-772. |
Liu Zhaoqian, Luo Kaiping, Tang Yong, et al. Critical Tectonic Periods and the Response of Gas Accumulation in Non‑Marine Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Yuanba‑Tongnanba Area, Sichuan Basin [J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 756-772. | |
13 | 王玮, 黄东, 易海永, 等. 淡水湖相页岩小层精细划分及地球化学特征——以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(5): 724-730. |
Wang Wei, Huang Dong, Yi Haiyong, et al. Stratigraphic division and geochemical characteristics of freshwater lacustrine shale: a case study of Jurassic Da’anzhai Section, Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(5): 724-730. | |
14 | 胡宗全, 王濡岳, 刘忠宝, 等. 四川盆地下侏罗统陆相页岩气源储特征及耦合评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 261-272. |
Hu Zongquan, Wang Ruyue, Liu Zhongbao, et al. Source⁃reservoir characteristics and coupling evaluations for the Lower Jurassic Lacustrine shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(1): 261-272. | |
15 | 王圣柱. 准噶尔盆地博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组岩相类型及页岩油储集特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(1): 1-16. |
Wang Shengzhu. Lithofacies types and shale‑oil accumulating characteristics of Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation in Bogeda area of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(1): 1-16. | |
16 | 李磊, 李平平, 张正辰, 等. 川北元坝地区大安寨段页岩微观孔隙空间定量表征[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(22): 8923-8932. |
Li Lei, Li Pingping, Zhang Zhengchen, et al. Quantitative characterization of microscopic pore structure of shale in Da’ anzhai member in Yuanba Area, Northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(22): 8923-8932. | |
17 | 李进, 张洪安, 王学军, 等. 高演化湖相页岩储层特征及其主控因素——以普光地区中侏罗统千佛崖组千一段为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(1): 1-8. |
Li Jin, Zhang Hongan, Wang Xuejun, et al. Reservoir characteristics of high‑evolution lacustrine shale and its main controlling factors: a case study of the 1st member of Qianfoya Formation of Middle Jurassic in Puguang area [J]. Fault‑Block Oil & Gas Field, 2021, 28(1): 1-8. | |
18 | 郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考: 以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. |
Guo Xusheng, Hu Dongfeng, Li Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: A case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da’anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. | |
19 | Chen L, Jiang Z, Liu Q, et al. Mechanism of shale gas occurrence: insights from comparative study on pore structures of marine and lacustrine shales[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 104: 200-216. |
20 | Camp W K, Diaz E, Wawak B. Electron microscopy of shale hydrocarbon reservoirs[M]. Tulsa: AAPG Memoir, 2013: 153- |
171 | |
21 | 王玉满, 王淑芳, 董大忠, 等. 川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩岩相表征[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 119-133. |
Wang Yuman, Wang Shufang, Dong Dazhong, et al. Lithofacies characterization of Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian, southern Sichuan[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 119-133. | |
22 | 王朋飞, 姜振学, 吕鹏, 等. 重庆周缘下志留统龙马溪组和下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩有机质孔隙发育及演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 997-1008. |
Wang Pengfei, Jiang Zhenxue, Lv Peng, et al. Organic matter pores and evolution characteristics of shales in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation and the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in periphery of Chongqing [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(7): 997-1008. | |
23 | Milliken K L, Rudnicki M, Awwiller D N, et al. Organic matter⁃hosted pore system, Marcellus Formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97 (2):177-200. |
24 | 焦淑静, 张慧, 薛东川, 等. 泥页岩有机显微组分的扫描电镜形貌特征及识别方法[J]. 电子显微学报, 2018, 37(2): 137-144. |
Jiao Shujing, Zhang Hui, Xue Dongchuan, et al. Morphological structure and identify method of organic macerals of shale with SEM [J]. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2018, 37(2): 137-144. | |
25 | 李倩文, 唐令, 庞雄奇. 页岩气赋存动态演化模式及含气性定量评价[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(2): 457-466. |
Li Qianwen, Tang Ling, Pang Xiongqi. Dynamic evolution model of shale gas occurrence and quantitative evaluation of gas‑bearing capacity[J]. Geological Review, 2020, 66(2): 457-466. | |
26 | 付小平, 杨滔. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(4): 589-597. |
Fu Xiaoping, Yang Tao. Pore structure of continental shale reservoirs in Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(4): 589-597. | |
27 | 徐立富, 邓纪梅, 杜佳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区海陆过渡相页岩岩相类型和储层差异研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(S2): 862-876. |
Xu Lifu, Deng Jimei, Du Jia, et al. Lithofacies types and reservoir differences of marine continental transitional shale in Linxing area, eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J/]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(S2): 862-876. | |
28 | 柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. |
Liu Bo, Shi Jiaxin, Fu Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine‑grained sedimentary system: A case study of organic‑rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. | |
29 |
谷一凡, 蔡光银, 李树新, 等. 不同岩相海陆过渡相页岩孔隙结构及控制因素——以鄂东缘地区山西组山2 3亚段为例[J/OL]. 沉积学报: 1-19 [2022-07-20]. DOI:10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.070 .
doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.070 |
Gu Yifan, Cai Guangyin, Li Shuxin, et al. Pore structure and controlling factors of different lithofacies in transitional shale: A case study of the Shanxi Formation Shan2 3 submember, Eastern Ordos Basin [J/OL]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica: 1-19 [2022-07-20]. DOI:10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.070 .
doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.070 |
|
30 | 霍建峰, 高健, 郭小文, 等. 川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175. |
Huo Jianfeng, Gao Jian, Guo Xiaowen, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of pore structures of various lithofacies in shales of Longmaxi Formation,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175. | |
31 | Hao F, Zou H, Lu Y. Mechanisms of shale gas storage: implications for shale gas exploration in China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(8): 1325-1346. |
32 | Zhang T, Ellis G S, Ruppel S C, et al. Effect of organic‑matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale‑gas systems[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2012, 47(6): 120-131. |
33 | 俞凌杰, 范明, 陈红宇, 等. 富有机质页岩高温高压重量法等温吸附实验[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36 (5): 557-563. |
Yu Lingjie, Fan Ming, Chen Hongyu, et al. Isothermal adsorption experiment of organic‑rich shale under high temperature and pressure using gravimetric method[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36 (5): 557-563. | |
34 | 任岚, 林然, 赵金洲, 等. 页岩气水平井增产改造体积评价模型及其应用[J].天然气工业, 2018, 38(8): 47-56. |
Ren Lan, Lin Ran, Zhao Jinzhou, et al. A stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) evaluation model and its application to shale gas well productivity enhancement[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(8): 47-56. | |
35 | 赵文韬, 侯贵廷, 张居增, 等. 层厚与岩性控制裂缝发育的力学机理研究: 以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 51(6): 1047-1058. |
Zhao Wentao, Hou Guiting, Zhang Juzeng, et al. Study on the development law of structural fractures of Yanchang Formation in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2015, 51(6): 1047-1058. | |
36 | 刘雅利, 张顺, 刘惠民, 等. 断陷盆地陡坡带富有机质页岩基本特征及勘探前景——以济阳坳陷为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(6): 1108-1118. |
Liu Yali, Zhang Shun, Liu Huimin, et al. Basic characteristics and exploration prospect of shale in steep slope belt of continental faulted basin: A case study of Jiyang depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2021, 50(6): 1108-1118. | |
37 | 吴蓝宇, 胡东风, 陆永潮, 等. 四川盆地涪陵气田五峰组—龙马溪组页岩优势岩相[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2): 189-197. |
Wu Lanyu, Hu Dongfeng, Lu Yongchao, et al. Advantageous shale lithofacies of Wufeng Formation‑Longmaxi Formation in Fuling Gas Field of Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2): 189-197. |
[1] | 刘惠民, 包友书, 黎茂稳, 李政, 吴连波, 朱日房, 王大洋, 王鑫. 页岩油富集可动性地球化学评价参数探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 622-636. |
[2] | 黄彤飞, 张光亚, 罗贝维, 喻志骅, 张磊, 何治亮, 白国平, 尹继全, 祝厚勤, 殷进垠, 姚健欢. 白垩纪特提斯域原型盆地与岩相古地理及其控油气作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 658-672. |
[3] | 蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 宋舜尧, 时战楠, 韩文中, 张伟, 解德录. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709. |
[4] | 方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769. |
[5] | 李军, 邹友龙, 路菁. 陆相页岩油储层可动油含量测井评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 816-826. |
[6] | 杜晓宇, 金之钧, 曾联波, 刘国平, 杨森, 梁新平, 陆国青. 基于成像测井的深层陆相页岩油储层天然裂缝有效性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 852-865. |
[7] | 邹才能, 董大忠, 熊伟, 傅国友, 赵群, 刘雯, 孔维亮, 张琴, 蔡光银, 王玉满, 梁峰, 刘翰林, 邱振. 中国页岩气新区带、新层系和新类型勘探进展、挑战及对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 309-326. |
[8] | 赵喆, 白斌, 刘畅, 王岚, 周海燕, 刘羽汐. 中国石油陆上中-高成熟度页岩油勘探现状、进展与未来思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 327-340. |
[9] | 柳波, 蒙启安, 付晓飞, 林铁锋, 白云风, 田善思, 张金友, 姚瑶, 程心阳, 刘召. 松辽盆地白垩系青山口组一段页岩生、排烃组分特征及页岩油相态演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 406-419. |
[10] | 何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439. |
[11] | 张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470. |
[12] | 潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485. |
[13] | 高和群, 高玉巧, 何希鹏, 聂军. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层岩石力学特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 502-515. |
[14] | 师良, 范柏江, 李忠厚, 余紫巍, 蔺子瑾, 戴欣洋. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部三叠系延长组7段烃组分的运移分异作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 157-168. |
[15] | 张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田:一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||