塔北哈拉哈塘加里东期多期岩溶古地貌恢复与洞穴储层分布预测

doi:10.11743/ogg20160302

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 304-312.doi: 10.11743/ogg20160302

塔北哈拉哈塘加里东期多期岩溶古地貌恢复与洞穴储层分布预测

淡永^1,2, 邹灏¹, 梁彬^2,3, 张庆玉^2,3, 曹建文^2,3, 李景瑞^2,3, 郝彦珍^2,3

1. 成都理工大学, 四川成都 610059;
2. 中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所, 广西桂林 541004;
3. 国土资源部/广西岩溶动力学重点实验室, 广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2015-02-09 修回日期:2016-04-20 出版日期:2016-06-08 发布日期:2016-06-22
通讯作者: 邹灏(1986—),男,讲师、博士,矿产勘查与评价。E-mail:zouhao21@sina.com。 E-mail:zouhao21@sina.com
第一作者简介:淡永(1986—),男,助理研究员、博士研究生,沉积地质及古岩溶油气储层地质。E-mail:danyong@karst.ac.cn。
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(41302122);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB201001);中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20160300);广西青年基金项目(2015GXNSFBA139187)。

Restoration of multistage paleogeomorphology during Caledonian Period and paleokarst cavernous reservoir prediction in Halahatang area, northern Tarim Basin

Dan Yong^1,2, Zou Hao¹, Liang Bin^2,3, Zhang Qingyu^2,3, Cao Jianwen^2,3, Li Jingrui^2,3, Hao Yanzhen^2,3

1. Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China;
2. Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China;
3. Karst Dynamics Laboratory, MLR & GZAR, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

Received:2015-02-09 Revised:2016-04-20 Online:2016-06-08 Published:2016-06-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了认识塔里木盆地北部哈拉哈塘加里东期多期岩溶作用对奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层发育的控制机理，选择不同方法对各期古地貌进行恢复。结果表明良里塔格岩溶期古地貌以丘丛洼地、谷地为主，由北向南发育了多条深切河流，地震剖面证实河流常切穿至一间房组；前志留纪岩溶期，由北向南可划分为潜山岩溶区、碎屑岩浅覆盖岩溶区和厚层覆盖岩溶区，地势北高南低，北部潜山区以微岩溶地貌为主，未发育深切河谷，南部厚层覆盖区为碎屑岩山地，由北向南的水系，汇入碎屑岩尖灭线附近岩溶湖。通过钻录井、岩心、测井解释等资料统计，总结浅覆盖区洞穴型储层主要发育在两个带：一间房组顶面以下0~30 m及50~110 m，对应层位分别为一间房组和鹰山组，厚层覆盖区洞穴型储层主要发育在一间房组顶面以下0~40 m，分带性不明显。结合断裂、古地貌、古水系等因素，认为浅覆盖区下部洞穴型储层及厚层覆盖区洞穴储层主要受控于良里塔格岩溶期径流带岩溶作用，该期南部深切河流为排泄点，控制了储层发育规模及走向。而浅覆盖区上部洞穴型储层受控于前志留纪岩溶期径流带岩溶作用，岩溶湖为径流排泄区，控制了上部洞穴储层发育。

关键词: 侧向径流溶蚀, 古水系, 碳酸盐岩, 一间房组, 鹰山组, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: This paper studied the controlling mechanism of multi-stage Caledonian karstification on the development of the Ordovician carbonate reservoirs through reconstruction of the Palaeogeomorphology with different methods in Halahatang area, northern Tarim Basin.It shows that the karst geomorphology is dominated by mound-cluster depression and mound-cluster valley during the Lianglitage period.Several deep incised-rivers are developed from north to south and seismic sections reveal that they often cut through the Yijianfang Formation.The pre-Silurian paleokarst can be divided into three zones from north to south,namely buried hill karst zone, shallow coverage karst zone and thick coverage karst zone.The terrain is high in north and low in south.The northern buried hill karst zone is dominated by mini-karst physiognomy without deep incised-rivers.In contrast,the southern thick coverage karst zone is in clastic rock mountain landform where a drainage system flowing from north to south and finally into the karst lake near the pinchout line of clastic rock.Based on the statistics of logging,drilling and cores,the cavernous reservoirs in the shallow coverage karst zone mainly occur in two intervals.One is 0 to 30 m below the top Yijianfang Formation (corresponding to the horizon of the Yijianfang Formation) and the other is 50 to 110 m below the top Yijianfang Formation (corresponding to the horizon of the Yingshan Formation).In contrast,the cavernous reservoirs in the thick coverage karst zone mainly occur in an interval of 0 to 40 m below the top Yijianfang Formation without obvious zonation.A comprehensive analyses of the geomorphology,ancient drainage system,tectonic fault and other factors shows development of the cavernous reservoirs in the lower part of the shallow coverage zone and thick coverage zone was mainly controlled by paleokarstification in runoff zone during Lianglitage period when the deeply incised-rivers in the southern part acted as the runoff drainage points controling the size and direction of cavernous reservoirs.In contrast,the development of cavernous reservoirs in the upper part of the shallow coverage zone was mainly controlled by paleokarstification in runoff zone during the pre-Silurian period when the karst lakes were karst runoff drainage areas.

Key words: runoff zone, ancient drainage system, carbonate rock, Yijianfang Formation, Yingshan Formation, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

淡永,邹灏,梁彬,等. 塔北哈拉哈塘加里东期多期岩溶古地貌恢复与洞穴储层分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(3): 304-312. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160302 Dan Yong,Zou Hao,Liang Bin,et al. Restoration of multistage paleogeomorphology during Caledonian Period and paleokarst cavernous reservoir prediction in Halahatang area, northern Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(3): 304-312. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160302

参考文献

[1] 朱光有,杨海军,朱永峰,等.塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩油气地质特征与富集成藏研究[J].岩石学报, 2011,27(3):827-844. Zhu Guangyou,Yang Haijun,Zhu Yongfeng,et al.Study on petro-leum geological characteristics and accumulation of carbonate reservoirs in Halahatang area, Tarimbasin[J].ActaPetrologica Sinica,2011,27(3):827-844.
[2] 张学丰,李明,陈志勇,等.塔北哈拉哈塘奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶储层发育特征及主要岩溶期次[J].岩石学报, 2012,28(3):815-826. Zhang Xuefeng,Li Ming,Chen Zhiyong,et al.Characteristics and karstification of the Ordovician carbonate reservoir, Halahatang area, northern TarimBasin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(3):815-826.
[3] 崔海峰,郑多明, 滕团余.塔北隆起哈拉哈塘凹陷石油地质特征与油气勘探方向[J].岩性油气藏,2009, 21(2):54-58. Cui Haifeng,Zheng Duoming,Teng Tuanyu.Petroleum geologic cha-racteristics and exploration orientation in Halahatang Depression of Tabeiuplif[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):54-58.
[4] 高计县,唐俊伟,张学丰,等.塔北哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系一间房组碳酸盐岩岩心裂缝类型及期次[J].石油学报, 2012,33(1):64-73. Gao Jixian,Tang Junwei,Zhang Xuefeng,et al.Types and periods of fractures in carbonate cores of Ordovician Yijianfang Formation in Halahatang area, northern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(1):64-73.
[5] 倪新锋,张丽娟,沈安江,等.塔北地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶类型、期次及叠合关系[J].中国地质,2009,36(6):1312-1321. Ni Xinfeng,Zhang Lijuan,Shen Anjiang,et al.Paleokarstification types karstification periods and superimposition relationship of Ordovician carbonates in northern Tarim Basin[J].Geology in China,2009,36(6):1312-1321.
[6] 倪新锋,张丽娟,沈安江,等.塔里木盆地英买力-哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系岩溶储集层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].古地理学报, 2010, 12(4):467-479 Ni Xinfeng,Zhang Lijuan,Shen Anjiang,etal.Diagenesis and pore evolution of the Ordovician karst reservoir in Yengima-Halahatang region of Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2010,12(4):467-479.
[7] 肖玉茹,何峰煜,孙义梅.古洞穴型碳酸盐岩储层特征研究—以塔河油田奥陶系古洞穴为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1):75-80. Xiao Yuru,He Fengyu,Sun Yimei.Reservoir characteristics of paleocave carbonates a case study of Ordovician paleocave in Tahe Oilfield [J].Oil & Gas Geology,2003,24(1):75-80.
[8] 闫相宾,李铁军,张涛,等.塔中与塔河地区奥陶系岩溶储层形成条件的差异[J].石油与天然气地质, 2005,26(2):202-207 Yan Xiangbin,Li Tiejun,Zhang Tao,et al.Differences between formation conditions of Ordovician karstic reservoirs in Tazhong and Tahe areas [J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(2):202-207.
[9] 胡剑风,蔡振忠,马青,等.塔里木盆地轮古东奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层特征与主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质, 2007,28(6):776-783. Hu Jianfeng,Cai Zhenzhong,Ma Qing,et al.Characteristics and main controlling factors of the Ordovician carbonate rock reservoirs in Lugudong area,theTarim Basin [J].Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(6):776-783.
[10] 陈利新,潘文庆,梁彬,等.轮南奥陶系潜山表层岩溶储层的分布特征[J].中国岩溶, 2011, 30(3):327-333. Chen Lixin,Pan Wenqing,Liang Bin,et al.The distribution characteristics of the epikarst reservoir in Lunnan Ordovician buried hill[J].Carsologica Sinca,2011,30(3):327-333.
[11] 何君,韩剑发,潘文庆.轮南古隆起奥陶系潜山油气成藏机理[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):44-48. He Jun,Han Jianfa,Pan Wenqing.Hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism in the giant buried hill of Ordovician in Lunnanpaleohigh of Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,,2007,28(2):44-48.
[12] 淡永,梁彬,曹建文,等.塔里木盆地轮南地区奥陶系岩溶缝洞充填物地球化学特征及环境意义[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(6)623-628. Dan Yong,Liang Bin,Cao Jianwen,et al.Geochemical features and environmental significances of deposits in Ordovician karstic fractures and caves,Lunnan area,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(6)623-628.
[13] 顾家裕.塔里木盆地轮南地区下奥陶统碳酸盐岩岩溶储层特征及形成模式[J].古地理学报,1999,1(1):54-60. Gu Jiayu.Characteristics and evolutional model of karst reservoirs of Lower Ordovician carbonate rocks in Lunnan area of TarimBasin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,1999,1(1):54-60.
[14] 张庆玉,梁彬,曹建文,等.哈拉哈塘一间房组古地貌及岩溶发育条件研究[J].断块油气田,2014,21(4):413-415. Zhang Qingyu,Liang Bin,Cao Jianwen,et al.Palaeogeomorphology and karst development conditions of Yijianfang Formation in Hanilcatam Area[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2014,21(4):413-415.
[15] 中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所.桂林岩溶与碳酸盐岩[M].重庆出版社,1987. Karst institute of geology research institute in Chinese Academy of Sciences.Karst and Carbonate Rocks in Guilin[M].Chongqing:Chongqing Science and Technology Publishing House,1987.
[16] 任美锷,刘振中,王飞燕, 等.岩溶学概论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983. Ren Meie,Liu Zhenzhong,WangFeiyan,et al.Karst Introduction[M].Beijing:Commercial Press, 1983.
[17] 袁道先.中国岩溶学[M].北京:地质出版社,1994. Yuan Daoxian.China Karstology[M].Beijing:Geological Press,1994
[18] 朱学稳.桂林岩溶地貌与洞穴研究[M].北京:地质出版社,1988. Zhu Xuewen.Karst landform and caves in Guilin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1988
[19] 袁道先.中国岩溶动力系统[M].北京:地质出版社,2002. Yuan DaoXian.Karst dynamic system in China[M].Beijing:Geolo-gical Publishing House,2002.

塔北哈拉哈塘加里东期多期岩溶古地貌恢复与洞穴储层分布预测

Restoration of multistage paleogeomorphology during Caledonian Period and paleokarst cavernous reservoir prediction in Halahatang area, northern Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	韩鹏远, 丁文龙, 杨德彬, 张娟, 马海陇, 王生晖. 塔里木盆地塔河油田S80走滑断裂发育特征及其对奥陶系储层的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 770-786.
[2]	张艳秋, 陈红汉, 王燮培, 王彭, 苏丹梅, 谢舟. 塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂带通源性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 787-800.
[3]	丁文龙, 李云涛, 韩俊, 黄诚, 王来源, 孟庆修. 碳酸盐岩储层高精度构造应力场模拟与裂缝多参数分布预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 827-851.
[4]	曹自成, 云露, 漆立新, 李海英, 韩俊, 耿锋, 林波, 陈菁萍, 黄诚, 毛庆言. 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北84X井超千米含油气重大发现及其意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 341-356.
[5]	杨德彬, 鲁新便, 鲍典, 曹飞, 汪彦, 王明, 谢润成. 塔里木盆地北部奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏成因类型及特征再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 357-366.
[6]	张长建, 杨德彬, 蒋林, 姜应兵, 昌琪, 马雪健. 塔里木盆地塔河北部“过溶蚀残留型”断溶体发育特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 367-383.
[7]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[8]	江同文, 邓兴梁, 曹鹏, 常少英. 塔里木盆地富满断控破碎体油藏储集类型特征与注水替油效果[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 542-552.
[9]	牛月萌, 韩俊, 余一欣, 黄诚, 林波, 杨帆, 余浪, 陈俊宇. 塔里木盆地顺北西部地区火成岩侵入体发育特征及其与断裂耦合关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 231-242.
[10]	张三, 金强, 史今雄, 胡明毅, 段梦悦, 李永强, 张旭栋, 程付启. 塔北地区奥陶系地下河溶洞充填规律与储集性能[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1582-1594.
[11]	屈海洲, 郭新宇, 徐伟, 李文皓, 唐松, 邓雅霓, 何仕鹏, 张云峰, 张兴宇. 碳酸盐岩微孔隙的分类、成因及对岩石物理性质的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1102-1117.
[12]	康志江, 张冬梅, 张振坤, 王睿奇, 姜文斌, 刘坤岩. 深层缝洞型油藏井间连通路径智能预测技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1290-1299.
[13]	胡伟, 徐婷, 杨阳, 伦增珉, 李宗宇, 康志江, 赵瑞明, 梅胜文. 塔里木盆地超深油气藏流体相行为变化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1053.
[14]	张坦, 姚威, 赵永强, 周雨双, 黄继文, 范昕禹, 罗宇. 塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系卡拉沙依组年代标尺及地层剥蚀厚度精细计算[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1054-1066.
[15]	郭宏辉, 冯建伟, 赵力彬. 塔里木盆地博孜—大北地区被动走滑构造特征及其对裂缝发育的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 962-975.