四川盆地剑阁-九龙山地区长兴期与飞仙关期古地貌演化特征及其对礁滩体的控制

doi:10.11743/ogg20160607

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 854-861.doi: 10.11743/ogg20160607

四川盆地剑阁-九龙山地区长兴期与飞仙关期古地貌演化特征及其对礁滩体的控制

陈辉¹, 郭海洋¹, 徐祥恺², 张本健³, 梁虹¹, 吴育林¹

1. 中国石油川庆物探公司物探研究中心, 四川成都 610213;
2. 中国石油青海油田公司采油五厂, 甘肃敦煌 736202;
3. 中国石油西南油气田分公司川西北气矿, 四川江油 621700

收稿日期:2015-11-06 修回日期:2016-10-09 出版日期:2016-12-08 发布日期:2017-01-02
第一作者简介:陈辉(1980-),男,博士,地震与地质综合研究。E-mail:478176859@qq.com。
基金项目:
中国石油西南油气田分公司重大科技专项（2013ZD01-02）。

Features of paleogeomorphological evolution and its control on reef flat composite in Changxing-Feixianguan Formation in Jiange-Jiulongshan region,the Sichuan Basin

Chen Hui¹, Guo Haiyang¹, Xu Xiangkai², Zhang Benjian³, Liang Hong¹, Wu Yulin¹

1. Research Center of PetroChina, CCDC Geophysical Prospecting Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China;
2. No. 5 Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang, Gansu 736202, China;
3. Northwest Sichuan Gas Mine of PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Jiangyou, Sichuan 621700, China

Received:2015-11-06 Revised:2016-10-09 Online:2016-12-08 Published:2017-01-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据钻井、测井及三维地震资料，利用层拉平技术、切片及属性分析技术对四川盆地剑阁-九龙山地区长兴组与飞仙关组主要层序界面进行了古地貌恢复，探讨了古地貌演化特征及其对礁滩的控制作用。研究表明，该区古地貌整体具有西南高北东低的格局，在古地貌演化过程中研究区内碳酸盐台地沉积区具有由西南向北东不断扩张的趋势，反映了长兴期至飞仙关期整体海退、沉积物不断向深水充填的特征。随着台缘及台内正地形等古地貌高带的迁移，礁滩体发育有利区也随之迁移，其中剑阁地区的Lg68井-Lg63井-Lg62井一带为长兴末期继承性古地貌高地，是长兴组与飞仙关组各时期礁滩体垂向叠置发育最为有利的区域。九龙山构造主体为飞仙关组二段多期台缘滩横向迁移叠置的区域，是飞仙关组鲕滩体发育最为有利的区域。

关键词: 长兴组, 飞仙关组, 古地貌演化, 礁滩体, 剑阁-九龙山地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Utilizing core,well logging and 3D seismic data,technologies such as horizon flattening,section and attribute analysis were used to reconstruct the paleogeomorphology environments in Changxing and Feixianguan Formations' main sequence boundaries in Jiange and Jiulongshan districts,the Sichuan Basin.The features of paleogeomorphological evolution were investigated and their control on the reef flat were discussed.Results show that paleo topography of the area is featured by higher southwestern parts and dipping down to the Northeastern parts.The carbonate platform's constant progredation from southwest to northeast during the paleo-geomorphological evolution in the area leds to features such as marine regression,sediment filling into deep water during the periods of Changxing and Feixianguan deposition.The reef flat's favorable depo-center areas were also transferred in tune with the migration of paleo-landform's high belt and platform margin.The area around wells Lg68,Lg63 and Lg62 is an inherited paleogeomorphological high grounds,representing the most favorable place for the reef flat's vertical aggredation of Changxing and Feixianguan carbonates in the Jiange district.The major positive structure in Jiulongshan area is composed of Feixianguan formation's second section,which are a set of platform margin oolitic beaches superimposed one on another in transverse and overlaying fashion.It is also the most favorable area for development of oolitic beach in Feixianguan formation.

Key words: Changxing Formation, Feixianguan Formation, paleogeomorphological evolution, reef flat, Jiange-Jiulongshan region, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.1

陈辉,郭海洋,徐祥恺,等. 四川盆地剑阁-九龙山地区长兴期与飞仙关期古地貌演化特征及其对礁滩体的控制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 854-861. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160607 Chen Hui,Guo Haiyang,Xu Xiangkai,et al. Features of paleogeomorphological evolution and its control on reef flat composite in Changxing-Feixianguan Formation in Jiange-Jiulongshan region,the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6): 854-861. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160607

参考文献

[1] 王一刚,洪海涛,夏茂龙,等.四川盆地二叠、三叠系环海槽礁滩富气带勘探[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):22-27. Wang Yigang,Hong Haitao,Xia Maolong,et al.Exploration of reef-bank gas reservoirs surrounding Permian and Triassic Troughs in Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(1):22-27.
[2] 冯仁蔚,王兴志,张帆,等.川西北广旺地区飞仙关组沉积岩石学特征及沉积环境分析[J].地质调查与研究,2007,30(2):98-108. Feng Renwei,Wang Xingzhi,Zhang Fan,et al.Characteristic of sedimentary petrography and depositing environment of the Feixianguan Fm.in Guangyuan-Wangcang Southwestern Sichuan province[J].Geological Survey and Research,2007,30(2):98-108.
[3] 张延充,彭才,杨雨,等.四川盆地飞仙关组高能鲕滩储层地震层序识别[J].天然气工业,2010,30(3):8-11. Zhang Yanchong,Peng Cai,Yang Yu,et al.Identification of seismic sequences of high-energy oolitic beach reservoirs in the Feixianguan Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010l,30(3):8-11.
[4] 唐金良,俞建宝,赵曙白,等.基准面变化在地震层序地层研究中的应用[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(3):186-190. Tang Jinliang,Yu Jianbao,Zhao Shubai.Application of sedimentary base level in the study of seismic sequence stratigraphy[J].Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2003,26(3):186-190.
[5] 姜正龙,邓宏文,林会喜,等.古地貌恢复方法及应用[J].石油天然气学报,2009,23(5):865-870. Jiang Zhenglong,Deng Hongwen,Lin Huixi,et al.Methods and application of Paleo-geomorphologies rebuilding[J].Geoscience,2009,23(5):865-870.
[6] 韩敏强,蒲仁海,刘海娟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区奥陶纪末古地貌恢复与储层预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(54):760-765. Han Minqiang,Pu Renhai,Liu Haijuan,et al.Reconstruction of the Late Ordovician palaeogeomorphology and reservoir prediction in Yanchang exploration area,the Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(54):760-765.
[7] 吴丽艳,陈春强,江春明,等.浅谈我国油气勘探中的古地貌恢复技术[J].石油天然气学报,2005,27(4):559-564. Wu Liyan,Chen Chunqian,Jiang Chunming,et al.Paleogeomorphic restoring techniques in China hydrocarbon exploration[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,2005,27(4):559-564.
[8] 彭莉,刘小平,林畅松,等.塔中隆起晚奥陶世古地貌及其沉积相特征[J].石油地球物理勘探,2009,44(6):767-772. Peng Li,Liu Xiaoping,Lin Changsong,et al.Late Ordovician palaeogeomorphology and its sedimentary facies characteristics in central Tarim uplift[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2009,44(6):767-772.
[9] 朱筱敏,董艳蕾,胡廷惠,等.精细层序地层格架与地震沉积学研究——以泌阳凹陷核桃园组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(4):615-619. Zhu Xiaomin,Dong Yanlei,Hu Tinghui,et al.Seismic sedimentology study of fine sequence stratigraphic framework:a case study of the Hetaoyuan Formation in the Biyang Sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(4):615-619.
[10] 刘继顺,毕殿,姚一林,等.地震沉积学在杏树岗油田扶余油层中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2011,11(11):2569-2573. Liu Jishun,Bi Dianhui,Yao Yilin,et al.Seismic sedimentology and its application in Fuyu layer of Xingshugang Oil Field[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2011,11(11):2569-2573.
[11] 邹德江,于兴河,李胜利,等.古地貌对储层沉积体系控制作用分析[J].石油天然气学报,2009,30(2):175-179. Zou Dejiang,Yu Xinghe,Li Shengli,et al.Analysis on control of paleogeomorphology to reservoir sedimentary system[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2009,30(2):175-179.
[12] 倪新锋,陈洪德,田景春,等.川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组沉积格局及成藏控制意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(4):458-462. Ni Xinfeng,Chen Hongde,Tian Jingchun,et al.Sedimentary framework of Changxing-Feixianguan Formations and its control on reservoiring in northeastern Sichuan basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(4):458-462.
[13] 洪海涛,王一刚,杨天泉,等.川东北地区长兴组沉积相和生物礁气藏分布规律[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):38-41. Hong Haitao,Wang Yigang,Yang Tianquan,et al.Sedimentary facies of Changxing Formation and distribution of organic reef gas reservoirs in northeastern Sichuan basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(1):38-41.
[14] 王兴志,张帆,马青,等.四川盆地东部晚二叠世一早三叠世飞仙关期礁滩特征与海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2002,20(2):249-254. Wang Xingzhi,Zhang Fan,Ma Qing,et al.The characteristics of reef and bank and the fluctuation of sea-level in Feixianguan period of late Permian-Early Triassic,East Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2002,20(2):249-254.
[15] 陈洪德,钟怡江,侯明才,等.川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩台地层序充填结构及成藏效应[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(5):539-545. Chen Hongde,Zhong Yijiang,Hou Mingcai,et al.Sequence styles and hydrocarbon accumulation effects of carbonate rock platform in the Changxing-Feixianguan formations in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(5):539-545.

四川盆地剑阁-九龙山地区长兴期与飞仙关期古地貌演化特征及其对礁滩体的控制

Features of paleogeomorphological evolution and its control on reef flat composite in Changxing-Feixianguan Formation in Jiange-Jiulongshan region,the Sichuan Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[4]	潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[5]	张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田：一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[6]	张自力, 乔艳萍, 豆霜, 李堃宇, 钟原, 武鲁亚, 张宝收, 戴鑫, 金鑫, 王斌, 宋金民. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段岩溶古地貌与控储模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[7]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 周彤, 张亚雄, 王濡岳, 李宁, 陈昱辛, 熊晓菲. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[8]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[9]	王红岩, 周尚文, 赵群, 施振生, 刘德勋, 焦鹏飞. 川南地区深层页岩气富集特征、勘探开发进展及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[10]	边瑞康, 孙川翔, 聂海宽, 刘珠江, 杜伟, 李沛, 王濡岳. 四川盆地东南部五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气藏类型、特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[11]	李双建, 李智, 张磊, 李英强, 孟宪武, 王海军. 四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[12]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[13]	刘昇, 范存辉, 张本健, 张亚, 王尉, 罗冰, 白晓亮. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组孤峰段展布特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 993-1008.
[14]	吴冬, 邓虎成, 熊亮, 曹凯旋, 董晓霞, 赵勇, 魏力民, 王同, 马若龙. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统麦地坪组-筇竹寺组层序充填和演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 764-777.
[15]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 赖富强, 刘粤蛟, 邬忠虎, 何建华, 邹冠贵, 王鹏威, 李治昊. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩脆性特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 366-378.