考虑液硫析出的超深酸性气藏数值模拟技术

doi:10.11743/ogg20170622

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1208-1216.doi: 10.11743/ogg20170622

• 技术方法 • 上一篇

考虑液硫析出的超深酸性气藏数值模拟技术

顾少华^1,2, 石志良^1,2, 史云清^1,2, 胡向阳^1,2, 岑芳^1,2

1. 中国石化海相油气田开发重点实验室, 北京 100083;
2. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-11-25 修回日期:2017-08-25 出版日期:2017-12-28 发布日期:2018-01-08
通讯作者: 石志良(1972-),男,博士,气藏工程。E-mail:shizl.syky@sinopec.com。 E-mail:shizl.syky@sinopec.com
第一作者简介:顾少华(1984-),男,博士,气藏工程。E-mail:cc0012@126.com。
基金项目:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05017-005）；中石化科技攻关项目（P15050）。

Numerical simulation for ultra-deep sour gas reservoirs with liquid sulfur condensate

Gu Shaohua^1,2, Shi Zhiliang^1,2, Shi Yunqing^1,2, Hu Xiangyang^1,2, Cen Fang^1,2

1. SINOPEC Key Laboratory for Marine Oil and Gas Exploration, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-11-25 Revised:2017-08-25 Online:2017-12-28 Published:2018-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 超深酸性气藏开采时在储层中发生液硫析出现象，阻碍气体流动，降低气井产能。为研究液硫析出对气井生产的影响，建立考虑了液硫析出、气-液硫两相同流的酸性气藏数值模拟模型。基于上述模型开发了相应的数值模拟器，并将该模拟技术应用于四川盆地元坝长兴组气藏气井动态研究中。结果表明：液硫析出后在井壁附近聚集，并且自始至终仅局限于井筒附近。相较固硫析出而言，液硫析出对气井生产的影响较小，但仍能明显降低气井稳产期。在非均质地层中，析出的液硫主要聚集在储层物性较好的区域，如裂缝或溶孔等高渗区，造成气藏渗透性降低，气井产能下降。该模拟技术实现了对酸性气藏液硫析出的定量预测，为该类气藏的开发提供了可靠的决策依据。

关键词: 数值模拟, 液硫, 速敏相渗, 气井稳产, 酸性气藏, 长兴组, 四川盆地

Abstract: Liquid sulfur condensate phenomenon exists in ultra-deep sour gas reservoir,which affects the reservoir permeability and reduce the gas well productivity.A numerical simulation model proposed in this paper for sour gas reservoirs considers such a two phase flow with both liquid sulfur condensate and gas fluids.On basis of the model,a numerical simulator is developed and used in research of sour gas well production.The results shows liquid sulfur mainly gathers near wellbore,and never extend further during the entire production life.Compared with solid sulfur deposition,condensation of liquid sulfur has less effect on the gas well production.However,the peak production period of gas well reduces obviously.In heterogeneous formation,the liquid sulfur mainly gathers where better reservoir property is present.The liquid sulfur preferentially occupies high permeability zones such as fractures or vugs,which leads to reservoir permeability reduction and the well production decline.Based on this technology,the liquid sulfur condensate behavior in sour gas reservoir can be predicted quantitatively.Thus the technology can provide reliable results for decision-making.

Key words: numerical simulation, liquid sulfur condensate, velocity dependent relative permeability, gas well productivity, sour gas reservoir, Changxing Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE348

顾少华,石志良,史云清,等. 考虑液硫析出的超深酸性气藏数值模拟技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6): 1208-1216. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170622 Gu Shaohua,Shi Zhiliang,Shi Yunqing,et al. Numerical simulation for ultra-deep sour gas reservoirs with liquid sulfur condensate[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(6): 1208-1216. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170622

参考文献

[1] Changyu Sun,Guangjin Chen.Experimental and modeling studies on sulfur solubility in sour gas[J].Fluid Phase Equilibrium,2003,2(4):187-195.
[2] Robert B E.The effect of sulfur deposition on gas well inflow performance[J].SPE Reservoir Engineering,1997,12(2):118-123.
[3] Hyne J.B.Study aids prediction of sulfur deposition in sour gas wells[J].Oil and Gas,1968,25(11):107-118.
[4] Alawadhy F,Kocabas I,Abou-Kassem J H,et al.Experimental and numerical modeling of sulfur plugging in a carbonate oil reservoir[J].energy Sources,2007,18(1-2):3-18.
[5] Mingxing Gu,Qun Li,Tianmin Guo.Experimental and modeling studies on the phase behavior of high H₂S-content natural gas mixtures[J].Fluid Phase Equilibria,1993,82(82):173-182.
[6] 胡书勇,张烈辉.高含硫气藏硫沉积的研究进展[J].钻采工艺,2009,32(1):71-74. Hu Shuyong,Zhang Liehui.Research on Elemental sulfur deposition in gas reservoir with high H₂S[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2009,32(1):71-7.
[7] 曾平,赵金洲,周洪彬,等.高含硫气藏元素硫沉积对储集层的伤害[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(6):113-115. Zeng Ping,Zhao Jinzhou,Zhou Hongbin,et al.Study on gas percolation behavior for gas reservoirs with high sulfur content[J].Natural gas Industry,2005,25(9):83-85.
[8] 杨学锋,黄先平,杜志敏,等.考虑非平衡过程元素硫沉积对高含硫气藏储层伤害研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(6):67-70. Yang Xuefeng,Huang Xianping,Du Zhimin.Reservoir damage caused by elemental sulfur deposition to high sulfur content gas reservoirs with the consideration of non-equilibrium process[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2007,26(6):67-70.
[9] 龙胜祥,游瑜春,刘国萍,等.元坝气田长兴组超深层缓坡型礁滩相储层精细刻画[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(6):994-1000. Long Shengxiang,You Yuchun,Liu Guoping,et al.Fine characterization of ultra-deep reef-shoal reservoirs of ramp-type in Changxing Formation in Yuanba gas field,Sichuan Basin.Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(6):994-1000.
[10] 何治亮,张军涛,丁茜,等.深层-超深层优质碳酸盐岩储层形成控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(4):633-644,763. He Zhiliang,Zhang Juntao,Ding Qian,et al.Factors controlling the formation of high-quality deep to ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(4):633-644,763.
[11] 王卫红,刘传喜,穆林,等.高含硫碳酸盐岩气藏开发技术政策优化[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(2):302-310. Wang Weihong,Liu Chuanxi,Mu Lin,et al.Technical policy optimization for the development of carbonate sour gas reservoirs[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(2):302-310.
[12] Guo Xiao,Du Zhimin,Zhang Yong,et al.Laboratory and simulation investigation of sulfur deposition in sour gas reservoir[C]International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China.Society of Petroleum Engineers,2006:861-867.
[13] Nicholas H,Bora O,Bruce R,et al.Advances in the prediction and management of elemental sulfur deposition associated with sour gas production from fractured carbonate reservoirs[C].Society of Petroleum Engineers,2002.
[14] 杜志敏.高含硫气藏流体相态实验和硫沉积数值模拟[J].天然气工业,2008,28(4):78-81. Du Zhimin.High sulfur gas reservoir fluid phase state experiment and numerical simulation of sulfur deposition[J]Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(4):78-81
[15] Mahmoud M,Mahmoud M.Effect of elemental-sulfur deposition on the rock petrophysical properties in sour-gas reservoirs[J].SPE Journal,2014,19(4):703-715.
[16] Xiao Guo,Qing Wang.A new]rediction model of elemental sulfur solubility in sour gas mixtures[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering,2016,31:98-107.
[17] Henderson G D,Danesh A,Tehrani D.H,et al.The relative significance of positive coupling and inertial effects on gas condensate relative permeabilities at high velocity[C]2000.
[18] 杨胜来,魏俊之.油层物理学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2010. Yang Shenglai,Wei Junzhi.Reservoir physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2010

考虑液硫析出的超深酸性气藏数值模拟技术

Numerical simulation for ultra-deep sour gas reservoirs with liquid sulfur condensate

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[4]	潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[5]	张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田：一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[6]	张自力, 乔艳萍, 豆霜, 李堃宇, 钟原, 武鲁亚, 张宝收, 戴鑫, 金鑫, 王斌, 宋金民. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段岩溶古地貌与控储模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[7]	赵俊威, 孙海航, 张东伟, 王恒. 典型海相砂质临滨坝沉积演化过程及成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 65-80.
[8]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 周彤, 张亚雄, 王濡岳, 李宁, 陈昱辛, 熊晓菲. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[9]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[10]	王红岩, 周尚文, 赵群, 施振生, 刘德勋, 焦鹏飞. 川南地区深层页岩气富集特征、勘探开发进展及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[11]	边瑞康, 孙川翔, 聂海宽, 刘珠江, 杜伟, 李沛, 王濡岳. 四川盆地东南部五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气藏类型、特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[12]	李双建, 李智, 张磊, 李英强, 孟宪武, 王海军. 四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[13]	雷涛, 任广磊, 李晓慧, 冯文杰, 孙华超. 砂质辫状河心滩沉积演化规律与沉积构型特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1595-1608.
[14]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[15]	李晓, 郭鹏, 胡彦智, 李士祥, 杨伟伟. 陆相页岩压裂试验与数值模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1009-1019.