石油与天然气地质 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 293-308.doi: 10.11743/ogg20240120
董鑫旭1(), 周兴海2, 李昆2, 蒲仁海1(), 王爱国1, 关蕴文1, 张鹏1
收稿日期:
2023-10-17
修回日期:
2024-01-06
出版日期:
2024-02-01
发布日期:
2024-02-29
通讯作者:
蒲仁海
E-mail:1276479878@qq.com;purenhai@126.com
第一作者简介:
董鑫旭(1995—),博士研究生,石油与天然气勘探、开发地质。E-mail:1276479878@qq.com。
基金项目:
Xinxu DONG1(), Xinghai ZHOU2, Kun LI2, Renhai PU1(), Aiguo WANG1, Yunwen GUAN1, Peng ZHANG1
Received:
2023-10-17
Revised:
2024-01-06
Online:
2024-02-01
Published:
2024-02-29
Contact:
Renhai PU
E-mail:1276479878@qq.com;purenhai@126.com
摘要:
海上工区面积辽阔,单井资料匮乏,花港组内部横向上的沉积微相界定存在争议、纵向上的沉积演化规律不明。为充分挖掘现有井、震资料的地质解释潜力,选取东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带X区块古近系花港组为研究对象,提出了井-震小波变换建立高精度等时地层格架、井点沉积相标志定相类型、分频RGB属性刻画沉积相展布以及古地貌恢复辅助沉积相演化规律分析的地震沉积学解释技术。研究结果表明:①测井-地震小波变换结果有较好的一致性,可将研究区花港组分为花港组上段(花上段)3个(H1—H3)和花下段5个(H4—H8)四级旋回,并在此基础上建立高精度等时地层格架。②根据岩心相、测井相和地震相相互印证,确认研究区花港组沉积期为辫状河三角洲沉积环境。分频振幅属性验证不同厚度砂岩层在15,30和45 Hz单频体的振幅响应明显,采用分频RGB属性融合可在平面凸显不同沉积体的边界。③研究区H1和H2旋回整体为三角洲前缘沉积,H3—H6旋回为浅水背景下的三角洲平原-前缘沉积,H7和H8旋回为辫状河三角洲平原沉积,砂层组沉积相垂向演化受控于物源供给、相对湖平面高低和古地貌形态。在井-震时频分析建立等时地层格架基础上,通过相关性分析优选属性进行RGB融合能够凸显不同厚度砂岩的展布,减少了人为主观因素的影响,提升了沉积体边界的识别能力,可为其他井网稀疏地带沉积相刻画提供借鉴。
中图分类号:
图5
西湖凹陷X区块花港组岩心岩性与沉积构造照片a. 含砾粗砂岩, 砾石定向排列, B2井, 埋深3 141 m,H3砂层组; b. 底部板状交错层理, 上部平行层理, B2井, 埋深3 132 m,H3; c. 细砂岩、泥质粉砂岩互层, B2井, 埋深3 141 m,H3砂层组;d. 细砂岩, 底部泥砾冲刷面, B4井, 埋深2 834 m,H2砂层组; e. 砂纹层理, B3井, 埋深3 367 m,H6砂层组; f. 波状层理, B3井, 埋深3 235 m,H5砂层组; g. 植物茎叶碎片炭化, B3井, 埋深3 367 m,H6砂层组; h. 煤层, B3井, 埋深3 406 m,H6砂层组"
1 | ZENG Hongliu. What is seismic sedimentology?A tutorial[J]. Interpretation, 2018, 6(2): SD1-SD12. |
2 | 娄敏, 刘江, 涂齐催, 等. 河流-三角洲相不同厚度储层的地震沉积学研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(5): 2191-2203. |
LOU Min, LIU Jiang, TU Qicui, et al. Application of seismic sedimentology to the prediction of fluvial-delta facies reservoirs with different thickness[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(5): 2191-2203. | |
3 | 陈波, 段冬平, 刘英辉, 等. 西湖凹陷中深层河流相砂体地震沉积学解释与沉积演化分析[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3): 117-126. |
CHEN Bo, DUAN Dongping, LIU Yinghui, et al. Seismic sedimentary interpretation and sedimentary evolution analysis on middle-deep fluvial facies sandbodies in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3): 117-126. | |
4 | 娄敏, 蔡华, 何贤科, 等. 地震沉积学在东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷河流-三角洲相储集层刻画中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(1): 125-138. |
LOU Min, CAI Hua, HE Xianke, et al. Application of seismic sedimentology in characterization of fluvial-deltaic reservoirs in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(1): 125-138. | |
5 | CHENG Yanjun, WU Zhiping, XU Bin, et al. Structural characteristics and genetic mechanism of transfer zones in an extensional rift zone: An example from the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Tectonophysics, 2023, 856: 229852. |
6 | 孙思敏, 彭仕宓. 东海西湖凹陷平湖油气田花港组高分辨率层序地层特征[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2006, 28(4): 184-187, 448-449. |
SUN Simin, PENG Shimi. High resolution sequence stratigraphic characters in Huagang Formation of Pinghu Formation oil and gas field in Xihu Depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2006, 28(4): 184-187, 448-449. | |
7 | 张锡楠, 程超, 鞠颢, 等. 河流相砂体精细描述在西湖凹陷某气田的应用[J]. 中国地质调查, 2020, 7(5): 25-32. |
ZHANG Xinan, CHENG Chao, JU Hao, et al. Application of sandbody description of fluvial facies in one gas field of Xihu Sag[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2020, 7(5): 25-32. | |
8 | 于兴河, 李顺利, 曹冰, 等. 西湖凹陷渐新世层序地层格架与沉积充填响应[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(2): 299-314. |
YU Xinghe, LI Shunli, CAO Bing, et al. Oligocene sequence framework and depositional response in the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(2): 299-314. | |
9 | 张国华, 刘金水, 秦兰芝, 等. 西湖凹陷渐新统花港组大型辫状河沉积体系特征[J]. 中国海上油气, 2018, 30(3): 10-18. |
ZHANG Guohua, LIU Jinshui, QIN Lanzhi, et al. Characteristics of the large braided river depositional system of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 30(3): 10-18. | |
10 | 陈琳琳. 西湖凹陷北部渐新统花港组湿地扇沉积学分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2015, 8(4): 1-6. |
CHEN Linlin. Sedimentary analysis of humid fan in Oligocene Huagang Formation of the northern Xihu Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2015, 8(4): 1-6. | |
11 | 肖剑南, 陈晶, 陈琳琳, 等. 西湖凹陷东坡渐新统花港组下段粗碎屑体基准面旋回分析[J]. 海洋石油, 2017, 37(4): 12-20. |
XIAO Jiannan, CHEN Jing, CHEN Linlin, et al. Analysis of base level cycles in coarse Lower Huagang Formation of Oligocene on eastern slope of Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil, 2017, 37(4): 12-20. | |
12 | 周荔青, 江东辉, 张尚虎, 等. 东海西湖凹陷大中型油气田形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 803-812. |
ZHOU Liqing, JIANG Donghui, ZHANG Shanghu, et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large and medium oil and gas reservoirs in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 803-812. | |
13 | 余浪, 余一欣, 蒋一鸣, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷天台斜坡构造变换带发育特征及形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 753-763. |
YU Lang, YU Yixin, JIANG Yiming, et al. Characteristics and forming mechanisms of transform zone in the Tiantai slope, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 753-763. | |
14 | ZHANG Guohua, LI Sanzhong, SUO Yanhui, et al. Cenozoic positive inversion tectonics and its migration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Geological Journal, 2016, 51(S1): 176-187. |
15 | 李天军, 黄志龙, 郭小波, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平北斜坡带平湖组煤系原油地球化学特征与油-源精细对比[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 432-444. |
LI Tianjun, HUANG Zhilong, GUO Xiaobo, et al. Geochemical characteristics of crude oil from coal measure source rocks and fine oil-source correlation in the Pinghu Formation in Pingbei slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 432-444. | |
16 | 张迎朝, 邹玮, 陈忠云, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组气藏 “先汇后聚” 机制及地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1256-1269. |
ZHANG Yingzhao, ZOU Wei, CHEN Zhongyun, et al. The mechanism of “convergence ahead of accumulation” and its geological significance for gas reservoirs in Paleogene Huagang Formation across the central inverted structural zone of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5): 1256-1269. | |
17 | 刘贤, 葛家旺, 赵晓明, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组年代标尺及层序界面定量识别[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4): 990-1004. |
LIU Xian, GE Jiawang, ZHAO Xiaoming, et al. Time scale and quantitative identification of sequence boundaries for the Oligocene Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 990-1004. | |
18 | MUSHIN I A, MAKAROV V V, KOZLOV E A, et al. Structural-formational interpretation tools for seismic stratigraphy[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2000, 48(6): 953-981. |
19 | 殷文. 基于时频约束的井震资料联合时深标定方法[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(3): 377-384. |
YIN Wen. Time-depth calibration with seismic and well data based on time-frequency constraint[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 42(3): 377-384. | |
20 | 彭军, 于乐丹, 许天宇, 等. 天文地层学研究程序及其在渤海湾盆地东营凹陷的应用实例分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(6): 1292-1308. |
PENG Jun, YU Ledan, XU Tianyu, et al. Research procedure of astrostratigraphy and case study of Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1292-1308. | |
21 | 冯磊. 利用地震资料时频特征分析沉积旋回[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(2): 95-99. |
FENG Lei. Using time-frequency characteristics to analyze sedimentary cycle[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(2): 95-99. | |
22 | LI Wei, ZHANG Jianguo, XIE Jun, et al. Application of the wavelet transform and INPEFA in sequence stratigraphy[J]. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(3): 3441-3451. |
23 | WANG R, XIE J, RAN A H, et al. Comparison of INPEFA technology and wavelet transform in sequence stratigraphic division of mixed reservoir: A case study of lower Es3 of KL oilfield in Laizhouwan Sag[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2022, 12(12): 3213-3225. |
24 | POSAMENTIER H W, PAUMARD V, LANG S C. Principles of seismic stratigraphy and seismic geomorphology I: Extracting geologic insights from seismic data[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 228: 103963. |
25 | 王红岩. 西湖凹陷曲流河三角洲古地貌恢复及沉积特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(3): 318-327. |
WANG Hongyan. Paleogeomorphic restoration and sedimentary characteristics of meandering river delta in Xihu Depression, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 47(3): 318-327. | |
26 | 姜雪, 熊志武. 基于灰色理论指导的储层构型半定量表征及优质储层预测——以西湖凹陷A构造花港组H3砂层组为例[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2022, 42(6): 162-172. |
JIANG Xue, XIONG Zhiwu. Semi-quantitative study on reservoir configuration in grey theory—A case study of H3 sand unit of Huagang Formation in A Structure, Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2022, 42(6): 162-172. | |
27 | 蔡佳, 祁鹏, 宋双. 东海盆地西湖凹陷花港组下段沉积相分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2017, 37(2): 56-65. |
CAI Jia, QI Peng, SONG Shuang. Sedimentary facies of the Lower Huagang Formation in Xihu Depression of Donghai Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(2): 56-65. | |
28 | 张建培, 徐发, 钟韬, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组-花港组层序地层模式及沉积演化[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012, 32(1): 35-41. |
ZHANG Jianpei, XU Fa, ZHONG Tao, et al. Sequence stratigraphic models and sedimentary evolution of Pinghu and Huagang formations in Xihu trough[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(1): 35-41. | |
29 | FENG L, LU Y C, WELLNER J S, et al. Fluvial morphology and reservoir sand-body architecture in lacustrine rift basins with axial and lateral sediment supplies: Oligocene fluvial-lacustrine succession in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2020, 67(2): 279-304. |
30 | 杨占龙, 陈启林, 郭精义. “三相” 联合解释技术在岩性油气藏勘探中的应用——以吐哈盆地胜北地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3): 370-374. |
YANG Zhanlong, CHEN Qilin, GUO Jingyi. “Three facies” integrated interpretation technique and its application in lithologic reservoir exploration in Shengbei area, Turpan-Harmy Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007, 18(3): 370-374. | |
31 | 岳大力, 李伟, 杜玉山, 等. 河流相储层地震属性优选与融合方法综述[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(11): 3929-3943. |
YUE Dali, LI Wei, DU Yushan, et al. Review on optimization and fusion of seismic attributes for fluvial reservoir characterization[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(11): 3929-3943. | |
32 | 侯东梅, 郭敬民, 全洪慧, 等. 基于分频RGB融合技术和水平井信息的辫状河储层构型研究——以C油田馆陶组为例[J]. 石油科学通报, 2022, 7(1): 1-11. |
HOU Dongmei, GUO Jingmin, QUAN Honghui, et al. Research into braided river reservoir architecture based on frequency fused seismic attribute and horizontal wells——A case study of the Guantao Formation of C oilfield[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2022, 7(1): 1-11. | |
33 | 万晓龙, 刘瑞璟, 时建超, 等. 基于地震属性智能融合的湖相重力流沉积致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 石油科学通报, 2023, 8(1): 1-11. |
WAN Xiaolong, LIU Ruijing, SHI Jianchao, et al. Prediction of tight sandstone of lacustrine gravity-flow reservoirs using intelligent fusion of seismic attributes[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2023, 8(1): 1-11. | |
34 | 马佳国, 王建立, 周卿, 等. 分频RGB融合技术在精细刻画沉积微相中的应用[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2019, 12(3): 27-31. |
MA JIA Guo, WANG Jianli, ZHOU Qing, et al. Frequency division RGB fusion technique for fine description of sedimentary microfacies[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2019, 12(3): 27-31. | |
35 | LIU Jinshui, LI Shuai, LIAO Kaifei, et al. New interpretation on the provenance changes of the upper Pinghu-Lower Huagang Formation within Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2023, 42(3): 89-100. |
36 | ZHANG Jingyu, LU Yongchao, KRIJGSMAN W, et al. Source to sink transport in the Oligocene Huagang Formation of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 98: 733-745. |
37 | 赵洪, 蒋一鸣, 沈文超, 等. 西湖凹陷花港组物源特征及对储层的影响研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(2): 65-72. |
ZHAO Hong, JIANG Yiming, SHEN Wenchao, et al. Study on Huagang Formation provenance characteristics and effects on reservoirs in Xihu Sag[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(2): 65-72. |
[1] | 蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 宋舜尧, 时战楠, 韩文中, 张伟, 解德录. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709. |
[2] | 韩载华, 刘华, 赵兰全, 刘景东, 尹丽娟, 李磊. 渤海湾盆地临南洼陷古近系沙河街组源-储组合类型与致密(低渗)砂岩油差异富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 722-738. |
[3] | 高和群, 高玉巧, 何希鹏, 聂军. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层岩石力学特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 502-515. |
[4] | 远光辉, 彭光荣, 张丽丽, 孙辉, 陈淑慧, 刘浩, 赵晓阳. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系深层高变温背景下储层成岩作用与低渗致密化机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 44-64. |
[5] | 杨小艺, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 李国雄, 冯德浩, 杨韬政, 何志斌, 苏加佳. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷西南洼古近系东营组超压分布特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 96-112. |
[6] | 方志雄, 肖秋生, 张殿伟, 段宏亮. 苏北盆地陆相“断块型”页岩油地质特征及勘探实践[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1468-1478. |
[7] | 雷涛, 任广磊, 李晓慧, 冯文杰, 孙华超. 砂质辫状河心滩沉积演化规律与沉积构型特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1595-1608. |
[8] | 王永诗, 巩建强, 陈冬霞, 邱贻博, 茆书巍, 雷文智, 杨怀宇, 王翘楚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷盐家地区深层砂砾岩油气藏相态演化及成藏过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1159-1172. |
[9] | 张迎朝, 邹玮, 陈忠云, 蒋一鸣, 刁慧. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组气藏“先汇后聚”机制及地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1256-1269. |
[10] | 刘豪, 徐长贵, 高阳东, 林鹤鸣, 邱欣卫, 剧永涛, 汪旭东, 李磊, 孟俊, 阙晓明. 断陷湖盆低勘探区源-汇系统与烃源岩预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 565-583. |
[11] | 高阳东, 彭光荣, 张向涛, 汪旭东, 孙辉, 刘太勋, 孙丰春. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系文昌组源-汇系统特征及演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 584-599. |
[12] | 彭光荣, 王绪诚, 陈维涛, 靳瑶瑶, 王菲, 王文勇, 全涵. 珠江口盆地惠州26洼东南缘古近系恩平组上段断-拗转换期源-汇系统及勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 613-625. |
[13] | 杜晓峰, 庞小军, 黄晓波, 王冰洁. 辽西凹陷北部古近系沙河街组二段源-汇系统及其对滩坝砂体的控制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 662-674. |
[14] | 余浪, 余一欣, 蒋一鸣, 邹玮, 陈石, 唐贤君, 梁鑫鑫, 何新建, 陈冬霞. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷天台斜坡构造变换带发育特征及形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 753-763. |
[15] | 周雁, 付斯一, 张涛, 陈洪德, 苏中堂, 张军涛, 张成弓, 刘子铭, 韩骁宇. 鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界构造-沉积演化、古地理重建及有利成藏区带划分[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 264-275. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||