张家垛油田阜三段Ⅲ砂组沉积微相特征与沉积模式

doi:10.11743/ogg20130606

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 751-757.doi: 10.11743/ogg20130606

张家垛油田阜三段Ⅲ砂组沉积微相特征与沉积模式

陈倩倩¹, 丁晓琪^1,2, 万友利¹, 张哨楠^1,2

1. 成都理工大学能源学院, 四川成都 610059;
2. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2012-12-31 修回日期:2013-10-10 出版日期:2013-12-08 发布日期:2014-01-04
作者简介:陈倩倩（1988- ），女，硕士研究生，储层岩石学与储层地球化学。E-mail：491096496@qq.com。
基金资助:
中国博士后基金项目（2011M511941）；自然科学青年基金项目（41302115）。

Microfacies characteristics and sedimentary models of the third member of Funing Formation in Zhangjiaduo oilfield

Chen Qianqian¹, Ding Xiaoqi^1,2, Wan Youli¹, Zhang Shaonan^1,2

1. Energy College, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2012-12-31 Revised:2013-10-10 Online:2013-12-08 Published:2014-01-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 苏北盆地张家垛油田阜宁组三段发育4种岩相：黑色泥岩相，生物扰动粉砂岩相、泥质纹层+生物钻孔粉-细砂岩相及平行层理细砂岩相。剖面结构主要为向上变粗的反韵律，其次是向上变粗复变细的复合韵律，几乎不见正韵律。根据岩石相、剖面结构、测井相及粒度累计曲线，认为阜宁组三段为浅湖滩坝沉积。根据沉积特征和砂体展布规律，将储层进一步划分为坝砂和滩砂，并提出该地区的滩坝沉积模式。坝砂由于泥质含量低、储层物性好，油气充满度高；而滩砂泥质纹层理发育，非均质性弱。由于主要充填在平行层理细砂岩相和泥质纹层+生物钻孔粉砂岩相中，充注程度差别大。

关键词: 浅湖, 滩坝, 沉积微相, 沉积模式, 阜宁组, 张家垛油田, 苏北盆地

Abstract: Four types of lithofacies are identified in the 3rd member of Funing Formation in Zhangjiaduo oilfield,the Su-bei Basin,including dark mudstone,bioturbated siltstone,siltstone-fine sandstone lithofacies with argillaceous laminates and burrow as well as fine sandstone with parallel bedding.Upward-coarsening reverse rhythm is the main section structure,followed by first upward-coarsening and then upward-thinning composite rhythm,while positive rhythm is very rare.All the features of lithofacies,section structure,logging facies and cumulative grading curve show that the 3rd member of Funing Fm is typical shallow lake beach-bar facies.According to the sedimentary characteristics and spatial distributions,the reservoirs are further divided into sandstone of bar microfacies and sandstone of beach microfacies.A beach-bar sedimentary model is proposed.The sandstone reservoirs of bar microfacies are high in hydrocarbon fullness,due to its low shale content and high porosity.In contrast,the sandstone reservoirs of beach microfacies show great variance in hydrocarbon fullness as argillaceous laminations are well developed,heterogeneity is week,and hydrocarbons mainly fill in the fine sandstone lithofacies with parallel bedding and argillaceous laminates+burrow fine sandstone lithofacies.

Key words: shallow lacustrine, beach-bar, sedimentary microfacies, sedimentary model, Funing Formation, Zhangjiaduo oilfield, Subei Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.3

陈倩倩,丁晓琪,万友利,等. 张家垛油田阜三段Ⅲ砂组沉积微相特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(6): 751-757. doi: 10.11743/ogg20130606 Chen Qianqian,Ding Xiaoqi,Wan Youli,et al. Microfacies characteristics and sedimentary models of the third member of Funing Formation in Zhangjiaduo oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(6): 751-757. doi: 10.11743/ogg20130606

参考文献

[1] 焦里力.苏北盆地张家垛油田阜三段油气富集规律[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2):166-173. Jiao Lili.Hydrocarbon enrichment patterns of the 3rd member of Funing Formation in Zhangjiaduo oilfield, Subei Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 3(2):166-173.
[2] 魏祥峰, 张廷山, 梁兴, 等.海安凹陷曲塘、海北次凹戴南组-三垛组一段沉积特征及演化[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2):265-276. Wei Xiangfeng, Zhang Tingshan, Liang Xing, et al.Sedimentary cha-racteristics and evolution of the 1st member of Dainan Formation and the 1st member of Sanduo Formation in Qutang and Haibei Sub-sags, Hai'an Sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(2):265-276.
[3] 徐辉, 田荣斌, 李珊, 等.张家垛阜三段储层敏感性和油水相渗特征.[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2011, 1(6):48-51. Xu Hui, Tian Rongbin, Li Shan, et al.Reservoir sensitivity and oil-water relative permeability of the third member of Funing formation in Zhangjiaduo[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2011, 1(6):48-51.
[4] 鲁雪松, 马淑芳, 杨贵丽.苏北盆地金湖凹陷三垛组剥蚀厚度恢复及意义[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(4):13-17. Lu Xuesong, Ma Shufang, Yang Guili.Erosion thickness reconstruction of Sanduo Formation and its significance in Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2009, 31(4):13-17.
[5] 黄方方, 丁晓琪, 万友利, 等.张家垛油田阜三段储层成岩作用[J].断块油气田, 2013, 03, 20(2):150-153. Huang Fangfang, Ding Xiaoqi, Wan Youli, et al.Diagenesis of Fu 3 Member reservoir in Zhangjiaduo Oilfield[J].2013, 03, 20(2):150-153.
[6] 刘迪, 丁晓琪, 韩玫梅.异常高压对张家垛油田阜三段成岩作用的控制[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(3):39-46. Liu Di, Ding Xiaoqi, Han Meimei.Govern of abnormal pressureon re-servoir diagenesis[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 35(3):39-46.
[7] Miall A D.Principle of sedimentary basin analysis[M].New York:Springer, 1998:141-233.
[8] Miall A D.Reservoir heterogenesis in fluvial sandstones:lesson from outcrop studies[J].AAPG Bulletion, 1988, 72(6):682-697.
[9] 吴小红, 吕修祥, 周心怀, 等.BZ34油区明下段浅水三角洲沉积特征及其油气勘探意义[J].大庆石油学院学报, 2009, 33(5):32-40. Wu Xiaohong, Lv Xiuxiang, Zhou Xinhuai, et al.Discovery of the shallow delta sediment in Minghuazhen formation in BZ34 oil fields and its significance in oil and gas exploitation[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2009, 33(5):32-40.
[10] 吴崇筠.中国中-新生代湖相沉积[C]//冯增昭, 王英华, 刘焕杰, 等.中国沉积学.北京:地质出版社, 1994. Wu Chongjun.Lacustrine sediment in Mesozoic-Cenozoic, China[C]//Feng Zengzhao, Wang Yinghua, Liu Huanjie, et al.Chinese Sedimentology.Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1994.
[11] 刘伟, 吕优良, 徐徽, 等.东营凹陷南斜坡东段沙四上亚段沉积相与砂体展布研究[J].江汉石油学报, 2004, 26(2):23-25. Liu Wei, Lv Youliang, Xu Hui, et al.Sedimentary microfacies and sandbody distribution in the Upper Members of Es₄ in the South Slope of Dongpu Depression[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004, 26(2):23-25.
[12] 李国斌, 姜在兴, 陈诗望, 等.利津洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝沉积特征及控制因素分析[J].中国地质, 2008, 35(5):911-921. Li Guobin, Jiang Zaixing, Chen Shiwang, et al.Sedimentary characte-ristics and controlling factors of beach bars in the Upper Submember of the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Lijin subasin[J].Geology in China, 2008, 35(5):911-921.
[13] 田继军, 姜在兴.惠民凹陷与东营凹陷沙四上亚段滩坝沉积特征对比与分析[J].吉林大学学报, 2012, 42(3):612-623. Tian Jijun, Jiang Zaixing.Comparison and analysis of beach bars sedimentary characteristics of Upper Es₄ in Huimin and Dongying Depression[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(3):612-623.
[14] 冯兴雷, 马立祥, 邓宏文, 等.大王北洼陷浅水漫湖砂质滩坝沉积微相特征[J].地质科技情报, 2009, 28(1):9-14. Feng Xinglei, Ma Lixiang, Deng Hongwen, et al.Microfacies characters of sandy beach and bar in shallow water over-lake, with an example from the Dawangbei Sag[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2009, 28(1):9-14.
[15] 远光辉, 操应长, 王艳忠.东营凹陷民丰地区沙河街组四段-三段中亚段沉积相与沉积演化特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2):277-286. Yuan Guanghui, Cao Yingchang, Wang Yanzhong.Sedimentary facies and their evolution of the 4th-middle 3rd members of Shahejie Formation in Minfeng area, Dongying Sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(2):277-286.
[16] 郝雪峰.东营凹陷沙三-沙四段砂岩储层超压成因与演化[J].石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2):167-173. Hao Xuefeng.Overpressure genesis and evolution of sandstone reservoirs in the 3rd and 4th members of Shahejie Formation, the Dongying Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(2):167-173.

张家垛油田阜三段Ⅲ砂组沉积微相特征与沉积模式

Microfacies characteristics and sedimentary models of the third member of Funing Formation in Zhangjiaduo oilfield

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周冰, 金之钧, 刘全有, 伦增珉, 孟庆强, 朱东亚. 苏北盆地黄桥地区富CO₂流体对油气储-盖系统的改造作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1151-1161.
[2]	毛先宇, 宋本彪, 韩如冰, 田昌炳, 李保柱, 宋海强. 伊拉克南部白垩系Mishrif组碳酸盐缓坡潮道沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1233-1243, 1256.
[3]	朱毅秀, 黄导武, 王欢, 何贤科, 师源, 佘亚明. 东海西湖凹陷A气田渐新统花港组三段厚层砂岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1226-1235.
[4]	赵建华, 金之钧, 林畅松, 刘光祥, 刘可禹, 刘忠宝, 张钰莹. 上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 701-715.
[5]	贺婷婷, 段太忠, 赵磊, 刘彦锋. 塔里木盆地塔河油田T区三叠纪沉积模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 822-834.
[6]	孙莎莎, 芮昀, 董大忠, 施振生, 拜文华, 马超, 张磊夫, 武瑾, 昌燕. 中、上扬子地区晚奥陶世—早志留世古地理演化及页岩沉积模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1087-1106.
[7]	刘君龙, 孙冬胜, 纪友亮, 朱宏权, 于海跃, 王天云. 川西晚侏罗世前陆盆地浅水三角洲砂体分布特征与叠置模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1164-1178.
[8]	栾国强, 董春梅, 林承焰, 任丽华, 焦红岩, 赵海燕, 彭先国. 异重流发育条件、演化过程及沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 438-453.
[9]	崔璀, 郑荣才, 蒋宜勤, 靳军, 文华国. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区头屯河组储层特征及敏感性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 398-408.
[10]	刘玉瑞. 苏北盆地戴南组泥屑流扇沉积[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 419-429.
[11]	蔡全升, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 邓猛. 强烈断陷期小型湖盆沉积充填演化特征——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷宋站地区沙河子组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(2): 259-269.
[12]	吴林, 陈清华, 刘寅, 王玺, 张晓丹, 孙珂, 陈传浩. 裂陷盆地伸展方位与构造作用及对构造样式的控制——以苏北盆地高邮凹陷南部断阶带为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 29-38.
[13]	张磊夫, 吴陈君, 苏洋, 郭艳军, 王红亮. 爱尔兰克莱尔盆地Ross Sandstone组深水浊积岩露头高分辨率层序地层学[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 165-174.
[14]	张顺, 王永诗, 刘惠民, 陈世悦, 谭明友, 张云银, 郝雪峰, 谢忠怀. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷细粒沉积微相对页岩油储层微观结构的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 923-934.
[15]	宋璠, 邱隆伟, 苏妮娜, 徐宁宁, 周鹏. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组二段沉积相特征及演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 499-508.