特低渗透油藏多层合采评价新指标

doi:10.11743/ogg20150617

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1016-1021.doi: 10.11743/ogg20150617

特低渗透油藏多层合采评价新指标

徐庆岩¹, 蒋文文², 林伟³, 张磊⁴, 魏林果⁵, 杨正明⁶

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国专利信息中心, 北京 100088;
3. 中国石油渤海钻探第三钻井公司, 天津 300280;
4. 中国石化华东分公司采油厂, 江苏泰州 225300;
5. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司规划计划处, 新疆库尔勒 841000;
6. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院, 河北廊坊 065007

收稿日期:2015-01-05 修回日期:2015-08-11 出版日期:2015-12-08 发布日期:2016-01-08
作者简介:徐庆岩(1987—),男,博士、工程师,油气田开发。E-mail:xuqingyan007@163.com。
基金资助:
国家油气重大专项(2011ZX0513-006)。

New evaluation indicators of commingled production for ultra-low permeability reservoirs

Xu Qingyan¹, Jiang Wenwen², Lin Wei³, Zhang Lei⁴, Wei Linguo⁵, Yang Zhengming⁶

1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
2. China Patent Information Center, Beijing 100088, China;
3. No.3 Drilling Enginering Company of Bohai Drilling Co.Ltd., PetroChina, Tianjin 300280, China;
4. East China Branch Oil Production Plant of China Petrochemical, SINOPEC, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, China;
5. Planning Center of Tarim Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China;
6. Langfang Branch of Petroleum Exploration & Development Research Institute, PetroChina, Langfang, Hebei 065007, China

Received:2015-01-05 Revised:2015-08-11 Online:2015-12-08 Published:2016-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对特低渗透多层油藏的层间非均质性和流体的非线性渗流特征，采用天然露头平板大模型并联驱替的物理模拟方法和非线性渗流数值模拟软件，对特低渗透多层油藏合采的开发效果进行研究。结果表明，特低渗透油藏多层合采时的总体采出程度与渗透率级差、平均渗透率、开发层数和地层油粘度均有关系。渗透率级差越大，总体采出程度越低，相对高渗层与相对低渗层的采出程度差值越大；平均渗透率越高，总体采出程度越高；开发层数越多，地层油粘度越大，多层合采时的开发效果越差。在此基础上，提出了“四元综合影响因子”的概念来评价多层合采的开发界限。计算分析表明，多层合采的综合采出程度与四元综合影响因子呈幂函数递减关系，“四元综合影响因子”可以作为评价多层油藏开发效果的重要指标。

关键词: 四元综合影响因子, 非线性渗流, 数值模拟, 物理模拟, 多层油藏, 特低渗透油藏

Abstract: Considering the vertical heterogeneity characteristics of multilayer reservoirs and nonlinear seepage regularity for fluid flowing in the ultra-low permeability reservoirs,natural large-scale outcrop model and nonlinear seepage numerical simulation software were adopted to research the development effect of commingled production for ultra-low permeabi-lity reservoirs.Results show that total recovery percent is influenced by permeability ratio,average permeability,layer number and oil viscosity during commingled production.With the increase of permeability ratio,the total recovery percent decreases and the difference between the higher and the lower permeability layers becomes larger;And the higher the average permeability is,the higher total recovery percent is;the more the layer number is and the higher the oil viscosity is,the poorer the develoipment effect is during commingled production.On this basis,a new parameter called “quad-element synthetic influence factor” is proposed to evaluate the development boundary for the commingled production of multilayer reservoir.Analysis indicates that the total recovery percent is in a power function relationship with this new parameter,which could be used as an important indicator for development effect evaluation of ultra-low permeability multilayer reservoir.

Key words: quad-element synthetic influence factor, nonlinear seepage, numerical simulation, physical simulation, multilayer reservoir, ultra-low permeability reservoir

中图分类号:

TE348

徐庆岩,蒋文文,林伟,等. 特低渗透油藏多层合采评价新指标[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(6): 1016-1021. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150617 Xu Qingyan,Jiang Wenwen,Lin Wei,et al. New evaluation indicators of commingled production for ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6): 1016-1021. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150617

参考文献

[1] 李捷,杨正明,邱勇松.表外油层注水开发的指进现象研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(2):21-22,28. Li Jie,Yang Zhengming,Qiu Yongsong.A study on the finger advancement during waterflooding stage in untabulated multilayer reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2002,21(2):21-22,28.
[2] 邱勇松,杨正明,李捷,等.低渗透油层注水开发的层间突进研究[J].西安石油学院学报:自然科学版,2003,18(1):27-29. Qiu Yongsong,Yang Zhengming,Li Jie,et al.Study on interlayering fingering during water-flooding development of low permeability reservoir[J].Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute(Natural Science Edition),2003,18(1):27-29.
[3] 周英芳,刘志军,茆春锦,等.多层油藏水驱驱替效率计算新方法[J].特种油气藏,2008,15(3):72-75. Zhou Yingfang,Liu Zhijun,Mao Chunjin,et al.A new calculation method for water displacement efficiency for layered reservoir[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2008,15(3):72-75.
[4] 莫建武,孙卫,杨希濮,等.严重层间非均质油藏水驱效果及影响因素研究[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2011,41(1):113-118. Mo Jianwu,Sun wei,Yang Xipu,et al.Study on water displacing oil effect and its factors in serious interlayer heterogeneity character reservoir [J].Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2011,41(1):113-118.
[5] 杨正明,于荣泽,苏致新,等.特低渗透油藏非线性数值模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(1):94-98. Yang Zhengming,Yu Rongze,Su Zhixin,et al.Numerical simulation of the nonlinear flow in ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(1):94-98.
[6] 李洋,雷群,刘先贵,等.微尺度下的非线性渗流特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(3):336-340. Li Yang,Lei Qun,Liu Xiangui,et al.Characteristics of micro scale nonlinear filtration[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(3):336-340.
[7] 杨仁锋,姜瑞忠,孙君书,等.低渗透油藏非线性微观渗流机理[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(2):90-93. Yang Renfeng,jiang Ruizhong,Sun Junshu,et al.Study on non-linear flow mechanism in low permeability porous medium[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(2):90-93.
[8] 陈民锋,姜汉桥,曾玉祥.严重非均质油藏开发层系重组渗透率级差界限研究[J].中国海上油气,2007,19(5):319-322. Chen Minfeng,Jiang Hanqiao,Zeng Yuxiang.A study on max/min ratio boundary for reasonable developed-layer recombination in extremely heterogeneous reservoirs[J].China offshore oil and gas,2007,19(5):319-322.
[9] 李伟才,姚光庆,周锋德,等.低渗透油藏不同流动单元并联水驱油[J].石油学报,2011,32(4):658-663. Li Weicai,Yao Guangqing,Zhou fengde,et al.Water displacing oil efficiency with cores grouped in parallel of different flow units in low permeability reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(4):658-663.
[10] 魏长霖,原野.基于油藏数值模拟技术的渗透率级差组合界限研究[J].科学技术与工程,2011,11(35): 8882-8884. Wei Changlin,Yuan Ye.Research on the boundary of permeability max-min ratio based on numerical simulation technology[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2011,11(35):8882-8884.
[11] 崔茂蕾,丁云宏,薛成国,等.特低渗透天然砂岩大型物理模型渗流规律[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(2):695-700. Cui Maolei,Ding Yunhong,Xue Chengguo,et al.Percolation law of large-scale model natural sandstone physical model with ultra-low permeability[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(2):695-700.
[12] 徐轩,刘学伟,杨正明,等.特低渗透砂岩大型露头模型单向渗流特征实验[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):453-458. Xu xuan,Liu Xuewei,Yang Zhengming,et al.An experimental study on single-phase seepage characteristics with a large-scale model made of ultra-low permeability sandstone outcrops[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):453-458.
[13] 徐轩,杨正明,刘学伟,等.特低渗透大型露头模型流场测量技术及分布规律研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(11):3331-3337. Xu xuan,Yang Zhengming,Liu Xuewei,et al.Study of flow field measurement technique and distribution regularity of ultra-low permeability large-scale outcrop model[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(11):3331-3337.
[14] 于荣泽,王楷军,卞亚南,等.特低渗透油藏变渗透率场油藏数值模拟研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(5):98-103. Yu Rongze,Wang Kaijun,Bian Yanan,et al.Numerical simulation of ultra-low permeability reservoir on variable permeability field[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2011,33(5):98-103.
[15] 徐庆岩,杨正明,王学武,等.特低渗透油藏井网部署与人工压裂裂缝优化[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2012,31(5):93-97. Xu Qingyan,Yang Zhengming,Wang Xuewu,et al.Deploying of well network and optimization of artificial fractures for ultra-low permeability reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing 2012,31(5),93-97.

特低渗透油藏多层合采评价新指标

New evaluation indicators of commingled production for ultra-low permeability reservoirs

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	史帅雨, 余一欣, 殷进垠, 邬长武, 刘静静, 刘延莉, 王波. 下刚果盆地盐构造变形特征及其形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1092-1099.
[2]	郑定业, 庞雄奇, 姜福杰, 刘铁树, 邵新荷, 李龙龙, 呼延钰莹, 国芳馨. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界致密气成藏特征及物理模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 744-754.
[3]	孙帅, 侯贵廷. 岩石力学参数影响断背斜内张裂缝发育带的概念模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 455-462.
[4]	徐中一, 方思冬. 边界层对致密油藏逆向渗吸的数值模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 638-646.
[5]	杨晓兰. 埃及西沙漠盆地中生界烃源岩特征及剩余资源分布[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 423-433.
[6]	苏玉亮, 鲁明晶, 李萌, 张琪, 王文东, 董明哲. 页岩油藏多重孔隙介质耦合流动数值模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 645-652,660.
[7]	薛衡, 黄祖熹, 王贺华, 安永生, 刘榧, 成一, 何冰, 刘卡. Ahdeb油田水平井控水完井及一体化耦合模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 423-429.
[8]	王文环, 彭缓缓, 李光泉, 蔚涛, 魏晨吉. 特低渗透油藏水驱规律及最佳驱替模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1): 182-189.
[9]	胡渤. 高温高盐油藏化学驱数值模拟技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1305-1310.
[10]	张继标, 张仲培, 汪必峰, 邓尚. 塔里木盆地顺南地区走滑断裂派生裂缝发育规律及预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 955-963,1055.
[11]	袁学浩, 姚艳斌, 甘泉, 刘大锰, 周智. TOUGH-FLAC^3D热流固耦合模拟煤储层水力压裂过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 611-619.
[12]	冯建伟, 王志坤, 商琳. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷3区多期叠加断裂体系形成机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6): 1032-1042.
[13]	肖康, 穆龙新, 姜汉桥, 申健, 张鹏宇. 封堵优势通道动用剩余油机制及策略[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6): 1180-1186.
[14]	顾少华, 石志良, 史云清, 胡向阳, 岑芳. 考虑液硫析出的超深酸性气藏数值模拟技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6): 1208-1216.
[15]	刘军, 任丽丹, 李宗杰, 王鹏, 杨子川, 马灵伟. 塔里木盆地顺南地区深层碳酸盐岩断裂和裂缝地震识别与评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(4): 703-710.