鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界致密气成藏特征及物理模拟

doi:10.11743/ogg20200408

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界致密砂岩气藏资源勘探潜力巨大，但是成藏规律及运移方式较为模糊。基于构造、沉积相和砂体展布特征，临兴地区上古生界源-储组合关系可分为源内、近源和远源3种类型。利用岩石热解、热成熟度测定、岩心描述、薄片鉴定、扫描电镜观察，物性分析以及地震和测井等资料，对烃源岩、储层、充注动力及断裂的发育进行分析。结果表明：临兴地区发育煤、炭质泥岩和暗色泥岩3套烃源岩，干酪根类型为Ⅲ和Ⅱ₂型，有机质丰度较高，普遍进入成熟-高成熟阶段，生气潜力较大；储层岩石类型以成熟度中等的长石岩屑砂岩为主，非均质性强，孔喉类型多样，包括原生粒间孔、溶解粒间孔、溶解粒内孔、晶间孔和微裂缝。物性以低孔-低渗为主，平均孔隙度为6.81%，平均渗透率为0.610×10^-3 μm²，属于典型致密储层；地层超压普遍发育，气体膨胀力是源内、近源组合成藏的关键动力；断裂十分发育，既可为天然气垂向充注至远源组合提供运移通道，又能改善储层品质，提高天然气横向运移能力。在此基础上，对建立起的成藏模式进行物理模拟实验，发现储层非均质性及断裂的发育是影响气水关系的主要因素，源内组合处于成藏优势区，可作为后期勘探开发的重点。

关键词: 成藏特征, 物理模拟, 致密气藏, 上古生界, 临兴地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract:

The exploration potential of the Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Linxing area, Ordos Basin is huge, but the accumulation patterns and migration pathways are relatively controversial.Based on the characteristics of structure, sedimentary facies and sand-body distribution, the source-reservoir combination relationship of the Upper Paleozoic in Linxing area can be categorized into three types:in-source-, near-source- and far-source-reservoir combinations.Using the data of rock pyrolysis, thermal maturity measurement, core description, thin-section observation, scanning electron microscopy, petrophysical property analysis, seismic and well logging interpretation, we analyzed the development characteristics of the source rock, reservoir, charging dynamics and faults.The results show that there are three sets of hydrocarbon source rocks in Linxing area, including coal, carbonaceous mudstone and dark mudstone source rocks with Type Ⅲ and Ⅱ₂ kerogens.The source rocks have high abundance of organic matter and are mostly mature to highly mature, thus are large in hydrocarbon generation potential.The reservoir rocks are dominated by feldspar lithic sandstone of moderate maturity, and are characterized by high heterogeneity and multiple pore throat types, including primary intergranular pores, dissolved intergranular pores, dissolved intragranular pores, intercrystalline pores and micro-cracks.The reservoirs mostly have low porosity and low permeability, with an average porosity of 6.81% and an average permeability of 0.61×10^-3 μm², which reflects a typical tight reservoir.Overpressure is common and gas expansion force is the main driving force for gas accumulation of the in-source- and near-source-reservoir combinations.The well-developed faults can serve as the migration pathways for the natural gas vertically charging to the far-source-reservoir combination and can also improve the reservoir quality and strengthen the lateral migration ability of natural gas.Physical simulation experiments were carried out on the established accumulation model, and it was found that reservoir heterogeneity and faults are the main factors affecting the gas-water relationship.The in-source-reservoir combination is the favorable area for hydrocarbon accumulation, and can be selected as the focus of later exploration and development.

Key words: accumulation characteristics, physical simulation, tight gas reservoir, Upper Paleozoic, Linxing area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.3

郑定业,庞雄奇,姜福杰,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界致密气成藏特征及物理模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 744-754. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200408 Dingye Zheng,Xiongqi Pang,Fujie Jiang,et al. Characteristics and physical simulation of the Upper Paleozoic tight gas accumulation in Linxing area, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 744-754. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200408

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

参考文献 33

1	贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39 (02): 129- 136.
	Jia Chengzao , Zheng Min , Zhang Yongfeng . Unconventional hydrocarbon resources and exploration prospects in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39 (02): 129- 136.
2	邹才能, 杨智, 朱如凯, 等. 中国非常规油气勘探开发与理论技术进展[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89 (06): 979- 1007.
	Zou Caineng , Yang Zhi , Zhu Rukai , et al. Unconventional oil and gas exploration and theoretical technology progress in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89 (06): 979- 1007.
3	邹才能, 翟光明, 张光亚, 等. 全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42 (01): 13- 25.
	Zou Caineng , Zhai Guangming , Zhang Guangya , et al. Global conventional-unconventional oil and gas formation distribution, resource potential and trend forecast[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42 (01): 13- 25.
4	童晓光, 张光亚, 王兆明, 等. 全球油气资源潜力与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (04): 727- 736.
	Tong Xiaoguang , Zhang Guangya , Wang Zhaoming , et al. Global oil and gas resource potential and distribution[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (04): 727- 736.
5	邱中建, 邓松涛. 中国非常规天然气的战略地位[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32 (01): 1- 5+117.
	Qiu Zhongjian , Deng Songtao . Strategic position of unconventional gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32 (01): 1- 5+117.
6	渠沛然.致密油气:不可忽视的"主力军"[N].中国能源报, 2013-08-19(015).
	Qu Peiran.Tight oil and gas: A major force to be reckoned[N].China Energy News, 2013-08-19(015).
7	郑力会, 魏攀峰, 张峥, 等. 联探并采:非常规油气资源勘探开发持续发展自我救赎之路[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37 (05): 126- 140.
	Zheng Lihui , Wei Panfeng , Zhang zheng , et al. Joint exploration and exploitation:A road to self-redemption for the sustainable development of unconventional oil and gas resources[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37 (05): 126- 140.
8	Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.Natural gas policy act of 1978[R].Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980: 340-346.
9	Spencer C W . Geologic aspects of tight gas reservoirs in the Rocky mountain region[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1985, 37 (8): 1308- 1314.
10	Spencer C W . Review of characteristics of low-permeability gas reservoirs in western Unites States[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73 (5): 613- 629.
11	邹才能. 非常规油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011: 18- 22.
	Zou Caineng . Unconventional hydrocarbon geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 2011: 18- 22.
12	赵文智, 汪泽成, 朱怡翔, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田低效气藏的形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2005, (05): 9- 13.
	Zhao Wenzhi , Wang Zecheng , Zhu Yixiang , et al. Formation mechanism of low efficiency gas reservoir in Sulige gas field in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, (05): 9- 13.
13	魏修平, 胡向阳, 李浩, 等. 致密砂岩气藏水平井测井评价—以鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田X井区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (05): 1084- 1094.
	Wei Xiuping , Hu Xiangyang , Li Hao , et al. An evaluation on logging data of horizontal wells in tight sand gas reservoir —A case study of drilling sector X in Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 1084- 1094.
14	陈朝兵, 杨友运, 邵金辉, 等. 鄂尔多斯东北部致密砂岩气藏地层水成因及分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 313- 325.
	Chen Zhaobing , Yang Youyun , Shao Jinhui , et al. Origin and distribution of formation water in tight sandstone reservoirs in the northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 313- 325.
15	郑定业, 姜福杰, 刘铁树, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区天然气成因类型及气源分析[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2018, 40 (02): 203- 214.
	Zheng Dingye , Jiang Fujie , Liu Tieshu , et al. Genetic type and gas source analysis of Linxing area in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2018, 40 (02): 203- 214.
16	陈晓智, 庞雄奇, 邵新荷, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴A地区下石盒子组致密砂岩气成藏条件[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37 (1): 169- 176.
	Chen Xiaozhi , Pang Xiongqi , Shao Xinhe , et al. The tight gas accumulation conditions of the Xiashihezi formation in Linxing A area of Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37 (1): 169- 176.
17	刘玲, 王烽, 汤达祯, 等. 临兴地区上古生界煤系烃源岩评价及排烃特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25 (1): 5- 10.
	Liu Ling , Wang Feng , Tang Dazhen , et al. Evaluation on Upper Paleozole coal-bearing source rocks and hydrocarbon expulsion feature in Linxing Region[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25 (1): 5- 10.
18	谢英刚, 秦勇, 叶建平, 等. 临兴地区上古生界煤系致密砂岩气成藏条件分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41 (01): 181- 191.
	Xie Yinggang , Qin Yong , Ye Jianping , et al. Analysis of tight sandstone gas accumulation conditions of upper Paleozoic in Linxing area[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41 (01): 181- 191.
19	吴鹏, 高计县, 郭俊超, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区太原组桥头砂岩层序地层及沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (1): 66- 76.
	Wu Peng , Gao Jixian , Guo Junchao , et al. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary characteristic analysis of Qiaotou sandstone of Tayuan Fm in Linxing area, eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (1): 66- 76.
20	Li Y , Tang D Z , Wu P , et al. Continuous unconventional natural gas accumulations of Carboniferous-Permian coal-bearing strata in the Linxing area, northeastern Ordos basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 36, 314- 327.
21	陈建平, 赵长毅, 何忠华. 煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1997, (01): 1- 5+91.
	Chen Jianping , Zhao Changyi , He Zhonghua . Discussion on evaluation criteria for hydrocarbon generation potential of organic matter in coal measures[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1997, (01): 1- 5+91.
22	杨华, 刘新社, 杨勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密气勘探开发形势与未来发展展望[J]. 中国工程科学, 2012, 014 (006): 40- 48.
	Yang Hua , Liu Xinshe , Yang Yong . Status and prospects of tight gas exploration and development in the Ordos Basin[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2012, 014 (006): 40- 48.
23	呼延钰莹, 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31 (2): 56- 65.
	Huyan Yuying , Jiang Fujie , Pang Xiongqi , et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area, eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31 (2): 56- 65.
24	Hunt J M . Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74, 1- 12.
25	England W A , Mackenzie A S , Mann D M , et al. The movement and entrapment of petroleum fluid in the subsurface[J]. Journal of Geological Society, 1987, 144, 327- 347.
26	刘勇, 徐国盛, 曾兵, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷花港组储层孔隙演化与油气充注关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (2): 168- 176.
	Liu Yong , Xu Guosheng , Zeng Bing , et al. Relationship between porosity evolution and hydrocarbon charging in tight sandstone reservoirs in Oligocene Huagang Formation, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (2): 168- 176.
27	郝芳, 邹华耀, 倪建华, 等. 沉积盆地超压系统演化与深层油气成藏条件[J]. 地球科学, 2002, (05): 610- 615.
	Hao Fang , Zou Huayao , Ni Jianhua , et al. Overpressure system evolution and deep hydrocarbon accumulation conditions in sedimentary basin[J]. Earth Science, 2002, (05): 610- 615.
28	Shao X H , Pang Xiongqi , Jiang Fujie , et al. Genesis and accumulation of natural gas in the Upper Paleozoic strata of north-eastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Geological Journal, 2018, 1- 14.
29	Huyan Y Y , Pang X Q , Liu TS , et al. Petrophysical characteristics of tight sandstone gas reservoirs using nuclear magnetic resonance:a case study of the upper Paleozoic strata in the Kangning area, eastern margin of the Ordos Basin, China[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2018, 1- 13.
30	姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 武丽. 致密砂岩气藏成藏过程中的地质门限及其控气机理[J]. 石油学报, 2010, (1): 49- 54.
	Jiang Fujie , Pang Xiongqi , Wu Li . Geological threshold and gas control mechanism during the formation of tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, (1): 49- 54.
31	Jiang F J , Pang X Q , Guo F T , et al. Critical conditions for natural gas charging and delineation of effective gas source rocks for tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Geological Journal, 2016, 51 (1): 113- 124.
32	庞雄奇, 金之钧, 姜振学, 等. 深盆气成藏门限及其物理模拟实验[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2003, (03): 207- 214.
	Pang Xiongqi , Jin Zhijun , Jiang Zhenxue , et al. Threshold of deep basin gas accumulation and physical simulation experiment[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2003, (03): 207- 214.
33	姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 姜振学, 等. 致密砂岩气藏成藏过程的物理模拟实验[J]. 地质论评, 2007, 53 (6): 844- 849.
	Jiang Fujie , Pang Xiongqi , Jiang Zhenxue , et al. Physical simulation of formation process of tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Geological Review, 2007, 53 (6): 844- 849.

时间/s	出水量/mL								测压点压力/kPa
时间/s	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	①	②	③
0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	-1.15	-0.03	0.02
22	12	5	30	18	27	19	29	微量	7.89	10.38	13.76
40	23	13	60	40	56	41	54	微量	25.52	20.77	28.56
60	25	16	68	49	63	47	66	微量	28.11	24.90	35.67
110	34	27	82	76	85	69	103	微量	36.56	38.74	42.19
300	34	27	100	76	98	69	115	微量	37.62	45.59	42.88

[1]	党伟, 张金川, 王凤琴, 李沛, 单长安, 王睿婧. 富有机质页岩-水蒸气吸附热力学与动力学特性——以鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系山西组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 173-185.
[2]	范柏江, 梅启亮, 王小军, 孟越, 黄启江. 泥岩与页岩地化特征对比——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组7段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1119-1128.
[3]	肖正录, 陈世加, 刘广林, 王攀, 唐隆祥, 刘章昊. 有限充注动力背景下致密储层油水差异成藏再认识——以鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区延长组8段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1129-1138.
[4]	李蒙, 商晓飞, 赵华伟, 吴双, 段太忠. 基于likelihood地震属性的致密气藏断裂预测——以四川盆地川西坳陷新场地区须二段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1299-1309.
[5]	史帅雨, 余一欣, 殷进垠, 邬长武, 刘静静, 刘延莉, 王波. 下刚果盆地盐构造变形特征及其形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1092-1099.
[6]	何发岐, 梁承春, 陆骋, 袁春艳, 黎小伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘过渡带致密-低渗油藏断缝体的识别与描述[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 710-718.
[7]	李士祥, 牛小兵, 柳广弟, 李继宏, 孙明亮, 游富粮, 何昊楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段页岩油形成富集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 719-729.
[8]	曾联波, 吕鹏, 屈雪峰, 樊建明. 致密低渗透储层多尺度裂缝及其形成地质条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 449-454.
[9]	赵向原, 吕文雅, 王策, 朱圣举, 樊建明. 低渗透砂岩油藏注水诱导裂缝发育的主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田W区长6油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 586-595.
[10]	鞠玮, 尤源, 冯胜斌, 徐浩然, 张晓丽, 王胜宇. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7油层组致密砂岩储层层理缝特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 596-605.
[11]	史今雄, 曾联波, 谭青松, 王继鹏, 张云钊, 李宏为. 沁水盆地南部煤岩储层天然裂缝有效性及对煤层气开发的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 617-626.
[12]	董少群, 吕文雅, 夏东领, 王世佳, 杜相仪, 王涛, 伍岳, 管聪. 致密砂岩储层多尺度裂缝三维地质建模方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 627-637.
[13]	蔡振家, 雷裕红, 罗晓容, 王香增, 程明, 张丽霞, 姜呈馥, 赵谦平, 尹锦涛, 张立宽. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组7段页岩有机孔发育特征及其影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 367-379.
[14]	冯程, 樊海涛, 石玉江, 陈雪昆, 李高仁, 毛志强. 润湿性影响下低渗透储层地层水矿化度预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组长8¹段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 442-448.
[15]	何治亮, 马永生, 张军涛, 朱东亚, 钱一雄, 丁茜, 陈代钊. 中国的白云岩与白云岩储层:分布、成因与控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 1-14.