吸附水膜厚度确定致密油储层物性下限新方法——以辽河油田大民屯凹陷为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20160119

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 135-140.doi: 10.11743/ogg20160119

吸附水膜厚度确定致密油储层物性下限新方法——以辽河油田大民屯凹陷为例

王伟明¹, 卢双舫¹, 田伟超¹, 周能武¹, 李吉君¹, 单俊峰², 胡英杰², 袁红旗³

1. 中国石油大学(华东)非常规油气与新能源研究院, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 辽河油田勘探开发研究院, 辽宁盘锦 124000;
3. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江大庆 163318

收稿日期:2015-05-11 修回日期:2015-08-23 出版日期:2016-02-08 发布日期:2016-03-02
第一作者简介:王伟明(1981-),男,博士、硕士生导师,油气成藏。E-mail:wangweiming6686@163.com。
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金项目(41302103,41330313,41472105);中国石油科技创新基金项目(2014D-5006-0107);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(15CX05008A,14CX02224A);黑龙江省教育厅面上项目(12531067)。

A new method to determine porosity and permeability cutoffs of tight oil reservoirs by using thickness of adsorption water film: A case study from the Damintun Sag, Liaohe oifield

Wang Weiming¹, Lu Shuangfang¹, Tian Weichao¹, Zhou Nengwu¹, Li Jijun¹, Shan Junfeng², Hu Yingjie², Yuan Hongqi³

1. Research Institute of Unconventional Petroleum and Renewable Energy, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
2. Petroleum Exploration and Development Research Institute, Liaohe Oilfield Co., Ltd, Panjin, Liaoning 124000, China;
3. College of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China

Received:2015-05-11 Revised:2015-08-23 Online:2016-02-08 Published:2016-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 伴随着致密油开采工艺技术的提高，其储层的可采物性下限也正逐渐降低，开采极限越来越接近致密油的成藏物性下限。引用水膜厚度理论，采用实验分析和理论计算相结合的方法，确定了辽河油田大民屯凹陷致密油储层物性下限。研究表明：大民屯凹陷沙河街组四段致密储层以油页岩为主，在相同地质条件下颗粒表面吸附的一层水膜（由强结合水和弱结合水组成）与储层喉道同处纳米级别。当喉道半径小于水膜厚度，相应孔喉及其所控制的微小孔隙则被束缚水所饱和；当喉道半径大于水膜厚度，喉道才能成为致密油有效的充注通道。通过对水膜厚度的受力分析，根据力平衡关系，可建立不同地层压力下水膜厚度与喉道半径的关系，进而求取致密油充注的临界喉道半径。通过借鉴土壤学中水膜厚度与孔隙度、比表面积及束缚水饱和度关系，又可把临界喉道半径下限值转化为适用范围更广的孔隙度下限值。该方法不仅理论依据强，又有实验数据支撑，具有一定的推广性。

关键词: 吸附水膜, 物性下限, 孔喉分布, 致密油, 大民屯凹陷, 辽河油田

Abstract: With the advancement of exploitation technologies of tight oil,the porosity and permeability cutoffs of tight oil exploitation have been greatly reduced,and are approaching to that of tight oil accumulation.In combination with experimental analysis and theatrical computation,this paper introduced the water film theory to determine the porosity and permeability cutoffs of the Damintun Sag.The results show that tight reservoirs mainly consist of oil shale in the 4^th Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Damintun Sag.Under the same geological conditions,there are water films (composed of strong bound water and weak bond water) adsorbed on the surface of tight sand particles.The minimum throat radius is equal to the thickness of water film which is so small that they can only be measured with nanometers.When the throat radius is smaller than water film thickness,the pore is filled with bound water.Only throats whose radius are larger than the film thickness can be valid oil charging pathways.Based on equilibrium of forces,relationship between water film thickness and throat radius is established,and the minimum throat radius valid for oil charging is calculated.The relationship of water film thickness with porosity,specific area and bound water saturation can be used to turn the critical value of throat radius into the critical porosity.This method not only has strong theoretical basis,but also the support of experimental data.

Key words: adsorbed water film, physical property cutoff, pore distribution, tight oil, Damintun Sag, Liaohe oilfield

中图分类号:

122.2

王伟明,卢双舫,田伟超,等. 吸附水膜厚度确定致密油储层物性下限新方法——以辽河油田大民屯凹陷为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 135-140. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160119 Wang Weiming,Lu Shuangfang,Tian Weichao,et al. A new method to determine porosity and permeability cutoffs of tight oil reservoirs by using thickness of adsorption water film: A case study from the Damintun Sag, Liaohe oifield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1): 135-140. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160119

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):174-187. Zou Caineng,Zhu rukai,Wu songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
[2] 孙赞东,贾承造,李相方,等.非常规油气勘探与开发(上册)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:1-150. Sun Zandong,Jia Chengzao,Li Xiangfang,et al.Unconventional oil & gas exploration anddevelopment(upper volumes)[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011:1-150.
[3] 贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-350. Jia Chengzao,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resouece prospects of the tight oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):343-350.
[4] Feng Z,Yin C,Lu J,et al.Formation and accumulation of tight sandy conglomerate gas:A case from the Lower Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation of Xujiaweizi fault depression,Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):696-703.
[5] Shanley K,Cluff R M,Robinson J W.Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs:implications for resource assessment,prospect development and risk analysis[J].AAPG Bulletin,2004,(8):100-102.
[6] 操应长,王艳忠,徐涛玉,等.东营凹陷西部沙四上亚段滩坝砂体有效储层的物性下限及控制因素[J].沉积学报,2009,27(2):230-237. Cao Yingchang,Wang Yanzhong,Xu Taoyu,et al.The petrophysical parameter cutoff and controlling factors of the effective reservoir of beach and bar sandbodies of the upper part of the fourth member of the shahejie formation in west part of Dongying Depression[J].Acta Sedmentologica Sinica,2009,27(2):230-237.
[7] 郭睿.储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(5):140-144. Guo Rui.Supplement to determining method of cut-off value of net pay[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(5):140-144.
[8] 焦翠华,夏冬冬,王军,等.特低渗砂岩储层物性下限确定方法-以永进油田西山窑组储集层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(3):379-383. Jiao Cuihua,Xia Dongdong,Wang Jun,et al.Methods for determining the petrophysical property cutoffs of extra low porosity and permeability sandstone reservoirs-An example from the xishanyao Formation reservoirs in yongjin oilfield[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(3):379-383.
[9] 王磊,李克文,赵楠,等.致密油储层孔隙度测定方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(4):49-53. Wang Lei,Li Kewen,Zhao Nan,et al.Methods research of porosity determination for tight oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(4):49-53.
[10] 黎箐,赵峰,刘鹏.苏里格气田东区致密砂岩气藏储层物性下限值的确定[J].天然气工业,2012,32(6):31-35. Li Qing,Zhao Feng,Liu Peng.Determination of lower limits of porosity and permeability of tight sand gas reservoirs in the eastern block of the sulige gas field[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(6):31-35.
[11] 邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864. Zou Caineng,Zhu rukai,Bai Bin,et al.First discovery of nanopore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
[12] 任战利,李文厚,梁宇,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组致密油成藏条件及主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):190-198. Ren Zhanli,Li Wenhou,Liang Yu,et al.Tight oil reservoir formation conditions and main controlling factors of Yanchang Formation in southeastern Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(2):190-198.
[13] 马洪,李建忠,杨涛,等.中国陆相湖盆致密油成藏主控因素综述[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):668-677. Ma Hong,Li Jianzhong,Yang Tao,et al.Main controlling factors for tight oil accumulation in continental lacustrine basins in China[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):668-677.
[14] 杨华,付金华,刘新社,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界致密气成藏条件与勘探开发[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,27(6):295-303. Yang Hua,Fu Jinhua,Liu Xinshe,et al.Accumulation conditions and exploration and development of tight gas in the upper paleozoic of the Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,27(6):295-303.
[15] 冉新权,何光怀.关键技术突破、集成技术创新实现苏里格气田规模有效开发[J].天然气工业,2007,27(12):1-5. Ran Xinquan,He Guanghuai.KeyTechnologies broken through and integrated techniques innovated to realize efficient and large-scaled development in the sulige gas field[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(12):1-5.
[16] 王飞宇,孟晓辉,冯伟平,等.湖相致密油资源量和可采性评价技术[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(3):144-149. Wang Feiyu,Meng Xiaohui,Feng Weiping,et al.Evaluating techniques for the resource extent and its recoverability of lacustrine-facies tight oil[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2003,14(3):207-214.
[17] 张国印,王志章,郭旭光,等.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区风城组云质岩致密油特征及"甜点"预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(2):219-229. Zhang Guoyin,Wang Zhizhang,Guo Xuguang,et al.Characteristics and ‘sweet spot’ prediction of dolomitic tight oil reservoirs of the Fengcheng Formation in Wuxia area,Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(2):219-229.
[18] 王大纯,张人权,史毅虹,等.水文地质学基础[M].北京:地质出版社,2006:19-21. Wang Dachun,Zhang Renquan,Shi Yihong,et al.The basis of hydrogeology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2006:19-21.
[19] 杨峰,宁正福,张世栋,等.基于氮气吸附试验的页岩孔隙结构表征[J].天然气工业,2013,33(4):135-140. Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Zhang Shidong,et al.Characterization of pore structures in shales through nitrogen adsorption experiment[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(4):135-140.
[20] 杨峰,宁正福,孔德涛等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):450-455. Yang Feng,Ning Fuzheng,Kong Detao,et al.Pore structure of shales from high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption method[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):450-455.
[21] 赵明华,刘小平,彭文祥.水膜理论在非饱和土中吸力的应用研究[J].岩石力学,2007,28(7):1323-1327. Zhao Minghua,Liu Xiaoping,Peng Wenxiang.Application of aqueous film theory to study of unsaturated soils suction[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2007,28(7):1323-1327.
[22] 刘德新,岳湘安,侯吉瑞,等.固体颗粒表面吸附水层厚度实验研究[J].矿物学报,2005,25(1):15-19. Liu Dexin,Yue Xiangan,Hou Jirui,et al.Experimental study of adsorded water layer on solid particle surface[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica,2005,25(1):15-19.
[23] 张学庆,戴宗,刘林,等.水膜理论在致密低渗透砂岩储层改造中的应用[J].矿物岩石,1998,18(增刊):161-163. Zhang Xueqing,Dai Zong,Liu Lin,et al.Application of theory of water film to reform the reservoir in tight and low permeability sandstone[J].Journal of Mineral Petrology,1998,18(Suppl):161-163.
[24] 庞雄奇,金之钧,姜振学,等.深盆气成藏门限及其物理模拟实验[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(3):207-214. Pang Xiongqi,Jin Zhijun,Jiang Zhenxue,et al.Critical condition for gas accumulation in the deep basin trap and physical modeling[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(3):207-214.
[25] 韩永林,刘军锋,余永进,等.致密油藏储层驱替特征及开发效果——以鄂尔多斯盆地上里塬地区延长组长7油层组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):207-211. Han Yonglin,Liu Junfeng,Yu Yongjin,et al.Displacement characteristics and development effect of tight oil reservoir:a case from Chang 7 oil layer of the Yanchang Formation in Shangliyuan area,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(2):207-211.
[26] 向阳,向丹,羊裔常,等.致密砂岩气藏水驱动态采收率及水膜厚度研究[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):389-391. Xiang Yang,Xiang Dan,Yang Yichang,et al.Study of gas recovery and water film thickness in water drive for tight sandstone gas reservoir[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,1999,26(4):389-391.

吸附水膜厚度确定致密油储层物性下限新方法——以辽河油田大民屯凹陷为例

A new method to determine porosity and permeability cutoffs of tight oil reservoirs by using thickness of adsorption water film: A case study from the Damintun Sag, Liaohe oifield

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	田景春, 梁庆韶, 王峰, 余威. 陆相湖盆致密油储集砂体成因及发育模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4): 877-888.
[2]	李军. 致密油藏储量升级潜力不确定性评价方法及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 755-764.
[3]	肖正录, 陈世加, 刘广林, 王攀, 唐隆祥, 刘章昊. 有限充注动力背景下致密储层油水差异成藏再认识——以鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区延长组8段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1129-1138.
[4]	陈志明, 陈昊枢, 廖新维, 曾联波, 周彪. 致密油藏压裂水平井缝网系统评价方法——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔地区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1288-1298.
[5]	何发岐, 梁承春, 陆骋, 袁春艳, 黎小伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘过渡带致密-低渗油藏断缝体的识别与描述[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 710-718.
[6]	徐中一, 方思冬. 边界层对致密油藏逆向渗吸的数值模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 638-646.
[7]	朱如凯, 邹才能, 吴松涛, 杨智, 毛治国, 杨海波, 范春怡, 惠潇, 崔景伟, 苏玲, 王焕第. 中国陆相致密油形成机理与富集规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1168-1184.
[8]	黄文彪, 詹卓琛, 逯瑞敬, 高阳, 卢双舫, 白振华, 杨亮. 致密油微观充注动态过程及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1197-1204,1214.
[9]	周磊, 王永诗, 于雯泉, 卢双舫. 基于物性上、下限计算的致密砂岩储层分级评价——以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组一段致密砂岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1308-1316,1323.
[10]	王媛, 汪少勇, 李建忠, 张义杰. 辽西雷家地区沙四段中-低熟烃源岩排烃效率与致密油-页岩油勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 810-821.
[11]	周庆凡, 金之钧, 杨国丰, 董宁, 尚柱成. 美国页岩油勘探开发现状与前景展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 469-477.
[12]	牛小兵, 冯胜斌, 尤源, 梁晓伟, 辛红刚, 淡卫东, 李廷艳, 任继胜. 致密储层体积压裂作用范围及裂缝分布模式——基于压裂后实际取心资料[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 669-677.
[13]	徐田武, 张洪安, 李继东, 赵伟. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷盐湖相成烃成藏特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 248-261.
[14]	付小东, 吴健平, 寿建峰, 王小芳, 周进高, 张天付, 郭永军. 渤海湾盆地束鹿凹陷古近系沙河街组湖相混积泥灰岩致密油储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1): 78-91.
[15]	葛云锦, 任来义, 贺永红, 马芳侠, 王全, 杜克锋, 李红进. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县—甘泉地区三叠系延长组7油层组致密油富集主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1190-1200.