石油与天然气地质 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1198-1207.doi: 10.11743/ogg20170621

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

碎屑岩孔隙演化定量计算方法的改进和应用

冯旭1,2, 刘洛夫1,2, 李朝玮1,3, 窦文超1,2, 郑珊珊1,2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京) 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京) 盆地与油藏研究中心, 北京 102249;
    3. 中海油研究总院 技术研发中心, 北京 100028
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-28 修回日期:2017-09-27 出版日期:2017-12-28 发布日期:2018-01-08
  • 通讯作者: 刘洛夫(1958-),男,博士、教授,石油地质及油气地球化学。E-mail:liulf@cup.edu.cn。 E-mail:liulf@cup.edu.cn
  • 第一作者简介:冯旭(1988-),女,硕士研究生,储层沉积与成岩作用。E-mail:fxx085@163.com。
  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41372143);教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20130007110002)。

Improvement and application of quantitative calculation of porosity evolution of clastic rock

Feng Xu1,2, Liu Luofu1,2, Li Chaowei1,3, Dou Wenchao1,2, Zheng Shanshan1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. Basin and Reservoir Center, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Technology Research and Development Center of CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100028, China
  • Received:2016-07-28 Revised:2017-09-27 Online:2017-12-28 Published:2018-01-08

摘要: 孔隙度演化是油气藏成藏机制研究的重点和难点。在利用“反演回剥法”恢复孔隙度时会存在一些缺陷,包括将面孔率等同于孔隙度、将机械压实损失孔隙度全部归结为成岩早期、不考虑岩石表观体积的变化等。基于此,将压实作用造成的岩石表观体积变化考虑在内,并将压实作用分期列入计算,推导了每一期成岩作用中对应不同岩石表观体积的压实和胶结损失孔隙度和溶蚀增加孔隙度、对应古埋深孔隙度的计算公式。以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组长7和长63小层致密砂岩为例,结合本区的成岩相,建立了5种孔隙度演化模式,并应用不同方法分别计算出孔隙度演化曲线。不考虑岩石表观体积变化和压实不分段时,恢复的孔隙度存在很大的偏差,可达13.8%。

关键词: 岩石表观体积, 成岩相, 孔隙演化, 致密储层, 延长组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Porosity evolution of reservoirs is a key and difficult point of the study on hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism.But the present research methods of "porosity inversion and back stripping" have some flaws,including equating thin section porosity with porosity,attributing the porosity loss by compaction to early diagenetic stage,and neglecting rock bulk volume's reduction in the compacting process.In this study,compaction was corrected in every stage of diage-nesis according to the normal compaction curve.Equation of porosity variation through history is derived,accounting for the porosity loss through compaction and cementation,and also porosity increase by corrosion,also taking into account of rock bulk volume variation in every stage of diagenesis.A case study on Chang 7 and Chang 63 tight oil reservoir of the southwest Ordos Basin was carried out,integrating the diagenetic facies of the research area and the derived formula.We reconstructed the porosity evolution from inversion and back stripping under the constraint of diagenetic sequences,and built five porosity evolution pattern and porosity evolution curve by different methods.If compaction is not corrected and rock bulk volume change is not considered,large error of the recovered porosity exist and it may be up to 13.8%.

Key words: rock bulk volume, diagenetic facies, porosity evolution, tight sandstone reservoir, Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: