塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系柯坪塔格组米兰科维奇旋回沉积记录

doi:10.11743/ogg20180412

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 749-758.doi: 10.11743/ogg20180412

塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系柯坪塔格组米兰科维奇旋回沉积记录

贾东力¹, 田景春¹, 林小兵¹, 杨国华², 冯文新², 张翔¹, 唐艳³, 杨辰雨⁴

1. 成都理工大学沉积地质研究院, 四川成都 610059;
2. 郑州工业贸易学校, 河南郑州 450007;
3. 四川省第三测绘工程院, 四川成都 610500;
4. 四川省地质矿产勘查开发局, 四川德阳 618000

收稿日期:2017-12-15 修回日期:2018-05-09 出版日期:2018-08-28 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 林小兵(1980-),男,博士、讲师,沉积学与储层地质学。E-mail:linxiaobing07@cdut.cn E-mail:linxiaobing07@cdut.cn
作者简介:贾东力(1988-),男,博士研究生,层序地层学与沉积学。E-mail:25944718@qq.com。
基金资助:
中国地质调查局地质调查项目（1212011220760）；成都理工大学沉积地质学科研创新团队项目（KYTD201703）。

Milankovitch cycles in the Silurian Kepingtage Formation in Shuntuoguole area,Tarim Basin

Jia Dongli¹, Tian Jingchun¹, Lin Xiaobing¹, Yang Guohua², Feng Wenxin², Zhang Xiang¹, Tang Yan³, Yang Chenyu⁴

1. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China;
2. Zhengzhou Industry and Trade Schools, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China;
3. The Third Academy of Engineering of Surveying and Mapping, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
4. Geochemistry Exploration Brigade of Sichuan Bureau of Exploration and Development of Geology and Minerals Resources, Deyang, Sichuan 618000, China

Received:2017-12-15 Revised:2018-05-09 Online:2018-08-28 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 塔里木盆地志留系柯坪塔格组主要沉积于盆地构造活动相对稳定期的潮坪环境，是盆地内典型的海相碎屑岩地层之一，由多层中-细砂岩和泥岩频繁互相叠置而成，地层分布上具有明显的三段特性。根据前人已有研究成果，柯坪塔格组在国际地层表上对应于特列奇阶、埃隆阶及鲁丹阶，沉积时限应介于8.1~12.7 Ma。然而目前对其米兰科维奇高频地层旋回格架划分鲜有探讨，通过选择顺托果勒地区顺9井自然伽马测井曲线作为替代指标，运用频谱分析法进行计算。结果表明顺9井柯坪塔格组记录并保存了完整的米兰科维奇旋回，天文旋回周期在地层沉积过程中对旋回厚度具有明显的控制作用。其中旋回厚度16.73 m对应于405 ka长偏心率周期；5.24 m和3.92 m分别对应于125 ka和95 ka的短偏心率周期；1.59 m和1.26 m分别对应于38.1 ka和31.1 ka的斜率周期。地层平均沉积速率为4.15 cm/ka，沉积时限为10.4 Ma，通过经验模态分解法建立了顺9井柯坪塔格组"浮动"天文年代标尺。柯坪塔格组共记录了83个125 Ka短偏心率旋回，334个31.1 ka周期斜率旋回。最后结合Fischer图解法，以125 ka短偏心率周期作为控制的五级旋回划分的标准模式，分析各个高频旋回之间的叠加差异及成因。该结果为盆地内或类似盆地海相碎屑岩高频旋回划分提供了一种统一的，不受人为影响且行之有效的新方法。

关键词: 米兰科维奇旋回, 频谱分析, 经验模态分解, 天文年代标尺, 柯坪塔格组, 志留系, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: The Silurian Kepingtage Formation in the Tarim Basin is mainly deposited in the tidal flat environment during a relatively stable period of tectonic activity.It is one of the typical marine clastic sequences in the basin.And it is composed of frequently alternating and superimposing medium-fine sandstone and mudstone,and can be obviously divided into three intervals.According to previous research results,the Kepingtage Formation can be approximately correlated with the Telychian,Aeronian and Rhuddanian Stage of the International Stratigraphic Chart,and its deposition period should be within 8.1-12.7 Ma.However,its Milankovitch high-frequency stratigraphic cycle framework is rarely discussed.Ta-king the Gamma-Ray logs of Well Shun-9 as proxies and using spectral analysis method for computation,we found that the Kepingtage Formation in Well Shun-9 recorded the complete Milankovitch cycle.The astronomical cycle significantly controls the cycle thickness,with the cycle thickness of 16.73 m corresponding to the long eccentricity of 405 ka,the cycle thickness of 5.24 m and 3.92 m corresponding to the short eccentricity of 125 ka and 95 ka respectively,and the cycle thickness of 1.59 m and 1.26 m corresponding to the obliquity of 38.1 ka and 31.1 ka respectively.The average sedimentary rate was estimated as 4.15 cm/ka and the depositing time as 10.4 Ma.And a "floating" astronomical time scale was established for the Kepingtage Formation in Well Shun-9 based on Empirical Mode Decomposition(EMD).The Kepingtage Formation was found to have 83 cycles with short eccentricity of 125 ka and 334 cycles with obliquity of 38.1 ka.Finally,we analyzed the superposition differences and their causes of each high-frequency cycle by using the Fischer plots and a standard model for fifth-order cycle division under the control of the short eccentricity of 125 ka.This result provides a new method that is unified and unbiased for high-frequency cycle division of marine clastic strata in this basin and similar basins.

Key words: Milankovitch cycle, spectral analysis, EMD, astronomical time scale, Kepingtage Formation, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.3

贾东力,田景春,林小兵,等. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系柯坪塔格组米兰科维奇旋回沉积记录[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 749-758. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180412 Jia Dongli,Tian Jingchun,Lin Xiaobing,et al. Milankovitch cycles in the Silurian Kepingtage Formation in Shuntuoguole area,Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 749-758. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180412

参考文献

[1] Schwarzacher W.Cyclostratigraphy and the Milankovitch theory[M].Elsevier,1993.1-50.
[2] Doyle P,Bennet M.Unlocking the stratigraphical record:advances in modern stratigraphy[J].Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science,1998,58(1):209-210.
[3] 吴怀春,张世红,冯庆来,等.旋回地层学理论基础、研究进展和展望[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2011,36(3):409-428. Wu Huaichun,Zhang Shihong,Feng Qinglai,et al.Theoretical basis,research advancement and prospects of cyclostratigraphy[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2011,36(3):409-428.
[4] 吴智勇.米兰柯维奇韵律层及其年代地层意义[J].地层学杂志,1995,19(2):156-160. Wu Zhiyong.Rhythmites with Milankovitch periods and their chronostratigraphic implications[J].Journal of stratigraohy,1995,19(2):156-160.
[5] 金之钧,范国章,刘国臣.一种地层精细定年的新方法[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1999,24(4):379-382. Jin Zhijun,Fan Guozhang,Liu Guochen.A new method for accurate dating of strata[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,1999,24(4):379-382.
[6] 贾承造.中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1997:1-98. Jia Chengzao.Tectonic characteristics and petroleum in Tarim Basin,China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:1-98.
[7] 熊万林,陈红汉,云露,等.塔中隆起北坡顺托果勒区块志留系储层油气充注历史-以顺9井流体包裹体分析为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(2):239-246. Xiong Wanlin,Chen Honghan,Yun Lu,et al.Hydrocarbon charging history for Silurian reservoirs of Shuntuoguole block in the north slope of Tazhong uplift,Tarim Basin:constraints from fluid inclusion of well Shun 9[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,34(2):239-246.
[8] 漆立新.塔里木盆地顺托果勒隆起奥陶系碳酸盐岩超深层油气突破及其意义[J].中国石油勘探,2016,21(3):38-51. Qi Lixin.Oil and gas breakthrough in ultra-deep Ordovician carbona-te formations in Shuntuoguole uplift,Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2016,21(3):38-51.
[9] 任建业,张俊霞,阳怀忠,等.塔里木盆地中央隆起带断裂系统分析[J].岩石学报,2011,27(1):219-230. Ren Jianye,Zhang Junxia,Yang Huaizhong,et al.Analysis of fault systems in the Central uplift,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(1):219-230.
[10] 赵文光,周波,蔡忠贤,等.塔中地区志留系柯坪塔格组沉积特征与油气分布[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):231-234. Zhao Wenguang,Zhou Bo,Cai Zhongxian,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and pool distribution in the Silurian Kepingtage Formation of Tazhong area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(2):231-234.
[11] 张翔,田景春,彭军.塔里木盆地志留-泥盆纪岩相古地理及时空演化特征研究[J].沉积学报,2008,26(5):762-771. Zhang Xiang,Tian Jingchun,Peng Jun.The lithofacies Peleogeoraphy and space time evolvement of Silurian-Devonian in the Tarim Basin[J].Acta Sedmentologica Sinica,2008,26(5):762-771.
[12] 彭军,张涵冰,鲁明,等.顺托果勒柯坪塔格组储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(4):173-182. Peng Jun,Zhang Hanbing,Lu Ming,et al.Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Kepingtage in Shuntuoguole block[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2016,38(4):173-182.
[13] K Hays J D,Imbrie J,Shackleton N J.Variations in the Earth's Orbit:Pacemaker of the Ice Ages[J].Science,1976,194(4270):1121.
[14] Abels H A,Aziz H A,Krijgsman W,et al.Long-period eccentricity control on sedimentary sequences in the continental Madrid Basin(middle Miocene,Spain)[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2010,289(1-2):220-231.
[15] 吴淑玉,刘俊.北黄海东部坳陷始新统米兰科维奇旋回特征[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2015,40(11):1933-1944. Wu Shuyu,Liu Jun.Characteristics of Milankovitch Cycle in Eocene Formation,Eastern Depression of the North Yellow Sea Basin[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2015,40(11):1933-1944.
[16] 吴瑞棠,张守信,刘椿,等.现代地层学[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1989:1-50. Wu Ruitang,Zhang Shouxin,Liu Chun,et al.Modern strati graphy[M].Beijing:China University of Geosciences Press,1989:1-50.
[17] Hinnov L A,Hilgen F J.Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology[C]//Felix Gradstein,James G Ogg.The Geologic Time Scale 2012,Elsevier,2012:63-83.
[18] Berger A,Loutre M F,Laskar J.Stability of the astronomical frequencies over the earth's history for paleoclimate studies[J].Science,1992,255(5044):560-566.
[19] Lasker J,Robutel P,Joutel F,et al.A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth[J].Astronomy and astrophysics,2004,428(1):261-285.
[20] Laskar J,Fienga A,Gastineau M,et al.La2010:a new orbital solution for the long-term motion of the Earth[J].Astronomy and Astrophysi-cs,2011,532(2):784-785.
[21] 刘占红,陈荣,宋成兵,等.塔里木盆地石炭系卡拉沙依组旋回地层与层序地层综合研究[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2012,37(5):1051-1065. Liu Zhanhong,Chen Rong,Song Chengbing,et al.Cyclostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy on carboniferous Karashayi Formation of Tarim Basin,China[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2012,37(5):1051-1065.
[22] Berger A,Loutre M F.Astronomical forcing through geological time[J].Orbital Forcing and Cyclic Sequences,2009:15-24.
[23] 赵治信,张桂芝.新疆古生代地层及牙形石[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:145-149. Zhao Zhixin,Zhang Guizhi.Paleozoic stratigraphy and conodonts in XinJiang[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2000:145-149.
[24] 张运波,赵宗举,袁圣强,等.频谱分析法在识别米兰科维奇旋回及高频层序中的应用——以塔里木盆地塔中-巴楚地区下奥陶统鹰山组为例[J].吉林大学学报(地),2011,41(2):400-410. Zhang Yunbo,ZhaoZongju,Yuan Shengqiang,et al.Application of spectral analysis to identify Milankovitch Cycles and high-frequency sequences-take the Lower Ordovician YingShan Formation of Mid-Tarim Basin as an example[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(2):400-410.
[25] 李凤杰,郑荣才,罗清林,等.四川盆地东北地区长兴组米兰科维奇周期分析[J].中国矿业大学学报,2007,36(6):805-810. Li Fengjie,Zheng Rongcai,Luo Qinglin,et al.Analysis of Milankovitch Cycles of the Changxing Formation in Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2007,36(6):805-810.
[26] Chen Shuping,Jin Zhijun,Wang Yi,et al.Sedimentation rate rhythms:evidence from Filling of the Tarim Basin,Northwest China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition),2015,89(4):1264-1275.
[27] 张猛,王华忠,隋志强,等.基于经验模态分解和小波变换的地震瞬时频率提取方法及应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2016,51(3):565-571. Zhang Meng,Wang Huazhong,Sui Zhiqiang,et al.Seismic instantaneous frequency extraction based on empirial mode decomposition and wavelet transform[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(3):565-571.
[28] 李凤杰,刘殿鹤,郑荣才,等.四川盆地东北地区上二叠统层序地层特征研究[J].沉积学报,2009,27(6):93-100. Li Fengjie,Liu Dianhe,Zheng Rongcai,et al.The sequence stratigraphics characteristics of Upper Permian in the Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(6):93-100.
[29] 伊海生.测井曲线旋回分析在碳酸盐岩层序地层研究中的应用[J].古地理学报,2011,13(4):456-466. Yi Haisheng.Application of well log cycle analysis in studies of sequence stratigraphy of carbonate rocks[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2011,13(4):456-466.

塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系柯坪塔格组米兰科维奇旋回沉积记录

Milankovitch cycles in the Silurian Kepingtage Formation in Shuntuoguole area,Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 张磊夫. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75.
[2]	张天付, 黄理力, 倪新锋, 熊冉, 杨果, 孟广仁, 郑剑锋, 陈薇. 塔里木盆地柯坪地区下寒武统吾松格尔组岩性组合及其成因和勘探意义——亚洲第一深井轮探1井突破的启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 928-940.
[3]	李慧莉, 李婧婧, 杨素举, 马中远. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系成藏特征与勘探启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 941-952.
[4]	郭春涛, 宋海强, 梁洁, 倪玲梅. 塔东地区米兰1井寒武系白云岩成因及其对储层的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 953-964.
[5]	王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 郭小文, 曹自成, 邓尚, 吴鲜, 杨毅. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 965-974.
[6]	曹自成, 路清华, 顾忆, 吴鲜, 尤东华, 朱秀香. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田1号和5号断裂带奥陶系油气藏特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 975-984.
[7]	宁超众, 胡素云, 潘文庆, 姚子修, 李勇, 袁文芳. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系良里塔格组古地貌与岩溶洞穴特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 985-995, 1047.
[8]	程洪, 张杰, 张文彪. 断溶体储层类型识别、预测及发育模式探讨——以塔里木盆地塔河十区TH10421单元为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 996-1003.
[9]	何大祥, 唐友军, 胡锦杰, 莫少武, 陈践发. 塔里木盆地天然气中稀有气体地球化学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 755-762.
[10]	姚尧, 何治亮, 李慧莉, 张瑜, 高晓鹏, 王康宁, 焦存礼. 塔里木盆地阿瓦提断陷中-上奥陶统萨尔干组沉积地质模型与烃源岩分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 763-775.
[11]	朱可丹, 张友, 林彤, 王雅春, 郑兴平, 朱琳. 基于CT成像的白云岩储层孔喉非均质性分析——以塔东古城地区奥陶系GC601井鹰三段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 862-873.
[12]	冯建伟, 孙建芳, 张亚军, 戴俊生, 魏荷花, 权莲顺, 任启强, 赵力彬. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷断层相关褶皱对裂缝发育的控制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 543-557.
[13]	孙福宁, 胡文瑄, 胡忠亚, 刘永立, 康逊, 朱峰. 断裂-层序双控机制下的热液活动及成储效应——以塔里木盆地塔河、玉北地区下奥陶统为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 558-575.
[14]	闫亮, 季苗, 贾宝迁, 陈晓彤, 高平. 塔里木盆地顺北断溶体油气藏微生物特征及有利区预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3): 576-585.
[15]	王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 李自安. 库车坳陷下侏罗统阿合组致密砂岩储层孔隙微观结构特征及其对致密气富集的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 295-304.