石油与天然气地质 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 302-312.doi: 10.11743/ogg20190209

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密砂岩储层微观孔喉特征差异及其成因

高辉1,2, 朱耿博仑1,2, 王泫懿3,4, 史华3,4, 王明磊5, 何梦卿1,2, 窦亮彬1,2, 王琛1,2   

  1. 1. 西安石油大学 石油工程学院, 陕西 西安 710065;
    2. 西安石油大学 西部低渗-特低渗油藏开发与治理教育部工程研究中心, 陕西 西安 710065;
    3. 中国石油 长庆油田分公司 油气工艺研究院, 陕西 西安 710018;
    4. 低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室, 陕西 西安 710018;
    5. 中国石油 勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-22 修回日期:2018-11-28 出版日期:2019-04-28 发布日期:2019-01-23
  • 第一作者简介:高辉(1979-),男,博士、教授,油气田地质与开发。E-mail:Email:ghtopsun1@163.com。
  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金项目（51774236，51604224）；中国石油科技创新基金项目（2017D-5007-0104）；西安石油大学研究生创新与实践能力培养项目（YCS17211001）。

Differences and origin of micro-pore throat characteristics for tight sandstone reservoir of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin

Gao Hui1,2, Zhugeng Bolun1,2, Wang Xuanyi3,4, Shi Hua3,4, Wang Minglei5, He Mengqing1,2, Dou Liangbin1,2, Wang Chen1,2   

  1. 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China;
    2. Engineering Research Center of Development & Management of Western Low & Ultra-Low Permeability Oilfield, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China;
    3. Oil and Gas Technology Institute of Changqing Oilfield Branch Company, PetroChina, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
    4. National Engineering Laboratory of Low Permeability Oil & Gas Fields Exploration and Development, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
    5. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2018-03-22 Revised:2018-11-28 Online:2019-04-28 Published:2019-01-23

PDF (PC)

258

摘要： 为分析不同沉积与成岩作用改造下致密砂岩储层的孔喉类型及其参数差异，利用物性、铸体薄片、扫描电镜、恒速压汞、图像粒度与X衍射实验结果，对比了鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区延长组长8储层和薛岔地区延长组长6储层的孔喉类型，定量评价了孔喉参数，揭示了形成原因。结果表明，合水地区长8储层孔隙更为发育，粒间孔、溶蚀孔、晶间孔和微孔、弱压实成因缩颈状喉道和溶蚀成因、粘土胶结成因管束状喉道含量高；薛岔地区长6储层的孔隙类型少且发育程度较差，压实成因片状、弯片状喉道含量高。两个区块的孔隙参数差异小，喉道参数差异大，前者大喉道更为发育，喉道差异大，孔喉比大，对渗透率起贡献的喉道分布范围更宽。相同渗透率条件下，前者的平均喉道半径、主流喉道半径和孔喉比大于后者。沉积水动力条件、粒度、碎屑组分、填隙物、成岩作用类型及其改造程度是两个研究区孔隙发育程度不同、喉道类型差异和孔喉参数表现出不同特征的主要原因。

关键词: 定量评价, 孔喉类型, 孔喉参数, 致密砂岩, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: By adopting quantitative evaluation of pore throat parameters under different depositional and diagenetic conditions,and with reference to the test results of physical property,casting section,SEM,constant speed mercury injection,particle size and X diffraction,the pore throat types of Chang 8 reservoir of Heshui Region and Chang 6 reservoir of Xuecha Region in Ordos Basin were analyzed,contrasted and reasons for how they were formed were revealed.Results show that the pores are better developed in Chang 8 reservoir in Heshui Region,with a high quantity of intergranular,dissolved,intercrystalline and micro pores,as well as necking down throats with weak compaction,tube-shaped throats with dissolution and clay cementation; while pores are less developed in terms of both types and range in Chang 6 reservoir of Xuecha Region,with high quantity of lamellar and curved lamellar throats with compaction.For the two studied reservoirs,the differences in pore parameters are not as significant as those in throat parameters.Compared to Chang 6 reservoir,Chang 8 reservoir developed better and larger throats with apparent differences,bigger pore-throat ratio,and wider distribution of throats that are conducive to permeability.Under the condition of same permeability,the average throat radius,main flow throat radius and pore-throat ratio of Chang 8 reservoir are all bigger than those of Chang 6 reservoir.It can be concluded that the hydrodynamic conditions in sediments,particle size,detrital component,interstitials,diagenesis types and their respective influence degrees,are the main reasons for the differences in the development of pores,throat types and pore throat parameters.

Key words: quantitative evaluation, pore throat type, pore throat parameter, tight sandstone, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: