四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素

doi:10.11743/ogg20210111

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地侏罗系陆相油气勘探过去主要聚焦在构造-裂缝型常规油气和介壳灰岩及砂岩致密油气上，为实现侏罗系油气重大新突破，思路需要向页岩油气转变。在分析自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气的分布、生烃、物性和保存等地质特征基础上，认为大安寨段具备形成大规模页岩油气成藏地质特征，提出3项成藏控制因素。大安寨段二亚段暗色页岩作为页岩油气的供烃源岩，油气显示丰富，页岩厚度在20~80 m，整体分布面积广、厚度大、连续稳定，孔缝发育、物性好，处于中-高成熟热演化阶段，有区域性致密顶底板灰岩封闭的超压页岩油气藏。半深湖-深湖亚相、致密灰岩顶底板与高孔隙储层、中-高成熟热演化阶段这3项因素共同控制自流井组大安寨段页岩油气的生成、储集和富集。

关键词: 地质条件, 成藏控制因素, 陆相页岩油气, 大安寨段, 自流井组, 下侏罗统, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Hydrocarbon exploration in the terrestrial Jurassic system of Sichuan Basin has been focused on conventional tectonically fractured reservoirs and unconventional coquina and tight sandstone reservoirs.However, shale reservoirs are regarded as the new focal point for making significant breakthroughs in the system of the basin.Based on an analysis of the distribution, generation, reservoir properties and preservation conditions of the terrestrial shale oil/gas in the Da'anzhai Member of Ziliujing Formation, we conclude that the member is favorable for a large-scale shale oil and gas accumulation in terms of its geological features and that three factors serve to control the accumulation.Geologically, the 20-80 m thick dark shale with oil and gas shows in the 2^nd sub Da'anzhai Member is both excellent source rock and over-pressured oil/gas reservoir sandwiched between cap and bottom tight limestones with its wide and continuous distribution, large thickness, well-developed pores and fractures, good physical properties, and medium-high maturity.The three factors including the semi-deep and deep lacustrine sub-facies, high-porosity reservoirs between the top and bottom limestones and medium-high maturity, jointly control the generation, preservation, enrichment of oil and gas in the shale.

Key words: geological condition, accumulation controlling factor, terrestrial shale oil & gas, Da'anzhai Member, Ziliujing Formation, Lower Jurassic, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.3

孙莎莎,董大忠,李育聪,等. 四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 124-135. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210111 Shasha Sun,Dazhong Dong,Yucong Li,et al. Geological characteristics and controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation in terrestrial shale in the Da'anzhai Member of the Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 124-135. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210111

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

表3

图6

表4

参考文献 27

1	李延钧, 冯媛媛, 刘欢, 等. 四川盆地湖相页岩气地质特征与资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40 (4): 423- 428.
	Li Yanjun , Feng Yuanyuan , Liu Huan , et al. Geological characteristics and resource potential of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40 (4): 423- 428.
2	李登华, 李建忠, 张斌, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油形成条件、资源潜力与甜点区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38 (7): 740- 752.
	Li Denghua , Li Jianzhong , Zhang Bin , et al. Formation condition, resource potential and sweet-spot area prediction of Jurassic tight oil in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38 (7): 740- 752.
3	黄金亮, 董大忠, 李建忠, 等. 陆相页岩储层特征及其影响因素: 以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组页岩为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (2): 158- 166.
	Huang Jinliang , Dong Dazhong , Li Jianzhong , et al. Reservoir characteristics and its influence on continental shale: An example from Triassic Xujiahe Formation shale, Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers (China University of Geosciences(Beijing); Peking University), 2016, 23 (2): 158- 166.
4	聂海宽, 马鑫, 余川, 等. 川东下侏罗统自流井组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38 (3): 438- 447.
	Nie Haikuan , Ma Xin , Yu Chuan , et al. Shale gas reservoir characteristics and its exploration potential-analysis on the Lower Jurassic shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38 (3): 438- 447.
5	刘忠宝, 刘光祥, 胡宗全, 等. 陆相页岩层系岩相类型、组合特征及其油气勘探意义--以四川盆地中下侏罗统为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (12): 10- 21.
	Liu Zhongbao , Liu Guangxiang , Hu Zongquan , et al. Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their significance for shale gas exploration: A case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (12): 10- 21.
6	杜江民, 张小莉, 张帆, 等. 川中龙岗地区下侏罗统大安寨段沉积相分析及有利储集层预测[J]. 古地理学报, 2015, 17 (4): 493- 502.
	Du Jiangming , Zhang Fan , Wang Xingzhi , et al. Sedimentary facies and reservoir prediction of the Lower Du Jiangmin Jurassic Da'anzhai Member, Longgang area, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17 (4): 493- 502.
7	郑荣才, 何龙, 梁西文, 等. 川东地区下侏罗统大安寨段页岩气(油)成藏条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33 (12): 30- 40.
	Zheng Rongcai , He Long , Liang Xiwen , et al. Forming conditions of shale gas (oil) plays in the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai member in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33 (12): 30- 40.
8	廖群山, 华胡, 林建平, 等. 四川盆地川中侏罗系致密储层石油勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32 (54): 815- 838.
	Liao Qunshan , Hu Hua , Lin Jianping , et al. Petroleum exploration prospect of the Jurassic tight reservoirs in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32 (54): 815- 838.
9	杨跃明, 杨家静, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地中部地区侏罗系致密油研究新进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43 (6): 873- 882.
	Yang Yueming , Yang Jiajing , Yang Guang , et al. New research progress of Jurassic tight oil in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43 (6): 873- 882.
10	庞正炼, 陶士振, 张琴, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油二次运移机制与富集主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39 (11): 1211- 1222. doi: 10.7623/syxb201811002
	Pang Zhenglian , Tao Shizhen , Zhang Qin , et al. Secondary migration mechanism and accumulation controlling factors of Jurassic tight oil in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39 (11): 1211- 1222. doi: 10.7623/syxb201811002
11	杨跃明, 黄东. 四川盆地侏罗系湖相页岩油气地质特征及勘探开发新认识[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (6): 22- 33.
	Yang Yueming , Huang Dong . Geological characteristics and new understandings of exploration and development of Jurassic lacustrine shale oil and gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (6): 22- 33.
12	邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. "进源找油": 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93 (7): 1551- 1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001
	Zou Caineng , Yang Zhi , Wang Hongyan , et al. Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen: Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93 (7): 1551- 1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001
13	蒋裕强, 漆麟, 邓海波, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系油气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30 (3): 22- 26.
	Jiang Yuqiang , Qi Lin , Deng Haibo , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration potentials of the Jurassic reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30 (3): 22- 26.
14	梁狄刚, 冉隆辉, 戴弹申, 等. 四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32 (1): 8- 17.
	Liang Digang , Longhui Ran , Dai Danshen , et al. A recognition of the prospecting potential of Jurassic large-area and non-conventional oils in the central-northern Sichuan Basinc[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32 (1): 8- 17.
15	张闻林, 周肖, 严玉霞, 等. 川中地区侏罗系适合页岩油气藏开采的地质依据[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32 (8): 117- 124. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.08.026
	Zhang Wenlin , Zhou Xiao , Yan Yuxia , et al. Geologic evidences of the Jurassic reservoirs for the shale oil/ gas recovery in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32 (8): 117- 124. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.08.026
16	韩克猷, 王毓俊, 查全衡. 川中侏罗系勘探潜力及勘探目标再认识[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2015, 34 (6): 51- 57.
	Han Keyou , Wang Yujun , Zha Quanheng . Exploration potential and targets of Jurassic system in Central Sichuan[J]. Oil Forum, 2015, 34 (6): 51- 57.
17	王世谦, 胡素云, 董大忠. 川东侏罗系_四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32 (12): 22- 29.
	Wang Shiqian , Hu Suyun , Dong Dazhong . Jurassic tight oil & gas resources in East Sichuan Basin: A new exploration target[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32 (12): 22- 29.
18	黄东, 杨跃明, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油勘探开发进展与对策[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39 (3): 304- 311.
	Huang Dong , Yang Yueming , Yang Guang , et al. Countermeasure and progress of exploration and development of Jurassic tight oil in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39 (3): 304- 311.
19	魏祥峰, 黄静, 李宇平, 等. 元坝地区大安寨段陆相页岩气富集高产主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41 (3): 979- 981.
	Wei Xiangfeng , Huang Jing , Li Yuping , et al. The main factors controlling the enrichment and high production of Da'anzhai member continental shale gas in Yuanba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41 (3): 979- 981.
20	周文, 徐浩, 邓虎成, 等. 四川盆地陆相富有机质层段剖面结构划分及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28 (6): 1- 8.
	Zhou Wen , Xu Hao , Deng Hucheng , et al. Characteristics and classification of section structure ofnonmarine organic-rich formations in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28 (6): 1- 8.
21	朱彤, 包书景, 王烽. 四川盆地陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32 (9): 16- 21+126-127.
	Zhu Tong , Bao Shujing , Wang Feng . Pooling condtions of non-marine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its exploration and development prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32 (9): 16- 21+126-127.
22	倪超, 杨家静, 陈薇, 等. 致密灰岩储层特征及发育模式--以四川盆地川中地区大安寨段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27 (6): 38- 47.
	Ni Chao , Yang Jiajing , Chen Wei , et al. Reservoir characteristics and development model of dense limestone: A case study from Da'anzhai member in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27 (6): 38- 47.
23	周德华, 焦方正, 郭旭升, 等. 川东南涪陵地区下侏罗统页岩油气地质特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34 (4): 450- 454.
	Zhou Dehua , Jiao Fangzheng , Guo Xusheng , et al. Geological features of the Lower Jurassic shale gas play in Fuling area, the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (4): 450- 454.
24	Jarvie D M . Shale Resource Systems for Oil and Gas: Part 2-Shale-Oil Resource Systems[M]. Houston: AAPG, 2012: 89- 119.
25	王玉满, 李新景, 陈波, 等. 海相页岩有机质炭化的热成熟度下限及勘探风险[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (3): 385- 395.
	Wang Yuman , Li Xinjing , Chen Bo , et al. Lower limit of thermal maturity for the carbonization of organic matter in marine shale and its exploration risk[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (3): 385- 395.
26	肖继林, 魏祥峰, 李海军. 涪陵海相页岩气和元坝_兴隆场湖相页岩气富集条件差异性分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2018, 41 (04): 8- 17.
	Xiao Jilin , Wei Xiangfeng , Li Haijun . Difference of accumulation conditions between Fuling marine shale gas and Yuanba-Xinglongchang lacustrine shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018, 41 (04): 8- 17.
27	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26 (1): 13- 28.
	Li Maowen , Ma Xiaoxiao , Jiang Qigui , et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26 (1): 13- 28.

地区	井数/口	平均厚度/m	最小厚度/m	最大厚度/m
龙岗	26	64.3	50.0	82.0
营山	8	62.0	56.0	68.0
广安	61	51.0	36.4	67.1
南充	10	51.0	33.5	64.5
八角场	7	37.5	28.6	48.5
公山庙	11	50.8	46.9	57.0
合川	10	21.7	12.6	33.7
潼南	7	13.5	9.2	16.0
遂宁	15	22.0	16.0	24.0
涪陵	4	44.8	37.7	59.3

井名	深度/m	岩性	密度/(g·cm^-3)	杨氏模量/GPa	泊松比
蓬莱10井	1 984.44~1 984.56	页岩	2.57	37.6	0.29
蓬莱10井	2 009.02~2 009.18	页岩	2.54	71.0	0.28
XL101^[26]	2 240.22~2 246.31	页岩	-	25.8	0.23
XL101^[26]	2 144.00~2 150.00	页岩夹灰岩	-	31.1	0.21

岩相	厚层块状纯页岩相	页岩夹薄层灰岩相	页岩与介屑灰岩不等厚互层相
典型岩心照片
沉积相	半深湖-深湖	湖坡	浅湖
分布层段	大二段	大二段	大一段
有机质丰度
剖面类型

盆地	美国		中国
盆地	Williston盆地	Maverick盆地	四川盆地	四川盆地
地层	上泥盆统Bakken	上白垩统Eagle Ford	侏罗系大安寨段	志留系龙马溪组
有利页岩厚度/m	3~15	45~100	20~80	30~70
主要开采类型	页岩夹砂岩型	页岩、碳酸盐岩薄互层	灰岩夹页岩型	页岩
埋深/m	2 100~3 300	2 130~3 650	2 000~3 500	2 000~4 500
沉积相	海相	海相	湖相	海相
有机质类型	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ	Ⅱ	Ⅰ, Ⅱ
TOC/%	7.2~10.6	3.7~4.5	0.8~3.0	0.4~9.6
R_o/%	0.6~1.0	1.0~1.3	0.9~1.5	2.3~2.8
孔隙度/%	8~12	5~14	0~10	2~10
渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	0.05~1.00	0.01~0.80	0.08~9.79	0.01~0.60
密度/(g·cm^-3)	＜0.82	0.82	0.76~0.87	2.37~2.60
气油比/(m³/t)	80~426	513~5 041	153~6 720	不存在
孔隙特征	有机孔	有机孔	无机孔+有机孔	有机孔
压力系数	1.35~1.58	1.35~1.80	1.23~1.72	1.20~2.10
脆性矿物含量/%	＞90	50~80	45~70	50~90

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[4]	潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[5]	张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田：一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[6]	张自力, 乔艳萍, 豆霜, 李堃宇, 钟原, 武鲁亚, 张宝收, 戴鑫, 金鑫, 王斌, 宋金民. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段岩溶古地貌与控储模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[7]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 周彤, 张亚雄, 王濡岳, 李宁, 陈昱辛, 熊晓菲. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[8]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[9]	王红岩, 周尚文, 赵群, 施振生, 刘德勋, 焦鹏飞. 川南地区深层页岩气富集特征、勘探开发进展及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[10]	边瑞康, 孙川翔, 聂海宽, 刘珠江, 杜伟, 李沛, 王濡岳. 四川盆地东南部五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气藏类型、特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[11]	李双建, 李智, 张磊, 李英强, 孟宪武, 王海军. 四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[12]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[13]	刘昇, 范存辉, 张本健, 张亚, 王尉, 罗冰, 白晓亮. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组孤峰段展布特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 993-1008.
[14]	吴冬, 邓虎成, 熊亮, 曹凯旋, 董晓霞, 赵勇, 魏力民, 王同, 马若龙. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统麦地坪组-筇竹寺组层序充填和演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 764-777.
[15]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 赖富强, 刘粤蛟, 邬忠虎, 何建华, 邹冠贵, 王鹏威, 李治昊. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩脆性特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 366-378.