四川盆地涪陵页岩气田江东区块下古生界深层页岩气勘探开发实践与启示

doi:10.11743/ogg20210120

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目前埋深大于3 500 m的深层页岩气已逐渐成为中国页岩气勘探开发的重要接替领域，开发过程主要面临地层压力增大、储集物性变差、压裂改造形成复杂缝网困难等问题，开发选区及井位优化部署难度大。江东区块是四川盆地涪陵页岩气田二期产能建设的主要区块，埋深大于3 500 m的深层页岩气面积为57.8 km²，约占区块面积的1/2，目的层为上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组①—⑤小层优质页岩，是一套富碳、富硅、富页理和富黄铁矿的黑色页岩。采用深层页岩气开发评价选区指标体系及水平井井位优化评价技术研究结果表明，影响深层页岩气井开发效果的主要地质因素包括地层埋深、地应力、裂缝发育特征及页岩地层倾角。深层页岩气水平井与最小主应力夹角不超过40°，A与B靶点高差尽量小于300 m。通过江东区块深层页岩气勘探开发实践，单井获得较高的测试产量和可采储量，勘探开发效果较好，研究成果对四川盆地深层页岩气开发具有重要借鉴意义。

关键词: 开发潜力, 深层页岩气, 五峰组, 龙马溪组, 江东区块, 涪陵页岩气田, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Shale gas exploration and development in China has turned to shales buried in more than 3 500 m deep, posing development challenges with their high-pressure, poor physical properties and reluctance to form complex fracture networks after stimulations. The Jiangdong block, one of the major blocks in the phase-Ⅱ productivity construction of the Fuling shale gas field in the Sichuan Basin, contains shale gas at or deeper than such depth in an area of 57.8 km², accounting for about half of the total block area. The main targets are the high-quality thin black shale layers (① to ⑤) in the Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formations that are rich in carbon, silicon, lamellation and pyrite. By applying an appraisal index system for deep shale gas blocks and an optimized horizontal well location selection method to the shales, we come to the conclusion that the major geological factors influencing the performance of deep shale gas wells are the burial depth, in-situ stress, fracture growth characteristics and dip angle of shale layers. It is therefore recommended that, during horizontal well drilling design, the angle between the wellbore and the minimum principal stress be less than 40° with a level difference between two designed target points (A and B) being kept as less than 300 m as possible. The exploration and development practices in the deep shale in the Jiangdong block have achieved relatively higher test production and recoverable reserves from single wells, which is of realistic guidance and reference for other similar deep shale gas exploration and development in the basin.

Key words: development potential, deep shale gas, Wufeng Formation, Longmaxi Formation, Jiangdong block, Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

陆亚秋,梁榜,王超,等. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田江东区块下古生界深层页岩气勘探开发实践与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 241-250. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210120 Yaqiu Lu,Bang Liang,Chao Wang,et al. Shale gas exploration and development in the Lower Paleozoic Jiangdong block of Fuling gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 241-250. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210120

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

表2

图5

图6

图7

表3

图8

表4

参考文献 33

1	何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 等. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41 (4): 379- 391.
	He Zhiliang , Nie Haikuan , Hu Dongfeng , et al. Geological problems in effective development of deep shale gas[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science,, 2020, 41 (4): 379- 391.
2	王志刚. 涪陵页岩气勘探开发重大突破与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36 (1): 1- 6.
	Wang Zhigang . Breakthrough of Fuling shale gas exploration and development and its inspiration[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36 (1): 1- 6.
3	王志刚. 涪陵焦石坝地区页岩气水平井压裂改造实践与认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35 (3): 425- 430.
	Wang Zhigang . Practice and cognition of shale gas horizontal well fracturing stimulation in Jiaoshiba of Fuling area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35 (3): 425- 430.
4	科技创新导报编辑部. 中国首个大型页岩气田诞生[J]. 科技创新导报, 2014, (21): 2.
	Editorial Department ofscience and technology innovation herald . The first large shale gas field in China[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2014, (21): 2.
5	刘若冰. 中国首个大型页岩气田典型特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (8): 1488- 1498.
	Liu Ruobing . Typical features of the first giant shale gas field in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (8): 1488- 1498.
6	梁榜, 李继庆, 郑爱维, 等. 涪陵页岩气田水平井开发效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29 (2): 289- 295.
	Liang Bang , Li Jiqing , Zheng Aiwei , et al. Development effect evaluation for shale gas wells in Fuling shale gasfield[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29 (2): 289- 295.
7	武加鹤, 陆亚秋, 刘颉, 等. 四川盆地涪陵焦石坝地区五峰-龙马溪组低序级断层识别技术及应用效果[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (1): 51- 57.
	Wu Jiahe , Lu Yaqiu , Liu Jie , et al. Low-grade fault recognition technology and its application in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Jiaoshiba area, Fuling, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (1): 51- 57.
8	董大忠, 程克明, 王玉满, 等. 中国上扬子区下古生界页岩气形成条件及特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (3): 289- 299.
	Dong Dazhong , Cheng Keming , Wang Yuman , et al. Forming condi-tions and characteristics of shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of theUpper Yangtze region, China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (3): 289- 299.
9	何治亮, 聂海宽, 张钰莹, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (2): 817.
	He Zhiliang , Nie Haikuan , Zhang Yuying , et al. The main factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (2): 817.
10	臧艳彬. 川东南地区深层页岩气钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46 (3): 7- 12.
	Zang Yanbin . Key Drilling Technology fordeep shale gas reservoirs in the Southeastern Sichuan Region[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46 (3): 7- 12.
11	宋争. 涪陵江东与平桥区块页岩气水平井井眼轨迹控制技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2017, 45 (6): 14- 18.
	Song Zheng . Wellbore trajectory control techniques for horizontal well in the Jiangdong and Pingqiao blocks of the Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45 (6): 14- 18.
12	金之钧, 胡宗全, 高波, 等. 川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (1): 1- 10.
	Jin Zhijun , Hu Zongquan , Gao Bo , et al. Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (1): 1- 10.
13	刘猛, 刘超, 舒志恒, 等. 四川盆地涪陵焦石坝地区黑色页岩非均质性特征及控制因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (1): 118- 125.
	Liu Meng , Liu Chao , Shu Zhiheng , et al. Heterogeneity characteristics and controlling factors of black shale in Jiaoshiba, Fuling, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (1): 118- 125.
14	王秀平, 牟传龙, 葛详英, 等. 川南及邻区龙马溪组黑色岩系矿物组分特征及评价[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36 (2): 150- 162.
	Wang Xiuping , Mou Chuanlong , Ge Xiangying , et al. Mineral component characteristics and evaluation of black rock series of Longmaxi Formation in Southern Sichuan and its periphery[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science, 2015, 36 (2): 150- 162.
15	刘超, 陆亚秋, 梁榜, 等. 涪陵焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组含气页岩岩相划分——以JY11-4井为例[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2015, 28 (5): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-301X.2015.05.001
	Liu Chao , Lu Yaqiu , Liang Bang , et al. Lithofacies classification of gas bearing shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi formation: A case study of JY11-4 well[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers, 2015, 28 (5): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-301X.2015.05.001
16	王超, 张柏桥, 舒志国, 等. 四川盆地涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组海相页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (3): 485- 497.
	Wang Chao , Zhang Boqiao , Shu Zhiguo , et al. Lithofacies types and reservoir characteristics of marine shales of the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling area, the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (3): 485- 497.
17	盛秋红, 李文成. 泥页岩可压性评价方法及其在焦石坝地区的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31 (4): 1473- 1479.
	Sheng Qiuhong , Li Wencheng . Evaluation method of shale fracability and its application in Jiaoshiba area[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2016, 31 (4): 1473- 1479.
18	杨宏伟, 李军, 柳贡慧, 等. 基于测井数据的页岩可压性定量评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24 (3): 382- 386.
	Yang Hongwei , Li Jun , Liu Gonghui , et al. Quantitative evaluation of shale fracability based on logging data[J]. Fault-Block Oil &Gas Field, 2017, 24 (3): 382- 386.
19	胡德高, 刘超. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田单井可压性地质因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (1): 20- 24.
	Hu Degao , Liu Chao . Geological factors of well fracability in Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (1): 20- 24.
20	刘尧文, 王进, 张梦吟, 等. 四川盆地涪陵地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩气层孔隙特征及对开发的启示[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (1): 44- 50.
	Liu Yaowen , Wang Jin , Zhang Mengyin , et al. Pore features of shale gas layer in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area of Sichuan Basin and the application to development[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (1): 44- 50.
21	刘莉, 包汉勇, 李凯, 等. 页岩储层含气性评价及影响因素分析-以涪陵页岩气田为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (1): 58- 63.
	Liu Li , Bao Hanyong , Li Kai , et al. Evaluation of gas content in shale reservoirs and analysis of influencing factors in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (1): 58- 63.
22	张士万, 孟志勇, 郭战峰, 等. 涪陵地区龙马溪组页岩储层特征及其发育主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (12): 16- 24. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.002
	Zhang Shiwan , Meng Zhiyong , Guo Zhanfeng , et al. Characteristics and major controlling factors of shale reservoirs in the Longmaxi Fm, Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (12): 16- 24. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.002
23	张金川, 聂海宽, 徐波, 等. 四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28 (2): 151- 156. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.02.045
	Zhang Jinchuan , Nie Haikuan , Xu Bo , et al. Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28 (2): 151- 156. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.02.045
24	孟志勇. 四川盆地涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组含气页岩段纵向非均质性及其发育主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (6): 838- 846.
	Meng Zhiyong . Vertical heterogeneity and its controlling factors of the gas shale in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Fms in Fuling area, the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (6): 838- 846.
25	李军, 金武军, 王亮, 等. 利用核磁共振技术确定有机孔与无机孔孔径分布——以四川盆地涪陵地区志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (1): 129- 134.
	Li Jun , Jin Wujun , Wang Liang , et al. Quantitative evaluation of organic and inorganic pore size distribution by NMR: A case from the Silurian Longmaxi Formation gas shale in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (1): 129- 134.
26	郭旭升, 李宇平, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 6 (34): 9- 16.
	Guo Xusheng , Li Yuping , Liu Ruobing , et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Shale Play in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 6 (34): 9- 16.
27	李东晖, 聂海宽. 一种考虑气藏特征的页岩含气量计算方法——以四川盆地及其周缘JY1井和彭页1井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1324- 1332.
	Li Donghui , Nie Haikuan . A new method to calculate shale gas content based on gas reservoir characterization——A case study of Wells JY 1 and PY 1 in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1324- 1332.
28	梅海燕, 马明伟, 于倩, 等. 页岩气藏压裂水平井产能及其影响因素[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38 (1): 71- 77.
	Mei Haiyan , Ma Mingwei , Yu Qian , et al. Productivity of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir and its influencing factors[J]. Petroleum Geology and oilfield development in Daqing, 2019, 38 (1): 71- 77.
29	郭建春, 周鑫浩, 邓燕, 等. 页岩气水平井组拉链压裂过程中地应力的分布规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35 (7): 44- 48. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.07.006
	Guo Jianchun , Zhou Xinhao , Deng Yan , et al. Distribution rules of earth stress during zipper fracturing of shale gas horizontal cluster wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry,, 2015, 35 (7): 44- 48. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.07.006
30	Leopoldo Sierra, Mike M H. Evaluating the of zipper fracs inunconventional reservoirs[C]//paper168977-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Re-sourcesonference, 1-3 April 2014, Woodlands, Texas, USA.
31	钱旭瑞, 刘广忠, 唐佳, 等. 页岩气井产能影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19 (3): 81- 83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2012.03.020
	benefits Qian Xurui , Liu Guangzhong , Tang Jia , et al. Analysis of influencing factors on shale gas well productivity[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19 (3): 81- 83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2012.03.020
32	林长城, 丁文龙, 王兴华, 等. 页岩储层地应力研究进展[J]. 科技通报, 2018, 34 (7): 1- 8.
	Lin Changcheng , Ding Wenlong , Wang Xinghua , et al. Research rrogress of reostress in Shale reservoir[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2018, 34 (7): 1- 8.
33	蔡进, 刘莉, 吉婧, 等. 页岩气资源评价方法及应用——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国地质调查, 2020, 7 (1): 7- 13.
	Cai Jin , Liu Li , Ji Jing , et al. Shale gas resource evaluation method and application: An example of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2020, 7 (1): 7- 13.

小层编号	TOC/%
小层编号	JY81-2	JY87-3	JY9
⑨	0.96	1.05	1.55
⑧	1.61	2.01	1.53
⑦	1.75	1.92	1.74
⑥	1.80	2.10	1.78
⑤	2.83	2.96	2.36
④	2.88	2.95	2.85
③	4.12	4.04	3.87
②	4.61	5.13	4.84
①	4.09	3.93	3.70
①—⑨平均	2.74	2.90	2.69
①—⑤平均	3.48	3.48	3.10

小层编号	深层页岩孔隙度/%			一期中-浅层页岩孔隙度/%
小层编号	JY81-2井	JY87-3井	JY9井	JY1井
⑨	4.42	4.93	4.05	4.88
⑧	5.83	5.63	4.06	5.36
⑦	5.41	3.95	3.00	3.90
⑥	4.09	3.95	3.10	3.83
⑤	5.16	5.10	3.64	5.22
④	5.33	4.43	3.48	4.77
③	5.44	4.62	3.61	4.59
②	6.50	4.66	3.92	4.89
①	6.11	4.53	3.52	4.95

井号	埋深/m	全烃显示/%	最小主应力/MPa	破裂压力/MPa	曲率值	裂缝发育程度	测试产量/(10⁴ m³·d^-1)
JY86-1井	3 665	7.59	72.3	82.9	0.001 3	不发育	18.1
JY86-2井	3 569	10.86	73.6	85.4	0.001 5	不发育	22.0
JY83-1井	3 603	35.47	72.8	76.6	0.003 6	发育	21.2
JY83-2井	3 583	32.72	73.2	74.0	0.003 8	发育	30.5

评价级次	页岩品质		含气性			可压性			压裂试气情况
评价级次	TOC/%	硅质含量/%	孔隙度/%	压力系数	电阻率/(Ω·m)	气层埋深/m	构造形态	曲率特征	测试压力/ MPa	测试产量/ (10⁴ m³·d^-1)
Ⅰ	＞3	＞65	4.05	＞1.3	30~60	＜3 500	正向	斑点状为主	＞20	＞20
Ⅱ	2~3	50~65	4.05	1.1~1.3	20~30，60~100	3 500~4 000	正、负向	斑点状、条带状	10~20	10~20
Ⅲ	＜2	＜50	3.52	＜1.1	＜20，＞100	＞4 000	负向	条带状为主	＜10	＜10

[1]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 李双建, 刘光祥, 丁江辉, 边瑞康, 卢志远. 特提斯域板块构造约束下上扬子地区二叠系龙潭组页岩气的差异性赋存[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 1-15.
[2]	蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 高波, 朱彤, 田玲珏, 孙川翔. 中国石化页岩气“十三五”发展成果与展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 16-27.
[3]	王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 张磊夫. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75.
[4]	卢志远, 何治亮, 余川, 叶欣, 李东晖, 杜伟, 聂海宽. 复杂构造区页岩气富集特征—以四川盆地东南部丁山地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 86-97.
[5]	沈骋, 任岚, 赵金洲, 陈铭培. 页岩岩相组合划分标准及其对缝网形成的影响——以四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 98-106, 123.
[6]	蔡全升, 陈孝红, 张国涛, 张保民, 韩京, 陈琳, 李培军, 李炎桂. 鄂西宜昌地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气储层发育特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 107-123.
[7]	孙莎莎, 董大忠, 李育聪, 王红岩, 施振生, 黄世伟, 昌燕, 拜文华. 四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 124-135.
[8]	刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 刘珠江, 刘晧天, 郝景宇, 王鹏威, 李鹏. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145.
[9]	朱洪建, 琚宜文, 孙岩, 黄骋, 冯宏业, AliRaza, 余坤, 乔鹏, 肖蕾. 构造变形作用下页岩孔裂隙结构演化特征及其模式——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界海相页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 186-200, 240.
[10]	舒志国, 周林, 李雄, 刘皓天, 曾勇, 谢洪光, 姚明君, 王艳春. 四川盆地东部复兴地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩凝析气藏地质特征及勘探开发前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 212-223.
[11]	何希鹏, 卢比, 何贵松, 任建华, 王伟, 陈祖华, 高玉巧, 房大志. 渝东南构造复杂区常压页岩气生产特征及开发技术政策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 224-240.
[12]	霍建峰, 高健, 郭小文, 易积正, 舒志国, 包汉勇, 杨锐, 罗涛, 何生. 川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175.
[13]	马德芹, 田景春, 林小兵, 文龙, 徐亮. 四川盆地二叠系长兴组生物礁发育的差异性及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1176-1187.
[14]	祖克威, 范凌霄, 王波, 曹东升, 管聪, 李中超, 程秀申. 四川盆地普光地区嘉陵江组二段碳酸盐岩储层裂缝发育规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1188-1196.
[15]	邓模, 段新国, 翟常博, 龙胜祥, 杨振恒, 郑伦举, 李章畅, 曹涛涛. 页岩热模拟过程中液态烃含量变化及对物性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1310-1320.